Skip to main content

Aus Open 2020 – Men’s Draw Preview


Aus Open 2020 – Men’s Draw Preview

Charles Friesen
18 Jan 2020

Will someone other than the Big Three of Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic rise up and claim this Australian Open?  The Big Three have won the last 12 slams and 51 of the last 59.  That’s 15 years of dominance.  They have been interrupted on the slam podium only by Andy Murray, Stan Wawrinka, Juan Martin Del Potro, and Marin Cilic, all of whom are in there 30’s now.  Can someone born in the 1990’s or later win a slam? 

The signals of last year are positive.  Thiem, Tsitsipas, Zverev, and Medvedev have multiple wins over the Big Three and are entrenched in the top ten.  Berrettini, Shapovalov, and Rublev are making strong headway; and there are teenagers on the horizon like Auger-Aliassime and Jannik Sinner.  With the draws released, how did the chips fall?  Who is likely to win some matches, go deep, or contend for the title?

First Quarter
Rafael Nadal is the top seed and his first few rounds look unthreatening.  But he could face Nick Kyrgios (seeded 23) in the fourth round.  Kyrgios is a top-level talent who sports three wins over Nadal and knows how to get under Rafa’s skin.  To get there, Kyrgios may have to get through Karen Khachanov (16).  Khachanov was Kyrgios’ opponent in Nick’s record-setting meltdown in Cincinnati that netted him $113,000 in fines.  Khachanov is a much less-threatening 0-7 versus Nadal.  If Kyrgios can somehow get there, a meeting with Nadal would be a toss-up and must-see viewing.

Also in this quarter are Gael Monfils (10), Felix Auger-Aliassime (20), former slam finalist Kevin Anderson, and #5 seed, Dominic Thiem.  F-double-A has looked mostly lost in the last six months, although he did just win two rounds in Adelaide.   Monfils arrives in unknown form, but his depth of ability means he can never be discounted.  Anderson is on the road back after missing the last half of 2019.  His draw is not great but he could be a thorn for Thiem.

Thiem had a stellar 2019 that saw him claim 5 titles and runners-up at Roland Garros and the Tour Finals.  He has four wins over Nadal, all on clay, where they have met 12 times.  Their lone hard court meeting was a 7-6 in the fifth affair at the US Open in 2018.  Thiem has not typically been strong at this time of year so I give Nadal the edge, but if Thiem finds his range, it could be a blockbuster.

Nadal d. Thiem

Second Quarter
With a strong showing at the ATP Cup, Daniil Medvedev just pipped Thiem for the #4 seeding. Medvedev had a spectacular six-tournament run after Wimbledon of always making the final round.  It netted him three titles, and a trip to the US Open final where he went down in a hard-fought five-setter to Nadal.  Then he ended the year with four straight losses.  But he’s been righting the ship and only Djokovic could stop him in Sydney. His draw could get tricky with Tsonga (28) in the third round, and Isner (19) or Wawrinka (15) in the fourth.  On the youth side, Kecmanovic, Tiafoe, and Popyrin are nearby, but I expect the veterans to prevail.

The next highest seed in this quarter is Alexander Zverev (7). Zverev is often poo-pooed as under-performing at the slams, but he actually has a better slam match-winning record than Tsitsipas, Medvedev, Berrettini, Shapovalov, or Rublev. Regardless, his three straight losses to fellow young guns at the ATP Cup were not encouraging.

Meanwhile, Andrey Rublev (17) has already won two 250 tournaments this year.  Can he sustain this high level?  His draws in those wins were not very tough.  He could run into David Goffin (11) in round three.  Goffin had a solid six months to end 2019 and just upset Nadal at the ATP Cup.  He will be a challenge for anyone.

