Skip to main content

2024 French Open Women

 

Word among the pundits and commentators is that Roland Garros 2024 is Swiatek’s to lose.  She’s won three of the last four French Open’s and four 1000-level tournaments this year.  The bookies have her as a 1.61 (3/5) favourite for the title.  So is this an open and shut case? 

The primary contender is likely to be Aryna Sabalenka.  Sabalenka already won the Australian Open this year, and was finalist to Swiatek in the last two big tournaments, Madrid and Rome, both on clay.  In her runner-up speech in Rome, Sabalenka said she wanted to reverse the result in Paris.  If they reproduce the quality of their Madrid clash in which Swiatek saved three match-points, Sabalenka could well emerge with the first half of a Grand Slam for the year.

However, Elena Rybakina should not be neglected.  She doled out Swiatek’s sole loss on clay this year, and owns a winning head-to-head 4-2 over Iga.  And of course there’s current US Open champion and former French finalist, Coco Gauff, and her fellow-American Danielle Collins who has gone 19-2 (win – loss) in recent months.  Who will rise to the top?

 

First Quarter

The big news in Iga Swiatek’s (seed 1) early draw is a potential second-round clash with Naomi Osaka.  Osaka is a four-time slam winner but is still coming back after giving birth last year.  She has not thriven on clay and could have a tough go against Lucia Bronzetti in the first.  Former FO champ Barbora Krejcikova is nearby in the draw but after a quarter-final run at the Aus Open in January, has floundered and hasn’t won a match on clay this year.

Danielle Collins (11) announced she will retire at the end of the year over continuing struggles with health (in particular, endometriosis) and a desire to pursue other aspects of life.  Whether it’s because she’s healthier than ever or the promise of retirement has freed her up, she’s having a career year.  She surprised by taking the 1000 title in Miami and followed up with a clay title at the Charleston 500.  Until today, only Sabalenka had beaten Collins on clay this year, but she just lost a final to Keys.  Collins is the fifth favourite of the bookies, and a quarter-final clash with Swiatek will be appointment-viewing.

Before Collins gets there she may have to get past Marketa Vondrousova (5), who is surely one of the least predictable players.  Vondrousova is the reigning Wimbledon champion and made the final at RG in 2019 (loss to Barty).  She’s looked very unreliable since Wimbledon but recently made the semis in Stuttgart on clay, beating Sabalenka.  There’s no saying what Vondrousova might do.  A first-round loss or a title run are both possible.  But I’d give odds that Collins will emerge to face Swiatek.

Swiatek def Collins

 

Second Quarter

Coco Gauff (3) heads this quarter. She won a 250 title in early January but hasn’t been in another final since.  So it’s surprising that she has one of the best win-loss (W-L) records for the year 25-8, not far off Sabalenka’s 25-7.  She’s struggled since making semis in Australia and Indian Wells but found form last week in Rome, going out in two close-ish sets to Swiatek in the semis.  Swiatek is her nemesis, but Coco did finally beat her last year, so she knows she can do it.  If Gauff can keep her serve and forehand under control she’ll make a deep run.

There are some big hitters in her section, like Liudmila Samsonova (17), Beatriz Haddad Maia (13), and Amanda Anisimova.  The last two are both former semi-finalists at RG, but Gauff has great defensive skills and should squeak past them all.

The other part of this quarter is led by Ons Jabeur (8) and Jelena Ostapenko (9).  Jabeur is a three-time slam-finalist but has been a shell of herself since flaming out in last year’s Wimbledon final.  Ostapenko won this tournament in 2017 but her hit-for-the-lines-with-max-power style is rarely reliable.  If Ostapenko should bash her way through this section and face Swiatek in the semis, she’ll have reason for confidence since she owns a 4-0 record against Iga.  However she’s 2-3 against Jabeur and 1-2 against Gauff.

Also in this section is a potential second-rounder between former finalist Sophia Kenin and on-again-off-again French hope, Caroline Garcia (21).  Kenin has not refound the form that made her arguably the best player of 2020, and Garcia has resided at world #4 in both 2018 and 2023, but not in between.  Garcia seems to struggle at the French, although she did make quarters in 2017.

Leylah Fernandez (31) and Anhelina Kalinina both land near Jabeur in the draw.  Kalinina has been in two 250 semis this year and was the Rome 1000 finalist last year.  Fernandez is a former US Open runner-up.  If the seeds in this section start to fall, either could take advantage.

Gauff def Ostapenko

 

Third Quarter

Qinwen Zheng (7) added her name to the list of serious slam contenders when she made the final at the Australian in January.  She took a set from Iga at this tournament two years ago and is coming off a quarter-final loss to Gauff in Rome.  She’s dangerous.

Jasmine Paolini (12) won a 1000 title in February and is possibly still settling into the idea of being a top-16 player.  Bianca Andreescu returns to action after nearly ten months away.  She’s got a tough opener against clay-loving Sara Sorribes Tormo, whom Andreescu should spank under normal conditions, but I expect rust will prevent her. 

