Skip to main content

Wimbledon Women’s Preview 2022

 

All the women who have a reasonable Wimbledon pedigree seem either past their prime or out of form.  So that leaves a lot of unknowns entering this year’s tournament.  Iga Swiatek is the bookies’ favourite, and justifiably so, riding a 35-match win streak.  But she’s only played the Wimbledon main draw twice, her best: a fourth round showing last year.  There are eleven slam champions in the draw, but only two of them, Swiatek and Muguruza, are in the top ten.  There seem two possible scenarios:  either Swiatek continues her indomitable march to victory, or the tournament is wide open.

 

First Quarter

Iga Swiatek is a deserved #1, having dominated the tour since February.  If she wins here she could extend her win streak to 42 matches, a number that hasn’t been surpassed since Steffi Graf won 44 matches in a row in 1993.  For perspective, Graf had previous streaks of 45, 46, and 66; Navratilova won 74 straight in 1984; and there were several 100+ streaks in the 1920’s to 40’s.  The kind of dominance we are seeing from Iga is rare, especially in today’s hyper-competitive arena.

Swiatek’s draw looks reasonable, providing she figures out how to play on grass – she skipped the warm-up events.  Her first stiff challenge might come in the fourth round from Barbora Krejcikova (seeded 13), last year’s Roland Garros champion who made the fourth round at Wimbledon last year in her main draw debut.

Also in this quarter are former champ Garbine Muguruza (9), Sloane Stephens, Bianca Andreescu, and Jessica Pegula (8) who has been having a career best year but has little pedigree on grass.  Muguruza is below .500 on the year (8-11).  Stephens is only slightly better (10-9), but had an encouraging run to the quarters of the French. 

Andreescu has also been finding form and made the final of Bad Homburg last week on grass.  Last year was a recovery year for Bianca and she is now rounding into what could be dangerous fettle.  A run to the final would signal a return to championship level.  As of today she is the tenth favourite of the bookies.

Swiatek def Andreescu

 

Second Quarter

This quarter has many talented players and a lot of opportunity.  The big attraction is Serena Williams, unseeded and playing for the first time since exiting in the first round here one year ago, victim of a slip on the grass. Serena has won seven titles at Wimbledon.  This surface is likely the one that will be most forgiving for lack of match fitness.  Serena has shown before that she can come into a tournament with no preparation and still win it.  But at age 40 her ability to regain fitness is likely diminished.  I expect that, despite her otherworldly talent, she will struggle to keep pace with younger and fitter opponents.  And yet… she can never be counted out.

Last year’s runner-up Karolina Pliskova (6) could meet Serena in the third round.  Although she’s only won eight matches all year, Pliskova’s record and talent on grass mean she will be dangerous.  Amanda Anisimova (20) took Naomi Osaka out of both slams this year, but without Osaka in the draw who will be her next big scalp?  She could face Coco Gauff (11) in the third round.  The recent French Open runner-up showed she can play on grass too, making the semis in Berlin.  Still only 18 years old, the sky is the limit for Gauff’s talent.

Petra Kvitova (25) continues to show she is always dangerous, winning in Eastbourne last week.  Her 29th title trails only Venus and Serena among active players.  Surprisingly she has not been past the fourth round since her second Wimbledon title in 2014.

Simona Halep (16) did not have a chance to defend her 2019 title last year, and without Barty in the draw is the closest thing to a defending champion.  She could sweep to the title or lose in the first round.  She has a deadly opener against the all-court game of Karolina Muchova, who has made the quarters both previous times she played SW19.

The highest seed in this quarter is Paula Badosa (4) who made the fourth round last year, her break-out year. It is anyone’s guess what Badosa can do on grass this year, but a first round loss in Eastbourne last week is hardly encouraging.

Halep def Gauff

 

Third Quarter

Ons Jabeur is both the third seed and, as of today, the second favourite of the bookies.  She crashed out at Roland Garros, but can she do better here?  I’ll bet she can.  She claimed the Berlin crown on grass two weeks ago.  The always dangerous Kaia Kanepi (31) is a possible third round opponent, but a greater threat might come from Angelique Kerber (15) in the fourth round.  Kerber is a former champ who made the semis last year.  Grass is probably her best surface.

Danielle Collins is seeded seven but her best previous showing at Wimbledon is third round.  Meanwhile, Shuai Zhang (33) has been a quarter-finalist at Wimbledon before and made the final in Birmingham two weeks ago.

Caroline Garcia took the title in Eastbourne last week, but is notoriously unpredictable at slams.  She could be a second-round opponent for Emma Raducanu (10).  The British sensation has struggled in the sophomore year of her US Open triumph last year, plagued by injury.  She made the fourth round here last year, announcing herself to the cognoscenti, but despite abundant talent, I suspect she will not make a deep run at Wimbledon until better health returns.

Kerber def Zhang

 

Fourth Quarter

This may be the toughest quarter to predict.  I don’t see a clear favourite.  Anett Kontaveit is the second seed, but seemingly by default.  She’s won only three matches since the end of February, and none since April.  The next highest seed, Maria Sakkari (5), has fared a little better, winning nine matches since March, including five on grass.  But she has trouble closing in big moments.

Jelena Ostapenko (12) is about as unpredictable as they come.  The former French Open champion was once a Wimbledon semi-finalist and made the final in Eastbourne last week.  Belinda Bencic (14) has a tricky opener against Qiang Wang.  Bencic has twice made Wimbledon’s second week (fourth round) and made the final in Berlin two weeks ago.  She would seem to be well-suited for a deep run, but has had some surprising losses at slams.

Beatriz Haddad Maia (23) has been a revelation on grass this year, winning 12 straight matches and two tournaments, before finally being out-battled by Kvitova in the semis of Eastbourne. Can this mid-career player at an all-time high ranking make a deep run at the world’s most prestigious tournament?

Haddad Maia def Ostapenko

 

Semis and Final

Swiatek def Halep

Kerber def Haddad Maia

 

Final – Swiatek def Kerber

 

Expert Picks

Swiatek – (2) JDrucker, DKane

Jabeur – (2) MFitzgerald, SLivaudais

Kerber – (1) STignor

Sakkari – (1) EMcGrogan

 

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 20 Jun 2022

1

Swiatek

2.5

2

Gauff

11

3

Halep

13

4

Jabeur

15

5

Raducanu

17

6

SWilliams

17

7

KaPliskova

19

8

Badosa

21

9

Sakkari

21

10

Krejcikova

21

11

Bencic

21

12

Kvitova

23

13

Muguruza

23

14

Andreescu

23

15

Kontaveit

26

16

Rybakina

26

17

Anisimova

26

18

Kerber

26

19

Keys

34

20

Collins

34

21

LFernandez

34

22

Haddad Maia

34

23

Ostapenko

41

24

Vondrousova

41

25

Stephens

41

26

Van Uytvanck

41

27

Giorgi

51

28

Brady

51

29

Muchova

51

30

Pegula

51

31

QZheng

67

32

Tauson

67

33

Mertens

67

34

Kostyuk

67

35

Martic

81

36

Trevisan

101

37

Kenin

101

38

LFruhvirtova

101

39

Yastremska

101

40

Tomljanovic

101

41

Siniakova

101

42

Linette

101

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open