Skip to main content

Wimbledon Men 2025

 

Carlos Alcaraz is on a roll.  He’s won 18 straight matches AND the last two Wimbledons.  In the meantime, Jannik Sinner has established himself at #1. Between the two of them they have won the last  six slam tournaments.  Is a clash in the final inevitable? Or can Novak Djokovic or someone else disrupt the party?

 

First Quarter

Jannik Sinner is still the top seed but it seems increasingly that this year belongs to Carlos Alcaraz.  Sinner’s year was interrupted by a three-month ban, but he hit the ground running on his return, staging an epic final for the ages at Roland Garros with Alcaraz.  He held three match points in that encounter, after dominating the first half of the match. Although he fought valiantly to the end, that painful loss has got to leave some scar tissue.  Sinner has done well at Wimbledon, two quarter-finals and a semi – good but not spectacular.  Can he overcome the painful loss from three weeks ago to make his best effort during the fortnight? He’s jumped a level and a title run is certainly within reason.

Challenges from his quarter could come from Tommy Paul (seeded 13) who’s got a respectable 9-3 record at SW19, Ben Shelton (10), or Lorenzo Musetti (7).  Shelton looks like he has a game made for grass, and did make the fourth-round last year.  Musetti, normally thought of as a clay-courter, made the semis here last year.

Looking to the semis, Sinner could face challenges from Djokovic or Jack Draper.  Even making it to the final would be a huge accomplishment for Sinner, but taking down Alcaraz for the title would be a major statement. It’s not an easy road.

JSinner def Musetti

 

Second Quarter

Jack Draper (4) is the top seed in this section.  It has been a remarkable rise for him this year, starting at #15.   He’s British and should be good on grass, right? Right?? Actually he’s never been past the second round at Wimbledon.  But he is 18-8 on the surface. Which is not… terrible….  Not the most promising… Can he live up to that seeding? This year we have a whole new Draper, this should be the chance for him to establish himself as a force at Wimbledon, if indeed he is to be one.

He could get the very grass-proficient Alexander Bublik (28) in the third round. Bublik, a born comedian, will not cease to delight the crowd with under-arm serves, go for broke forehands, ill advised net approaches, and banter with the audience, his opponent, the umpire, or whoever might be within earshot.

Jakub Mensik (15) who won Indian Wells is here, as well as Alex de Minaur (11) a quarter-finalist last year.  But the name to watch out for is Novak Djokovic (6).

Djokovic is 7-time winner and 10-time finalist at Wimbledon.  He had a rough start to the year and rumours of his retirement have begun to swirl.  He narrowly lost to Sinner at the French Open, but should they meet again here, I’d expect Djokovic to have the edge.  His game and abilities seem better suited to grass, especially his body and footwork stability.  He’s shown he can match and over-match the brilliance of Alcaraz at the Olympics last year and the Australian this year.  But can he do it on grass – that surface that above all others, favours the shotmaker? With perhaps his only real surviving chance to reach a magnificent quarter century of major titles, he should be highly motivated.

Djokovic def Draper

 

Third Quarter

This is the wild quarter.  There’s talent here but not a clear favourite.  Alexander Zverev (3) is the top seed, but has never been past the fourth round at the big W.

Karen Khachanov (17) has, and is a threat at any slam he plays. Matteo Berrettini (32) was a finalist here four years ago. Taylor Fritz (5) has twice been to the quarters, and could run into flame-throwing young Canadian, Gabriel Diallo in the third round.

But although he’s struggled mightily this year and may have entered the downswing of his career, Daniil Medvedev (9) is still a force to be reckoned with.  He’s been in the semis the last two years, and despite his lanky awkwardness weirdly thrives on this SW19 grass.

Medvedev def Berrettini

 

Fourth Quarter

Holger Rune’s (8) best slam has been the French, but he’s made fourth-round and quarter-final here the last two years.  He’s the last man to beat Alcaraz, can he do it again, this time on grass?

Eighteen-year-old Joao Fonseca is clearly talented, but still a bit of a wildcard.  He could have an entertaining second-rounder with Jenson Brooksby or Tallon Griekspoor (31). The talented Brooksby is also a wild card, his only previous result here a third-rounder in 2022.

Jiri Lehecka (23) made the fourth-round in his most recent appearance here, and Frances Tiafoe (12) has been solid in seven previous appearances.  Andrey Rublev (14) has been a quarter-finalist.

But the gigantic force at the bottom of this quarter is Carlos Alcaraz (2). He had a slow start to the year, but since clay season dawned as been on an absolute tear.  Given his status as two-time defending champ, it’s hard to find any reason to believe he’s not the favourite.  Sinner or Djokovic can hopefully mount a credible challenge in the final, but honestly, I expect Carlos to win this, going away.

Alcaraz def Rune

Semis and Final

Djokovic def Sinner, Alcaraz def Medvedev

Alcaraz def Djokovic

 

Bookies

Odds from Bet365.com on 28 June 2025:

1

Alcaraz

2.05

2

JSinner

2.75

3

Djokovic

6.5

4

JDraper

15

5

AZverev

26

6

Bublik

34

7

Fritz

34

8

DMedvedev

34

9

Lehecka

51

10

DeMinaur

81

11

Mensik

81

12

Musetti

81

13

Rune

81

14

Berrettini

101

15

Shelton

101

16

Fonseca

126

17

Tsitsipas

151

18

Auger Aliassime

201

19

Humbert

201

20

Khachanov

201

21

Mpetshi Perricard

201

22

TPaul

201

23

Popyrin

201

24

Davidovich Fokina

251

25

Diallo

251

26

Dimitrov

251

27

Griekspoor

251

28

Mochizuki

251

29

Tiafoe

251

30

Michelsen

301

31

Rublev

301

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem....

Victory Points - Djokovic vs Connors, Lendl vs Sampras

Novak Djokovic has just won his 63 rd main tour title with his victory in Miami last week.  It seems like a lot of tournaments and is almost as many as Nadal has won with 67... or Sampras with 64.  But it’s still a lot less than Jimmy Connors’ open era record of 109 titles.  Here’s the title list for the top 20 of the Open Era (since 1968 when professionals were allowed to play with amateurs). 109 Connors 94 Lendl 88 Federer 77 McEnroe 67 Nadal 64 Sampras 64 Borg 63 Djokovic 62 Vilas 60 Agassi 58 Nastase 49 Becker 46 Laver 44 Muster 41 Edberg 37 Smith 35 Murray 34 Chang 33 Ashe 33 Wilander That list may or may not agree with various lists published on the ATP website or Wikipedia, and that’s because there was a fair bit of confusion in the early days of the open era (1968-1973) about what tournaments counted and which were exhibitions.  Some supposed ‘tournaments’ had draws of only four players or were ‘invitational’.  But after ...

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...