Skip to main content

French 2013 - Women's Preview

French 2013 – Women’s Preview
Serena Williams was the overwhelming pick last year at this time for the French title.  She’d won 17 matches in a row on clay and had stated she ‘wanted’ the French.  Then she lost in the first round.  Things look remarkably similar this year.  Except that last year is history and maybe she will have learned from that to control her nerves better.  Can that be learned?  An in form Serena has to be a clear favourite.  If she should falter, Sharapova or Azarenka, ranked 2 and 3 in the world are the next most likely picks. 
The women have crowned a different French champion each of the last 6 years – since Justine Henin’s third straight in 2007.  Any of SWilliams, Azarenka, Errani, Stosur, or Kvitova could extend that run to 7 years.  They are 5 of the top 7 bookies picks.  Only four times in grand slam history have 7 or more different women won the title at a major consecutively:  French 1997-2004, Aus 1977-1982, French 1954-1963, Wim 1936-1948.  I’d say the odds are good we will have a fifth.  Henin can definitely be ruled out.  Ivanovic, Kuznetsova, and Schiavone look highly unlikely to repeat.  That leaves the last two champions, Li and Sharapova, who each have a reasonable chance.  Can they do it?

First Quarter
Serena Williams was predicted to win the Australian Open by 15 of 20 tennis insiders at ESPN, Sports Illustrated, and Tennis magazine as that tournament dawned.  The three who got it right and predicted Azarenka were Ubha, Graham, and Tignor.  This time all 17 analysts who have weighed in have predicted Serena – a complete sweep among the cognoscenti.  Will she prove them sage?
She last won here in 2002 and hasn’t been past the quarters in 10 years, losing four times at that stage.  Her draw does not look likely to cause any trepidation early on.  Either Pavlyuchenkova (seeded 19) or Roberta Vinci (15) would have to have a very good day to threaten her in the fourth round, with A-Pavs the more likely – with that big game of hers.
Caroline Wozniacki (10) and Laura Robson play a stand-out first rounder in the opposing eighth.  The former #1 has been slumping badly this spring.  Although she made the final in Indian Wells (to Sharapova), she has lost 5 straight matches on clay.  Robson on the other hand, has been on the ascendance and has achieved a career-high rank of 35, narrowly missing a seeding.  It should be a battle and I hedge towards Robson. 
Another interesting first rounder is between Angelique Kerber (8) and Mona Barthel.  Barthel is clearly talented and we keep waiting for her, Gulbis-like, to break out.  Also here is Svetlana Kuznetsova opening against Makarova (22).  The 2009 champion is unpredictable and a deep run is always possible.  She’s shown signs of life this year but not enough to put her in the conversation.  Regardless, the most likely winner of this section is Kerber.
SWilliams d. Kerber

Second Quarter
Agnieszka Radwanska (4) heads this section.  She started the year on a 13 match win streak, but has fizzled a little since.  She has been especially dismal on clay 1-2, and has never been past 4R here.  This opens up her eighth considerably. 
Venus Williams (30) has been to the QF or better 5 times and has a good chance to usurp A-Rad’s spot in the third round.  That could pit her against a resurgent Ana Ivanovic (14) in round 4.  Ivanovic has not quite found the form that took her to the title here in 2008, but a strong showing here could restore a lot of confidence. 
The other half has Sara Errani (5) as the highest seed.  Errani has impressed me with her solid play over the last year and her runner-up showing at last year’s tournament is not nearly so surprising now has it seemed then.
The first-rounder between Simona Halep (SF in Rome) and Carla Suarez Navarro should be high quality.  The winner could potentially meet Nadia Petrova (11), always formidable on clay, or Madison Keys in 3R.  The 18-year old Keys is a player I’m watching closely this year.
Errani d. Ivanovic

