Skip to main content

WTA - 2014 Yearend and 2015 Forecasts

WTA – 2014 Yearend and 2015 Forecasts

The year was full of surprises:  Simona Halep, Eugenie Bouchard, Petra Kvitova, Victoria Azarenka, Ana Ivanovic, even Serena Williams and her ‘bestie’ Caroline Wozniacki.  After a scintillating 2013 in which Serena Williams won more matches and titles than in any previous year, had her best ever match-winning percentage, and crowned it with two slam titles, I suppose a letdown was not surprising.  But 2014 was as notable for how many women stepped up and put pressure on her – not the least of whom was Alize Cornet who took 3 matches from Serena.

Serena Williams

It’s hard to call it a bad year when she wins more titles than anyone else (7) and takes the US Open and WTA Finals.  But by her standards, she looked vulnerable.


2014 WTA titles
SWilliams
7
Sharapova
4
Ivanovic
4
Kvitova
3
Petkovic
3
Li
2
Halep
2
Karolina Pliskova
2
Pavlyuchenkova
2

Interestingly, only 9 women won at least two titles this year on the main WTA circuit.  Serena was by far the class of the field.  But she struggled at the slams, especially the first three.  Her showing of only six total match wins in 3 consecutive slams was her worst in 15 years when she was only 17 years old.

Serena has now tied Navratilova and Evert at 18 slam singles wins, and will be eager to get nearer Margaret Court’s record of 24.  Beating such a record may loom in her mind to some degree.  She claimed that getting to #18 was a mental block that may have contributed to her poor play at the early slams in 2014.  Perhaps she will now feel free to chalk up a few more.

But how much is age a factor?  She turned 33 in September and will be that age for the slams in 2015.  The only major player to win a slam title at 33 or older (born after 1900) is Navratilova who was 33 when she took Wimbledon 1990.  This suggests slam titles will be very difficult to acquire at her age.

But she did finish #1 last year, and looking for challengers to take over the reins does not seem promising at first glance.  Halep and Bouchard burst on the scene last year and might be possibilities… especially Halep who actually has a win over Serena and pushed her in the yearend championships.  Sharapova can claim slams, but only if Serena loses to others it seems.  Petra Kvitova might be a threat, especially at Wimbledon.  No one else has her raw power, but she has yet to notch a win against Serena in 5 attempts.  Victoria Azarenka has 3 wins against Serena and already owns two slam titles.  But after missing most of last year she’s currently ranked #42.  Wozniacki looked close to beating Serena last year at times, so can’t be ruled out.

Basically, I see only two options for Serena not being #1 next year:  1. we see new levels from Halep/Kvitova/Azarenka/Wozniacki; or 2. Serena self-destructs.  Neither of these options looks likely, so barring injury, another year at #1 for Serena would seem prediction-worthy. 

I think two slam titles should be well within reason, although which two is anybody’s guess.  Three straight US Opens (the first since Chris Evert) are potentially a good augur for victory there, and maybe the fast courts of Wimbledon, to give a little extra edge to her serve.  Certainly the final I would be pulling for at Wimby would be Serena against an in-form Kvitova.  Fireworks! Ka-boom! 

Outside of the slams, an 8th Miami title is a reasonable bet, and perhaps Madrid or Stanford which seem to be favourites of hers.  She’ll be the favourite every time she takes the court, and a calendar slam is not out of the question, if highly unlikely.  I’ll be expecting some off days too.

Maria Sharapova

Sharapova claimed a 5th glorious slam in 2014 – all won in even years by some strange coincidence.  She’s now made the last three French finals, and may be the game’s current premier clay-court player… as long as Serena loses to someone else.  Maria has lost 13 straight times to her rival, including 6 in the last two years. 

With 5 slam titles and 33 singles titles overall, Sharapova is easily the second most accomplished player on tour.  Only one player in the top ten, Serena, has a winning head-to-head with her.  It’s almost strange she has never occupied the yearend #1 spot on the computer (although paradoxically she did receive the WTA award as #1 for 2004).  There appears to be little change on the horizon for Sharapova.  Her game does not seem to be evolving and there are no radical coaching changes.  We should expect more of the same from her singly focused hard-hitting game. 

