Skip to main content

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men

Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him?

Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1. 

Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth? 

The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem.  Thiem made the Madrid final and pushed Nadal, getting closer to him each of the three times they’ve played on clay this year, culminating in a straights set victory over Rafa last week.  But will Thiem be able to maintain that level over best of five sets at Roland Garros instead of the best of three played at non-slam tournaments?  He’s #3 in the points race this year, a fair ways back of Nadal and Federer – but impressive nonetheless.

However, the best match record of this year, percentage-wise, belongs to Roger Federer who is 19-1 to Nadal’s 36-6.  Federer skipped the clay season, but has racked up 4 straight wins against Nadal.  Roger seems to have finally figured out how to hit his backhand effectively against Rafa.  I think he might be among the only players capable of beating Nadal on clay this year, but he’s not playing the French, increasing the odds of a 10th Rafa title.

It was only a year ago that Novak Djokovic seemed to have Nadal’s number permanently, racking up 7 straight wins against the Spaniard, including 3 on clay.  But Novak has struggled mightily over the last 12 months, seemingly sated by last year’s completion of the career grand slam.  Even more impressively, Djokovic also completed a non-calendar year slam – a feat unprecedented since Rod Laver in 1969. 

But since then, he’s appeared lost, and only rejoined the top 10 in this year’s points race after last week’s finalist appearance in Rome.  There were positive signs in the clay season for Novak.  Although it’s possible Djokovic will be undone by an inconsistent performance some time before the final, taking on Andre Agassi as a coach might be the zen tonic that Novak needs to return to dominant form.  He doesn’t look strong now, but he might become a real contender as the tournament progresses.

Nadal should probably be more wary of Stan Wawrinka.  Wawrinka owns only one win over Rafa on clay, in Rome 2015 – not Nadal’s best year by a long shot – but Stan has the kind of game that can dust anyone when he’s on.  The question is, when will Stan be on?  He’s managed one French title in 12 appearances.  Will lightning strike twice?

There’s always the possibility that a young hotshot like Nick Kyrgios or just-crowned first time Masters 1000 champion Alexander Zverev (in Rome) will play out of his tree.  Zverev looked impressive in winning six matches to take the title, but it was not exactly a murderer’s row he faced, taking out Raonic and Isner in the quarters and semis before facing an off-form Djokovic in the final.  I’m not convinced he will pose a serious threat to Nadal, but you never know. 

Zverev is #4 in the yearly points race, just ahead of David Goffin, who has been surprisingly good this year, if still underpowered.  A few other unexpected faces are in the race top 10 like #8 Dimitrov, #9 Carreno Busta, and #10 Sock. They usurp some top 10 stalwarts like Murray, Nishikori, Raonic, Tsonga, Cilic, and Berdych.

All things considered, barring unlikely challenges from Wawrinka, Thiem, possibly Zverev, or a suddenly rejuvenated Djokovic, there appears little to stand in Rafa’s way this French Open.

First Quarter

Murray (seeded #1) should win his first match against Andrey Kuznetsov, but the way Murray has been playing it is far from guaranteed.  Juan Martin Del Potro (#29) could provide a stiff test in the third round (R3), but Del Potro has been injured and it is uncertain if he will even play.  The fourth round for Murray could bring up John Isner (21), Tomas Berdych (13), or maybe improving 21-year old Karen Khachanov.  The draw has been reasonably kind to Murray, but the result is far from certain.

In the lower half of this section AZverev (9) has a tough opener with former world #7 Fernando Verdasco (now ranked 37).  Should he survive, he could have a very difficult slog with clay court specialist Pablo Cuevas (22) in 3R.  Cuevas beat AZverev in Madrid two weeks ago.  And not to be forgotten is Kei Nishikori (8) as a potential 4R opponent.  Nishikori has been battling injury this spring, but that is not unusual for him.

AZverev d. Murray

Second Quarter

Wawrinka (3) started the year with a bang making semi-finals (SF) at the Australian and the finals of Indian Wells.  But he has looked mediocre ever since.  Recent form seems to matter little to Stan, and he has made QF or better in 11 of 14 of the last slams, winning three titles.  His draw doesn’t look too bad.  Fabio Fognini (28) and Frances Tiafoe could stage an interesting 1R clash, with the winner a possible 3R opponent for Stan.  Also nearby are Richard Gasquet (24) and Gael Monfils (15).

Kevin Anderson has been re-finding his game and could have a good battle with mercurial Nick Kyrgios (18) in 2R.  The potential winner could face Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (12) in the third.  Tsonga is into his first ATP clay final this week and is a former semi-finalist at the French.  It will likely come down to him and Wawrinka for the quarter.

Wawrinka d. Tsonga

Third Quarter

Although Benoit Paire can be a difficult opponent for most, on clay Rafael Nadal (4) should have no trouble mowing him down in 1R.  After that Gilles Simon (31), Roberto Bautista Agut (17), and Jack Sock (14) are unlikely to provide much resistance to the current king of clay’s quest for the quarter final.  Sock could have a tough first round tussle with Jiri Vesely who took Djokovic out of Monte Carlo last year.

The other QF slot is likely to go to Milos Raonic (5) or Pablo Carreno Busta (20).  PCB has been knocking it flat this year with 17 clay wins, including a title in Portugal.  He could face Grigor Dimitrov (11) in 3R who’s also been playing well this year, even if clay is not his best surface.

Nadal d. Raonic

Fourth Quarter

This is where it starts to get interesting.  If Thiem (6) can get over his dreadful one-and-love shellacking at the hands of Djokovic last week, he should find his feet in time to face Steve Johnson (25) in 3R.  Ever-consistent David Goffin (10) could provide a stern test in 4R, with the winner into the QF.

