Skip to main content

US Open 2018 Men’s Preview


US Open 2018 Men’s Preview

The more things change, the more they stay the same.  The top of men’s tennis is once again dominated by Nadal, Federer, and Djokovic.  They’ve each won a slam title this year and the breakthrough of the Next Gen, while promising at lesser tournaments, has been stubbornly resisted at the slams.  Is that about to change?

First Quarter
Rafael Nadal seems to have a reasonably easy path to the quarterfinal.  He could face Karen Khachanov in the third round, whom he beat in the semis of Toronto in a tight two sets.  The fourth round could bring up Kyle Edmund (seeded 16) or Jack Sock (18).  Top seeds in the lower half of the quarter are Dominic Thiem (9) and Kevin Anderson (5).  Thiem has made the fourth round in three of four outings in New York but played only one match on hard courts in preparation, a loss to Tsitsipas in Toronto, so I won’t be expecting much from him. 

Anderson is at a career high #5 on the backs of finalist performances at Wimbledon and last year’s US Open, where he went down meekly to Nadal.  A meeting in the quarters would hold less pressure for Anderson, but I still expect Rafa will be too good.  The quarter also holds a fascinating match-up between two Canadian teenagers, Denis Shapovalov and Felix Auger-Aliassime.  Will the result be an indication of their futures?

Nadal d. Anderson

Second Quarter
Juan Martin Del Potro headlines the second quarter as the #3 seed across from #8 Grigor Dimitrov.  But there are two former champions lurking here.  Stan Wawrinka plays Dimitrov in the first, a rematch of their Wimbledon encounter a few weeks ago.  Wawrinka won that one and given his recent good form, I expect a repeat. The row doesn’t get any easier to hoe however as he could face Raonic (25) in the third and Isner (11) in the fourth round.

Del Potro could face Andy Murray in the third.  Murray looked revitalized in Washington, winning three matches, but pulled out after a three hour pyrrhic victory over Marius Copil.  In the fourth Delpo could get Borna Coric (20) or Stefanos Tsitsipas (15).  Both Next Gen have been hot this year and Tsitsipas’ defeat of four top ten players in Toronto was a beaver-tail slap heard round the world tennis pond.

Del Potro d. Wawrinka

Third Quarter
Alexander Zverev (4) has been a fixture in the top five for the last year.  He’s the first player outside of the Big 4 to win three 1000 titles in the last 13 years since Davydenko won his third in 2009.  He has not made much of an impression at the slams but did finally make a quarter-final at this year’s French.  Despite speculation that his smart-phone addicted generation can’t concentrate through five sets, it seems only a matter of time before he breaks through on the slam stage.  His draw looks manageable until the fourth round where he could face Schwartzman (13), Nishikori (21), or perhaps Monfils.

Across the quarter are Marin Cilic (7) and David Goffin (10) along with Next Gens Alex De Minaur who was runner-up in Washington and Frances Tiafoe who won the title in Delray Beach.  Cilic won the US title in 2014 and looks most likely to make it through this quarter despite some patchy play this summer.

Cilic d. Zverev

Fourth Quarter
This is the quarter that has everyone buzzing since it situates Novak Djokovic (6) opposite from Roger Federer (2).  Djokovic has been in slam-winning form this summer claiming the Wimbledon title and capturing a precedent-setting Masters 9000.  With his victory in Cincinnati over Federer, Djokovic has now won all nine Masters 1000 titles.  Ivan Lendl made a similar accomplishment in the Grand Prix era, before 1990, but Djokovic is the first since the tournaments achieved the prominence they have now.

Pablo Carreno Busta (12) made the semis here last year but has been in questionable form this summer.  He did just make the semis at the small 250 event in Winston-Salem, but I expect he will be no match for Nole.

Federer has one of the more difficult paths through the draw that could include the mercurial Benoit Paire in the second, the talented Nick Kyrgios (30) in the third and Fognini (14) or Chung (23) in the fourth.  Federer inches ahead in the head to head with Kyrgios 2-1 with eight of the nine sets they have played being decided in a tie-break.  Kyrgios seems to get up for the big-name players but loses interest perhaps against the rank and file.

Should Federer survive he is likely to face Djokovic in the quarters.  Djokovic leads the head to head 24-22 including 18-17 on hard courts.  By all measures it’s too close to call.  But where Djokovic has looked historic this summer, Federer has looked shaky.

Djokovic d. Federer

Semis
There’s no question Del Potro loves the US Open and the US Open and its contingent of Argentine fans love him.  Del Potro has looked focused and dispassionate this year and a deep run would seem in order.  Last year he dug deep to defeat Thiem and Federer before succumbing to Nadal in the semis.  He’s at a career high #3 but I suspect a similar fate awaits him this year.  Nadal was the strongest he’s been in years at Wimbledon and his victory in Canada was a bellwether.

Nadal d. Del Potro

Although Djokovic has owned Cilic 15-2 in the head to head, those two Cilic victories have come in the last three matches.  Nonetheless, with the form Djokovic has shown this summer he should scrap his way to victory.

Djokovic d. Cilic

Final
The two dominant names in men’s tennis this decade have been Nadal and Djokovic.  Nole has claimed 12 singles title in the 2010’s and Rafa 11.  A distant third is Federer with five.  It looks unlikely that the Next Gen will rise up in this tournament – Zverev and Tsitsipas may be the most likely – but when the final comes I expect the two most prolific winners of this decade to slug it out. 

Rafa has three US Open titles and Novak has two.  Djokovic is the only slam-winning player to hold a winning record against Nadal, a very close 27-25.  This is the most frequent rivalry of the Open Era (since 1968).  Rafa is in great form but hard is not his best surface.  Djokovic thrives on hard but has still not looked as consistently invincible as he did in the run-up to his career-defining four consecutive majors in 2016.  It’s almost a coin toss.  Nadal has lost only three times this year but I’ll go with the player I think thrives more easily on hard courts.

Djokovic d. Nadal

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 23 August 2018
1
Djokovic
3.5
2
Nadal
4.5
3
Federer
5.5
4
AZverev
11
5
Murray
13
6
Del Potro
13
7
Cilic
17
8
Kyrgios
21
9
Wawrinka
26
10
Raonic
26
11
Dimitrov
26
12
Thiem
34
13
Shapovalov
34
14
Nishikori
34
15
KAnderson
34
16
Isner
41
17
Khachanov
51
18
Tsitsipas
51
19
Chung
67
20
Tsonga
81
21
Goffin
81
22
Monfils
101
23
Edmund
101
24
Coric
101
25
Querrey
101
26
Pouille
101
27
Rublev
101
28
Sock
126
29
Fognini
151
30
MZverev
151
31
Bautista-Agut
151
32
Muller
151


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open