Skip to main content

2015 WTA Yearend and Predictions for 2016

2015 WTA Yearend and Predictions for 2016

The grand slam... the ultimate achievement in tennis... was so close this year.  Serena Williams was within two wins of the monumental feat, before Roberta Vinci derailed her in the US Open semis.  Serena did not play after that loss, but she had still amassed a 53-3 match win record for the year:  her losses coming to Petra Kvitova, Belinda Bencic, and Vinci. 

Surprisingly, this amounted to only two titles outside of the three slams she won.  But she also retired from three tournaments.  Her total of 5 titles for the year seems low for such a dominant #1.  But her total of 21 slam singles titles is third on the all time list.

Slam Singles Titles
24 – Margaret Court
22 – Steffi Graf
21 – Serena Williams
20 – Helen Wills*
18 – Chris Evert
18 – Martina Navratilova
*includes 1924 Olympics which replaced Fre Chps that year

The sense of deflation after Serena’s US Open loss was huge.  It’s actually had me questioning if she will play again.  Where to go after this?  The Grand Slam would have been the crowning achievement of her career.  Can she muster the effort to try again in 2016?  Will just winning slams still have any thrill for her after coming so close to something so much bigger?   Maybe the motivation to catch Graf and Court on the all time list (both calendar slam winners) will still push her.  She says she is still hungry.

After Serena, the rest of the field seems a light year behind.  But two old Italians stole the lime light at the US Open.  Roberta Vinci stunned the world by defeating Serena in the semis after Serena led by a break in the third set.  At age 32, she’s no spring chicken in tennis terms.  But even older is her countrywoman, Flavia Pennetta, 33, who beat Vinci in the USO final to claim the first and only slam of her career. 

Instead of cashing in on her newfound fame, fans, and endorsement opportunities, Pennetta promptly announced she was retiring at the end of the year.  This seems to be becoming a trend on the WTA tour with Bartoli, Li, and Pennetta all retiring in the year of a slam victory.  I wish this accomplished trio were still around to challenge for more titles.  The grand slam letdown was quickly turned by the engaging personalities of the Italians, especially Vinci, who rapidly converted her villainous slam-slayer role into public darling, bubbling with an ingenue’s joy.

Another feel good story was the re-emergence of Venus Williams.  After last appearing in the top 10 in April 2011, and subsequently battling through Sjogren’s, Venus claimed 3 titles this year, including the weird second-tier-yearend championships in Zhuhai, and finishes the year at #7.  If she had managed to get through Serena at either Wimbledon or the US Open, she might have claimed those titles too.  She certainly should not be counted out for next year.  She has by far the most wins over Serena of any active or inactive player.  Her 11 wins over Serena are well ahead of Capriati who had 7, or Hingis and Henin with 6 each.

Simona Halep seems to have improved with a yearend finish of #2, one better than last year.  But she actually had slightly more WTA points last year than this.  The difference is that it was kind of a weak year points-wise for most of the top players.  Notably so was Maria Sharapova who effectively only played half a year.  This opened the door for a par showing from Halep to look good.

Halep seemed to start the year on a rip, winning 3 of her first 4 tournaments, but then petered out, posting only second round at Roland Garros and first round at Wimbledon.  She reached the semis at the US Open, but was so-so in the Yearend Championship, going out in straights to Sharapova and Agnieszka Radwanska.   Although she’s determined to improve, barring the removal of her main competition it is hard to imagine her doing any better next year at age 25 in her 5’6” frame.

It still seems that Sharapova is ‘the real’ #2.  She held the spot for much of the year, and it was only lack of play that seemed to keep her from it in the yearend reckoning.  She was unable to solve the Serena riddle in the final of the Australian or the semis at Wimbledon, but she’s formidable for everyone else, and claimed the Rome and Brisbane titles this year.  2016 is an even-numbered year, and since she’s won all 5 of her slam titles in even years, why not predict she will win another next year – just so long as she doesn’t have to beat Serena to do it.

