Skip to main content

2015 Australian Open - Women's Draw

2015 Australian Open – Women’s Draw    


To my mind the top three seeds, Serena Williams, Maria Sharapova, and Simona Halep are head and shoulders above the field and should be clear favourites for the Australian title.  But Serena has been in questionable form.  Does that open the door for someone else?

 

First Quarter


For all intents and purposes Serena (1) is the favourite.  The bookies have her as #1 at 3.25 (2.25:1 or 9/4) over her nearest competitor, Sharapova at 6.0.  But Serena hasn’t won the Australian since 2010, going 4r-QF-4R in the last three iterations.  Will she continue to falter early in Melbourne?

Bet365.com odds on 15 Jan 2015

Position
Player
Odds
1
SWilliams
3.25
2
Sharapova
6.0
3
Halep
8.0
4
Kvitova
11
5
Wozniacki
11
6
Azarenka
12
7
Bouchard
12
8
ARadwanska
21

Serena could get Vera Zvonareva in the second round.  Zvonareva is coming back after the better part of two years away, but she does have two wins over Serena.  Round 3 could bring up rising Elina Svitolina (seeded 26).  The 20-year old has wins over Kerber (this year!), Kvitova, and Bouchard. 

The fourth round for Serena might bring up two more dangerous young players, Garbine Muguruza (24) and Saisai Zheng; or possibly Jankovic (15) or Timea Baczinsky – who has a win over Kvitova in 2015.  In all, it looks to be loaded with possible mines for Serena, and that’s just to get to the quarters.

The other half of this quarter features Caroline Wozniacki (8) as the top seed, opposite last year’s finalist, Dominika Cibulkova (11), in a potential fourth rounder.  Wozniacki will need to be sharp for 1R against young, talented, and dangerous Taylor Townsend, ranked 100, age 18.

Next door is an eye-popping first round featuring Victoria Azarenka against Sloane Stephens in a rehash of their 2013 semi-final.  The winner is likely to face Woz.  Who emerges from this fearsome foursome into 3R is anybody’s guess, although the bookies favour Wozniacki by a hair.

Other seeds here are Alize Cornet (19) – three time winner over Serena last year – and Barbora Zahlavova Strycova – last year’s surprise Wimbledon QFist.  I’m not expecting another deep run from Cibulkova, although she might surprise again later in the season.

I’m picking Azarenka over Stephens, and then a highly entertaining contest with Wozniacki over Azarenka.  Serena ‘should’ emerge from this quarter, she has more than enough game to do it, but with so many snares I think she won’t.

Possible match-ups
1R
2R
3R
4R
QF
SF

SWilliams (1)





Zvonareva






Svitolina (26)




Mugurza (24)





SZheng




Bacsinsky





Jankovic (15)







Cibulkova (11)





Cornet (19)





ZahlavovaStrycova (25)



Stephens





Azarenka





Townsend





Wozniacki (8)






Wozniacki d. Muguruza




Second Quarter


Petra Kvitova (4) leads this quarter.  She is in good form this year and has declared she wants to take it to the next level in her career – win elsewhere than Wimbledon.  With Petra’s inconsistency nothing is given, but she should be fairly clear until the third round where she could run into young and talented Madison Keys or perennial Aussie over-achiever, Casey Dellacqua (29).  R4 could present perennial Aussie under-achiever Stosur (20), or a resurgent Petkovic (13).  Petkovic can never be underestimated but I would pick an in-form Kvitova should they meet.

The lower half of this quarter is led by Aggie Radwanska (6) who will need to be careful in her first round against Kurumi Nara.  The third might offer Lepchenko (30) or new Aussie (former Croatian) Tomljanovic both of whom are capable of a big day.  But ARad’s 4R could get REALLY interesting if she meets seeds Pennetta (12) or the redoubtable Venus Williams (18).  Pennetta started strongly last year then faded, and Venus has just been getting stronger and stronger of late.  She’s already claimed a title this year and with a title-winning span of 18 years is just the 4th woman in the open era to reach this milestone, tied with Evert and Martinez, and behind Martina Navratilova who won at least one for an incredible 21 consecutive years.

Radwanska has taken on volleyer Navratilova as coach, but will the lessons stand up if she runs into the real deal in Venus?  I think a part deux of Kvitova vs Venus ‘s Wimbledon classic last year could be enthralling.

Possible match-ups
1R
2R
3R
4R
QF
SF


Kvitova (4)




Keys





Dellacqua (29)






Stosur (20)





Petkovic (13)





Pennetta (12)





VWilliams (18)




Lepchenko (30)





Tomljanovic






ARadwanska (6)















VWilliams d. Kvitova




Third Quarter


I expect little difficulty for Simona Halep (3) in sweeping to the quarters over the struggling seeds in her section, Errani (14), Pavlyuchenkova (23), and Lisicki (28).  She really seems a cut above.