Given the depth of the upcoming talent and Serena’s tenaciousness, I’d say Sharapova has about a 50% chance of nabbing another slam this year, which could be anywhere.  Since Serena seems most vulnerable on clay, Maria’s best chance is probably at the French.  Outside that, another 3 or 4 titles would seem about par for the course.

Simona Halep

Halep advanced as high as #2 this year, from a yearend finish of #11 last year, and settles at #3 for 2014.  Her rise has been steady over the last few years 81-53-47-11-3.  But further improvement could be difficult.  The two women above her are entrenched.  It will take a very big push to displace Serena or Sharapova.

In 2014 she made the final at Roland Garros and at the Yearend Championships, beating Serena along the way.  There’s no question Halep is the real deal.  At this point the only remaining terra incognita is a slam triumph. To my mind she’s pretty much even with Sharapova in likelihood to take a slam next year, in the event that Serena falters.

I think Halep will have an excellent shot at the French open, and a good chance anywhere else as well.  Another 3 or so tour titles also seem reasonable.  A yearend finish of #1 is within reason, but it would be because Serena is off.  I don’t see Halep as capable of dominating a healthy Serena, and she still needs to notch a first victory over Sharapova after 5 attempts.

Petra Kvitova

After two and a half years of disappointing her fans, Petra Kvitova rose from the ashes and seized the Wimbledon title.  After surviving a concerted effort from a formidable Venus Williams in 3R, Kvitova slashed to victory over successive opponents, demolishing Bouchard in the final to the loss of only 3 games.

Her high-risk style is capable of such great heights, but we have also become accustomed to inexplicable losses and consistent inconsistency.  Having now erased all possible doubt that her first Wimbledon title in 2011 was a fluke, she has announced that she is seeking to raise her game for 2015.

She seems one of the few players able to match Serena’s power, possibly even exceeding it at times.  It would be with great relish that I would welcome more consistent play from one so obviously talented.  She has the potential to make things interesting at the top of the WTA.

However I don’t expect her to be a Serena beater, against whom she’s 0 and 5.  She showed in 2011 that she can win 6 tournaments in a year, so some consistently higher play is possible...  or maybe that playing at high level can happen more frequently than she has allowed in the last 3 years.

For 2015 I’ll expect that she will win a few more titles than we’ve become accustomed to from her.  A win at a slam outside of Wimbledon is also a possibility.  It will be interesting to see what a truly motivated Kvitova is capable of... but she faces some very steep competition in the 3 women ranked above her, not to mention Bouchard, Ivanovic, and Wozniacki.

Wimbledon may be the true litmus.  With Kvitova now owning a better record than Serena at the AEC over the last 5 years, and with Petra’s open designs on more trophies, I would expect Serena will be uber-motivated to reclaim the hallowed turf.  In a showdown I’d probably favour Serena, but against the field I make Kvitova the favourite for Wimbledon.

Wimbledon Record – 2010-2014
Wins
Losses
Ratio
Kvitova
26
3
0.897
SWilliams
22
3
0.880
Lisicki
19
4
0.826
Bartoli
14
3
0.824
Bouchard
8
2
0.800
ARadwanska
18
5
0.783


Li Na

Li started off 2014 with a bang.  She made her third trip to the Australian Open final, this time against surprise finalist, Dominika Cibulkova, whom she handled fairly easily.  At the time she said there was no reason not to keep playing for a long time, since she was still winning.  After winning her first two tournaments of the year, she made SF in Indian Wells and the Final in Miami and was 22-3 to that point.  A campaign for yearend #1 seemed possible and whispers of ‘calendar slam’ were heard. 