Returning after a year’s absence is Angelique Kerber.  This is undoubtedly her weakest slam, and the former world #1 and three-time slam champ has not looked in form this year.  Elina Svitolina (15) made a triumphant return (after giving birth) to slam play last year, making the quarters at RG and the semis of Wimbledon.  However she’s just 14-9 this year.  She’s been good on clay in the past, twice winning Rome, but there’s little to suggest a deep run is in the offing this year.  Former finalist Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (20) should not go unmentioned, although she hasn’t looked particularly threatening of late.

And that leaves us with the biggest name in this quarter, Elena Rybakina (4).  The only player to beat Swiatek on clay this year, also beat her in last year’s Rome final, although, caveat, it was a retirement at 2-all in the third from Swiatek.  Still, Rybakina has a 4-2 record against Iga and was not beaten at last year’s French Open.  She withdrew without playing her third-round match with allergies, presumably to pollen.  And therein lies the crux: can Rybakina overcome the pollen?  If yes, she could take this title, if not, who knows.  Even if she stays healthy, beating Sabalenka and Swiatek back-to-back is by no means a given.  Rybakina COULD do it, it’s possible – but I’d put the odds at less than 50-50 against either player. Rybakina has made five tournament finals this year and her win-loss record of 30-6 is second only to Swiatek’s 38-4.

Rybakina def QZheng

 

Fourth Quarter

Maria Sakkari is the 6th seed here, but somehow she really doesn’t seem like a threat.  She did finally win a 1000 event last year, so she should be a contender for any title, but the other top players feel miles ahead of her.  Someone who DOES feel like a threat is Madison Keys (14).  She’s lost only to Swiatek on European clay this year.  The draw would have her face the #2 seed in the fourth round.

There’s a snarly little section of the draw here that could see second round matches between Victoria Azarenka vs. Mirra Andreeva and Peyton Stearns (who just won a 250 this week) vs. Daria Kasatkina (10).  It’s anybody’s guess who might emerge from that cage fight to face likely Sakkari or Linda Noskova (27) conqueror of Swiatek in Melbourne.

Also here are former world #2 Paula Badosa, Sloane Stephens – a former runner-up at RG, and the ever-feisty Yulia Putintseva.  However, casting a significant shadow over all is Aryna Sabalenka (2).

Sabalenka seemed to struggle for form after claiming her second slam title in Australia, but she’s righted the ship and made the final of her last two tournaments.  She pushed Swiatek to the brink in a high quality Madrid final that saw both players at or near their peaks for most of the match.  But in the Rome final, Swiatek looked a class apart.  The Roland Garros clay and elevation is closer to Rome than Madrid, so it should favour Swiatek.  But such is Sabalenka’s determination and relentless pace off every ball that nothing can be taken for granted.  She stand’s above the field in my estimation, with one significant exception.

Sabalenka def Sakkari

 

Semi-finals

Swiatek def Gauff

Sabalenka def Rybakina

 

Final

Swiatek def Sabalenka

 

Swiatek is 51-4 on clay in the last three years. If she wins it would be Swiatek’s fourth RG crown and fifth slam title overall.  Sabalenka is gunning for her third slam title.  Other former slam winners in the draw are: Osaka – 4, Kerber – 3, Azarenka – 2, Rybakina – 1, Gauff – 1, Krejcikova – 1, Ostapenko – 1, Vondrousova – 1, Stephens – 1, Andreescu – 1, Kenin – 1.  Former slam finalists playing here include: QZheng, LFernandez, Keys, Jabeur, Collins, KaPliskova, Pavlyuchenkova, Errani.

Overall there are 13 slam winners and 8 finalists in the draw.

 

Expert Picks:

Swiatek – 13

Steve Tignor (tennis.com), Ed McGrogan (tennis.com), Joel Drucker (tennis.com), David Kane (tennis.com), Stephanie Livaudais (tennis.com), Peter Bodo (tennis.com), Jon Levey (tennis.com), Liya Davidov (tennis.com), Jon Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Amy Lundy (Tennis Connected), Ben (Game to Love), JG (Game to Love), Andy Roddick (Served)

Others – 0

 

Bookies

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 25 May 2024:

1

Swiatek

1.61

2

Sabalenka

5.5

3

Gauff

9

4

Rybakina

11

5

Collins

21

6

Sakkari

34

7

QZheng

34

8

Ostapenko

41

9

MAndreeva

51

10

Keys

51

11

Jabeur

67

12

Kasatkina

67

13

Paolini

67

14

Svitolina

67

15

Haddad Maia

81

16

Noskova

101

17

Samsonova

101

18

Vondrousova

101

19

Osaka

126

20

Siniakova

126

21

Azarenka

151

22

Badosa

151

23

Krejcikova

151

24

LFernandez

201

25

Mertens

201

26

Navarro

201

27

Sorribes Tormo

201

28

Garcia

251

29

Kalinina

251

30

Kostyuk

251

31

KaPliskova

251

32

Stephens

251

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem.  Thiem made the Madrid final and pushed Nad

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl