Skip to main content

2023 US Open Men – Draw Preview

The spectacular final we got to witness in Cincinnati between Djokovic and Alcaraz felt like it put those two players into the stratosphere.  Can the field bring them down to earth?

 

First Quarter

The big news of the draw reveal is that Carlos Alcaraz (1), Jannik Sinner (6), and Alexander Zverev (12) are in the same quarter.  Sinner was rated third or fourth by many commentators and odds-makers pre-draw, and Zverev fifth.  Having three of the top five favourites in one quarter should make for some exciting matches. However, I would have preferred a more balanced draw.

Zverev and Sinner are slated to meet in the fourth round.  Both hit hard and consistent ground strokes and defend well.  Zverev leads the head-to-head 3-1.  But it is Sinner who just won the Canada 1000. Zverev beat Medvedev in Cincinnati, so both Sinner and Zverev are in form. Both players have three wins over Alcaraz.  The good news for Alcaraz is that he can face only one of them.  There are some tricky early rounders for all these players, so there’s no guarantee they will meet, but I look forward to the clashes if they do.

Of the three, Alcaraz must be regarded as the clear favourite.  He is the titleholder both here and at Wimbledon, and the final he played with Djokovic at Cincinnati showed an incredible level.

Also here are veterans Stan Wawrinka, Andy Murray, and Grigor Dimitrov (19), along with teen talent Arthur Fils.

Alcaraz def Sinner

 

Second Quarter

Daniil Medvedev (3) heads this quarter, which means that four of the top five favourites are in the top half.  That equals a good draw for Djokovic.

Things could get tricky for Medvedev if he should meet Max Purcell in the second round.  Purcell is rising rapidly and pushed Alcaraz in Cincinnati. The third round could bring up Borna Coric (27), who enjoys a 4-3 head-to-head over Medvedev.  And the fourth round could pit Daniil against Alex De Minaur (13), who has two wins over Meddy.

The other half of this section looks fairly open.  Andrey Rublev (8) is the highest seed, but has a tricky opener against Emil Ruusuvuori, and an even trickier second against possibly Gael Monfils who is rounding back into form.  The third round might produce Matteo Berrettini who has made the second week the last four years at the US Open.  Next could be Karen Khachanov (11) who was in the semis last year.  Khachanov is returning from injury so I won’t have high expectations for him.  Rather, Hubert Hurkacz (17) might take his place.  Hurkacz had a match point on Alcaraz in Cincinnati, but couldn’t close the deal.  Also here are young Jack Draper, working his way back, and John Isner, age 38, who says he is retiring after this tournament.

Medvedev def Hurkacz

 

Third Quarter

The third quarter doesn’t have a clear favourite.  Of those here, Tommy Paul (14) had the best summer swing, claiming a win over Alcaraz in Canada and nearly doing it again in Cincinnati. 

Holger Rune (4) surprises me with a #4 seeding.  He made quarters at both Roland Garros and Wimbledon but didn’t win a single match in Canada or Cincy.  The talent is there, so I disregard his chances with hesitation, however there’s little to suggest now is the time for a deep run.  His record on outdoor hard-courts provides little encouragement.

Casper Ruud (5) was a finalist here last year but has mustered only one hard-court match win since Wimbledon.  With now three slam finals to his credit, he has to be in the running to claim this quarter. Perhaps best-of-five sets suits him.  He could meet Frances Tiafoe (10) in the fourth round.  Tiafoe was in the semis at the USO last year, but he’s had a forgettable summer hard-court swing.  Regardless, I think Tiafoe will thrive in the atmosphere of New York, and I expect the crowd will get behind him.  His first few rounds are not daunting, and if he can start to generate momentum he has a chance to go on another run.

Also here is Alejandro Davidovich Fokina (21) who is both talented and entertaining, and made the semis at the Canada 1000.  He could have a popcorn third-rounder with Paul.

Paul def Tiafoe

 

Fourth Quarter

There’s little we don’t know about Novak Djokovic’s tennis at this point. Yet the second seed continues to amaze with his incredible athleticism at age 36.  The victory at the Cincinnati 1000 showcased a broad range of undiminished skills.  I suspect that the loss to Alcaraz in the Wimbledon final has Novak highly motivated.  He will want to prove that he’s still the best, that he can still win another slam title.  I also suspect that the victory over Alcaraz might have come one match too soon.  While it will have given Djokovic belief, it should also spur Alcaraz to dig even deeper.  And it is the young Spaniard who has more room and time to improve.  Djokovic must be aware that he will have limited chances to add to his slam tally.  Surely he will be motivated to put an insurance win between himself and Nadal (23 and 22 slams, respectively), and also to equal, and possibly exceed the 24 slams of Margaret Court.  The next two years will be pivotal, and then the window will likely close, if it hasn’t already.

His draw could hardly have been kinder.  Neither of the next two highest seeds, Stefanos Tsitsipas (7) and Taylor Fritz (9), have ever been past the third round at the US Open.  Tsitsipas has a nightmare first-rounder against returning Milos Raonic and his massive serve. Tsitsipas’ poor record is a bit of an anomaly that he should be able to overcome at some point.  He has the talent.

 The next highest seed here is Felix Auger Aliassime (15) who has been in dreadful form, having won only three matches since Indian Wells in March. Also here, Wimbledon quarter-finalist Christopher Eubanks (28), and Francisco Cerundolo (20) may get chances to shine.

Djokovic def Tsitsipas

 

Semis

Alcaraz def Medvedev

Djokovic def Paul

 

Final

Alcaraz def Djokovic

 

Expert Picks

Djokovic (5) – Steve Tignor (Tennis Channel), Joel Drucker (Tennis Channel), Matt Fitzgerald (Tennis Channel), Gill Gross (Monday Match Analysis), Alex Gruskin (Cracked Racquets)

Alcaraz (3) – Ed McGrogan (Tennis Channel), David Kane (Tennis Channel), Stephanie Livaudais (Tennis Channel)

Sinner (1) – Pete Bodo (Tennis Channel)

 

Bookies

Decimal Odds from bet365.com on 24 Aug 2023

1

Djokovic

2.2

2

Alcaraz

2.62

3

DMedvedev

9

4

Sinner

13

5

AZverev

26

6

Rune

26

7

Tsitsipas

26

8

CaRuud

34

9

Fritz

34

10

Berrettini

41

11

Tiafoe

41

12

Hurkacz

41

13

Rublev

51

14

Auger Aliassime

51

15

SKorda

51

16

AMurray

61

17

Norrie

67

18

Khachanov

67

19

Eubanks

67

20

Thiem

67

21

Draper

67

22

DeMinaur

67

23

Wawrinka

75

24

Nishikori

75

25

Shelton

81

26

Paul

81

27

Dimitrov

101

28

Griekspoor

101

29

MaxPurcell

101

30

Musetti

126

31

Fils

126

32

Wu

126

33

Davidovich Fokina

126

34

Schwartzman

151

35

Raonic

151

36

Humbert

151

37

Monfils

151

38

Karatsev

151

39

Cressy

151

40

Isner

151

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open