2017 WTA Recap and Look into 2018
No one dominated the WTA tour this year. There were four different winners of the slam
tournaments, a different player finished the year at #1 on the computer, a
sixth player won the year ending WTA finals, a seventh player won the most
tournaments this year, and an eighth player won the most prize money. So who on earth is most deserving of
player-of-the-year (POTY) honours?
Year summary
The year started off predictably enough with Serena Williams
claiming the Australian Open. It was her
23rd singles slam title, breaking the Open Era (since 1968) record
she had shared with Steffi Graf (22), but still one behind the all-time record
of Margaret Court (24). But Serena’s
opponent in the Aus final was unexpected – her sister, Venus Williams. Venus hadn’t been in a slam final since 2009.
As it turned out, it was Serena’s last tournament of the
year. A short time later she announced
she was pregnant and gave birth to a daughter during the US Open.
Elina Svitolina won the first of the nine 900/1000 level
tournaments of the year at Dubai over Caroline Wozniacki. The big spring US tournaments at Indian Wells
and Miami were won by Elena Vesnina over Svetlana Kuznetsova and Johanna Konta
over Wozniacki. For both Vesnina and
Konta this was the biggest tournament win of their careers so far, at the
900/1000 level, and the highlight of their seasons.
The clay season kicked off in earnest in Charleston with a
glimpse of a possible future when 19-year olds Daria Kasatkina and Jelena
Ostapenko battled for the final.
Kasatkina won but it was a harbinger of bigger things to come for
Ostapenko.
A great deal of controversy and ink was expended over the
return of Maria Sharapova to competition play at the Porsche Championship in
Stuttgart after 15 months of drug suspension.
She did well to make the semis, but the always-competitive tournament
was taken by siege by the unheralded Laura Siegemund. Siegemund had also made the semis of
Charleston and seemed destined to make a late-career breakthrough at age
29. Tragically she suffered a
catastrophic knee injury just a month later and sat out the rest of the season.
Simona Halep picked up the sixth 900/1000 tournament of her
career by taking Madrid over Kristina Mladenovic, who had also been runner-up
in Stuttgart. Halep next made the final
in Rome but was out-gunned by Elina Svitolina, who picked up her second
900/1000 of the year.
Heading into the French Open at Roland Garros, Halep and
Svitolina looked like marginal favourites over Mladenovic, and last year’s
champ, Garbine Muguruza. Sharapova was
snubbed and denied a wildcard, amid much sniping. But the return of Petra Kvitova to tournament
play after a horrendous knife attack in her home last December, was lauded and
celebrated, especially after she won her first match. Halep and Svitolina met in the quarters and
Svitolina raced to a 6-3, 5-1 lead with victory looking assured. But she faltered and Halep rolled off 12 of
the next 13 games for an improbable six-love-in-the-third victory.
But the tables were turned on Halep in the final when she
led Ostapenko 6-4, 3-0 but failed to close.
A 100:1 long shot at the start of the tournament, the victory by
Ostapenko was a revelation. Two days
after her 20th birthday, she seized control of the final with
fearless go-for-broke play, painting the lines with the entitlement of youth.
At Wimbledon the 13-month slumber of Muguruza finally ended
as she steadily worked her way to a final round showing with the ageless Venus
Williams. That Williams had returned to
the top echelon of the sport at age 37 was remarkable. But Muguruza was too tough, and though she
had not played a final of any description since her victory at the French last
year, she claimed a second slam in her third final.
When Muguruza went on to claim the 900/1000 title in
Cincinnati in August (over Halep), she became the warm favourite for POTY
honours. In the meantime, Svitolina went
on to claim the 900/1000 in Toronto (over Wozniacki), her third title at that
level this year, and fifth title overall for the year.
As the US Open dawned, the favourites looked to be Muguruza,
Halep, Svitolina, and last year’s finalist Karolina Pliskova who had taken over
the #1 ranking in July on the strength of three 2017 titles at the 470 point
level and strong play in the latter half of 2016. But the tournament started to look like the
US Closed when Americans ripped through the draw and successfully occupied all
four semi-final spots.
Sloane Stephens gave up only three games in the final to
Madison Keys. It capped a remarkable comeback
that saw her ranking as low as #953 only two months before the USO. She had taken nearly a year away from the
game to heal a fracture in her foot and was in a walking boot only a few months
earlier. The other semi-finalists were
Venus Williams, the only woman to make multiple slam finals during the year,
and Coco Vandeweghe, who made the second slam semi of her career, and year,
having made it that far in Melbourne.
Coco also made the quarters at Wimbledon in what has been a career year.
The murky battle for #1 did not get much clearer in the
fall. Muguruza reached #1 after the US
Open despite a middling round of 16 showing there. But four weeks later, Halep finally seized
the top spot by making the final in Beijing.
It was the fourth time during the year, Halep had been within a match of
the #1 ranking, and this time she took it with a win, and then she held it for
the rest of the year.
She lost the Beijing final however to Caroline Garcia, who stunned
everyone including herself by claiming the last two 900/1000’s of the year, in
consecutive weeks, at Wuhan and Beijing.
The run was enough to propel Garcia to the WTA Finals in Singapore,
where she won two matches in the round robin to make the semis. The other Wuhan finalist was Ashleigh Barty
who returned to the tour this year after two years away. Still only 21 years old, Barty made three
finals this year, winning one 280 event and rising to a career high ranking of 17.
At the WTA Finals, it came down once again to Venus Williams
in the final, this time against Wozniacki.
Venus made the final of the three of the five biggest tournaments of the
year, and the semis of four of them, by far the most consistent record at the
top tournaments. But she failed to claim
any titles this year and cannot be considered POTY.
