Aryna
Sabalenka was #1 all year, yet we had four different slam winners. Is it an age of parity or dominance? Can Sabalenka keep it up next year, or will
someone new win a slam or enter the top ten?
Story of 2025
The year
began with Aryna Sabalenka winning the first tournament of the year in
Brisbane. In the same week, Clara
Tauson beat Naomi Osaka in Auckland.
Tauson had a banner year, finishing runner-up at the 1000 in Dubai a
month later and finishing the year at a career high ranking of #12. Can the 23-year old do even better next year?
For her
part, Naomi Osaka’s run was a portent of things to come. Her best results have always been on hard
courts, and sure enough she made a run to the Canada 1000 final, and then a few
weeks later to the semis of the US Open, where she lost a double-tiebreak
three-setter to Anisimova. She also won
a clay 125 in May, showing off some unexpected variety.
In week 2, Madison
Keys took the 500 in Adelaide, but then mic-dropped the Australian Open by
finally claiming a slam title, ten years after making her first slam semi. The power and uncomplicated strokes have
always been there, but she had long seemed the victim of too much early
hype. Well, she finally came good…
silencing the nay-sayers.
Her run was
epic. She beat five top-tenners, three
slam winners, and survived five three-set matches. Her astonishingly deep 8-6 third-set
tie-breaker over Swiatek in the semis was gut-wrenching. And then she did it all again, 7-5 in the
third over Sabalenka for the final.
Kudos. Lifetime vindication.
After the
tennis world breathed that monster sigh of relief, a few weeks passed and we
moved onto the next young thing. Let the
expectations begin. Mirra Andreeva
took the 1000 in Dubai and followed it up with the 1000 in Indian Wells. This catapulted her into the top ten at #6
where she hovered until mid-October, falling to #9 for yearend. She turned 18 in April, but then seemed to
stall and didn’t make any more big break-throughs on the year. She’s still young and will doubtless refind
that form and challenge again at big tournaments in the years to come.
Sabalenka
was runner-up in Indian Wells, and winner at the Miami 1000 – the start to a
solid year. The beaten Miami finalist was Jessica Pegula, who finishes
at yearend #6. Pegula made six
tournament finals this year, second-most on tour.
|
2025 WTA
Title Matches |
Titles |
Runner-ups |
Total Finals |
|
Sabalenka |
4 |
5 |
9 |
|
Pegula |
3 |
3 |
6 |
|
Anisimova |
2 |
3 |
5 |
|
Swiatek |
3 |
1 |
4 |
|
Gauff |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
Alexandrova |
1 |
3 |
4 |
Pegula
showed off her diversity by taking titles on clay, grass, and hard. She was middling at the slams, with her best
showings being a fourth round at the French and a semi at the US Open. That semi is actually her second best slam
performance, after last year’s runner-up at the US, so overall she did well,
staying in the top ten for a fourth straight year.
Jasmine
Paolini did not
match last year’s highs (two slam finals), but stayed in the top ten at
#8. Her best work came at her home
tournament in the Rome 1000. She had an inspired run, taking out three seeds,
before facing Coco Gauff in the final.
She took the title to thunderous applause from home fans, her trademark
smile beaming widely, and the world seemed a better place.
Gauff was just coming off another 1000
final, in Madrid. There, she shellacked Swiatek 6-1 6-1, a shocking result to
hand to the four-time French Open champion and current Queen of Clay, but
ultimately Gauff lost that final too.
However this fine clay form did not go wasted, and Gauff then proceeded
to the final of the biggest clay tournament in the world, Roland Garros. In the
quarters she took out Madison Keys, ending any hopes of a Grand Slam in 2025,
and faced Sabalenka in the title match.
Sabalenka won the first set in a tiebreak, but Gauff settled in and won
the third 6-4. She claimed her second
slam title at just 21 years old.
After
another poor Wimbledon result, Gauff decided to retool her serve and was in
re-building mode at the US Open. By fall
she was getting back on track and took the Wuhan 1000, ending her year at #3
for a third straight time. It really
looks like we have a Big Three in women’s tennis at the moment. Sabalenka, Swiatek, and Gauff have now
cornered 12 slam titles with lots of time left to win more.
When Iga
Swiatek lost in the semi-finals of the French Open to Sabalenka, it meant a
year had passed since she had been in a tournament final. Her frustration seemed to have begun at the
Olympics last year, when she lost to Qinwen Zheng in the semis at Roland
Garros, the site of four French Open triumphs for Iga. The loss to Sabalenka ended a 26-match run at
the tournament, third longest in history.
|
French
Open Win Streak |
Matches |
Years |
|
Chris Evert |
29 |
1974-81 |
|
Suzanne Lenglen |
27 |
1914-26 |
|
Iga Swiatek |
26 |
2022-25 |
|
Monica Seles |
25 |
1990-96 |
|
Justine Henin |
24 |
2005-10 |
|
Helen Wills Moody |
24 |
1924-32 |
*Includes WHCC 1912-1923, Olympics 2024, does not
include French Closed Chps pre-1925.