Djokovic (2) has an interesting first rounder against Marcel Granollers.  He should make it through to face another clay lover, Joao Sousa, in 2R.  Next up could be AZverev’s older brother Mischa Zverev (32).  The fourth round could match Novak against Albert Ramos-Vinolas (19) or Lucas Pouille (16) both of whom can be fairly deadly, especially on clay.  All that to make the QF and a chance to face likely Thiem or Goffin.

It’s a gauntlet, and if Djokovic survives, he’s likely to encounter Nadal at the end of it.  Novak’s confidence is the key variable in this quarter.  He looked dreadful at the start of the year, but has started to show signs of rejuvenation.  Coach Agassi might find just the right thing to say to get Nole back on track.  If not, there is plenty of opportunity in this tricky draw for Novak to go down.  I have a feeling he may find his way through.

If Novak plays Goffin in the QF, he may remember that their last match was a win for Goffin on clay in Monte Carlo.  But by all rights, Thiem, #3 in the yearly race, should be a more difficult opponent.  However, Djokovic has owned Thiem who has only mustered one set in their five encounters.  If Thiem can get over his Djoko-block he could become very dangerous in this draw.

Djokovic d. Thiem

Semi-finals

I didn’t think, coming in, that AZverev was really close to a very deep run, but he benefits from a favourable draw.  An in-form Wawrinka should take down AZverev, but what version of Wawrinka we get is always a guess.  For his part, AZverev is unproven in the backend of slams – he’s never been past 3R in, granted, only seven slams.  AZverev has been putting up ranking-to-age numbers that correlate with the great slam champions of the past – like McEnroe, Edberg, Sampras, and Federer.  A breakthrough on the slam stage seems inevitable – and soon.  But it’s a lot to expect from an unproven quantity.  Meanwhile, Wawrinka has a pretty plum draw, himself.

Wawrinka d. AZverev

If Thiem somehow finds his way through, fans will be salivating to see how Rafa handles the pressure of facing his most recent conqueror.  My money would be on Rafa.  But I’ve predicted Djokovic to come through to the semi, and if Novak can find his 2016 Roland Garros form, we could be in for a monster battle of titans in Nadal-Djokovic CI (that’s ‘51’ for the non-Roman numeral readers).  But Nadal spanked Djokovic in Madrid, and I expect he’ll do it again.

Nadal d. Djokovic

Final

If it actually comes down to Nadal vs Wawrinka, all bets are off.  Wawrinka has never lost a slam final in three attempts, and seems to bring his best game when it really counts.  On the other hand, Nadal has only two losses at this venue and a record-shattering 9 titles.  It seems highly likely he will be the first male to garner double digits at a slam and claim his 10th.  This is actually still one short of the 11 claimed by Margaret Court at the Australian, but if you’ve been following the news this week, enough about her.

Nadal d. Wawrinka

Expert Picks

Seven of eight experts I follow pick Nadal for the title, with the lone dissenting vote cast for Djokovic.

Bookies Odds

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 23 May 2015:
1
Nadal
1.8
2
Djokovic
4
3
Murray
10
4
Thiem
10
5
Wawrinka
13
6
AZverev
17
7
Nishikori
34
8
Kyrgios
34
9
Del Potro
51
10
Raonic
51
11
Goffin
51
12
Dimitrov
51
13
Monfils
67
14
Berdych
81
15
Tsonga
81
16
Ferrer
101
17
Pouille
101
18
Bautista Agut
101
19
Fognini
101
20
Ramos Vinolas
101
21
Gasquet
101
22
Cilic
126
23
Hyeon Chung
151
24
Simon
151
25
Sock
151
26
Cuevas
151
27
Isner
201
28
Kohlschreiber
201
29
Coric
201
30
Carreno Busta
201
31
Paire
201
32
Edmund
201
33
Verdasco
251
34
Gulbis
251
35
Berlocq
251
36
AnKuznetsov
251
37
DMedvedev
251
38
KAnderson
251
39
Kokkinakis
251
40
Evans
301
41
Bedene
301
42
Dzumhur
301
43
Zeballos
301
44
FLopez
301
45
Chardy
301
46
Almagro
301
47
Karlovic
301
48
Ruud
301
49
Kudryavtsev
501
50
Tsisipas
501
51
Khachanov
501
52
Monteiro
501
53
Tiafoe
501
54
Janowicz
501


Comments

  1. errata: obviously 51 is "LI" in roman numerals...

    ReplyDelete
  2. You correctly predicted 1 player to appear in each of the quarterfinals. So 4 / 8, with no correct pairings. What is the lowest, average, and highest # of QF-ists you have predicted?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have predicted:
    Men:
    highest 7/8 (3 times - 2012 Aus, 2013 Fre, 2015 Aus)
    lowest 3/8 (2 times - 2010 Fre, 2018 Aus)
    average 4.88/8

    Women:
    highest 6/8 (1 time - 2013 Aus)
    lowest 1/8 (1 time - 2015 Fre)
    average 3.33/8

    combined men and women:
    highest 11/16 (3 times - 2012 Aus, 2013 Aus, 2013 Fre)
    lowest 6/16 (2 times - 2013 Wim, 2016 Wim)
    average 4.09/8 (8.18/16)

    best year average 4.67/8 (2012)
    worst year average 3.63 (2016)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Those numbers are based on predictions published in this blog from Fre 2009 to Aus 2018 - total 65 predictions (a few slam tournaments did not receive predictions).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open