Almost as unsuccessful was Wozniacki. She lost the first six finals she played this
year, but claimed the last two, including the WTA Finals, the biggest title of
her career. She finishes the year at #3
on the computer. The fourth spot goes to
Karolina Pliskova who was consistent throughout the year but did not make a
showing on the biggest stages. Venus finishes
at #5, and Svitolina, who won a tour-leading five tournaments, gets the #6
spot. Number 7 goes to Ostapenko.
The top two come down to Halep and Muguruza. Although Halep is #1 on the computer and made
five finals this year, many of them at the highest levels, she won only one of
them. So for me, player of the year goes
to Muguruza who won one slam and one 900/1000, and was edged out of the top
spot by only 40 computer points, about half a percent.
Garbine Muguruza
Muguruza gave us quite a scare with her extended sophomore
slump. After claiming victory at last
year’s French Open, she did not make another final until Wimbledon this
year. But the wait was worth it and she
delivered a second slam. It was her
second final at the big W, having lost to Serena in 2015.
Afterwards, many observers seemed ready to anoint Muguruza
the new #1 and felt that victory at the US Open would cement her status. Although she disappointed the hopeful, at the
end of the year she still looks like the de facto #1, despite a computer
ranking of #2. Even the WTA awarded her
its Player of the Year award.
So what can we realistically expect from her in 2018? Well, establishing a strong position as the
dominant #1 is not what I expect. For
one thing, Serena Williams may be back in the mix. And secondly, nothing in Muguruza’s history
suggests that she is going to dominate.
She’s only won 5 titles total in her career, and this is the first year
in which she’s won as many as two. This
is not the resume of a dominant #1.
However it might be reasonable to think she could win
another slam next year. She’s only once
made the quarters of a hard court slam (this year’s Aus), so victory at the
Australian or US Open is probably unlikely.
But she’s been considerably more successful at the French and Wimbledon,
so victory at either or both of those tournaments might be a reasonable
expectation. Probably not both, however,
since she seems to space out her wins.
If Serena makes a slow return or no return to the tour, I
could see Muguruza having another year as default #1, since none of the other established
players have been making a strong case for being considered the best. Those established players would include the
likes of Halep, Pliskova, Wozniacki, Kvitova, Venus Williams, Radwanska, Konta,
Kuznetsova, and Kerber.
On the other hand, Maria Sharapova, Victoria Azarenka, and
of course Serena, could storm back and make strong plays for the top spot. The other, and perhaps more exciting, threat
for #1 could come from a young up and comer like Ostapenko, Kasatkina, an
injury-free Belinda Bencic, or maybe Barty, or someone slightly older like
Svitolina, Keys, Stephens, or Garcia. If
we have another year of parity, Muguruza could again be #1. I would like to see her make a stronger, more
consistent campaign for the top, but she will do what she can do.
Serena Williams
Serena’s match winning ratio in 2017 was a tour-leading 8.00
(8.00 wins per loss), but her lack of play means she is not a contender for
POTY. She only played two tournaments in
2018.
Match winning ratio 2017
|
Wins
|
Losses
|
Ratio
|
SWilliams
|
8
|
1
|
8.00
|
Svitolina
|
53
|
14
|
3.79
|
KaPliskova
|
53
|
18
|
2.94
|
Wozniacki
|
60
|
21
|
2.86
|
VWilliams
|
38
|
14
|
2.71
|
Sharapova
|
16
|
6
|
2.67
|
Halep
|
45
|
17
|
2.65
|
Konta
|
36
|
16
|
2.25
|
Muguruza
|
47
|
21
|
2.24
|
Garcia
|
48
|
22
|
2.18
|
Ostapenko
|
43
|
20
|
2.15
|
Barty
|
30
|
14
|
2.14
|
Goerges
|
48
|
23
|
2.09
|
(does not include WTA125 and Futures matches)
She may not be POTY, but the bookies still consider Serena
the best player around. They name her
the top favourite at all four slam tournaments in 2018. She may be the ‘best’ or most dangerous
player, but she did not accomplish the most in 2017, and that is what player of
the year is for me.
But can she really be expected to rebound from motherhood
just 4.5 months after giving birth and seriously contend for the Australian
Open? I have my doubts to be honest. But if she decides she does want to make a
serious comeback, she will be my favourite at Wimbledon and the US Open. My guess is she won’t play enough tournaments
in 2018 to gain the #1 ranking, but she may accomplish enough to be POTY.
Simona Halep
Simona Halep has claimed that 2017 is her best year yet, and
it’s hard to argue with attainment of the yearend #1 ranking. But the 6175 ranking points she has in 2017
are barely different than the 6060 ranking points she had as #2 in 2015, and
are less than the 6292 points she had as #3 in 2014. The main difference of course in 2017, is
that Serena Williams is not ahead of her with 9 or 10 thousand points. Overall it looks like a weak year for the #1
ranking.
Regardless, Halep should be praised for steeling through to
#1. She finally figured out a way to
stay positive and focussed when #1 was on the line. Martina Navratilova recently opined that
yearend #1 was more difficult than winning a slam. Will this lead to more in 2018? She says her goal now is to win a slam.
Probably her best bet will be at Roland Garros where she has
twice made the final. It helps that
there isn’t a clay court specialist on tour now, and that the field of players
seems to have more parity at the French, (unlike the grass of Wimbledon, say,
which the Williamses and Kvitova seem to prefer). If she can retain the positive attitude she
displayed at Beijing, Halep will have a chance at the French title, but so far,
she cannot be proclaimed the favourite even there. Rather, Serena, Sharapova, or Muguruza would
seem the best bets at RG.
It seems likely that Halep will remain in the top 5 for
2018, maybe even top 2 or 3. I give her
about a 20-25% chance of winning a slam, which is actually quite good. If she does, she could well finish at #1
again.
