Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview
What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean
for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon? Is she a legitimate contender for Serena
Williams’ role as #1? Is Serena done
winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’?
Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a
complete shock. Beforehand, she was
deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1
odds. Anytime we welcome a new slam
champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like
Garbine, only 22. She displaces Petra
Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam.
Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles
major: Serena, Venus, Sharapova,
Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur. (There would be four more if it were not for
the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.) These 11 players are probably the best bet to
win this Wimbledon, even if we have had a new winner in each of the last three
slams (Muguruza, Kerber, and Pennetta).
Sharapova is out with a drug suspension. Azarenka has
withdrawn because of injury. Ivanovic
last made a major final in 2008, and Kuznetsova in 2009. Neither of them has been past the 4th
round at Wimbledon since 2007, so they can safely be counted out. Schiavone has only made it past the 4th
round once (2009) and is now 36 years old.
Stosur is a more reasonable 32, but despite a game seemingly well-suited
for grass, has never made it past the 3rd round.
That leaves five of our slam winners. Two of them have not won Wimbledon before:
Muguruza and Kerber. Kerber had deep
runs to the quarters in 2014 and to the semis in 2015, so she can play on
grass. She’s been a little up and down
this year since her break through win in Australia, but that’s hardly
unexpected. As of Jun 17, the bookies
have her as their 5th favourite at 20:1 odds. She is a wild card, but not an unreasonable
one.
Muguruza, the newly crowned French Open champ was also last
year’s Wimbledon runner up. If she were
to follow up her first slam victory with another victory in the next slam it
would not be unprecedented, but it is definitely uncommon. It’s been done by Venus Williams, Mandlikova,
Evert, and Goolagong in the open era.
Muguruza has the talent to go all the way at this Wimbledon, but I would
be very surprised if she does. It’s a
lot to sort out mentally in three weeks.
Looking at her longer term, she could become a multi-slam winner like
Kvitova, Azarenka, or maybe even Sharapova.
But she has not demonstrated the consistency of a Serena or Henin when
they were her age. But times are changing, so perhaps anything is possible for
her. The bookies have her as their #2 at
5:1.
Kvitova has two Wimbledon titles and her go for broke style
is well-suited to the lawns. Her woeful
inconsistency, however, means it’s anyone’s guess whether she will sweep
gloriously to victory or slink out of an early round. She’s #3 with the bookies at 6:1
That leaves the Williams sisters. Venus is an elderly 36 but back in the top 10
at #9. Despite five Wimbledon titles,
she has not been to the semis this decade.
When everything clicks, she can still beat anyone, but to do it seven
matches in a row seems like asking too much.
The bookies have her ranked only #20 at 50:1 odds.
For Serena anything is possible. Will she match Graf with major #22? Anything less will seem like a failure. She’s been to both slam finals this year, an
accomplishment that would be heralded for anyone else, but the tennis community
is asking if this is the end for her.
She’s still #1 in the rankings, and #1 in the yearly race. She may or may not win this Wimbledon, but
she is far from done.
First Quarter
Serena could run into Kristina Mladenovic (seed #31) or
Heather Watson in the third round and Sloane Stephens (#18) in the fourth. All three are dangerous. Timea Bacsinszky (#11) made the quarters last
year but standing in her way in the fourth round this year could be grass-savant
Coco Vandeweghe (#27) recent winner at ‘s-Hertogenbosch. Former #1 Wozniacki is unseeded and could
upset Kuznetsova (#13) in the first round in a clash of former top 2 players.
SWilliams d. Vandeweghe
Second Quarter
This quarter is a viper’s nest of grass court specialists,
headlined by Aggie Radwanska (#3). The
2012 runner up thrives on grass, but just lost this week in the quarters of Eastbourne
to Dominika Cibulkova (#19). The two
could meet again in the fourth round of Wimbledon. Aggie’s third round could bring up Caroline
Garcia (#30) who won the grass event in Mallorca last week.
Cibulkova faces former Wimby semifinalist Lucic-Baroni in
the first, and in the third could meet former finalist Bouchard (unseeded) or
Johanna Konta (16) who upset Kvitova en route to the Eastbourne semis.
The bottom half of this section features two-time champion
Kvitova (#10), former quarter-finalists Makarova, Strycova (24), Paszek, and
Pironkova, as well as rising teen Belinda Bencic (#7). Seeing any of these names in the semis would
not be a surprise and the quarter seems ripe for upsets.
On balance I have to go with the frightening inconsistency
of the powerful Kvitova. When she’s on,
nothing on grass can stand in her way...