To
everyone’s surprise, Swiatek ended her final-round drought on grass, at Bad
Homburg, a loss to Pegula. She then
pulled an even bigger surprise by winning, on her supposed weakest surface, the
Wimbledon title. She became the 22nd
woman in history to win at least six slam titles. Her final-round white-wash of Anisimova 6-0
6-0 was breath-taking: Iga at her
unrelenting finest. Granted Anisimova
was unbearably nervous, but Iga had the sense to keep her foot to the floor. She ended the tournament on a 20-game winning
streak, three successive 6-0 sets, unmatched in grand slam history. Like Sinner and Alcaraz, Swiatek will be
aiming to complete the career slam in 2026, seeking that final piece of
silverware for her trophy case, the Australian Open.
After
Wimbledon, the WTA hosted another week of clay tournaments, and the one in
Hamburg was won by Lois Boisson. She had made a name for herself by
making the semis of Roland Garros, beating Mirra Andreeva and Jessica Pegula
along the way. She was ranked only #361
at the time, but finishes the year at #36. Will the 22-year old continue her
rise in 2026?
The next
big tournament on the calendar was the Canada 1000. Sabalenka didn’t play, the
seeds were mostly upset, and as a result, we had two unseeded players in the
final Naomi Osaka and Victoria Mboko.
Four-time slam champ Osaka is far from unknown. She would go on to make semis at the US Open
and finished the year at #16. This is a wonderful return to form after becoming
a mother, and may promise big things ahead for Osaka in 2026.
But the
then 18-year old Mboko was a revelation.
She won seven matches in a newly expanded 96-player draw. Along the way she beat four slam champs:
Gauff, Osaka, Kenin, and Rybakina. She played three 3-setters in the tournament
– one ended in a tiebreak, but the other two were run-aways for Mboko. In
claiming her first tournament, a big 1000 no less, Mboko had sustained a wrist
injury that translated into four straight losses and an anti-climatic follow-up
to her break-through. However she seemed to have overcome the injury in October
and ended the year with a second tour-level title, the 250 in Hong Kong.
Swiatek
then continued her Wimbledon form and took the Cincinnati 1000 on hard over
Paolini.
Amanda
Anisimova was on
the losing end of Swiatek’s 6-0 6-0 victory at Wimbledon. It was hard not to feel that the match was a
massive failure for Anisimova, but Anisimova remained utterly poised during the
post-match presentation and seemed to maintain the perspective that her
tournament had been a success. Particularly notable was her 6-4 in the third
victory over Sabalenka in the semis.
She then
made another final-round run at the US Open, and faced Swiatek again, this time
in the quarter-finals. Now she was ready and did not flinch in a 6-4 6-3
victory. She then took down Naomi Osaka
in a semi that saw both women absolutely pulverizing the ball. Into another slam final, she did not fold
under the pressure but found her game to force a hard-fought 6-3 7-6(3) victory
for Sabalenka. She then won her second
1000 for the year in Beijing, adding to the 1000 in Doha she had claimed in
February. It was a banner year for
Anisimova, finishing at #4 and putting her firmly in the conversation of future
slam champions.
Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah (rank 119) is a name
unknown to almost everyone, but this then 19-year old did win a WTA 250 in Sao
Paulo in September. I’ll be keeping an
eye on her. In the same week, 17-year
old Iva Jovic won the Guadalajara 500. She’s now ranked #35 and will be
keenly followed in 2026. Other teens to watch in the top 100 are Maya Joint,
age 19, rank 32; Tereza Valentova, age 18, rank 60; and Sara Bejlek,
age 19, rank 92.
Aryna
Sabalenka’s year
was her best ever. She held on to #1 for
every week of the year, made nine finals, won 63 matches, and had a tour-best
win:loss rate, 5.25 wins per loss (Swiatek was second at 3.77). Although she won the 1000’s at Miami and
Madrid, she entered the US Open having lost in the finals of the Australian,
French, and Indian Wells. Notably, she
had beaten Swiatek 6-0 in the third at the French, ending Swiatek’s attempted
four-peat. But she saved herself from being a lame-duck slamless #1 by marching
to the US title, losing only one set.
She was a factor in nearly every tournament she played and finally felt,
throughout the year, like a #1, the best player on tour, no longer
second-fiddle to Swiatek.
