There’s not
really a favourite for this tournament – which feels a bit weird, since Iga
Swiatek has won it four of the last five years.
She’s also been #1 much of that time, but as of today is ranked only
#5. In her absence, Aryna Sabalenka has
been entrenching herself at the top with multiple finals played this year,
winning three of them. The six clay
tournaments since Miami have seen six different winners, so the answers are not
clear cut. Maybe Jasmine Paolini who won
last week in Rome, in conditions very similar to Paris, should be regarded as
the first horse. She was indeed
runner-up in the City of Lights last year.
Top
Quarter
Aryna
Sabalenka has been
burning up the tour this year. The top seed has opened her lead at #1 to nearly
4000 points. Other than wobbly
performances in Doha and Dubai, she has been a factor in every tournament she’s
played. Impressively, she’s 11-2 on
clay. It’s hard not to regard her as the
favourite. Her two losses were to Jelena
Ostapenko and Qinwen Zheng, both of whom are past winners at this venue. The losses show Sabalenka is not invincible, yet
she is still the most consistent performer this year by a long shot, on this or
any surface. It will take a peaking player, or maybe a Swiatek with re-found
confidence, to beat her.
She could
meet the ever-feisty Danielle Collins in the third round. Collins knocked Swiatek out of Rome, where Iga
was 3-time champion, so should not be under-estimated.
Clara
Tauson (seeded 22)
is nearby in the draw. She won in
Auckland in January and made the finals of the 1000 in Dubai in March, beating
Sabalenka along the way. She’s come down
a bit since then, but her big strokes are always dangerous. She could meet Amanda
Anisimova (16) in the third round.
Anisimova is a former semi-finalist here, and she also won the 1000 in
Doha this year. But she too has cooled,
going just 5-6 (wins-losses) since that title run.
Diana
Shnaider (11) is
still just 21 years old and is knocking loudly on the door of a first trip to
the top ten. Her section includes Peyton
Stearns, the newly clay-loving American, who looked strong in a run to the
Rome semis.
Also here
is the other Rome semi-finalist, Qinwen Zheng. Zheng is extremely dangerous on this surface,
beating Iga Swiatek at this site during the Olympics last year on her way to a
gold medal. She also took Sabalenka out
of Rome last week. They could get a
rematch if both make the quarters. The
venue seems to suit Zheng and I’m not sure who I’d pick if they actually
play. But Sabalenka has to be more
trusted to go the distance, given her form this year.
Sabalenka
def QZheng
Second
Quarter
Iga
Swiatek (5) lands
here. It could have been worse and she
could have actually been drawn in Sabalenka’s quarter, but as it is, arguably
the top two favourites could play in the semis.
That statement coasts on Swiatek’s reputation. With four Roland Garros titles so far, this
has been a happy hunting ground for her.
However, this year she has been dreadful. Well not really dreadful. Her 27 match wins are third best actually, but in a time of
year when she usually dominates, the middle-east and clay, she has exactly 0
titles. Worst of all, her record on clay
is just 6-3. Last year she entered Paris on a 12 match clay win-streak. Whatever the problem is, it seems it’s all in
her head. For some reason her confidence
is shattered, and when a match gets tight, she starts to panic, and hits a
flurry of errors.
She may
recover from this. But by my
observation, a player often has to hit rock-bottom before recovering their
mojo. Crashing out early at RG might be
the wake up call she needs to erase the past and start over. Or she might will herself through this – but
I’m not hopeful of that. She could lose
first round and I wouldn’t be surprised.
But such is her talent and pedigree on the surface, I’m hedging she’ll
go deep before the tightness sets in.
Perennial
nemesis, Jelena Ostapenko (21), champion here in 2017 is a potential
fourth-rounder for Swiatek. Ostapenko
was in world-beating form when she seized the 500 in Stuttgart beating both
Swiatek (for a 6th straight time) and Sabalenka along the way. For me, Ostapenko is a thrill to watch. She goes for the line on virtually every
shot, completely negating the need for an opponent. She’s also convinced the automatic
line-judging system is wrong most of the time, which makes for some amusing
commentary from her lips. If she wins,
it seems like fate.
A possible
third round opponent for Ostapenko is Elena Rybakina (12). Rybakina is
an absolutely top notch player, a member of the once-purported ‘Big 3’ of the
WTA with Sabalenka and Swiatek, a concept that never really got off the
ground. She’s been in two slam finals,
winning Wimbledon in 2022, and has two big clay titles in Rome 2023 and Stuttgart
2024. However, she’s had a rough few
months, with rounds on the coaching carousel, and suspicions that her preferred
coach governs her with a Svengali-like abusive relationship. She is the odd combination of emotionally
placid yet inconsistent in play. What
Rybakina will bring to this tournament is anyone’s guess, but Swiatek should be
praying that Rybakina can take out Ostapenko before Iga has to face Jelena.