Caroline Wozniacki
Wozniacki returns to the computer top 10 after two years
absence for a seventh year. She has the
most match wins for the year with 60, ahead of Svitolina and KaPliskova with 53
each. It is her 10th consecutive year claiming a title at the WTA
level, the second longest active streak (Serena is on 11 years).
Consecutive years with WTA Title
|
|
Total Span
|
Navratilova
|
21
|
21
|
Evert
|
18
|
18
|
BJKing*
|
16
|
24
|
Graf
|
14
|
14
|
Sharapova
|
13
|
15
|
SWilliams
|
11
|
19
|
Wade
|
11
|
11
|
Goolagong
|
11
|
11
|
Wozniacki
|
10
|
10
|
*includes pre-open era
It looked like Wozniacki’s title streak would be broken when
she lost the first six finals she played this year, but she won the last
two. Her eight finals are the most
played by any woman this year. It was
especially heartening to see the way she played in claiming the WTA
Finals. She was aggressive while
maintaining her usual superior defensive skills. To balance these is a great achievement. The slow court probably favoured her.
If she can continue to find this sweetspot, a slam title is
not out of the question for 2018. Her
best slams are the hardcourt slams, the Aus and US Opens, where she averages
3.5 and 4.2 rounds played, respectively.
Average Slam Rounds Played*
|
Overall
|
Aus
|
Fre
|
Wim
|
US
|
SWilliams
|
5.79
|
5.8
|
5.0
|
6.1
|
6.2
|
Sharapova
|
4.72
|
5.0
|
5.1
|
4.5
|
4.2
|
VWilliams
|
4.46
|
4.0
|
3.4
|
5.4
|
5.1
|
Azarenka
|
3.90
|
4.7
|
3.1
|
3.6
|
4.2
|
ARadwanska
|
3.65
|
4.0
|
3.1
|
4.5
|
3.0
|
Muguruza
|
3.60
|
3.6
|
4.8
|
4.0
|
2.0
|
Kuznetsova
|
3.53
|
3.2
|
4.5
|
3.1
|
3.3
|
Kvitova
|
3.41
|
2.8
|
3.3
|
4.1
|
3.3
|
Wozniacki
|
3.38
|
3.5
|
2.8
|
3.0
|
4.2
|
Win=8, RU=7, SF=6, QF=5, 4R=4, 3R=3, 2R=2, 1R=1, (best active
players only)
Others: Zvonareva 3.21, Keys 3.10, Stephens 3.09, Kerber 3.00, Jankovic 3.00, Bouchard 2.95, Halep 2.93, SuarezNavarro 2.89, Cibulkova 2.83, Makarova 2.80, Ostapenko 2.70
Others: Zvonareva 3.21, Keys 3.10, Stephens 3.09, Kerber 3.00, Jankovic 3.00, Bouchard 2.95, Halep 2.93, SuarezNavarro 2.89, Cibulkova 2.83, Makarova 2.80, Ostapenko 2.70
Overall I’d give Wozniacki about a 10% chance to win a slam
next year, and I expect her to remain in the top 10, and likely in the top 5.
Karolina Pliskova
KaPliskova charged out of the gate winning three titles at
the 470 level in the first half of the year.
She then seized the #1 ranking from Kerber after Wimbledon. And after that she largely fizzled. Her win rate per loss halved to 2.0 as she
went 16-8 (W-L) after Wimbledon. Perhaps
the pressure of the #1 ranking got to her, or maybe it was just one of the
normal cycles that tennis players seem to go through.
Regardless, it was her best year in terms of ranking as she
climbed to yearend #4 from #6 last year.
And her 8 weeks at #1 is a laudable accomplishment. After last year’s US Open runner-up performance,
many were expecting a slam title from Pliskova in 2017. Although that did not materialize, she made
QF or better at three of the slams, including SF at the French, except
Wimbledon (2R) where many picked her as favourite for the title.
In 2018 I will be less quick to anoint her as favourite for
any slams, even if her big game is well-suited for a slam run some day. She showed signs of life in the yearend
championships, so I expect she will stay near the top 5 for 2018 and give her
about a 10% chance to claim a slam title.
Venus Williams
Venus tops the prize money listing for 2017, a milestone she
achieved once before in 2001. She was
also second in 2002 and 2008.
Prize money 2017
|
$
|
VWilliams
|
$5,468,741
|
Muguruza
|
$5,433,457
|
Halep
|
$5,275,227
|
Wozniacki
|
$4,748,518
|
Overall, 37 women earned more than $1 million playing tennis
in 2017. This is up from 32 in 2016 and
from 30 in 2015. In 2012, only 15 women
earned at least $1 million. Venus is
second on the all time list with $39.9 million earned, behind sister Serena who
has $84.5 million. Nine of the current
top ten in career prize money played in 2017.
The greatest amount earned in one year was the $12.4 million Serena took
home in 2013.
Venus was the most consistent at the biggest tournaments
this year, making two slam finals, three finals in the biggest 5 tournaments
(including WTA Finals), and at least SF in four of the top 5 tournaments. But she did not win a tournament at any
level. It’s a little mystifying. She has won 49 tournaments, which is 11th
best the Open Era (since 1968), and won at least one in each of the previous
three years. Is it age, or has she
developed a mental block about winning?
The Wimbledon final was especially puzzling. After battling mightily to go up two set
points at 5-4 in the first set, she seemed to mentally collapse and lost 9
games in a row to surrender the title bid.
Hopefully this was a blip and not an indication of a long term mental
block.
In 2018, I expect Venus will win a WTA event somewhere,
although a slam is less likely.
Wimbledon is probably her best bet for a slam title, although I would
likely place Serena, Muguruza, and Kvitova ahead of her in that probability
queue. I also expect her to finish in
the top 10 again.
Elina Svitolina
Svitolina finished last year at #14, but quickly joined the
top 10 in February and rose as high as #3 on the backs of five tournament wins
including three at the 900/1000 level.