The final
tournament of the year saw the resurgence of Elena Rybakina. She began
the year amid a storm of controversy around her coach, Stefano Vukov, who was
temporarily suspended by the tour amid allegations of abuse. Rybakina objected, however, and he was
re-instated mid-year. After 116 straight
weeks in the top ten, her ranking dropped to 11 in mid-April. It seemed to be the spur she needed as she
then won the 500 in Strasbourg. After a decent but unspectacular summer, she
surfaced again by taking the 500 in Ningbo in October. She then showed she was at her best by taking
the tour finals, beating five top players to do so. She finishes the year at #5 and will be in
the conversation for every major she plays in 2026.
Prognostications
Australian Open
Naomi Osaka
showed a mighty resurgence in 2025.
She’s a two-time winner of the Australian Open and showed good form at
this year’s US Open. Add that to her
combined 5-5 win-loss record against the big three of Sabalenka, Swiatek, and
Gauff, and she could be a real contender for the title. But paint me skeptical. She hasn’t shown a lot of consistency in her
return to tour.
Aryna
Sabalenka has been in the last three AO finals, winning twice and so is my
default pick for the title. After that it’s very tight between Anisimova,
Rybakina, and Swiatek. Anisimova has
come oh so close, and still has the itch to scratch of a first slam title. She will be hungry. Rybakina was playing lights out at the end of
the season, and should still be able to find some of that form. Swiatek will be motivated by achieving the
career slam. Swiatek can play at a very
high level, and at her best, I would take her over the field. However, increasingly she is beset by doubts
and it seems that over-thinking gets in the way of her free-flowing best.
Pegula is
not to be underestimated. She often
lives up to her seeding, and if things break her way, could go all the
way. I’ll take her fifth ahead of Osaka,
Gauff, and Paolini.
|
2026 Charles AO prediction |
2026 Bookies odds |
|
1 Sabalenka |
1 Sabalenka |
|
2 Anisimova |
2 Swiatek |
|
3 Rybakina |
3 Gauff |
|
4 Swiatek |
4 Rybakina |
|
5 Pegula |
5 Anisimova |
|
6 Osaka |
6 MAndreeva |
|
7 Gauff |
7 Osaka |
|
8 Paolini |
8 Keys |
|
9 MAndreeva |
9 QZheng |
|
10 Muchova |
10 Muchova |
|
11 Keys |
11 Pegula |
|
12 Mboko |
12 Mboko |
French Open
I still
believe Swiatek is the best current clay player, especially at Roland
Garros. But she is anything but clutch
and seems to psyche herself out of matches through over-intensity. Reigning
champion Gauff would be my second choice for the title, and Sabalenka
third. Sabalenka beat Swiatek last year
and took Gauff to three sets, so a title looks eminently possible. Positions four through eight are almost a
toss-up. Paolini’s game seems to work
best on the dirt. Mirra Andreeva has her best results here, quarters and semis
the last two years. Olympic champion Qinwen Zheng claimed her gold at this
site. Elena Rybakina has won a number of big titles on clay, and Amanda
Asinimova made her first grand slam break through by making the semis here
in 2019.
|
2026 Charles FO prediction |
2026 Bookies odds |
|
1 Swiatek |
1 Swiatek |
|
2 Gauff |
2 Sabalenka |
|
3 Sabalenka |
3 Gauff |
|
4 Paolini |
4 MAndreeva |
|
5 MAndreeva |
5 QZheng |
|
6 QZheng |
6 Rybakina |
|
7 Rybakina |
7 Keys |
|
8 Anisimova |
8 Paolinia |
|
9 Muchova |
9 Anisimova |
|
10 Krejcikova |
10 Svitolina |
|
11 Pegula |
11 Muchova |
|
12 Svitolina |
12 Badosa |
Wimbledon
None of the
current crop of players have a very convincing record at Wimbledon. The last player to win more than one
Wimbledon was Serena Williams. We’ve had
nine different champions in the last nine years and only four of them are
still playing. The best match records
there in the last five years belong to Rybakina, 21-4, Swiatek 18-4, Sabalenka
15-3, and Krejcikova 15-4. Swiatek may be my first choice because once
she figures out how to win somewhere, she likes to make a habit of it. Rybakina seems to be the choice of most
pundits: her late season form has encouraged optimism on her behalf. Next it comes down to Anisimova or Sabalenka. Anisimova’s pure strokes function well on low-bouncing
grass and her nerves in the final last year stopped her from reaching her full
potential. Sabalenka has three times
been a semi-finalist, and her continual improvement to all parts of her game
means she increasingly has no weaknesses.