The top half of the quarter is more interesting with Ivanovic (5) and 17-year old Belinda Bencic (32) as possible 3R foes.  I’ll be curious to see if 18-year old Oceane Dodin can surmount Alison Riske, with Karolina Pliskova (22) a likely second rounder.  KaPliskova (to distinguish her from twin sister Kristina Pliskova) could then run into is-she-really-the-10th-seed Makarova (10) in round three.  Both are playing very well of late and Makarova’s new-found consistency will be matched by KaPliskova’s burgeoning results.  But it’s tough to choose against Ivanovic for the quarters, with KaPliskova my second choice.

Halep could get into a real tussle against Ivanovic’s superior fire-power.  But Halep has been playing too well of late and could contend for the title with her accurate laser-like strokes.

Possible match-ups
1R
2R
3R
4R
QF
SF


Ivanovic (5)





Bencic (32)




KaPliskova (22)




Riske





Dodin







Makarova (10)





Errani (14)





Pavlyuchenkova (23)





Lisicki (28)





Halep (3)




Halep d. Ivanovic




Fourth Quarter


The last quarter leads off with Eugenie Bouchard (7) who has been in variable form.  It would not surprise me to see her fall to an upset.  The nearest seed is Kuznetsova (27) who has become perilously inconsistent.  Kuzzie last won a slam at the 2009 French, but looks very far from that now.  She opens against up and coming Caroline Garcia who has wins over Jankovic, Kerber, Errani, Venus, and ARadwanska.  Kuznetsova can still rise up and beat anyone on the right day, but I think the odds are with Garcia.

Seeded to meet Bouchard in 4R are Kerber (9) or Carla Suarez Navarro (17).  CSN appears to be in reasonable form, and the consistent, defensive Kerber can never be counted out.  In the end, Bouchard has a good draw, but I have a feeling that if she lasts that long, she will go down to Garcia or Kerber.

The bottom half of the quarter features Maria Sharapova (2) who opened the season in sterling form with a victory at Brisbane in three tough sets over Ivanovic.  In 3R she could meet 21-year old Zarina Diyas (31) who won 7 matches in the slams last year.

Seventeen-year old Ana Konjuh could run into Shuai Peng (17) in round two.  Konjuh made R3 at Wimbledon and I’m very curious how she will handle the pressure here.  In R3, the winner could meet Safarova (16) who made QF here in 2007 and SF at Wimbledon last year.

I expect Sharapova to roll over everyone here like a juggernaut.

Possible match-ups
1R
2R
3R
4R
QF
SF


Bouchard (7)



Garcia





Kuznetsova (27)







Suarez Navarro (17)





Kerber (9)





Safarova (16)




Konjuh





Peng (21)






Diyas (31)





Sharapova (2)





Sharapova d. Kerber


Semis

I must be crazy to predict that Serena Williams will not make the semis.  She is the dominant player in the game with the biggest set of weapons.  Yet I am not convinced she will concentrate her way through.  Perhaps I’m in a contrary mood.

If Wozniacki and Venus should meet as I predict, the head to head will definitely be in Venus’ favour.  She’s 6-0 against Caroline including a win last week in the Auckland final.  It was a 3-setter, and Caroline has been getting tougher and tougher, but Venus’ aggressive game matches well against Wozniacki’s defensive one.  Another victory for Venus would seem likely.

VWilliams d. Wozniacki


In the second semi I’ve predicted a rematch of last year’s Roland Garros final between Sharapova and Halep.  Sharapova won the match, as she has all 5 of their encounters.  The last 3 matches all went 3 sets and were close.  I believe Halep is still learning things and is improving.  Sharapova seems to be holding steady.  I suspect that, should they meet, Halep will finally get that first victory.

Halep d. Sharapova


Final

I have surprised myself by picking Venus for the final.  It seems like a big ask from a 34-year old player.  I think that if Halep or Sharapova should make the final they will win.  Venus has a 3-5 record with Sharapova, but leads Halep 3-0, although they did not meet in 2014 in the year of Halep’s ascendance.  She is aggressive, accurate, and consistent, and therefore I think Halep should be favoured to take the final.

Halep d. VWilliams

Last Thoughts

It is no stretch to imagine an Ivanovic-Kvitova final or a Bouchard-Wozniacki final.  And certainly Serena could rise up and crush all opposition and likely will since I’ve predicted against her.  This draws feels wide open to me and I’m reasonably confident I’ve got most of my predictions wrong.  We shall see.

Bet365.com odds on 15 Jan 2015:

Position
Player
Odds
1
SWilliams
3.25
2
Sharapova
6.0
3
Halep
8.0
4
Kvitova
11
5
Wozniacki
11
6
Azarenka
12
7
Bouchard
12
8
ARadwanska
21
9
Ivanovic
26
10
VWilliams
34
11
Muguruza
34
12
Stephens
41
13
Makarova
41
14
Kerber
41
15
KaPliskova
41
16
Safarova
51
17
Stosur
67
18
Jankovic
67
19
Jankovic
67
20
Cibulkova
67
21
Keys
67


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open