She won all five finals she contested and led the tour in WTA points
gained from tournament victories.
WTA championship matches 2017
|
Finals
contested
|
Finals won
|
Points from
tournament finals
|
Points from
tournament wins
|
Svitolina
|
5
|
5
|
3260
|
3260
|
Muguruza
|
2
|
2
|
2900
|
2900
|
Ostapenko
|
3
|
2
|
2585
|
2280
|
SWilliams
|
1
|
1
|
2000
|
2000
|
Stephens
|
1
|
1
|
2000
|
2000
|
Wozniacki
|
8
|
2
|
4580
|
1970
|
Garcia
|
2
|
2
|
1900
|
1900
|
Konta
|
3
|
2
|
1650
|
1470
|
KaPliskova
|
3
|
0
|
1410
|
1410
|
Svitolina won a tour-high 5 tournaments, followed by
Pavlyuchenkova and KaPliskova with 3 each.
Another eight women won 2 titles each, and 31 won a single title in 2017
(at the WTA level or higher).
Although Svitolina was very successful at WTA tournaments
she did not fare as well at the slams, where she reached only one quarter-final
(QF), at the French. Although Venus won
the derby for most rounds gained in slams in 2017 with 24 (RU, RU, SF, 4R), I
deem Muguruza to have had the best slam year with 21 rounds gained on W, QF,
4R, 4R, edging out Ostapenko who went W, QF, 3R, 3R.
Slam rounds gained 2017
|
8=W, 7=RU,
6=SF, 5=QF, 4=4R, 3=3R, 2=2R, 1=1R
|
A
|
F
|
W
|
U
|
WTA points
from slams
|
VWilliams
|
24
|
7
|
4
|
7
|
6
|
3620
|
Muguruza
|
21
|
5
|
4
|
8
|
4
|
2910
|
Ostapenko
|
19
|
3
|
8
|
5
|
3
|
2690
|
Vandeweghe
|
18
|
6
|
1
|
5
|
6
|
2000
|
KaPliskova
|
18
|
5
|
6
|
2
|
5
|
1710
|
Svitolina
|
16
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
4
|
1040
|
Garcia
|
15
|
3
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
930
|
Kuznetsova
|
15
|
4
|
4
|
5
|
2
|
980
|
Wozniacki and Halep each gained 14 rounds; Sevastova and
Konta had 13; Suarez Navarro, Radwanska, and Bacsinszky all had 12. In terms of WTA points gained at the slams,
Serena finished in a tie for fifth despite only playing the Australian Open:
VWilliams 3620, Muguruza 2910, Ostapenko 2690, Stephens 2010, Vandeweghe 2000,
SWilliams 2000, Halep 1750.
For next year, I’ll be looking to see if Svitolina can go a
bit deeper at one of the slams. She
could be a serious contender at Roland Garros for the French title and should
stick around the top 10.
Jelena Ostapenko
Ostapenko was the breakout sensation of 2017 on the WTA
tour. In my yearend write-up last year I
mentioned her as one of four 19-year olds I thought might assault the top 10. She was the only one that achieved that level
in 2017, and she did it with a bang, by taking Roland Garros. She knocked off a
slew of talented players en route to the final, where she blasted Halep off the
court after losing the first set, winning 12 of the last 16 games.
Importantly, she followed it up with a QF at Wimbledon and a
title in Seoul. A sophomore slump in
2018 might seem par for the course as the weight of expectations will likely be
felt, but I have a feeling she will shake it off. She may not win the French in 2018, but she
is a former Wimbledon junior champ, so may have a very good result there. I look for her to remain in the top 10, and
begin to challenge seriously for slam titles again in 2019. Her game seems a little wild. If she can tame it, she may be a candidate
for the #1 ranking at some point in the future, if Serena ever retires.
Caroline Garcia
To the surprise of many, including herself perhaps, Garcia
finishes at world #8 for 2017. She hung
around the 20’s for most of the year, after a couple years in the 30’s. But suddenly she went on an 11 match win
streak to claim the last two 900/1000’s of the year, catapulting her into the
WTA Finals and yearend top 10.
The question now is, will she stick around? Her best ever results at each of the four
slams happened this year, so she clearly has been improving for the whole year,
not just the last three weeks of it. I’m
uncertain if she will remain in the top 10.
If she believes she belongs there, she has the game to do it. Can she go higher? And can she challenge for
a slam?
A bit of a slump through the Aus and Indian Wells / Miami
swings would not be unexpected, but if she’s for real she should post some good
top-10-worthy results in the first half of the year. Regardless, what she accomplished this year
is an enormous achievement and she should be proud.
Sloane Stephens
Sloane didn’t play until Wimbledon, where, fresh off
crutches and with a protected ranking, she lost first round. But she started to look dangerous when she
made SF of both 900/1000’s in Canada and Cincinnati. She then worked her way through a string of
talent at the US Open, where the least accomplished player she faced was likely
Ashleigh Barty who finished the year at #17.
It was not an easy draw, but she went all the way through to the glory
of the title – a magnificent achievement.
It was something like vindication for Sloane. She had splashed on the scene in 2013 as a
19-year old with a shock run to the Aus Open semis, taking out Serena along the
way. Then she plateaued, and last year’s
foot injury sent her ranking tumbling into the 900’s. But she silenced her doubters and looked
again like the gigly ingénue who bubbled her way into the hearts of the public
four years ago. Except this time she was
serious, at least about her tennis.
Predictably, she lost the last four matches of her 2017
campaign. But she will recharge over the
winter and get a chance to fight again in the Australian summer. The post-slam hangover may last through at
least the next slam, but I will be looking to see if she can regroup by Indian
Wells / Miami or maybe the spring clay swing.