|
2026 Charles Wim prediction |
2026 Bookies odds |
|
1 Swiatek |
1 Sabalenka |
|
2 Rybakina |
2 Swiatek |
|
3 Anisimova |
3 Gauff |
|
4 SAbalenka |
4 Rybakina |
|
5 Paolini |
5 Anisimova |
|
6 Krejcikova |
6 MAndreeva |
|
7 Muchova |
7 Keys |
|
8 MAndreeva |
8 QZheng |
|
9 Pegula |
9 Vondrousova |
|
10 Gauff |
10 Paolini |
|
11 Vondrousova |
11 Bencic |
|
12 Navarro |
12 Samsonova |
US Open
At the US
Open, two-time defending champ Sabalenka has my vote as favourite. I’ll take
Anisimova’s clean strokes ahead of Gauff’s superior movement. However if Gauff can clean up her serve and
forehand she could well jump to favourite status. Naomi Osaka seems to love the Open, and
former champ Swiatek can’t be ruled out, either. Pegula has had her best slam
results in New York. And while Rybakina most certainly has not had good results
there, she did finally make the second week last year and her power and poise
mean she can never be counted out. Karolina Muchova rounds out my top eight for
the US Open, she’s 14-3 there in the last three years.
|
2026 Charles USO prediction |
2026 Bookies odds |
|
1 Sabalenka |
1 Sabalenka |
|
2 Anisimova |
2 Swiatek |
|
3 Gauff |
3 Gauff |
|
4 Osaka |
4 MAndreeva |
|
5 Swiatek |
5 Rybakina |
|
6 Pegula |
6 Anisimova |
|
7 Rybakina |
7 Osaka |
|
8 Muchova |
8 QZheng |
|
9 Paolini |
9 Pegula |
|
10 Navarro |
10 Keys |
|
11 Mboko |
11 Krejcikova |
|
12 Keys |
12 Muchova |
Yearend Rankings
At the end
of 2024 I made predictions for 2025, as follows:
|
2024 prediction |
2025
Actual |
|
1 Gauff |
3 |
|
2 Swiatek |
2 |
|
3 Sabalenka |
1 |
|
4 QZheng |
24 |
|
5 Rybakina |
5 |
|
6 Paolini |
8 |
|
7 Muchova |
19 |
|
8 Navarro |
15 |
|
9 Shnaider |
21 |
|
10 Pegula |
6 |
I got six
of my top ten actually making it there: which is fairly decent. The other four
finished no worse than 24, so I don’t feel too bad, although I was pretty far
out on Zheng.
Looking at
the actual top ten for 2025, what predictions had I made for them?
|
2025 Actual |
2024
prediction |
|
1 Sabalenka |
3 |
|
2 Swiatek |
2 |
|
3 Gauff |
1 |
|
4 Anisimova |
31 |
|
5 Rybakina |
5 |
|
6 Pegula |
10 |
|
7 Keys |
23 |
|
8 Paolini |
6 |
|
9 MAndreeva |
12 |
|
10 Alexandrova |
>35 |
The climbs
of Anisimova and Alexandrova surprised me in 2025. Nor did I foresee Madison Keys finally
fulfilling her potential. But Anisimova is probably the biggest revelation of
the year. Claiming a slam title in 2026
would not really be a surprise, even if I haven’t predicted it, above.
Predictions
for 2026
Putting it
all together and thinking about what the tour outside of the slams might bring,
here are my top ten predictions for 2026.
|
2026 prediction |
Current
Rank |
|
1 Sabalenka |
1 |
|
2 Swiatek |
2 |
|
3 Gauff |
3 |
|
4 Rybakina |
5 |
|
5 Anisimova |
4 |
|
6 Pegula |
6 |
|
7 Paolini |
8 |
|
8 MAndreeva |
9 |
|
9 Osaka |
16 |
|
10 Mboko |
18 |
This is a
fairly conservative prediction: eight of my predicted top ten are already in the
current top ten. It’s possible that
Osaka will not live up to the promise she was showing in her US Open form, and
it’s very possible Mboko will drop a little after such a spectacular
break-through in 2025.
My 11-20 predictions
are: Bencic, QZheng, Alexandrova, Tauson, Navarro, Muchova, Noskova, Svitolina,
Keys, Krejcikova. For 21-30 I have:
Shnaider, Ostapenko, Samsonova, Kenin, Haddad Maia, Vondrousova, VKudermetova,
Kostyuk, Badosa, LFernandez.
It’s all
highly speculative, especially the deeper I go.
It would be nice to see some new faces breaking into these upper tiers,
like Valentova, Jovic, Joint, and Boisson.
Final
Thoughts
Aryna
Sabalenka seemed to get better this year.
She didn’t have the lapses she did in previous years. She’s improved her fitness and variety. She’s not quite Sinner-like, but she puts
tremendous pressure on her opponents to bring their best, and if they don’t,
she hits them off the court. I don’t see
this dominance changing much in 2026.
Coco Gauff has tremendous upside with her athleticism, if she can make
some technical changes to her strokes she should soar. Anisimova is my pick for
a new slam winner, if there is one, with Andreeva second in that category. And
I’m tremendously curious about what Rybakina and Mboko can do in the coming
year. I’m looking forward to it all with
excitement.
Comments
Post a Comment