But she bombed out of the first round of the French and by mid-year her tune had changed radically.  She decided to retire from the game, citing an uncooperative physique after a 3R showing at Wimbledon.  She finishes a truncated year with the second best win percentage on tour, although it’s likely this might have been a little lower in a full year.


2014 match wins
Losses
Ratio
SWilliams
52
8
0.867
Li
28
7
0.800
Sharapova
49
13
0.790
Ivanovic
58
17
0.773
Halep
46
16
0.742
Kvitova
43
16
0.729
Wozniacki
49
19
0.721
ARadwanska
47
22
0.681
Kerber
47
24
0.662
Bouchard
45
23
0.662
Azarenka
15
9
0.625
Cibulkova
33
24
0.579

I’m sorry to see her depart the game.  With 2 slam titles out of 4 slam finals, she was a welcome addition to the upper echelon.  She was the peer of Sharapova, Kvitova, and Azarenka, although all of these still rank a notch below Serena in my estimation.  This may be why Serena’s departure does not look imminent – she still has no equal to push her from the game.  This was not so in the early part of her career when Venus, Henin, Clijsters, Hingis, and Davenport could match her toe to toe.  So until her level drops, or the almost top tier (of which Li was a part) can together overcome her, Serena stays on top.  The game is weakened by Li’s departure; her sharp game and clever tongue will be missed.

Ana Ivanovic

After five years of floundering around a ranking of 20, Ivanovic rises to the height of her past greatness with a yearend ranking of 5.  It was unexpected, this sudden resurgence, and I’m not yet willing to trust that it will last. 

She started off well by winning Auckland and defeating Serena at the Australian Open.  Although she had some fine results with 4 tournament victories, she does not appear to be at the level she was at in 2007-08 when she made three slam finals and achieved #1 on the computer.  But she should be proud of 2014’s accomplishments and ready to build on them for 2015.

Perhaps she will prove me wrong, but I do not expect that she will be a top contender at the major tournaments.  I think the others around her are just too tough and hungry.  Plus there’s that flawed serve of hers.  Her forehand is a true weapon, but with serve weakness, closing out matches will always be difficult.  Although she did well elsewhere, she did not do better at the slams than her opening QF showing at AO.  For 2015 I think she may improve her slam performances, but I doubt any will exceed the SF stage.

Agnieszka Radwanska

It was another solid effort from Radwanska, her sixth year in the yearend top 10.  She made the semis in Australia, playing brilliantly to beat two-time defending champ Azarenka in the QF, but lost disappointingly to Cibulkova.  Then she finessed her way to the final in Indian Wells, before losing inexplicably badly to Pennetta.  Her year seemed only to simmer from there, until she made a statement in Montreal taking out 5 quality opponents, including Azarenka and Venus, to claim the title.

But after coming so seemingly close in Australia, she now looks like not much of a threat to take a slam title.  She’s slipped from 4 to 5 to 6 in the last two years, and will probably have to fight like mad not to go down further in 2015.  Power and winners seem her weaknesses.  She’s taken on Martina Navratilova for 2015 as probably the highest profile coach of all in the recent celebrity coach craze.

Coach and player do not appear to have similar games, but perhaps Radwanska will learn to make up for her lack of ground-stroke power with forays to the net.  It could be enlightening and transformative, but to be honest, I’m not expecting improved results from Aggie this year... too many other sharks in the water.  I’ll look for a title or two and maybe a SF spot at one of the slams.  But I will continue to enjoy her genius, soft hands and brilliant shot-making.

Eugenie Bouchard

Genie blew by all expectations in a breakout year that saw her reach two slam semis and the final at Wimbledon.  At 20 years old this is worth sitting up for and taking notice.  The big question to my mind is if she is going to go all Sloane Stephens on us and virtually disappear in her sophomore year?
I do expect a bit of a dip this year, but I’m guessing she’s not going to go as far away as Sloane left us.  When I watched Bouchard in 2014 I wondered how she was winning all those matches.  There didn’t seem to be any one facet of her game that should warrant the amazing results.  Granted there were no real weaknesses, but there didn’t seem to be any particular weapons either.  What it seems, then, is that it is her mental toughness and ability to concentrate that are her biggest weapons – not unlike Chris Evert, perhaps.