DMedvedev d. Goffin

Third Quarter
This is Federer’s (3) quarter and the next highest seed here is Matteo Berrettini (8).  Also here is 21-year old Ugo Humbert who just claimed the title in Auckland with impressive wins over Shapovalov, Isner, and Paire.  Denis Shapovalov (13) has jumped a level in the last six months and is knocking on the door of the top ten.  He could meet Jannik Sinner, the 18-year old sensation from Italy, in round two; or Grigor Dimitrov (18) in the third.  Dimitrov is on the rise again, after troughing in the first half of 2019.  Federer should surpass all these to face Berrettini in the quarter-finals.  The hard-hitting Berrettini is in a soft section with Fognini (12), Pella (22), and Coric (23) as seeds.

Federer d. Berrettini

Fourth Quarter
Here resides the inimitable Novak Djokovic (2), seven-time and defending champion.  The first seed he could meet, Daniel Evans (30), has been steadily climbing in the last year and has already beaten De Minaur and Goffin this month.  But a greater challenge awaits in a likely showdown with Roberto Bautista Agut (9) or Stefanos Tsitsipas (6) in the quarters.  The two met last year in the quarters, a tense four-setter that ended in a tie-breaker for Tsitsipas.  Both players have jumped significantly in the rankings since then.  Bautista Agut just rattled off six straight victories at the ATP Cup, and although it was mostly second tier competition, his list of scalps included the talented Kyrgios and the hot hand of Dusan Lajovic.

Tsitsipas has been touted by a number of observers as the next most likely to win a slam and break the strangle-hold of the Big Three.  But if he has to take down consecutively Bautista Agut, Djokovic, Federer, and Nadal it may be too tall an ask, this time around.  He seems to possess the belief and the talent to win against any opponent, no matter how formidable.  Will he take the next step after his impressive run to the Tour Finals title?

Djokovic d. Tsitsipas

Semi-finals
Daniil Medvedev has not yet solved the Nadal riddle in three matches, but the last two have been nail-bitingly close.  The quick surface in Melbourne probably helps the Russian, but it won’t lessen Nadal’s incredible mental toughness and knack for staying in points and then hitting winners.

Nadal  d. Medvedev

The last meeting between Federer and Djokovic was a straight set beat-down from Federer that looked like revenge for the agonizing fifth set 13-12 loss the Swiss suffered at Wimbledon.  With the score settled, can Roger utilize the quick conditions to break through Novak’s astonishing defense?

Djokovic d. Federer

Final
Progress in the GOAT race will be at stake in every slam for the rest of the Big Three’s careers.  In Melbourne, Federer could pull two ahead of Nadal, Nadal could tie Federer, or Djokovic could pull within two of Nadal and three of Federer.

Nadal and Andy Murray have lost every final but one at the Aus Open for the last ten years.  With seven titles for Djokovic, one more than Federer, the conditions seem to favour Novak.  Nadal looked shaky in losing to Goffin last week and struggling against De Minaur.  Meanwhile Djokovic looked invincible in straight-setting Nadal.

Djokovic d. Nadal

Journalists picks
Djokovic – 8 votes – Tignor (Tennis.com), Pantic (Tennis.com), Drucker (Tennis.com), Fitzgerald (Tennis.com), Hammond (Tennis.com), Sanford (Tennis.com), Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Sunderland (Bleacher Report)
Tsitsipas – 2 votes – Flink (Tennis.com), Ndebele (Tennis.com)
Nadal – 1 vote – McGrogan (Tennis.com)

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 18 Jan 2020
1
Djokovic
2.2
2
Nadal
5
3
DMedvedev
8.5
4
Federer
11
5
Tsitsipas
13
6
Thiem
21
7
Kyrgios
26
8
Shapovalov
41
9
AZverev
41
10
BautistaAgut
51
11
Rublev
51
12
Berrettini
67
13
Cilic
67
14
Dimitrov
67
15
Wawrinka
67
16
Goffin
81
17
Khachanov
81
18
KAnderson
101
19
AugerAliassime
101
20
Coric
101
21
Raonic
101
22
Schwartzman
101
23
Sinner
101
24
CarrenoBusta
151
25
Edmund
151
26
Fognini
151
27
Hurkacz
151
28
Isner
151
29
Monfils
151
30
Tsonga
151
31
Evans
201
32
Fritz
201


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open