It would be great to see her finally make the top 10 in the
computer rankings. I’m not sure if she
will be a serious contender at the US Open in 2018, but I wouldn’t rule it
out. Despite the bubbly persona, a tiger
may lie within. She may not become a
dominant multi-year #1, but I think that she, like Muguruza, might rise up for
the odd slam or stint at #1 sometime in the future.
Johanna Konta
Konta finishes at #9 on the WTA ranking. Her year started with a bang, taking the
title in Sydney and making QF at the Australian. She then stunned everyone with a title run at
the 900/1000 in Miami, beating Halep, VWilliams, and Wozniacki in the last
three rounds. She struggled through the
clay season and then played four tournaments on grass, amassing a 13-4 record
on the surface, culminating in the semis of Wimbledon. The last half of her year was a woeful 2-6.
Clearly she will be hoping to emulate the first half of the
year in the future. But can she? She has now made two consecutive years in the
WTA yearend top 10. She will not be able
to tread water, however, if she wants to stay there. There is a lot of talent coming up, and trying
to hold the status quo may see her fall into the teens of the rankings. I predicted that fate for her last year and
was wrong, but the last half of 2017, has me thinking she will likely fall just
out of the top 10 in 2018. Hopefully she
proves me wrong again.
Coco Vandeweghe
Coco, aged 25, had her best year to date. She made the semis of both hard court slams
and the quarters at Wimbledon. She also
ended the season on a high, leading her country to a Federation Cup title. She finished at #10 in the WTA rankings. She’s got a big game that’s deadly when it’s
on, but can be a little inconsistent.
Can she produce another year that’s as good as this one?
Tellingly, she did not win a title in 2017, and she’s only
managed two for her career. She’s right
in the middle of her ability-curve, age wise.
Is she peaking now, or has it taken her this long to learn how to manage
some good wins on the tour? If the
latter, then we can expect her to maintain this level or even improve over the
next few years. However, if she lacks
the ability to close and claim titles, she will be hard-pressed to advance much
beyond where she is now.
Angelique Kerber
Kerber stunned everyone in 2016 by winning two slam titles
and claiming #1 for the year. Which
makes her collapse this year all the more stunning. She falls to #21 in the world, right ahead of
last year’s #2, Serena, who is #22 now.
But Serena only played two tournaments and Kerber played a full load
with 22. She barely broke 500 in the
wins department, going 29 and 24 (w/l).
What happened?
It seems likely her problems were of the mental and
self-confidence variety. She turns 30 in
January, and it’s unclear if she has time left in her career to really regroup
and threaten at the top again. Even if
she does not, she can safely revel in the accomplishments of 2016 for the rest
of her life without shame. She
accomplished more in that year than most players will in their careers. I would like to see her improve on 2017 and
threaten the top 10 again, but I doubt she will do much more.
Maria Sharapova
Sharapova has, in my opinion, been the best and most
dangerous player on the tour, besides Serena, since Clijsters’ last good run in
2011. Azarenka, Li, and maybe Venus
would come next, but the ‘real’ #2 for most of the last 6 years, has been
Sharapova. At least until she got
suspended for 15 months for a drug infraction last year.
With a return scheduled for late April at the Stuttgart
tournament, I expected Sharapova would have time to make a serious run at the
Top 10 this year. But a lot of debate
ensued over whether or not she should be granted wildcards. She was denied by the French Open, and then
missed Wimbledon due to injury. At the
US Open she drew #2 seed, Halep, in the first round and lost to her for the
first time in seven career meetings. So
Maria had some bad luck, which sees her rising only to #60 this year. But she won one of the eight tournaments she
played and posted a 16-6 match record for the year – which is a top ten level
win ratio (2.67).
With the chance to play a full schedule in 2018, I expect
Sharapova will work her way back into the Top Ten. Until then she will be the unseeded opponent
no one wants to face. She might even
threaten for a slam again. The French
Open is probably her best shot, where the surface is a little less favourable
to Serena, and where Maria has won twice before.
Victoria Azarenka
After giving birth last year, Azarenka returned to the tour
and played only two grass tournaments, Wimbledon, and a tune-up
beforehand. She acquitted herself rather
well, making fourth round at Wimbledon.
However things got bizarre when she had to pull out of all tournaments
for the rest of the year over a custody battle with her baby’s father. In an almost inexplicable turn of events, she
became confined to California or risked losing custody of her child.
Whether this ridiculous restriction can be overcome in the
near future is unclear at this time.
It’s entirely speculative if or how much she will play on the tour in
2018. If she can see her way clear to
playing full time, she should be able to return to the top 10. Her talent did
not seem diminished at Wimbledon. But at
this point, what she will be allowed to do is anyone’s guess.
Petra Kvitova
Kvitova was victim of a brutal home invasion and knife
attack last December which left her with a mangled playing hand, and uncertain
prospects for ever playing again.
However she received excellent surgical care and returned to play at the
French Open, albeit without full functionality in her hand.
Miraculously, she won the second tournament of her comeback,
in Birmingham, although not against the strongest of fields. But she was starting to look like her old
self again by the US Open, where she made the quarters, and she also posted a
semi-final in Beijing. I expect she will
be back at something like full strength again in 2018, which means she could be
a threat for Wimbledon.
Kristina
Mladenovic
After spending most of the last few years in the 30-50 range
of the rankings, Mladenovic caught fire in spring. She won St. Petersburg, then made the finals
of Acapulco, Stuttgart and the 900/1000 in Madrid. That propelled her near the top 10, where she
lurked for a few months before finally spending two weeks at #10 in October. She finishes the year at #11.
In her spring fling she ran up a gaudy 27-7 record, and
looked to be a serious contender for the French Open, where she did indeed make
the quarter-finals. But then she seemed
to lose self-confidence and ended the year on a horrendous 12 match losing
streak, having not won a match since July.
