Skip to main content

Australian Open Men 2017 – Preview

Australian Open Men 2017 – Preview

Novak Djokovic has won this title six times.  Andy Murray has been in the final five times without a win.  Federer and Nadal are both returning from injury.  Del Potro is out with injury, and Wawrinka is at his customary #4 in the world.  Djokovic slumped at the end of last year, allowing Murray to claim the yearend #1 spot.  But Novak beat Andy in the final of Doha last week.  Is Djokovic ‘back’ or is Murray still the ‘real’ #1?  Brad Gilbert says he would be shocked if one of these two doesn’t win, but which is the favourite?  The bookies have them at dead even odds.

First Quarter

Murray gets the #1 seed at a slam tournament for the first time in his career.  His first few rounds look pretty tame.  Seventeen-year-old Alex De Minaur won a round this week in Sydney and is nearby in the draw, but is of interest likely to only true geeks of the sport.  Sam Querrey (seeded #31) lurks as potential foil for Murray in the third round (3R), the same round that Querrey used to oust Djokovic at last year’s Wimbledon.  John Isner (19) and his big serve should never be overlooked, and he could face Lucas Pouille (16) in 3R.  Pouille made the quarter-finals (QF) of the last two slams he played, so must be considered dangerous, even if his results have been rather middling since then.  Their winner might face Murray in the fourth.

The lower half of this quarter is extremely interesting with the names of Kei Nishikori (5) and the redoubtable Roger Federer, seeded at a shocking #17 – Federer’s lowest seeding for a decade and a half.  The mighty Fed hasn’t played in half a year and watched his ranking plummet during that time.  He has had relatively bad luck to end up with two top 5 players in his quarter, three from the top 10.  Although his first few rounds look to be relatively easy and he can face no higher than a qualifier until 3R, that first round qualifier is Jurgen Melzer who won their last match (albeit in 2011) and has been ranked as high as #8.

In round 3, Fed could face Tomas Berdych (10).  Roger has mostly owned Berdych, even if Tomas has six wins over him.  Nothing should be taken for granted and Berdych has been strongest at the Aus Open, making at least the QF here for the last six years, twice in the SF.  On the other hand, Federer has been in the semis or better for all but one of the last 13 years.  I give a slight edge to Roger, although it is far from certain.

The fourth round (4R) could pit Federer/Berdych against Nishikori.  Kei has been in the QF here three times, but never higher.  That match is pretty much a toss-up among any of these three players.  I might give an edge to a match-tough Federer over Nishikori, but after such a long layoff for Roger, I think a healthy Nishikori should be slightly favoured.  Is Nishikori healthy?  The winner of this adder’s nest will likely have the ‘privilege’ of facing Murray.  It’s a tough quarter and heavy-sledding all around.

Murray d. Federer

Second Quarter

Major winners Stan Wawrinka (4) and Marin Cilic (7) are the top seeds in the second quarter.  Wawrinka’s first match against Martin Klizan is far from a ‘gimme’, and likewise is his 2R against either Federico Delbonis or Steve Johnson (the highest-ranked unseeded man in the draw).  Should Stan survive, he could face semi-finalist in Sydney this week, Victor Troicki (29) in the third.  Next up could come a very challenging match in 4R against Nick Kyrgios (14).  Kyrgios is massively talented, aged 21, and has history with Wawrinka.  Two years ago in Canada, Nick said nasty things to Stan about Stan’s girlfriend on a changeover and it was caught by the courtside microphone.  A debacle and fine ensued.  Their head-to-head is tied at 2-2.  Wawrinka probably has more depth and maturity in both his head and his game, but Kyrgios’ talent is undeniable.  It looks to be a challenging ride to the QF.

The lower half of this quarter features Cilic (7) potentially against Bernard Tomic (27) in 3R, and Jack Sock (23) possibly against Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (12) in the other third rounder.  All are about equally dangerous here by my estimation.  Normally I would place Tomic a fair bit behind the other three, but he has generally thriven at his home slam, making 4R three times.  Tsonga, finalist here in 2008, has not looked particularly up-to-snuff of late, but generally raises his game for slams.  Sock made only 2R in both previous times he played here, but has been on a bit of a roll and is into the Auckland final this week.  And while Cilic has done little at the AO in the last few years, he was in the SF in 2010 and holds a US Open title from 2014.  Just slightly I favour Tsonga of this group.

