Skip to main content

The confusing state of the Wimbledon ladies draw


The confusing state of the Wimbledon ladies draw

Serena is back!  … kinda…
Azarenka is back!  … sorta…
Sharapova is back!  … ish… 
Even two-time slam finalist Vera Zvonareva is back.

In their “absence”, Simona Halep, Caroline Wozniacki, and Sloane Stephens have legitimized themselves as slam champions. They are just three of the 14 active slam champions in the WTA.  So there are plenty of contenders for arguably the biggest title of the year at Wimbledon.  But a favourite is a little harder to nail down.

Favourites
Petra Kvitova is the bookies favourite.  She’s won the Big W twice before and leads the tour in titles won this year, with five.  She seems the obvious pick.  Except that she hasn’t been doing well at the slams.  She’s only made two slam quarter-finals in the 4 years since her last title, and her run of five consecutive deep runs at Wimbledon ended in 2014.  She hasn’t been past the third round at SW19 since then.  She seems to have developed a knack for folding when she’s expected to do well.  Her early draw isn’t too bad, but she could get Sharapova in the fourth round and Halep in the quarters.

What about the doyenne of tennis, Serena Williams?  There is no subtracting from her 23 slam titles including seven at Wimbledon.  But since coming back from motherhood she has not looked even close to dominant.  She’s won five matches total in three tournaments this year… a far cry from her usual excellence.  The Wimbledon seeding committee anointed her with just the 25th seed. The bookies are a little more optimistic and put her second behind Kvitova, and some observers, no less than Martina Navratilova, are proclaiming her the favourite.

How Serena does will depend on how close she is to regaining full form.  She hasn’t really shown it this year, but she has come from far down before to claim a slam title out of nowhere.  She could run into fifth seed Elina Svitolina in the third round, and Madison Keys in the fourth.

Keys has been on fire at the slams of late, going runner-up, quarters, semis in her last three.  She has a huge hard-hitting game and could spell serious trouble for Serena.  If Serena can get through Keys, then I think she becomes the favourite for the title.  But if Keys should win their matchup I would favour someone else to take out Keys.

That someone could be Sloane Stephens.  As good as Keys has been, Stephens has been better, making two of the last three slam finals and claiming the 1000 in Miami.  I can see Stephens coming through her section to face one of three former #1’s Venus Williams, Victoria Azarenka, or Karolina Pliskova, or maybe up and coming Aryna Sabalenka in the quarter-finals.  It’s a nasty little section and Stephens appears to have the easier road.

Contenders
Surprisingly, world #2 and recent slam winner Wozniacki has never been past the 4th round at Wimbledon despite two grass titles at Eastbourne.  Maybe this is her year.  She could have a tough third rounder with grass-loving Aggie Radwanska and a battle in the fourth against Coco Vandeweghe.  I’ll pick Aggie to come through but lose to Keys.

No analysis would be complete without mention of last year’s champ, Garbine Muguruza.  She’s already been in two Wimbledon finals and seems to find her groove on grass.  Her draw looks ok until the fourth where she could run into youngsters Daria Kasatkina or Ash Barty who recently took the grass title in Nottingham.

The quarters for Muguruza could bring up former finalist Angelique Kerber, world #6 Caroline Garcia, or maybe Indian Wells 1000 winner, ball blaster Naomi Osaka.  Of this lot, Kerber may be most likely to come through to the quarters and has proven chops on grass.  Till now Muguruza has struck slam gold only when she seems completely out of contention.  She just made semis of the French, is the defending champion at Wimbledon, and is the third favourite of the bookies.  So this may not be her time.  Of course that could be hogwash.  There is no question she is a significant threat for the Wimbledon title.

And finally, and certainly not least, is world #1 Simona Halep.  Halep has been in the quarter-finals her last two times here and in the semis in 2014.  Yet grass is not where she shines.  She could get an almighty tussle from hometown favourite Johanna Konta in the fourth round.  Should she survive, Kvitova is a likely quarter-final opponent.  It will be interesting to see what a newly confident and vindicated Halep can do, but I expect Kvitova will be too large a hurdle to cross.

Summary
In the quarters I’m taking Kvitova over Halep, Muguruza over Kerber, Stephens over Venus, and Keys over ARadwanska.  I think Kvitova, Muguruza, and Stephens have an almost equal shot at the title, but predict Kvitova claims her third Wimbledon over the newly vincible Stephens.  Of course, Serena could easily throw a huge wrench into that, but for now, I think she needs more time before reaching top form.

Odds from bet365.com on 27 June 2018
1
Kvitova
5
2
SWilliams
6.5
3
Muguruza
8
4
Kerber
13
5
Halep
13
6
Stephens
13
7
KaPliskova
15
8
Keys
15
9
Sharapova
15
10
Svitolina
21
11
Wozniacki
23
12
Konta
23
13
Barty
23
14
VWilliams
26
15
Rybarikova
26
16
Osaka
29
17
Kasatkina
29
18
Azarenka
29
19
Vandeweghe
29
20
Garcia
34
21
Goerges
34
22
Ostapenko
41
23
Kontaveit
41
24
Mertens
51
25
ARadwanska
51
26
Safarova
51
27
Sevastova
51
28
Makarova
67
29
Giorgi
67
30
Strycova
67
31
Cibulkova
81
32
Buzarnescu
81
33
TMaria
81
34
Sabalenka
81



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open