Skip to main content

Aus Open 2020 – Women’s Draw Preview


Aus Open 2020 – Women’s Draw Preview

Charles Friesen
18 Jan 2020

Is Serena Williams still the favourite?  Last year Osaka, Barty, Halep, and Andreescu stole the show at the slams.  Combining all four of their odds, they would have to be favoured over Serena in the coming year.  But at this Australian Open, the bookies are still putting up numbers that show Serena is the top pick.  Unfortunately Andreescu is out with injury.  Will the rest of the field be able to stop Serena’s quest for slam #24?

First Quarter
Ash Barty is the top seed and has created a nice points cushion at the top of the rankings.  She’s far enough ahead that she can’t lose the #1 spot at this slam.  She just won the tournament in Adelaide and looks in good form.  But she could have a challenging third round if she faces Elena Rybakina (seeded #29), who this year has already made the final in Shenzhen and taken the title in Hobart.

If she makes it to the quarters, Barty could face Madison Keys (10) or last year’s finalist, Petra Kvitova (7).  It speaks to the depth in the game that all three of these players are contenders for the title.

Barty d. Kvitova

Second Quarter
This loaded quarter features the bookies’ top two favourites, in defending champion Naomi Osaka (3) and seven-time champ, Serena Williams (8).  Their meeting would easily be worthy of a final.  And there are other notable names here as well; not the least of which include Venus Williams and burgeoning talent Coco Gauff, who are slated for a first-rounder.  We also find Sloane Stephens (24) with a tricky opener against Hobart runner-up Shuai Zhang.  Their winner could meet the tenacious focus of Sofia Kenin (14) in round three, and then Osaka in the fourth.

Johanna Konta (12) had a standout year in the slams in 2019, making quarters or better at the French, Wimbledon, and US Open.  In the third round she may get the winner of Yastremska and Wozniacki.  Winner here just two years ago, Wozniacki says this is her last tournament.  Dayana Yastremska (23) has just hired Sascha Bajin as coach and seems intent on climbing to the top echelon.  She lost in tears to Serena last year here, and may suffer the same fate in the fourth.

If it comes down to Osaka and Serena, anything is possible. Osaka leads the head to head 2-1, but Serena claimed the last victory.  By taking Auckland last week, Serena is back in the winner’s circle for the first time in three years.  Both players are capable of elevating their play to stratospheric levels and I think both are hungry.  As long as Serena does not get too intense, I give her a slight edge.

SWilliams d. Osaka

Third Quarter
Maria Sharapova was once the biggest draw in women’s tennis, but she turns 33 this year and with a ranking in the hundreds, it’s clear she never recovered from the doping scandal.  Can she find a way back?  Aryna Sabalenka (11) won’t make it easy.  The hard-hitting 21 year-old looked strong at the end of 2019, but has a thorny opener against former top-tenner Carla Suarez Navarro, who has made seven slam quarter-finals over the years.  Should Sabalenka survive, she could meet Belinda Bencic (6) in the fourth.  Bencic has shown she can beat anyone, but seems to get overwhelmed occasionally and can’t find her A-game.

Across the quarter we find last year’s semi-finalist Danielle Collins (26), and Karolina Muchova (20) who is still climbing the ranks.  Also here is Simona Halep (4).  Halep was a finalist hin Melbourne two years ago.  Her decisive victory at Wimbledon last year shows she must never be counted out, but her straight set loss to Sabalenka this week leaves some question marks.  Sabalenka has never had a really deep slam run, but with so much talent, is she choking or still just growing up?

Halep d. Sabalenka

Fourth Quarter
The former slam champs in this section, Kerber (17), Kuznetsova, and Muguruza, seem far from their best tennis.  That may open the door for youngsters like Amanda Anisimova (21) and Marketa Vondrousova (15) to go deep.  Both made the French semis last year, with Vondrousova going on to the final.  But there are some more established talents here as well, like Kiki Bertens (9), Elina Svitolina (5), and Karolina Pliskova (2). 

Svitolina had a strong second half in 2019 with semis at both Wimbledon and the US Open, and a runner-up at the Tour Finals.  But her distressing one-and-one loss to Collins last week gives pause.  Was it just a hiccup?  In much more convincing form is Pliskova, who took the title in Brisbane with victories over Osaka and Keys.  I remain unconvinced of Pliskova’s ability to close-out big matches, but she looks like the strongest bet for this quarter.

KaPliskova d. Svitolina

Semis
SWilliams d. Barty

KaPliskova d. Halep

Final
This tournament does not feel like the free-for-all that slams two or three years ago did.  There is a pool of five or six favourites from which the winner is likely to come, with maybe two or three others splashing near pool-side.  Barty, Serena, and Osaka are heavy favourites in the top half, with a nod to Kvitova as well.  The bottom feels a bit more open.  Halep has not been great since Wimbledon, and Pliskova is wearing the dubious label of ‘best never to win a slam.’  So a surprise finalist from the bottom would not surprise. Which sounds oxy-moronic. 

If my prediction comes true, Serena will have a chance to avenge last year’s loss here to Pliskova, and the squandering of four match points, in no small part because of an ankle injury.  Serena seems to have been sub-par in losing four slam finals in the last two years.  But then again, by making four slam finals in that time, she did something no other woman has done.  If she triumphs here she will tie the all time record for slam victories at 24.

SWilliams d. KaPliskova

Journalists picks
SWilliams – 4 votes – Pantic (Tennis.com), Drucker (Tennis.com), Fitzgerald (Tennis.com), Wertheim (Sports Illustrated)
Osaka – 3 votes – Tignor (Tennis.com), Flink (Tennis.com), Sanford (Tennis.com)
KaPliskova – 3 votes – Ndebele (Tennis.com), Hammond (Tennis.com), Sunderland (Bleacher Report)
Bencic – 1 vote – McGrogan (Tennis.com)

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 18 Jan 2020
1
SWilliams
5
2
Osaka
9
3
Barty
9
4
KaPliskova
12
5
Halep
12
6
Sabalenka
17
7
Kvitova
21
8
Keys
21
9
Svitolina
26
10
Yastremska
34
11
Collins
34
12
Bencic
34
13
Muguruza
41
14
Kerber
41
15
Kenin
41
16
Bertens
41
17
Anisimova
41
18
Vondrousova
51
19
Rybakina
51
20
Wozniacki
67
21
Vekic
67
22
Stephens
67
23
Mertens
67
24
Gauff
67
25
Alexandrova
67
26
Muchova
81
27
Kontaveit
81
28
Konta
81
29
SZhang
101
30
Swiatek
101
31
Sharapova
101
32
Garcia
101


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open