Skip to main content

Australian Open Women 2017 – Preview

Australian Open Women 2017 – Preview

Sharapova is out on a drug suspension, Kvitova is recovering from a knife attack, Azarenka is off being a mother, Keys is out with an injury, a bunch of recent slam winners have retired (Pennetta, Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, even Ivanovic), in fact only one other former champion will play in Australia – is there any chance Serena Williams will NOT win this Australian Open?

The best bets to deny Serena the title are probably last year’s defending champ Angelique Kerber, US Open runner up Karolina Pliskova, last year’s French Open champ Garbine Muguruza, world #3 Aggie Radwanska, #4 Simona Halep, Yearend Championship winner Dominika Cibulkova, or last year’s semi-finalist here #10 Johanna Konta.

First Quarter

The #1 seed is last year’s champ, Angelique Kerber.  She’s got a forgettable 1-2 (win-loss) record this year, but that might be all she needs as a warm up to defending her first major title.  Her first round opponent, Lesia Tsurenko, is no slouch, featuring in the semi-final (SF) of Hobart this week.  In the third, Krystina Pliskova (twin of world #5, Karolina) or Shvedova could be dangerous.  Things only get tougher from there, with dangerous young 19-year old Daria Kasatkina (#23 seed) or maybe a revitalized Eugenie Bouchard in the fourth.

In the lower section of this quarter, Garbine Muguruza (7) could have a straight-forward run to the fourth round, where she is seeded to meet Carla Suarez Navarro (10).  The head to head between these Spaniards is 1-1, so anything is possible.  The winner could give Kerber an almighty tussle, the head-to-heads favour Muguruza 4-3 and Kerber over CSN 5-3.  Muguruza has been in questionable form since her Roland Garros triumph in June, but has looked much sharper already this year.  CSN has never been past the quarters of a major.  I think Kerber might get nervous and her early rounds look dangerous.

Muguruza d. Kasatkina

Second Quarter

The highest seeds here are Simona Halep (4) and Svetlana Kuznetsova (8).  Kuznetsova ended last year strongly and used to be a good player.  She finished in third round or better at Melbourne Park for 10 straight years, ending in 2013.  In the last three years, she’s won only one match here.  Halep has been to the quarters twice here, and a deep run would surprise no one.  Nor would a first round exit, like in 2016 and 2013.  In short this section is wide open.

Taking advantage could be Venus Williams (13) who made the quarters here in 2015 and the Wimbledon semis last year – putting to bed any doubts she can still rise up for the big occasion at age 36.  Also here is Monica Puig (29), Olympic gold medalist, a possible third round opponent for Halep.  Halep’s opener against Shelby Rogers could be tricky, but if she gets through, I’d favour her to win a 4R encounter with Venus.

Kuznetsova could face last week’s Shenzhen winner, Katerina Siniakova, in the third round, and possibly Elina Svitolina in the fourth.  I consider Svitolina an extremely dangerous player.  She’s already notched a win over #1 Kerber this year, adding to last year’s collection of scalps from all of 2016’s slam winners:  Kerber, Muguruza, and most surprisingly, Serena, whom she took out of the Olympics.

Svitolina d. Halep

Third Quarter

Perennial top-fiver, Aggie Radwanska (3), leads this quarter and faces dangerous Pironkova (a former Wimbledon semi-finalist) in the first round.  The third round could bring up wildly unpredictable Alize Cornet (28) for Aggie, and the fourth could pit her against former US Open winner Samantha Stosur (18), now 32 years old, or streaky Elena Vesnina (14) who made the semis of Wimbledon in 2016.  Radwanska is always reasonably solid and has been in the semis here two of the last three years.  But she is vulnerable to big-hitters who can blast through her stylish collection of spins, impossible gets, and weird angles.

The other half of this quarter is head-lined by US Open runner-up Karolina Pliskova (5) who just took the title in Brisbane, beating Svitolina and Cornet in the last two rounds.  Dangerous 19-year old Jelena Ostapenko could meet Pliskova in the third round.  The fourth could bring up another 19-year old, Ana Konjuh, who is the highest ranked player not to be seeded in this draw.  Daria Gavrilova (22) and Timea Bacsinszky (12) are other possible fourth-rounders for Pliskova.  I expect Pliskova to mow down the competition with her smooth and powerful stroking.  She will have her hands full however, overcoming a 0-7 deficit in head to head with Radwanska.

KaPliskova d ARadwanska

Fourth Quarter

Here at last is the reigning Doyenne of tennis, 22-time slam champion Serena Williams (2), relegated ignominiously to the bottom of the draw.  Serena has a potentially tricky opening against yet another dangerous 19-year old, Belinda Bencic, who beat her two years ago in Canada.  The second round might feature Lucie Safarova, French Open runner-up to Serena in 2015.  Caroline Garcia (21) and Barbora Strycova (16) are potential fourth round opponents for the mighty queen.

The top half of this section is anchored by Dominika Cibulkova (6) who was a finalist here in 2014, won the season-ending Championships in 2016, but who has looked shaky this year.  In women’s tennis, recent form can mean almost nothing, so I’m not sure what to make of Cibulkova’s chances.  Her opener against Denisa Allertova is a landmine, and a possible 3R against Ekaterina Makarova who has been to the round of 16 or better here for the last six years, including a SF showing and a defeat of Serena, is far from straight forward.

If that wasn’t enough, last year’s semifinalist, Johanna Konta (9), and two-time US Open runner-up, Caroline Wozniacki (17) also feature in this section of the draw.  Throw in yet another dangerous 19-year old in Naomi Osaka, and it’s a real hornet’s nest.  Konta has been in good form in the two weeks that contribute to this year, but it would be hard to bet against a confident Cibulkova.

Serena Williams d. Konta

Semi-finals

I’m not at all confident in my first quarter prediction naming Muguruza to the semi, and could easily see Kerber finding a way through.  The top half looks quite open to me, and Svitolina is far from a sure bet for the second quarter.  But I have to pick someone so it will be inexperience over inconsistency.

Svitolina d. Muguruza

At the US Open, Pliskova stunned Serena in the semis to make her first slam final.  Serena rarely loses to the same person twice in a row, but such is Pliskova’s prowess that I think it a possibility.  Serena will have on her side the experience of having been in this situation so many times before, plus I’m counting on a bloodlust for revenge.

SWilliams d. KaPliskova

Final

I think Serena must be the favourite to claim a 23rd slam singles title, but seeing a newcomer like Svitolina or Pliskova rise up for their first would not be a surprise, especially since that happened twice last year.

SWilliams d. Svitolina

The draw is here.

Odds from bet365.com on 12 Jan 2017

1
SWilliams
4.00
2
Kerber
4.50
3
KaPliskova
8
4
Muguruza
11
5
Halep
11
6
ARadwanska
21
7
Cibulkova
26
8
Wozniacki
26
9
Konta
26
10
Svitolina
34
11
Bouchard
41
12
Bencic
51
13
Kasatkina
51
14
Safarova
67
15
Osaka
67
16
Kuznetsova
67
17
Puig
81
18
VWilliams
81
19
Makarova
101
20
Garcia
101
21
Stosur
101
22
Ostapenko
101
23
Bertens
126
24
Siniakova
126
25
Konjuh
126
26
Mladenovic
151
27
SuarezNavarro
151
28
Gavrilova
151
29
Pavlyuchenkova
151
30
Vandeweghe
151
31
Giorgi
151
32
SZhang
151



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open