Garbine Muguruza made (another) splash this year by making the final at Wimbledon and finishing the year at #3... a nice follow-up to beating Serena in the 2014 French.  But as excited as I am by the new blood at the top, I’m left with the nagging feeling that she’s a weak #3.  She really didn’t do much else, taking only one title for the year, albeit the big, expensive one in Beijing.  So I checked to see where her 5200 WTA points would place her in years past.

What 5200 WTA points gets you:
#3 in 2015
#5 in 2014
#6 in 2013
#6 in 2012
#9 in 2011

So her ranking is inflated compared to most years and I’m a little unsure what to expect from Muguruza next year.  Her breakthrough into the top 10 at age 22 is kind of old for a WTA player.  She might claim a slam title at some point in her career, but multi-slam, multi-#1 chops do not look likely.  That said, she has a big hard-hitting game that could reap major benefits if she can learn to control it.  If the landscape does not change much and Serena comes back to mortal-hood, I can see her taking a slam title next year, but I think it more likely that the coming vacuum at the top is going to be filled with a flight of younger players.

The perennial top-tenners had their struggles this year – and by that I mean Aggie Radwanska, Kvitova, Kerber, Wozniacki, Azarenka (remember her?), Ivanovic, Jankovic, and even Stosur and Kuznetsova.  Radwanska came out tops in this group at #5 yearend, proudly holding the Yearend Championship trophy – arguably the most important after the slams – and the biggest win of her career.

Kvitova took 3 titles and gave Serena one of only 3 losses.  But then she became her usual inconsistent self, looking very middling at the slams, before making the YEC final and taking the Czechs to their fourth Fed Cup title in five years, and a yearend finish of #6. 

Last year’s #5, Wozniacki, drops to #17 after six consecutive yearend top-10 finishes.  Angelique Kerber also dropped clean out of the top 10 after an early year slump, before getting her act together and claiming 4 titles (second most for the year) and a yearend rank of #10.

2015 Titles
5 – Serena Williams
4 – Angelique Kerber
3 – Simona Halep
3 – Agnieszka Radwanska
3 – Petra Kvitova
3 – Venus Williams
2 – Sharapova, Bacsinszky, Bencic, Schmiedlova, Pereira, Stosur, Jankovic
1 – 24 players

There was a surprising influx of players into the top 10 this year.  Elena Makarova led the charge in January and stayed for half a year.  Muguruza at #3 is the most highly ranked of the newcomers, but also new this year were Lucie Safarova, Karolina Pliskova, Carla Suarez Navarro, and Timea Bacsinszky, not to mention the return of Pennetta.  These 6 players represent the greatest uptake of new players into the top 10 since the WTA computer era began, except for 1984 and 1989 when there were 7 each year.  There were also some near misses, from Vinci, Belinda Bencic, Elina Svitolina, and Madison Keys.

Keys made news by taking out Kvitova and Venus before losing to Serena in the Aus Open semis – her best showing at a slam.  But 18-year old Belinda Bencic did one better, taking out four top 10 players and Eugenie Bouchard to take the title in Toronto.  Most impressive were her defeats of Serena in the semis and Halep in the final.  She might be the future of tennis.  She certainly looks promising.  A goal for next year should be to make the top 10 and at least the quarters at a slam.

Speaking of Canada’s darling, Eugenie Bouchard... things have started to look rather dire.  The Aus Open was a decent start with a QF showing.  But then things unravelled.  After 10 first round losses, at the US Open she finally started to show hints of last year’s form.  But after battling into the fourth round, things got bizarre when she slipped in the locker room and sustained a concussion.  Hopefully she returns next year, healthy and with the determination to improve her ranking from 48 and closer to the yearend #7 she attained the previous year.