Wawrinka d. Tsonga

Third Quarter

This quarter is chock full of rising young talents like Coric, Tiafoe, Nishioka, Medvedev, Escobedo, Jasika, Mmoh, Donaldson, Fritz, and Alexander Zverev (24).  It would seemingly defy the odds if one of them didn’t get to at least the third round.  Zverev is surely the most likely to live up to his seeding and do so.  His opponent there could be Rafael Nadal (9).  Nadal has struggled mightily the last two years, especially at the slams, but everything about his game suggests that he is still capable of a very deep run here.  Will he be able to stay focussed and make smart shots? 

Getting past 3R might be tougher than what lies ahead in the fourth where Nadal is seeded to meet either streaky Philipp Kohlschreiber (32) or terminally inconsistent Gael Monfils (6) fresh off his most consistent year.

Milos Raonic (3) is the highest seed in the third quarter and faces tricky Dustin Brown in the first round.  Overall it could be fairly smooth sailing for the Canadian, until he runs into Roberto Bautista-Agut (13) in the fourth.

It will probably come down to Nadal or AZverev for the right to face Raonic…  although another consistent run from Monfils is not impossible.  After all he did make the QF here last here.

Raonic d. AZverev

Fourth Quarter

It’s strange to see Djokovic (2) at the bottom of a draw and not in the top drawer where we’ve grown accustomed to his name over most of the last five years.  His first rounder could be a very exciting tussle with Fernando Verdasco, who took Nadal out of the first round here last year in a display of shot-making prowess rarely seen.  Verdasco made the semis here in 2009, losing deep into the night in five very close sets to Nadal.  Novak will not be thrilled for this tough opener, but will surely be worked into a fever of psychological readiness.  I expect he will crush Fernando.

After that there should be little to trouble Novak until Round 4 where he could meet Grigor Dimitrov (15) or Richard Gasquet (18).  Of these two, Gasquet surely has the better long term record, but whereas he is on the way down (it seems), Dimitrov is rapidly regaining lost ground.  Last week in Brisbane, Dimitrov took out Johnson, Thiem, Raonic, and Nishikori in an impressive run to the title.  Again Djokovic should be on high alert.  It could be a real test of Djokovic’s resolve, but if he’s concentrating, he should pull through.

The other portion of this quarter is led by Dominic Thiem (8) and David Goffin (11).  Thiem had (another) breakout year last year, settling into the top 10, but has wallowed over the last six months.  Nearby, 38-year old Tommy Haas returns, and could face 35-year old Feliciano Lopez (28) in the second.  And 37-year old Ivo Karlovic (20) is also in this section.  Karlovic’s likely 3R would be against Goffin.  It’s a rather fluffy eighth that would be a golden opportunity for an in-form Thiem.  But I think Goffin is more likely to take advantage.

Djokovic d. Goffin

Semi-finals

Murray and Wawrinka have a head-to-head of 10-7 in favour of Murray.  That’s pretty close.  On hard courts they are 8-5 for Murray.  At slams they are 3-2 for Murray.  There is little to choose between them.  Based on recent form, I think it more likely Murray will get this far, making it to his sixth final.

Murray d. Wawrinka

A match between the #2 and #3 players might seem tough to call, but Djokovic has more than double Raonic’s total of ATP points.  He also owns an 8-0 h2h over the Canadian, not to mention 12 slam titles.  But Raonic is determined, and his consistent path of improvement over the last five years means no one is taking him for granted.  If Djokovic is in a funky head space, this could go either way.  But recent signs from last week’s Doha tournament were very positive for Novak.

Djokovic d. Raonic

Final

Given Djokovic's six titles and Murray's five runner-ups, the choice would seem clear were it not for Novak’s shaky play over the last half year, and the rock solid dependability of Murray.  But when they are facing each other on the big stage, all the gains of the recent past may fade away, and I expect that Murray will remember his many losses here in the final, four of them to Djokovic, and history will repeat itself.  I dearly hope that I am wrong.

Djokovic d. Murray

The draw is here.

Odds from bet365.com on 12 Jan 2017


1
Djokovic
2.62
2
Murray
2.62
3
Wawrinka
13
4
Nadal
15
5
Raonic
17
6
Federer
21
7
Nishikori
26
8
Kyrgios
34
9
Dimitrov
34
10
Cilic
51
11
Tsonga
67
12
AZverev
67
13
Berdych
81
14
Thiem
81
15
Ferrer
126
16
Monfils
126
17
Isner
151
18
Gasquet
151
19
Sock
151
20
Goffin
151
21
Bautista-Agut
151
22
Simon
201
23
Troicki
251
24
FLopez
301
25
Dolgopolov
301
26
Paire
301
27
Fognini
301
28
Verdasco
301
29
Donaldson
301
30
Brown
751
31
De Minaur
1001
32
Escobedo
1001


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open