Skip to main content

Wimbledon 2018 Men's Prediction


Which man will win Wimbledon?
I have a funny feeling that Roger Federer will not be hoisting the cup on the final Sunday of Wimbledon.  He’s pretty much everyone’s favourite to win, including the bookies.  Although he’s the winningest player on grass, with an open-era record 18 titles on the surface including 8 at Wimbledon, he’s not nearly as safe a pick as Rafael Nadal is on clay.

Not Federer?
Federer has two questionable losses this year, to Kokkinakis in the first round of Miami, and to Coric in the final of Halle.  Both opponents played well, but I can’t shake the feeling that Federer could have taken those very close matches.  He did not seem to have the mental stiffness to see them through.  I have doubts about his confidence.

Federer is admittedly the favourite in his quarter and should get revenge over Coric in the fourth round.  But then he could face Sam Querrey who has eliminated the defending champion each of the last two years in quarter- and semi-final showings.  After that could come either Marin Cilic or Milos Raonic, who were runners-up the last two years.  It is far from an easy road.

Raonic has not fully rebounded from injury but Cilic is near the top of his game, having featured in two of the last four slam finals.  Cilic is the clear pick for the second quarter which includes Raonic, John Isner, and Grigor Dimitrov.  His path doesn’t look too bad, except for the potential blockbuster with Raonic in the fourth round.

To my mind Cilic is a near favourite with Roger for the title.  If Federer falters, which I half-expect, it is Cilic who I think will claim the championship. 

Quarter-final Treats
Although the three best picks are in the top, the bottom half is far from easy.  I would most like to see quarter-finals that featured Novak Djokovic against third seed Alexander Zverev, and two-time champs Andy Murray versus Rafael Nadal.  Among these four it is very difficult to pick a favourite.

Murray is coming back from hip surgery and a year away from competitive play.  He had some promising results at Queen’s but it is by no means clear that he can get through matches against Paire, Shapovalov, Lopez, and Del Potro to reach the quarter-final. 

Nadal hasn’t been past the fourth at Wimbledon since making the final in 2011.  He is long overdue, and he looks to have a very manageable draw.  If Murray is not up to snuff, there appears little to prevent Nadal from reaching the semis… perhaps a motivated Delpo.

Zverev has not looked great since an injured loss to Thiem in the French quarters, but his game and booming serve seem suited to Wimbledon, the site of his only previous fourth-round showing at a slam.  He could face the oceanically talented but inconsistent Nick Kyrgios in the fourth.  Their budding rivalry is locked at 3-3.  The winner might run into Djokovic for a spot in the semi.

Djokovic has been making steady progress and seems on the cusp of regaining top form.  He could just as easily go out early, but I suspect he’s poised for a deep run.  A semi with Nadal or Murray would be a treat.  A confident Nadal is very tough to beat, regardless of surface.  But I think Novak is a more natural grass player and if he has nerves, they may not surface until the final.

Young Spoilers
There are a host of other young talents to watch that could wreak havoc with my predictions. Denis Shapovalov could give Murray and Delpo fits and make a surprise appearance in the quarters.  Borna Coric might show us that his win over Federer was no fluke.  Frances Tiafoe could make it through Verdasco and Thiem to trouble Djokovic.  Kyle Edmund has been having a standout year, and Stefanos Tsitsipas has looked dangerous all spring.  And then there’s unknown Marco Cecchinato who shocked the world with a semi-final run at the French.

Final Prediction
At the end of the day, while a Cilic win would not surprise me, the odds still favour Federer.  I predict Roger over Cilic and Djokovic over Nadal for the semis, with Federer claiming the crown.

Odds from bet365.com on 27 Jun 2018
1
Federer
2.75
2
Djokovic
6
3
Nadal
8
4
Cilic
8
5
Murray
13
6
AZverev
15
7
Kyrgios
17
8
Raonic
19
9
DelPotro
21
10
Dimitrov
26
11
Thiem
34
12
Coric
41
13
KAnderson
41
14
Shapovalov
41
15
Isner
67
16
Wawrinka
81
17
Querrey
81
18
Khachanov
81
19
Goffin
81
20
Nishikori
81
21
Edmund
81
22
Sock
101
23
Muller
101
24
Chung
101
25
Tsitsipas
126
26
Pouille
126
27
Medvedev
126
28
FLopez
151
29
Monfils
151
30
Bautista-Agut
151
31
Gasquet
151
32
SJohnson
201


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open