Skip to main content

Roland Garros 2021 – Men’s Preview

 


Thirteen Roland Garros titles.  Unbelievable.  Can anyone stop the ageless Nadal?

 

First Quarter

Never before have all the Big Three of Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic been in the same half of a slam draw. It’s a golden opportunity for their young rivals to go deep.  Roger Federer (seeded 8) has played only three matches this year, winning only one of them.  He’s been recovering from knee surgery in 2020.  He could easily go out in the first round. But despite the rust, if he feels confident in the leg, he could still make a deepish run.  He could get a test in the second round from Cilic, or in the fourth from Berrettini.  He’s made it clear that his priority is Wimbledon and that anyone picking him to win the French is crazy.

Matteo Berrettini (9) won the clay 250 in Belgrade and made the 1000 final in Madrid.  He’s showing that his fine form of 2019 was not a fluke.  His compatriot young-gun Italian, Lorenzo Musetti is at a career high #76 (official ‘frozen’ covid ranking), and would be #30 in normal 52-week rankings. Musetti continues to impress at only age 19.

But likely this quarter will belong to top seed Novak Djokovic (1). He looked thoroughly out-classed by Nadal in the Rome 1000 final, but is rounding into form and is still a level above everyone else, especially at slams.  Although he dominates Nadal on hard courts, will he believe he can really challenge Nadal in Nadal’s favourite hunting ground?

Djokovic d. Federer

 

Second Quarter

Another 19-year old Italian, Jannik Sinner, lands in this section.  He played a very competitive set against Nadal in the quarters here last year.  His star has since risen and he’s seeded #18.  He would actually be ranked #9 in 52-week rankings. He has serious power, good speed, and a strong mental game. He could face Nadal again, in the fourth round.  I get the feeling that it’s just a matter of time before Sinner breaks out and vaults to a slam title.  He made a sterling run to the final of Miami in April.

Andrey Rublev (7) hasn’t been quite the title winning machine he was last year when he claimed five crowns.  But he looked strong in beating Nadal on clay in Monte Carlo and making the final there.  He’s now made quarters at the last three slams, including the last French Open, played in October.  He has four slam quarter-final showings without ever making a semi.  This is second among active players (and third in the Open Era since 1968, second is Guy Forget with five) to the ‘leader’ Robredo, who has made seven slam quarters without advancing.  Despite that cred, I think Rublev is likely better on hard than clay.

Aslan Karatsev (24) was a virtual unknown before his eye-popping run to the semis at the Australian in February.  He would be #10 in normal 52-week rankings.  Notably, he beat Djokovic on clay in front of Novak’s home crowd in Belgrade.  He’s very dependable and hard-hitting off the baseline.

What can be said of Rafael Nadal that hasn’t been said?  Seeding the 13-time champ at #3 seems ridiculous, but it’s nice to see that the ranking standards are followed fairly.  Despite a few hiccups this spring, Nadal claimed the clay titles in Barcelona and Rome and is the heavy favourite of the bookies.

Nadal d. Karatsev

 

Third Quarter

Opportunity knocks in the bottom half of the draw.  Who will be our finalist?

Dominik Thiem (4) is a two-time Roland Garros finalist and the reigning US Open champion.  But having achieved that lifetime award for “Slam Champion,” he’s look unmotivated since.  His results this year have been indifferent. After racking up 10 clay titles in five years, he hasn’t been close to a sniff this year.  His best result was a semi in Madrid, where he was straight-setted by Zverev. If he can release his mind and find desire, I don’t doubt that at age 27 he still has the body and the game to challenge the very top, especially in Paris on his best surface.  Hopefully he re-finds that inner fire.

Casper Ruud (15) seems at his best on clay. The 22-year old Norwegian won the clay 250 in Geneva last week and made semis at the Monte Carlo 1000 and Madrid 1000 events.  No competitor will be eager to see his consistent and penetrating strokes coming across the net.

Alexander Zverev (6) looked impressive in winning the Madrid 1000, beating Nadal and Thiem in succession. Once an underperformer at the slams, he’s now made quarters or better five times including last year’s US Open runner-up showing.  As impressive as the Madrid title was, it is not Paris, although he does have a title on similar slow clay from the Rome 1000 in 2017.

A Zverev d. Ruud

 

Fourth Quarter

Daniil Medvedev is the second seed, but even he mocks the idea that he is seeded higher than Nadal.  He’s been incredibly entertaining the last few months, openly cursing clay and the very idea of clay court tennis during his matches:  railing at umpires, fellow players, attending fans, anyone who would listen to his thoughts on the ‘garbage surface.’  With that attitude it’s no surprise he’s won only one match on clay this year.  The 25-year old has still never won a match at Rome or Roland Garros.

Meanwhile Stefanos Tsitsipas (5) has been entrenching himself at the top of the game.  He took the 1000 in Monte Carlo, and then pushed Nadal to the brink in the Barcelona final, and later Djokovic at Rome.  With Thiem floundering, he looks like the top player on clay outside of the Big Three.

Since Medvedev is likely to produce a hole in the draw, who might take his spot?  Nearby is Christian Garin (22) who is a solid clay player from Chile.  He beat Medvedev to make the quarters in Madrid and won a round in Rome.  Maybe that’s not the most scintillating record but he’s landed in a good spot in the draw.  Also in this section is Reilly Opelka (32), the seven-foot American who made the semis in Rome with his monster serve.

Tsitsipas d. Garin

 

Semis and Final

Denis Shapovalov pulled out of the French after losing the final of Lyon last week.  He also made semis at Rome last year and was starting to look like a legitimate threat on clay.  He will be missed along with former champ Stan Wawrinka and former finalist Andy Murray.

If there were no Nadal... Tsitsipas and Zverev would be real threats to take the title this year.  Djokovic would probably still be the favourite, but the margin would be razor thin.  But there is a Nadal.  Claiming a 14th title at Roland Garros would equal the entire slam haul of Pete Sampras.  It’s simply astonishing.

Semis: Nadal d. Djokovic, Tsitsipas d. A Zverev

Final: Nadal d. Tsitsipas

 

Odds

Bookies’ decimal odds at bet365.com on 28 May 2021:

1

Nadal

1.83

2

Djokovic

5

3

Tsitsipas

5.5

4

Thiem

12

5

AZverev

13

6

Rublev

34

7

Sinner

41

8

DMedvedev

51

9

CaRuud

51

10

Berrettini

67

11

Federer

67

12

Karatsev

67

13

CarrenoBusta

126

14

Schwartzman

126

15

Garin

151

16

BautistaAgut

201

17

Fognini

251

18

Nishikori

251

19

DavidovichFokina

301

20

Dimitrov

301

21

Sonego

301

22

AugerAliassime

401

23

Musetti

401

24

Raonic

451

25

Khachanov

501

26

Hurkacz

601

27

Krajinovic

601

28

Tiafoe

601

29

Isner

751

30

Pella

751

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open