Skip to main content

2023 US Open Women – Draw Preview

COCO!!

Coco?  Wait, she’s still a teenager?  And she beat Swiatek last week…

 

First Quarter

Iga Swiatek is world #1 and the defending champ.  She’s fast, she’s consistent, she’s got great groundstrokes.  She will be tough to beat.  Her first few rounds are manageable, but Jelena Ostapenko (seeded 20), possible fourth-round opponent, has a go-for-broke style that can beat anyone.

Surviving that, the real test could be Coco Gauff (6). Gauff is the fourth favourite of the bookies, just like last year.  She’d been having a so-so year until she got to the summer American hard-court swing. Then she claimed titles at the Washington 500 and Cincinnati 1000.

Odds-on pre-draw, Coco and Iga were my top two favourites, so I’m disappointed the draw has slotted them for the quarter-finals.  I’d like this to be a final.  Recency-bias has me favouring Gauff.  She’s had a hot summer and beat Swiatek last week. However, Iga had decent USO prep too, making semis in both Canada and Cincy, a significant improvement on last year when she won only one match at each.  And then she went on to win the Open last year, so she should be better now, no?

So these two players are my definite favourites for the title.  The match in Cincy was a close three-setter.  What I liked about Coco in that match was the confidence in the forehand.  Yes, it’s still a weakness, but with new coach Brad Gilbert in her corner, the forehand didn’t break down.  Gilbert emphasized her strengths and gave her enough belief in the forehand that an opponent going there might face a decent rally shot or even a screaming winner.  The shot produces errors too, but it’s become a lottery for opponents, and that’s enough to put Coco into the mix.  Her backhand is a serious weapon, and her movement is astonishing.  It looked like Coco had more game than Iga in Cincy.  But I’d say Iga’s floor is higher.

The main question with Coco is mental.  If she actually gets deep in the tournament, will she believe? Will the forehand hold up? And will she survive the early rounds?  There are some landmines – like Mirra Andreeva in the second round. The sixteen year-old made the fourth-round at Wimbledon and has big-time talent.  And then there’s the take-the-racket-out-of-your-hand power of Petra Kvitova (11), a potential fourth-rounder.

Also here, Caroline Wozniacki, returning after a three-year hiatus, could meet Kvitova second round. And Jennifer Brady, former Australian Open finalist, is healthy again after a two-year break.

Gauff def Swiatek

 

Second Quarter

Elena Rybakina (4) is a comfortable #3 in the yearly race, but I have some doubts about her for this US Open. Her year started brilliantly with a runner-up at the Australian, 1000 titles at Indian Wells and Rome, and a runner-up at the Miami 1000. But since withdrawing from Roland Garros, she’s looked off.  Her title defense at Wimbledon was derailed by Jabeur, and the North American hard-court swing was unconvincing.  Plus she’s never been past the US Open third round.  Regardless, she’s a huge talent, and if she’s healthy she’s in the mix.  But I don’t think she’s healthy. Her opener against Marta Kostyuk is far from straight-forward.

Maria Sakkari (8) has looked about average, for her, coming into this tournament.  So this quarter looks like opportunity-ville to me. French Open runner-up, Karolina Muchova (10) is here, too, and with a runner-up showing in Cincinnati, she’s my default pick for this quarter.  Also here is Beatriz Haddad Maia (19) who made semis at the French.

Victoria Azarenka (18) and Belinda Bencic (15) both have exceptional records at the US Open.  Bencic is 26 years old and the reigning Olympic champion, while Azarenka is a still competitive 34.

Muchova def Bencic

 

Third Quarter

Top seed here is Jessica Pegula at #3.  Pegula just claimed her second 1000 title, in Canada.  Notably she beat both Swiatek and Gauff in that run, and then lost only one game in blitzing Samsonova in the final.  She should be a top favourite… but I’m nervous about putting her there.  And it’s probably because she’s got six quarter-final losses in slams, and no wins.  In fact, she’s lost quarters in four of the last six slams.

However, this is her best surface, she’s at home, she’s in a good form, and she should have confidence.  This will be one of her best chances to break the quarter-final jinx.  But her draw has some tricky spots.  The first round is against the mercurial Camila Giorgi who won the Canada 1000 two years ago.  Pegula will need to be sharp to get through.