Young Climbers

Belinda Bencic – age 18, height 5’9”, rank: 14, rank last year: 33, my projection for 2016: top 10

Daria Kasatkina – age 18, height 5’7”, rank: 72, rank last year: 370, my projection for 2016: top 50

Jelena Ostapenko – age 18, height 5’10”, rank: 81, rank last year: 308, my projection for 2016: top 50

Ana Konjuh – age 17, height 5’9”, rank: 83, rank last year: 90, my projection for 2016: top 50

Anett Kontaveit – age 19, height 5’9”, rank: 91, rank last year: 166, my projection for 2016: top 75

Anhelina Kalinina – age 18, height ”, rank: 150, rank last year: 268, my projection for 2016: top 100

Naomi Osaka – age 18, height 5’11”, rank: 157, rank last year: 250, my projection for 2016: top 150

Katerina Stewart – age 18, height ”, rank: 170, rank last year: 378, my projection for 2016: top 150

Catherine Bellis – age 16, height 5’6”, rank: 242, rank last year: 257, my projection for 2016: top 150

Olga Fridman – age 17, height ”, rank: 279, rank last year: 671, my projection for 2016: top 150

Shilin Xu – age 17, height ”, rank: 293, rank last year: 405, my projection for 2016: top 200

Tamara Zidansek – age 17, height ”, rank: 294, rank last year: 741, my projection for 2016: top 200

Marketa Vondrousova – age 16, height ”, rank: 391, rank last year: nr, my projection for 2016: top 200

Claire Liu – age 15, height ”, rank: 560, rank last year: nr, my projection for 2016: top 250


The Coming Year

The safe prediction is that Serena Williams will dominate again.  It is not impossible that she could actually win the grand slam in 2016.  If she should happen to win the Australian, she will probably set her sights on the slam.  But if she goes on then to lose at a slam, I wonder if it will finish her career.  She says she is hungry, so that is a positive sign – even if a letdown would be very understandable in 2016.  Serena could have a more human year like 2014 when she only won one slam title.  That might keep her hungry.

Standing in Serena’s way could be big sister, Venus.  The boost of a #7 yearend finish will likely propel Venus to some better results, even if it’s only because her seeding will help.  Seeing Venus in the latter stages of a slam would not surprise, and the Wimbledon title is thinkable for her.  But consistently beating the other top women seems unlikely based on her last few years of results.  She did however finish third for the year in match-winning percentage, which shows how high the quality of her game remains.

2015 Match Winning Percentage
1 SWilliams          53-3       94.6%
2 Sharapova       39-9       81.3%
3 VWilliams         41-13     75.9%
4 Bacsinszky       41-14     74.5%
5 Halep                 49-17     74.2%
6 Kerber               53-22     70.7%
7 Azarenka          31-13     70.5%
8 Kvitova              38-17     69.1%
9 Jankovic            44-20     68.8%
10 Muguruza      41-19     68.3%

Bacsinszky is a real surprise on this list at #4, since on the WTA computer she holds the #12 spot.  Her best results were not in small tournaments, making SF at the French, QF at Wimbledon and Indian Wells, F at Beijing, along with two smaller Titles in spring.  A little more consistency and she could become a real threat for the top.

Another player who should improve on last year is Victoria Azarenka.  With two slam titles and a yearend #1 finish (2012) she is the most accomplished player on tour after the Williamses and Sharapova.  There’s lots of room for improvement from a yearend rank of #22, although it is not clear to me why she is floundering now.  She made QF at both the US Open and Wimbledon in 2015, so perhaps she is close to re-inserting herself into the top 10.

Another question concerns what up and comers Muguruza and Bencic will do in 2016.  Muguruza’s hard-hitting game is maturing nicely and Bencic seems to have the right combination of talent and determination to go far one day.  Will this be their year?

2015 Rankings

For possibly the first time ever, this year I follow the WTA rankings exactly in my own top 10.  There were 6 new additions to the top 10 during the year, but only two of those held onto their spots at yearend, Muguruza and Safarova.  Additionally, Venus and Pennetta re-entered after several years away.