Perhaps she will find more balance in 2018. It appears clay is her preferred
surface. She has a lot of points to
defend in the clay swing, so it will be interesting to see if she can master
that pressure and repeat her successes of 2017.
Svetlana
Kuznetsova
After six years away, Kuznetsova re-entered the Top Ten last
year at #9. In 2017 she slipped slightly
to #12. Sometimes it’s hard to remember
that she has played four slam finals, winning two of them. It’s just that they were so long ago, the
last a victory at Roland Garros in 2009.
But occasionally she shows flashes of the old brilliance.
She was one of the top eight performers at the slams this
year with 15 rounds gained, and she nearly won the 900/1000 in Indian Wells in
an extremely close final with Elena Vesnina.
The rest of her year was less memorable.
After so many years of mixed results, it’s hard to expect much different
from her in the future.
Madison Keys
Keys had a disappointing start to the year, marred by injury. She didn’t play until Indian Wells, and then
struggled with form right through Wimbledon in July. However on returning to American hardcourts
she was suddenly resurrected and claimed the title in Stanford taking out
Muguruza and Vandeweghe. She followed
that up with a run to her first slam final at the US Open. In the final, she looked overwhelmed by the
moment, and went down fairly meekly to a focused Sloane Stephens. She played only one match in the remainder of
the year before pulling the plug, while citing a wrist injury, to regroup for
2018.
With only three career titles, her lackluster showing in the
USO final is far from encouraging. Does
she have the mentality to close the deal when it really counts in a tournament
final? However her brilliant run on
summer hardcourts and her ability to cleanly wallop the ball have inspired many
to label her the next big thing in women’s tennis. Perhaps the pressure of expectation has
gotten to her.
Hopefully she can bring focus and match toughness to her
2018 campaign. A slam title is never out
of the question for someone of her physical talent. Perhaps coach Lindsay Davenport who claimed
55 titles in her career, including three
slams, can bring Keys’ mind to heel. I
put Keys’ chances at a slam in 2018 around 10%.
Other very good
players
Julia Goerges
made five finals in 2018, winning the last two, in Moscow and the awkwardly
labelled Elite Finals in Zhuhai. She
finishes the year at #14 and I won’t expect more from her next year.
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova,
#15, won three titles for the year, albeit all at the 280 level. It was a good and consistent performance that
A-Pavs should try to emulate in 2018.
27-year old, Anastasija
Sevastova, had her best year to date and finishes #16. She posted some surprising wins in 2017, over
the likes of Sharapova, KaPliskova, Stephens, and Konta. It was a banner year that should make her
proud.
Ashleigh Barty,
came out of retirement at age 20, (having retired age 18), after a stint in
Australian cricket. In 2013, aged 17,
she made the doubles finals at three of the slams, the Aus, Wim, and the
US. She completed her ‘doubles
runner-up’ slam this year at the French, but she arguably had even more success
in singles, finishing #17. In February
she won the 280 in Kuala Lumpur, coming from qualifying. She went on to runner-up showings in
Birmingham and the 900/1000 in Wuhan.
She will be over-looked by no one in 2018. She does not yet appear to have reached her
ceiling.
Elena Vesnina
probably had the win of her singles career when she captured the 900/1000 in
Miami, taking out #1 Kerber, and two other slam champions. However, I expect her future success to be in
doubles, where she has been far more consistent. She won Wimbledon doubles this year, with
Ekaterina Makarova, to add to her two other slam doubles titles and Olympic
gold medal in doubles.
After finishing eight of the last nine years in the yearend
Top Ten, Agnieszka Radwanska drops
to #28. She finished last year at #3,
her best yearend ranking, so perhaps her calamitous fall can be attributed,
like Kerber’s, to torpor after the glut of success. I expect her to improve in 2018, but with a
thatch of young talent crowding the top, reaching the first ten might prove a
tough slog. Although she fell out of the top 10 in 2017, Radwanska is fourth on
the list of active players for weeks spent in the WTA Top 10.
Active Player
|
Weeks Spent
in Top 10
|
SWilliams
|
792
|
VWilliams
|
608
|
Sharapova
|
503
|
ARadwanska
|
380
|
Kuznetsova
|
350
|
Wozniacki
|
320
|
Azarenka
|
285
|
Jankovic
|
278
|
Kvitova
|
261
|
Kerber
|
250
|
Halep
|
205
|
As of 31 Dec 2017
In a similar situation to Radwanska is Dominika Cibulkova. Last
year was her best, as she claimed the #5 ranking, the 1500 point WTA Finals,
and 4 total titles. This year was
decidedly more pedestrian and ended with zero titles and a ranking of #26 for
the 28-year old. Her explosive
pint-sized game once took her to an Australian Open final, but I think her
highs are probably behind her.
Youth Brigade
In addition to the 21-and-unders discussed above (Ostapenko
and Barty), there’s a crop of interesting players coming of age. 20-year old Daria Kasatkina is at a career high rank of #24. She won the reputable 470 in Charleston, made
the final of another in Moscow, as well as a round of 16 showing at the US
Open. She doesn’t seem to have the
explosiveness of Ostapenko but may be steadier.
She should continue to climb in 2018.
Anett Kontaveit,
age 21, rank 34, made the finals of three 280’s winning one of them. It’s a promising start that should see her go
higher in 2018.
Ana Konjuh, age
20, reached as high as #20 this year, but ends the year at #44. I’ll expect similar results from her in 2018.
Catherine Bellis
is only 18 years old and already ranked #46, reaching a high of #35 this
year. At her age, there is always room
to go higher. Top 20 would a great
achievement for 2018.
Vikhlyantseva,
rank #54, age 20, and Siniakova,
rank #49, age 21, and Haddad-Maia,
rank #69, age 21, all showed promise this year and may improve in 2018.
Marketa Vondrousova,
rank #67, is only 18 years old and claimed her first title this year, a 280 in
Biel. I will expect her to at least join
the top 50 in 2018, and she may do much better than that.