Kvitova d. ARadwanska
Third Quarter
Madison Keys (#9) could meet 2014 semi-finalist Simona Halep
(5) in the fourth round. Keys won the
tune-up in Birmingham and has the sort of big game that can go far on
grass. Only Serena won more slam rounds
than Keys in 2015, and Madison was a quarterfinalist here last year.
Australian champ, Angelique Kerber (#4), could go out to
dangerous Laura Robson in the first. Or
she could go all the way to final, but she may first have to overcome the
redoubtable grass skills of Karolina Pliskova (#15). Pliskova is into the final of Eastbourne this
week.
Keys d. KaPliskova
Fourth Quarter
Five-time champ, Venus Williams is seeded #8 this year and
looks to have a favourable draw. If she
can keep the matches short and get a high percentage of first serves in she is
always a threat on grass, despite recent middling results. She looks to have a fairly clear path to the fourth
round where she could face clay-loving Suarez Navarro (#12).
Sabine Lisicki is a former finalist, and unseeded this
year. She could give Stosur (#14)
nightmares in the second round and could go for a deep run. We will soon see the mental state of Muguruza
(#2) when she faces big-hitting Camila Giorgi in the first. She’s slated for a third rounder with
Safarova (#28) who made the semis two years ago. Garbine should get by Lisicki, but it’s no
gimme. Muguruza has the game to take the
title, but I think that will be too much to ask so soon after her French
victory. She could well lose early, but I
think it more likely she will take this quarter.
Muguruza d. VWilliams
Semis
I think it’s highly doubtful that Kvitova will actually make
the semis, but she has the best game in her quarter to do so. A decisive victory over Serena would not be
unprecedented despite Serena’s victories in their two previous Wimbledon
tussles, but given Kvitova’s inconsistency, Serena should make it through to
the final.
SWilliams d. Kvitova
Keys has only once been to a slam semi-final. But her talent is evident and Serena dubbed
her a future champion after they played in Rome this year. Muguruza seems to have the mentality and game
to take her to many more major championship finals in the future. But I suspect the timing, on the heels of
Roland Garros, will favour Keys.
Keys d. Muguruza
Final
Coming into 2015 Serena had lost only four slam finals
versus 21 wins. Having now lost two
finals this year, surely Serena will not fall victim a third time?! Nothing is certain in sport, and especially
in women’s tennis these days.
Slam final record of the most prolific slam winners
Player
|
Titles
|
Runner-up’s
|
Court
|
24
|
5
|
Graf
|
22
|
9
|
SWilliams
|
21
|
6
|
Wills
|
20
|
3
|
Navratilova
|
18
|
14
|
Evert
|
18
|
16
|
Keys has the talent to pull this off, but she has not often
been to the winner’s circle in tournaments at any level, let alone the highest
echelon of the sport. She only has two
tournament victories, although the same could be said of Stosur when she beat
Serena in the 2011 US Open final; and Li and Muguruza both had only 3 previous
titles before their first slam wins. But
it would be crazy to bet against Serena.
SWilliams d. Keys
Odds from bet365.com on 17 Jun 2016
1
|
SWilliams
|
2.5
|
2
|
Muguruza
|
6
|
3
|
Kvitova
|
7
|
4
|
Azarenka
|
9
|
5
|
Kerber
|
21
|
6
|
Keys
|
21
|
7
|
Halep
|
26
|
8
|
ARadwanska
|
26
|
9
|
Bencic
|
26
|
10
|
KaPliskova
|
34
|
11
|
Bouchard
|
34
|
12
|
Vandeweghe
|
34
|
13
|
Safarova
|
41
|
14
|
Stephens
|
41
|
15
|
Bacsinszky
|
41
|
16
|
Lisicki
|
41
|
17
|
Wozniacki
|
51
|
18
|
Ivanovic
|
51
|
19
|
Konta
|
51
|
20
|
VWilliams
|
51
|
21
|
Mladenovic
|
67
|
22
|
Konjuh
|
67
|
23
|
Makarova
|
101
|
24
|
Jankovic
|
101
|
25
|
Babos
|
101
|
26
|
Svitolina
|
101
|
27
|
Ostapenko
|
101
|
28
|
Pironkova
|
101
|
29
|
Garcia
|
101
|
30
|
Petkovic
|
151
|
31
|
Pavlyuchenkova
|
151
|
32
|
Siegemund
|
151
|
You made a mistake about your other semi-final matchup. It should read Muguruza and not Serena twice against Madison Keys.
ReplyDeleteThanks!
ReplyDeleteCorrected...