For 2015 I’m expecting a bit of a letdown, but I think she should then rebound and probably end up near her current slot (#7) by yearend.  It seems her game is best-suited to grass, so maybe another fine result at Wimbledon is in the offing, although a title there will be very tough to come by with the likes of Serena and Kvitova to battle.  Yet Bartoli took Wimbledon only two years ago, so victory by an underdog is not unthinkable.  For one more year at least, I expect Bouchard to be an underdog.  The question she will be answering this year (to my mind) is if her mental strength is enough to overcome the weapons of bigger hitters.  I will look for a couple slam semis in 2015 and maybe some titles to add to the Bouchard resume.

Caroline Wozniacki

Wozniacki looked down and out this year.  Then she got dumped by her fiancée, and suddenly she started to revive.  In addition to completing the New York City marathon in a quick 3:26, Wozniacki made her tennis talk in the last half of the year.   She won Istanbul in July, posted decent results on the summer hard court swing, and made her second US Open final.  She also played the most compelling match of the WTA finals:  a third set 7-6(6) loss to Serena in the semis.  After 4.5 years in the top 10, Wozniacki dropped below 10 in January, but clawed back in September.

The overriding feeling at the end of the year was that Wozniacki was reborn and is on the ascendance.  She seems to have added more aggression to her game.  This year I’ll expect her to play more consistently at the start of the year, but I’m not yet ready to believe her game will have more than its 2010 incarnation.  I see her staying near the middle of the top 10 next year, winning a couple of tournaments, and making a slam SF or two.

Dominika Cibulkova

After long demonstrating the ability to rise up and beat top players, Cibulkova was type-cast as dangerous but stuck in the top 20.  After storming to the Aus Open final, suddenly that changed and she finishes the year at #10 in what is probably a career year.  Despite the big game, she hasn’t shown the consistency to keep it coming.  I’ll expect her back around 20 by year’s end, but surprising me with something much better is possible.

Ekaterina Makarova

Makarova had a wonderful Wimbledon, knocking off ARadwanska in a QF showing.  She then took out Kvitova in a SF finish at Montreal, and, most impressively, made the US Open semis with victories over Bouchard and Azarenka.  I will not be expecting her to become entrenched in the top 10, but she may continue to have some solid results and could even morph into a women’s version of Wawrinka – peaking in her late 20’s – she’s now 26.

Alize Cornet

Anyone who beats Serena three times in one year against no losses is worthy of mention.  I won’t be expecting that streak to continue, but Cornet certainly showed she can play with the big girls.  I’ll expect her to remain in the second 10 for 2015.

Venus Williams

The year amounted to a comeback for Venus, climbing about 30 spots back up to #18 in the year she turned 34.  Her best results were the title in Dubai and a runner-up showing in Montreal that included a victory over her younger sister.  She also nearly took out eventual champ Kvitova at Wimbledon.  I think Venus is going to continue to rise in 2015 and may get close to the top 10.  A good showing at Wimbledon would not be a surprise.

Victoria Azarenka

It was a very tough year for Azarenka and she’s on record saying she’d like to forget the whole thing.  The two time defending champ at the Australian Open went down in the quarters and also made the quarters at the US Open.  These would have been middling results in other years, but were by far her best of 2014.  For 2015 we will hope that she can stay healthy, but even if she does, it will likely take her awhile to become a top player again.  If things go well, she could be challenging the other top women by mid-year and may threaten for the US Open title.

Up and Comers


Garbine Muguruza – rank 20, age 21 – showed off her big game at the French, taking out Serena and making the quarters.  Before that she won 8 consecutive matches out of the qualies to take the title in Hobart and made the fourth round at the Australian, taking out Wozniacki.  After some modest summer results, she showed signs of life again in the late fall.  I think she will continue to rise in 2015.  I’ll be looking for 3 to 5 big results from her and to start knocking on the door of the top 10.  A reasonable goal would be a slam SF.