Aryna Sabalenka,
rank #79, age 19, started the year around #150, but made the final in Tianjin
where she gave Sharapova a very tough match.
She also played in the Fed Cup final, beating Sloane Stephens. She could hit top 50 or higher in the coming
year.
Taylor Townsend
is an inauspicious #105 for her age of 21.
But I believe that she has untapped talent that could lead to
significant improvement in her ranking.
Belinda Bencic,
age 20, rank #120 had a very tough, injury-plagued year. She was once ranked in the top 10 and boasts a
900/1000 title that included a win over Serena.
I’m uncertain about her mental toughness, but a return to injury-free
playing could begin to answer that and other questions about her obvious
talent.
19-year olds to watch include #113 Kenin, #131 Lapko, #132 Kuzmova, #135 Cabrera, and #136 Blinkova.
In addition to Bellis and Vondrousova, above, 18-year old Kayla Day #154, will be worth tracking
in 2018.
The 17-year old cohort includes #150 Aiava, #182 Andreescu,
#189 Yastremska, #231 Zavatska, and #263 Liu.
The 16-year olds top out at #192, Anisimova, and include #237 Potapova,
and #365 Danilovic.
The top three 15-year olds are #485 Cheong, #521 Kostyuk,
and #732 Leylah Fernandez.
The top 14-year old is #743 Clara Tauson.
2018 Rankings
In naming my top 10 for the year I deviated from the WTA
rankings for the last two spots. It
seemed to me that the slam wins of Sloane Stephens and Serena Williams merited
their inclusion in the top 10, so I displaced #’s 9 and 10, Konta and
Vandeweghe.
|
Charles 2017 Ranking
|
|
WTA 2017 Ranking
|
1
|
Muguruza (6)
|
1
|
Halep
|
2
|
Halep (4)
|
2
|
Muguruza
|
3
|
Wozniacki (19)
|
3
|
Wozniacki
|
4
|
KaPliskova (8)
|
4
|
KaPliskova
|
5
|
VWilliams (21)
|
5
|
VWilliams
|
6
|
Svitolina (12)
|
6
|
Svitolina
|
7
|
Ostapenko (23)
|
7
|
Ostapenko
|
8
|
Garcia (16)
|
8
|
Garcia
|
9
|
Stephens
|
9
|
Konta
|
10
|
SWilliams (1)
|
10
|
Vandeweghe
|
Last year’s prediction in brackets
Looking at my predictions from last year, in brackets above,
it’s obvious that the way the year unfolded was quite a surprise for me.
2018 Top Ten
Predictions
For 2018, I think Serena is likely to become Player of the Year,
if not outright #1, if she plays at least 6 or 7 tournaments during the
year. Whether she will be motivated to
do so while continuing to mother her child is anyone’s guess.
I was very impressed with Halep’s push to gain the yearend
#1 ranking, and think some mental Rubicon has been crossed for her. I predict more good things for her in 2018,
and deem her likely for the #2 ranking.
Muguruza I predict for #3 in 2018.
I might place her higher based on talent and propensity to win slam
titles, but her results outside of the slams do not seem to merit it.
Sharapova certainly has the talent and drive to reach #4,
but she seems constantly beset by obstacles, frequently injury prevents her
from playing the schedule that tells the true story of her ability. But I will be optimistic and hope she gets a
full 2018 of playing under her belt.
I’m rather uncertain what to make of Venus Williams. 2017 shows she still has plenty of game. But if she can’t overcome the mental yips she
showed in finals this year, she might not retain a spot in the top 10, let
alone the top 5. However, she has too
much history and talent for me to ignore so I put her in at #5.
I actually want to put Wozniacki higher than I have, but
there’s so much talent crowding the top, she is relegated to #6. I was very impressed with her end of year
title at the WTA Finals, and look for more fine play from her in 2018. Ditto Karolina Pliskova who reached #1 in
2017 and seems like she should do better than yearend #7 for next year.
It’s entirely possible that Ostapenko will have a
significant let down in 2018 after her slam breakthrough this year. But I’m optimistic she will continue to post
enough big wins to establish herself in the top 10 and give her the #8 slot for
next year. Elina Svitolina seems like a
legitimate top 10 talent. She was as
high as #3 this year and I’m surprised I don’t have room for her above #9 for
next year. It is a rich age.
That brings me to a prediction for #10. There are at least 10 more players who seem
to me like shoo-ins for a top 10 spot next year. Yet somehow, impossibly, nine of them must be
excluded. There is both parity and density
of talent at the top of the WTA these days.
With eight years in the top ten, ARadwanska would seem like an obvious
pick to make it there in 2018. But her
fall into the 20’s and the competition she faces have me looking elsewhere.
An even better candidate for a top 10 spot might be last
year’s #1, Kerber. However, her descent to #21 lost look this year, and age
(29), have me relegating her. Coco
Vandweghe is the newest member of the top 10, but I suspect she will have
trouble repeating this year’s successes.
Ash Barty continues to impress but is she really ready to be a top 10
player? Azarenka clearly has the talent and resume to be at the very top of the
game, but I’m guessing her continuing custody struggles will prevent her from
playing enough to reach the top group. Keys
is certainly top 10 material, but her collapse in the US Open final has me
shying away from her. Konta just
completed a second year in the yearend top 10, but I expect her to descend
slightly in 2018.
My final three candidates for #10 in 2018 are Garcia,
Stephens, and Kvitova. Garcia is #8 and
seems poised for even better results in 2018.
After her breakthrough US Open title, Stephens has huge up side, and, if
she can stay healthy, could become a fixture at the top of the game. But in the end, I think Kvitova’s proven
track record of success and two slam titles mean she is most likely of this
group to claim a top ten slot next year.