Third Quarter
The name looming largest in this section is third seed and recently deposed #1, Victoria Azarenka.  She’s only lost twice this year, although the shellacking she took at Serena’s hands in the Rome final, 1 and 3, shows a large gap to the current #1 – at least on clay.  She looks to have a fairly clear trip to the quarters.
The other eighth is topped by former champion Li Na (6).  Li is unpredictable.  She can be devastatingly good when she’s on – one of the few players that could challenge an in-form Serena or make Sharapova look ordinary.  Li has a reasonably tough opener in Annabel Medina Garrigues, a solid clay player who could exploit a streaky opponent.  The highly gifted Yaroslava Shvedova (27) could also prove problematic in the third round.
If it comes down to an Azarenka-Li quarter-final, Li is certainly capable of blasting her way through.  But overall, Azarenka, despite never making it past the quarters here, seems the more reliable pick.
Azarenka d. Li

Fourth Quarter
The bottom half of this quarter looks to be relatively smooth sailing for Maria Sharapova (2).  Seeds Paszek (28), Stephens (17), and Cibulkova (16) should not trouble her.  Cibulkova did make the semis here in 2009 but has not posted much for results this spring.
Sloane Stephens is a bit of a wild card.  She’s been in a predictable slump since her breakthrough Serena-defeating semi run in Australia.  I’m not sure she’s ready to surprise us again.  Even a match or two won would help to restore confidence at this point and that’s probably all we can ask.
The other half is more interesting.  Petra Kvitova (7) and Samantha Stosur (9) bracket it with a surging Jelena Jankovic (18) in the middle.  Pretty much anything is possible from Kvitova – brilliant shots, clunkers, anguish – and that’s all in one point.  The roller coaster is fun to ride, hopefully the ride lasts for a few rounds.  Three-time semi-finalist Stosur is probably the safe pick to make the quarters, but Jankovic in 3R could prove testy.
Maybe last year’s Wimbledon sensation Camila Giorgi (won 6 matches from qualifying to make the fourth round) will prove that was not a fluke.
Sharapova d. Stosur

Semis
I sincerely expect that only maybe 2 of my four picks for the semis will make it that far, but proceeding heedlessly...
Errani simply doesn’t have the weapons to challenge Serena.  If Serena makes it this far she will have had her head on straight and her game firing.
SWilliams d. Errani
A contest between Sharapova and Azarenka could be very interesting for determining who is the real #2...  I’d say there’s a reasonable chance Azarenka won’t make the semis, having run into a patchy stretch in her own play, or withdrawing in a fit of injury or pique.  If she does make it to the semis, she’ll be ready to fight.
Sharapova has the better clay court pedigree with the French title and two Italians under her belt (not to mention two in Stuttgart).  But Azarenka may be the tougher player with more weapons and more variety in her game.  It’s probably more likely that Sharapova gets further, but if they face off I’d put my money on Azarenka.
Azarenka d. Sharapova


Final
Azarenka should fight gamely but it’s not likely to be enough.
SWilliams d. Azarenka
If Serena can claim her second Roland Garros crown she becomes one of only five women to win all the majors at least twice, joining Navratilova and Evert (at least two of each), Court (three), and Graf (four).  She would be as old as Court, Evert, and Billie Jean King when they won their last major, but still two years younger than Navratilova, and one younger than Helen Wills.  
Her 16th major will put her deep in the conversation for greatest ever.  Considering the depth in today’s tennis, and her continuing dominance of the field, she may well be deserving of that laurel.

Bookies
Average decimal odds from bookies.com on 25 May 2013

Player
Odds
1
Williams, S
1.86
2
Sharapova, M
5.39
3
Azarenka, V
7.71
4
Li, N
13.19
5
Errani, S
23.38
6
Stosur, S
26.50
7
Kvitova, P
40.19
8
Ivanovic, A
69.75
9
Radwanska, A
69.81
10
Kuznetsova, S
95.94
11
Kerber, A
100.38
12
Jankovic, J
101.56
13
Kanepi, K
145.75
14
Wozniacki, C
150.38
15
Stephens, S
166.06
16
Pavlyuchenkova, A
169.44
17
Lisicki, S
190.75
18
Schiavone, F
197.50
19
Robson, L
199.00
20
Vinci, R
207.14
21
Shvedova, Y
211.43
22
Barthel, M
222.47
23
Cibulkova, D
223.40
24
Kirilenko, M
224.19


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open