A resurgent Elina Svitolina (26) beat Swiatek in a semi-final run at Wimbledon and could face Pegula third round.  Madison Keys (17) or Liudmila Samsonova (14) are potential fourth-rounders for Pegula.

The other half of this quarter has slumping Caroline Garcia (7) and Wimbledon champ Marketa Vondrousova (9) as the top two seeds. Given the expectation of a trough after the incredible high of winning her first slam, Vondrousova did surprisingly well in the summer hard-court swing, claiming five wins.  Her two losses came to Swiatek and Gauff.  In the Swiatek match in particular, she pushed Iga hard in the first set, and it seemed almost miraculous that Iga pulled out the tiebreak win.

Also here, Canadians Bianca Andreescu and Leylah Fernandez could meet in the second round.

Pegula def Vondrousova

 

Fourth Quarter

This quarter is dominated, on paper, by Aryna Sabalenka (2) and Ons Jabeur (5).  Which is not to say that they’re guaranteed to meet in the quarters.  There are other good players here too, like Barbora Krejcikova (12), Daria Kasatkina (13), Donna Vekic (21), Qinwen Zheng (23), and Marie Bouzkova (31).  Sure they could take out a top player, but they don’t feel, to me, like threats for the title. (Famous last words.)

So back to Sabalenka and Jabeur: they’re the favourites but it feels like they have some question marks.  For Jabeur it’s the psychological hangover of the Wimbledon final loss.  It was her third slam final, and she was the favoured to win.  And it’s not that Vondrousova didn’t deserve to win, but Jabeur just totally over-played.  She was too eager, went for too much, and basically handed the match over on a platter.  Vondrousova just had to not make too many mistakes.  And it was so obvious how absolutely crushed Jabeur was by the loss. So, has she recovered?  Will she have the belief to put together another amazing run like she had at Wimbledon when she beat the top favourites?

With Sabalenka I am a little under-whelmed by her most recent results.  I’m probably nit-picking.  Sabalenka took the Madrid 1000 over Swiatek, and won her first slam title, in Australia.  At the other two slams she made semis.  She leads the yearly race and could become world #1 if she equals or betters Swiatek’s performance at this US Open, and with Swiatek’s tough draw, Sabalenka as #1 is a real possibility in two week’s time.

But she hasn’t taken a title in her last six tournaments. Granted she’s been losing to top-shelf players.  She’s strongest on hard, and with a decent draw, she’s a real threat for this title.  But if Jabeur can get her head together she can trouble Aryna.

Sabalenka def Jabeur

 

Semi-finals

Gauff def Muchova

Sabalenka def Pegula. On the other hand, somehow I can see Pegula in the final. It surprises me…

 

Final

Gauff def Sabalenka

 

Expert Picks from Tennis.com

Swiatek (2) – Ed McGrogan, Joel Drucker
Sabalenka (2) – Steve Tignor, David Kane
Gauff (2) – Matt Fitzgerald, Peter Bodo
Rybakina (1) – Stephanie Livaudais

 

Bookies

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 24 Aug 2023

1

Swiatek

3.25

2

Sabalenka

5.5

3

Rybakina

8

4

Gauff

8

5

Pegula

11

6

Jabeur

21

7

Muchova

21

8

Vondrousova

26

9

Samsonova

34

10

MAndreeva

41

11

Garcia

51

12

VKudermetova

51

13

Bencic

51

14

Sakkari

51

15

Haddad Maia

51

16

Collins

51

17

Svitolina

51

18

Keys

51

19

Andreescu

51

20

Ostapenko

51

21

QZheng

67

22

Krejcikova

81

23

Kasatkina

81

24

LFernandez

101

25

Potapova

101

26

Brady

101

27

KaPliskova

101

28

Badosa

101

29

LFruhvirtova

101

30

Azarenka

101

31

Alexandrova

101

32

Wozniacki

101

33

Tauson

101

34

Kenin

101

35

Noskova

151

36

Stephens

151

37

Parks

151

38

Linette

151

39

Kostyuk

151

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open