Initial thoughts on Sharapova drug test failure

So Sharapova fails a test for a drug she was using for 10 years. It was legal (or 'not-yet-illegal') until Jan 1, 2016.

She claims it was for medicinal reasons, irregular heartbeat, family history of diabetes...
but it turns out she was not the only athlete using this drug.

A Russian icedancer, two Russian biathletes, a Russian cyclist

http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/a137 … est-report

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/katusha … violation/

It all looks rather systematic. Yes it was 'legal'. But it appears it was definitely intended to be performance enhancing.

Here's a quote from an article on Meldonium

"Some pharmaceutical companies have recently marketed it explicitly as a performance-enhancing drug."
http://roidvisor.com/performance-enhanc … gly-legal/

Maria's doing her best to look innocent, while freely acknowledging she was using a legal substance, but her intent in using it seems to have been - as the growing bulk of circumstantial evidence points to - performance enhancement.

It all makes me wonder...
What else is going in the tennis world re: performance enhancement?
How deep is this?
What other 'legal' substances are being used? How much performance-enhancing activity is regularly engaged in by the top tennis players? which ones? and what activities?

I'd bet this is far bigger than we can see now...

Comments

Victory Points - Djokovic vs Connors, Lendl vs Sampras

Novak Djokovic has just won his 63 rd main tour title with his victory in Miami last week. It seems like a lot of tournaments and is almost as many as Nadal has won with 67... or Sampras with 64. But it’s still a lot less than Jimmy Connors’ open era record of 109 titles. Here’s the title list for the top 20 of the Open Era (since 1968 when professionals were allowed to play with amateurs). 109 Connors 94 Lendl 88 Federer 77 McEnroe 67 Nadal 64 Sampras 64 Borg 63 Djokovic 62 Vilas 60 Agassi 58 Nastase 49 Becker 46 Laver 44 Muster 41 Edberg 37 Smith 35 Murray 34 Chang 33 Ashe 33 Wilander That list may or may not agree with various lists published on the ATP website or Wikipedia, and that’s because there was a fair bit of confusion in the early days of the open era (1968-1973) about what tournaments counted and which were exhibitions. Some supposed ‘tournaments’ had draws of only four players or were ‘invitational’. But after ...

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros. Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end. It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does. Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1. He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1. Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem. Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career. Will this be the eighth? The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem....

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams. When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind. It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era. Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short: like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time. But it’s not that simple. His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count. It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals. Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility. The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players. Laver was by no means considered...

tennis gut

Search This Blog