2016 Top Ten Predictions

Seeing Serena on top again for 2016 does not require too much stretching.  A letdown after such a spectacular 2015 is possible, but she is still playing better than anyone else.  Sharapova seems able to lord it over everyone but Serena so she gets #2.  Simona Halep continues to play well, but I wonder if she has the power and will to go any higher – there were a few disconcerting let downs in 2015.  She could well lose ground to more powerful players like Kvitova and Muguruza, but I’ll count on her consistency to keep her near #3. 

Predicting Kvitova is a lottery, but she has delivered a number of big titles in the last 5 years, so she might do it again.  I think Muguruza is capable of winning a slam title in 2016, but I’m not sure she will have the consistency to be at the very top, so I hedge my bets with #5 for her.  I think Venus could have a better year than last year and might show up in a slam final again.  Maybe I’m optimistic but I think #6 is about right for her.

Last year I predicted Azarenka would rejoin the top 10 and she proved me wrong, so perhaps I am foolish to slot her in at #7 for next year.  I think her game is there, but she may need a little belief.  After two years at #10, putting Kerber in again is a testament to her consistency and tenaciousness. 

So that leaves two spots.  Leaving off ARadwanska after her biggest career title and 7 years in the top 10 may well be foolish, but her defensive creative game has its limits.  It would certainly be possible to argue that Safarova’s breakout run to the Roland Garros final merits consideration, even if she faltered a little toward the end.  Then there is Wozniacki:  passing over the former #1 takes some courage.  Likewise Ivanovic, who has shown she can post big results out of nowhere.  Karolina Pliskova had a very good year in 2015 and could get better.  So too could Svitolina.  And will Bouchard come back to her best form?  Or Madison Keys break out?  Maybe Carla Suarez Navarro will re-find her game, or Vinci will make one last kick at the can in her farewell year?  Picking the last spots for next year’s top 10 was very difficult, but in the end, I decided to go with a pair of Swiss “B’s”:  Belinda Bencic and Timea Bacsinszky.  At only 18 I think Bencic still has room for significant improvement, her wins over Serena and Halep are good augurs, and she has a big enough game to make a statement at the big events.  And Bacsinszky showed with her wins at big venues and high overall win percentage that she has room to improve her week-in week-out game and move closer to the top.

2016 Slam Predictions

Serena should be the favourite at the Australian Open and every tournament she plays.  But a hiccup is certainly possible and she’s only won the tournament once in the last 5 years.  Maria Sharapova, finalist last year and in 2012 and 2007, and champion in 2008 should be favoured next.  After her the top contenders are Halep, Kvitova, Venus, and Azarenka.

Although Serena is again the favourite at Roland Garros, Sharapova has been a finalist there 3 of the last 4 years and is a close second.  Next up would be Halep, Muguruza, Kvitova, and Venus in my estimation.  If there is any tournament that could produce a surprise finalist it is the French, as Safarova, Errani, Stosur, and Schiavone have shown in recent years.

Venus has 5 Wimbledon titles and is rounding into the best form we have seen from her in a while.  I put her just behind her sister and two-time champ Kvitova whose high stakes game seems tailor-made for grass.  Sharapova is always a contender, and Azarenka and Halep should not be counted out.  Next I rate Muguruza, last year’s finalist.

Vinci is the only non-slam-winner to beat Serena at the US Open since Serena’s debut in 1998 (Spirlea), so it’s hard to pick against Serena for this title.  After Venus’ narrow loss to Serena in the 2015 edition I think she has the second best shot at taking the title.  I would rate Pennetta next if she were playing, but take instead Halep whose game is well-suited for these courts.  I would likely rate Sharapova more highly if it were not for her dismal record at the USO, making the SF only once since her title in 2006.  Next for me comes Azarenka who, despite her low ranking, has been to the final twice, and is poised to improve.

The players most likely to make slam break-throughs in 2016 are Muguruza and Halep in my estimation.  Closely following would be the Swiss Bencic and Bacsinszky.

Charles’ Slam Predictions 2016

Bookies Decimal Odds from Bet365.com on 23 Nov 2015


The bookies and I are definitely not seeing eye to eye on Venus Williams.  Overall, I’m looking forward to another fascinating year in women’s tennis.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open