Karolina Pliskova – rank 23, age 22 – is notable for winning two tour-level titles in 2014.  She also beat 9th ranked Ivanovic at the US Open.  She plays a lot of small events, but I think she has the potential to entrench in the top 20 this year.  I won’t be looking for a slam breakthrough, but a deep run could start to transform her career.

Elina Svitolina – rank 28, age 20 – had some good wins in 2014, notching victories over Kvitova, Kerber, and Bouchard.  These results mean she has potential for more improvement.  I’ll be curious if she can make top 20 in 2015.

Madison Keys – rank 30, age 19 – had her best result on grass, beating then #7 Jankovic, and taking the title in Eastbourne.  She’s young enough that her best tennis should be ahead.  It’s hard to know how high she can rise, but top 10 is starting to look more like a career goal than a next year goal.

Belinda Bencic – rank 32, age 17 – burst on the scene in 2014 with 6 straight wins starting in the qualies through to the semis at Charleston.  But the best was yet to come:  a QF spot at the US Open, taking out two top 10 seeds along the way.  This is very impressive stuff for a 17-year old.  She could be one of the games future stars.  I’ll expect about top 15 for her in 2015 although a huge slam breakout is not impossible.

Sloane Stephens – rank 36, age 21 – definitely slumped after a breakout 2013 took her to #11 in the world.  But it wasn’t all bad.  She made 4R at the Aus Open and French, and QF in Indian Wells.  She’s still got great potential, but at this point it looks like harnessing her mind is the chief challenge.  I’ll expect her to start battling back in 2015 and she may even get back to the top 20.  The potential for her to be an eventual top 10 player remains.

Caroline Garcia – rank 37, age 21 – halved her ranking in 2014.  She took the title in Bogota beating Jankovic in the final, then in Madrid she beat Kerber and Errani, and at Wuhan she beat Venus Williams and ARadwanska.  These impressive streaks of results suggest that she has a big game that can take her higher if she can gain consistency.  Top 20 is within reason for 2015.

Donna Vekic – rank 82, age 18 – is still so young but has stalled at this ranking for about 2 years.  I’ve stopped expecting significant improvements from her.

Katerina Siniakova – rank 84, age 18 – climbed from #211 last year, her most impressive result being the semis at the 470 pointer in Moscow.  Top 50 would seem a reasonable goal for next year.

Ana Konjuh – rank 93, age 17 – rose 180 spots in 2014 before turning 17 at the very end of December.  She won 3 rounds of qualifying at Wimbledon, and then two main draw rounds.  I’ll be watching closely to see if she can go higher in 2015 and notch some wins against some big names.  The jury is still out on whether she has the potential of a Bencic or will stall like Vekic.

Taylor Townsend – rank 103, age 18 – gained 200 spots in 2014 and made the third round at Roland Garros, with a win over Cornet along the way.  As she starts to play less ITF events and more WTA events, it will be interesting to see if she can raise her game further.  Top 50 would a worthy accomplishment for 2015.

Catherine Bellis – rank 254, age 15 – splashed into the public eye by beating Cibulkova at the US Open.  She capped her year with two ITF tournament victories.  She’s very young but the signals are very good.  She may crack the first 100 in 2015.

Other names on the radar – Victoria Duval, Saisai Zheng, Francoise Abanda

Most interesting to me of this group – Bencic, Muguruza, Garcia, Konjuh, Bellis

2014 Rankings

For my 2014 rankings I follow the WTA yearend rankings, except that I insert the now-retired Li Na at #5 to honour her Australian Open title.  Li was #9 when she was discontinued from the WTA rankings on 10 Nov 2014.

The WTA rankings see the addition of three new players to the yearend top 10 – Halep, Bouchard, and Cibulkova.  Additionally, Ivanovic returns after a 5-year absence.