This loaded
quarter has two other significant contenders for the title: Jasmine Paolini and
Elina Svitolina (13). Svitolina, a former #3 has not reached the heights
she achieved before motherhood, but is still a force to be reckoned with,
especially on clay. She’s won a bunch of
titles on the surface, including the Rome 1000 twice. She’s also been to the French Open
quarterfinals four times. Seeing her
emerge from this quarter would not surprise.
Jasmine
Paolini (4) is
fresh from winning the 1000 in Rome. Her
other significant result on clay was finishing runner-up at the French last
year. Hard to say which accomplishment
was bigger. One thing she should not be
is under-estimated. She may be
pint-sized but her strokes are huge and spinny, especially that forehand.
Which of
these five strong contenders will emerge to the semi is a very tough call. But
my money is on a repeat of last year’s final.
Swiatek
def Paolini
Third
Quarter
This
quarter is no less difficult to predict than the last, but not for the same
reasons. This is the land of unproven
talent. Well not totally unproven, but more or less so.
Mirra
Andreeva (6)
headlines the list. She won consecutive 1000 titles at Dubai and Indian Wells
in Feb/March. She was a semi-finalist at
the French last year, so she is definitely on the short list of title
contenders. However, at just 18 years old we’ve never seen her in this position
as a favourite before, so this will be an interesting litmus test.
One of the
most intriguing first-rounders is between Naomi Osaka and Paula
Badosa, former #1 against former #2.
Osaka owns four slam titles from a previous pre-kid life, but has never
been past the third round at the French.
However, she did take Swiatek to match point here last year. Badosa has
clawed her way back to #10 and has never been worse than third round here. On current form I may take Osaka, but the
outcome could depend on the health of Badosa’s perennially bad back.
A potential
second-rounder could occur between Karolina Muchova (14) and Maria
Sakkari. Muchova was a finalist here
two years ago and Sakkari was in the semis in 2021. And yet another
second-rounder could occur between former slam finalists Ons Jabeur and Marketa
Vondrousova, Wimbledon winner from two years ago. All four of these players have the talent to
nab this title, but none have been in great form.
The highest
seed in this quarter is Jessica Pegula (3). Her record at the hard court
slams is at least twice as good as at the French on dirt, but she did make the
quarters two years ago.
Andreeva
def Muchova
Fourth
Quarter
Many of the
best American players have landed here: Gauff, Keys, Navarro, and Kenin. Sofia Kenin was runner-up at Roland
Garros in 2020, but has mostly struggled since then. She’s back into a seeded position at #31, and
can be dangerous on her day. Let’s not forget she won the Australian in 2020. No one will doubt her desire.
Madison
Keys (7) finally
fulfilled her potential when she seized the Australian Open this January. She’s been to seven slam semi-finals (or
better), including here at Roland Garros, so she’s a factor for the title.
Since her 16-match win-streak bracketing the AO title ended, she’s only been
6-4 in matches. It will be interesting
to see if she can recapture the headspace that took her to the laurels
down-under.
Emma
Navarro (9) has
been to at least the quarters of every slam except this one. Perhaps there’s a reason.
Maybe the
American with the best shot at the title is Coco Gauff. The number two seed was a finalist here in
2022. After falling to a 1-11 record
against Swiatek, Gauff has now won the last three matches in their
head-to-head, including in Madrid on clay. Gauff’s year started with a 9-match
win streak, before troughing until May.
She’s made two clay finals since, without, arguably, her best
tennis. Can she notch it up in Paris?
Also in
this quarter are Beatriz Haddad Maia (23) a former semi-finalist, and Barbora
Krejcikova (15), former winner here and reigning Wimbledon champion. Krejcikova has missed the entire year so far
due to injury, but played (and lost) her first match, this week in Strasbourg.
Gauff
def Keys
Semi-finals
Sabalenka
def Swiatek, Gauff def Andreeva
Final
Sabalenka
def Gauff
Bookies
Odds
Decimal
odds from Bet365.com on 23 May 2025:
1 |
Sabalenka |
3.4 |
2 |
Swiatek |
4 |
3 |
MAndreeva |
6 |
4 |
Gauff |
6 |
5 |
Paolini |
15 |
6 |
QZheng |
19 |
7 |
Rybakina |
29 |
8 |
Keys |
34 |
9 |
Ostapenko |
34 |
10 |
Svitolina |
34 |
11 |
Muchova |
51 |
12 |
Navarro |
51 |
13 |
Osaka |
51 |
14 |
Pegula |
51 |
15 |
Shnaider |
51 |
16 |
Collins |
67 |
17 |
Badosa |
81 |
18 |
Jabeur |
81 |
19 |
Kasatkina |
81 |
20 |
Tauson |
81 |
21 |
Alexandrova |
101 |
22 |
Kenin |
101 |
23 |
Krejcikova |
101 |
24 |
Noskova |
101 |
25 |
Anisimova |
126 |
26 |
Haddad Maia |
126 |
27 |
Kostyuk |
151 |
28 |
Raducanu |
151 |
29 |
Vekic |
151 |
30 |
VKudermetova |
201 |
31 |
Mertens |
201 |
32 |
Putintseva |
201 |
33 |
Sakkari |
201 |
Comments
Post a Comment