2015 Predictions – Top Ten

Picking Serena for #1 next year was not too tough.  The small signs of self-destruction were wiped away by her USO and YEC wins, not to mention her 5 other titles.  She does not yet have a worthy challenger.

I wrestled long and hard over #2.  Sharapova is a proven multi-slam champion and her competitive desire can never be questioned.  But she also seems to be treading water.  Halep is still hungry and has shown she can hang with anyone.  I’m looking for an even bigger push in 2015 than she gave us in 2014 so she gets #2.

I would like to put Kvitova higher.  I think she finally has the right attitude to push for the very top, but until I see more consistency from her I’m not a believer.  That said, the top 4 are in a league above the rest, in my opinion.  They are all capable of #1, I believe.

Radwanska gets my nod for #5 for next year because I think Navratilova may be able to add enough to her game to keep her relevant.  At #6 I’m optimistic that Wozniacki will continue her surge of more-aggressive play.  I expect a bit of a slump from Bouchard at #7, but think she will come on strong toward the end of the year and get back to #7.

Despite good things from Ivanovic this year, I think she will tail off a little in the face of the strong competition put up by everyone else, but think she can stay in the top 10 at around #8.

Picking #s 9 and 10 is where it gets dicey.  There are at least 8 good candidates for the last two spots.  Andrea Petkovic has been coming back steadily from injury.  The former top-tenner is back to #13.  She won the season-ender in Sofia.  Makarova has been on a steady upswing and has the game to take down the best.  Cibulkova has the talent to be a long-term top-tenner, but not perhaps the consistency.  Venus Williams talent is undeniable and she seems to be managing her Sjogren’s effectively.  Her reascendance to the top 10 would be welcomed by many.  Belinda Bencic doesn’t have far to go to get to #10 and will probably get there one day.  Will this be her break out year?  Garbine Muguruza looks to have lots of potential and is already at #20 – will she be tough enough to put up some consistent results?

Angelique Kerber has been in the yearend top 10 for 3 straight years.  There seems little new to expect from her defensive game except more consistent results.  It’s a boring choice, I’d love to slot Muguruza or Bencic in, but in the end I expect Kerber will continue to play well.

My choice for #9 may be risky given her disastrous 2014, but the talent of Victoria Azarenka is undeniable.  I think she’ll struggle at first but then start finding her way back to the late rounds of big events.

2015 Slam Predictions

At the Australian Open I think Serena is the clear favourite, even though she hasn’t won since 2010, same as Roger Federer.  Of course she has the potential to falter and open the door for someone else, but there’s no one who’s head to head makes me think they should beat Serena (well... possibly Cornet!).  Sharapova’s hard-hitting game and Halep’s craftier one are probably next best on these courts, now that Li is gone.  Kvitova could annex the title if she can keep concentrating as we have seen only at Wimbledon from her.  Safarova may have a good result here, too.

Roland Garros has been kind to Sharapova, winning 2 titles from 3 finals in the last 3 years.  I think Serena is on some level the favourite at every tournament she plays, but she has faltered so frequently at the French, I’m casting my vote behind Maria’s consistent performances.  Halep looked very convincing in a runner-up performance last year, and a title from her here would not surprise.  Perhaps Muguruza will have another good run here, and Kuznetsova can never be counted out on this surface.  Maybe Bencic will break out.

At Wimbledon Serena could be deemed the favourite but recent history suggests Kvitova may be a more reliable choice.  I would love to see a showdown between them for the title.  Lisicki thrives at the big W.  Bouchard and Radwanska seem particularly adept on this surface, and I won’t be overlooking Venus Williams.

On hard at the US Open, Serena Williams, 3-time defending champion will be trying to match Chris Evert’s record 4 consecutive titles (shared with Jacobs and Mallory).  Halep will likely be extremely hungry by then, if she hasn’t hoisted slam hardware yet.  Wozniacki seems to like these courts, and perhaps Azarenka will be ready to make another assault on the citadel.

Charles’ Slam Predictions




Bookies Odds from Bet 365 on 16 Dec 2014.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open