It is certainly a lot of guessing, and the coming year is sure to make a
mockery of my predictions.
Rank
|
Charles 2018 Prediction
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
2
|
Halep
|
3
|
Muguruza
|
4
|
Sharapova
|
5
|
VWilliams
|
6
|
Wozniacki
|
7
|
KaPliskova
|
8
|
Ostapenko
|
9
|
Svitolina
|
10
|
Kvitova
|
2018 Australian
Open Predictions
Like every year, I have made predictions for the top 12
finishers at each of the slams for 2018.
At the Australian Open it seems to me there is no clear favourite. If Serena plays she will probably be my pick,
but after not playing for a year, and with the changes to her body that
motherhood entails, I feel no confidence in naming her the favourite. Here’s a look at past records at the
Australian in terms of number of rounds gained.
Average # rounds gained at Aus Open
|
8=W, 7=RU,
6=SF, 5=QF, 4=4R, 3=3R, 2=2R, 1=1R
|
SWilliams
|
5.8
|
Konta
|
5.5
|
Sharapova
|
5.0
|
Azarenka
|
4.7
|
VWilliams
|
4.0
|
ARadwanska
|
4.0
|
Bouchard
|
4.0
|
Makarova
|
3.9
|
Muguruza
|
3.6
|
Wozniacki
|
3.5
|
Without Serena to thwart her, Venus might go one better than
runner-up in 2018. But her failure to
close last year is worrying. Wozniacki
was brilliant in the WTA Finals, but has not been a factor at the slams outside
of the US Open. KaPliskova lost my
confidence last year, but it’s not impossible she could blow white hot for two
weeks on hard courts. Ostapenko, Keys,
and Stephens all have slam-winning potential, but I suspect none of them will
be ready to step forward in January.
Ditto, proven multi-slam winners Sharapova, Azarenka, and Kvitova.
So it comes down to Halep or Muguruza in my mind. As good as Halep was in claiming #1 this
year, I think she might be better in 2018.
If she should make another slam final, I think she will face it with
equanimity. But Muguruza has already won
two slam finals and so I think she has to be considered a more likely candidate
to claim another, but only because there is no other clear favourite. She has only once before made QF in
Melbourne. The bookies are less
charitable to Halep than I am.
|
Charles AO Prediction
|
|
Bet365 AO Prediction
|
Odds
(decimal)
|
1
|
Muguruza
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
5.0
|
2
|
SWilliams
|
2
|
Muguruza
|
6.0
|
3
|
Halep
|
3
|
KaPliskova
|
10
|
4
|
Sharapova
|
4
|
Sharapova
|
10
|
5
|
Wozniacki
|
5
|
Azarenka
|
11
|
6
|
VWilliams
|
6
|
Halep
|
11
|
7
|
Keys
|
7
|
Kerber
|
11
|
8
|
Svitolina
|
8
|
Keys
|
15
|
9
|
KaPliskova
|
9
|
Konta
|
15
|
10
|
Kvitova
|
10
|
Kvitova
|
15
|
11
|
Stephens
|
11
|
Svitolina
|
17
|
12
|
Vandeweghe
|
12
|
Stephens
|
17
|
2018 French Open
Predictions
Again, it would be hard to overlook a healthy Serena as the
favourite if she plays. However I expect
she will have few matches under her belt by then. Timea Bacsinszky has been in two French
semis. Here’s a look at the most
consistent performers at Roland Garros.
Average # rounds gained at Fre Open
|
8=W, 7=RU,
6=SF, 5=QF, 4=4R, 3=3R, 2=2R, 1=1R
|
Sharapova
|
5.1
|
SWilliams
|
5.0
|
Muguruza
|
4.8
|
Ostapenko
|
4.5
|
Kuznetsova
|
4.5
|
Suarez Navarro
|
3.6
|
Stosur
|
3.6
|
Svitolina
|
3.6
|
VWilliams
|
3.4
|
Schiavone
|
3.4
|
Bacsinszky
|
3.4
|
12 Nov 2017
Last year, Svitolina and Mladenovic both put forth sterling
clay seasons. Mladenovic was less
inspired for the rest of the year and I suspect she will continue that
vein. Svitolina should have gone farther
than the QF last year when she was up 6-3 5-1 over Halep. Perhaps she will push through in 2018.
Stosur, Schiavone, and Kuznetsova have been strong at Roland
Garros in the past, but may be past their best tennis. Garcia and Kasatkina are both fine young clay
courters. Both claimed big clay titles
last year and could threaten for the title in Paris. Without a strong clay past, KaPliskova
surprised everyone by making semis last year, but I would be surprised if she
does it again.
Clearly Ostapenko can win Roland Garros, as she did in 2017. But defending a first slam win is not common,
and the list of those doing it in the open era (since 1968) is august and
short: Evert, Navratilova, Graf, Seles,
Hingis, VWilliams, and surprisingly, Capriati and Azarenka.
Sharapova has not yet looked like her old self, but she has
five months to gain momentum and threaten again at her most successful slam
where she averages more rounds gained than Serena. However, I suspect that the top two
favourites will be two-time finalist, Halep, and 2015’s winner, Muguruza. It is
only because Muguruza has won it before that I deem her the favourite. It is probably Halep’s best chance at slam
success.
|
Charles RG Prediction
|
|
Bet365 RG Prediction
|
Odds
(decimal)
|
1
|
Muguruza
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
5.0
|
2
|
Halep
|
2
|
Halep
|
8.0
|
3
|
SWilliams
|
3
|
Sharapova
|
9.0
|
4
|
Sharapova
|
4
|
Muguruza
|
9.0
|
5
|
Ostapenko
|
5
|
Azarenka
|
10
|
6
|
Svitolina
|
6
|
Svitolina
|
11
|
7
|
KaPliskova
|
7
|
Ostapenko
|
13
|
8
|
Stephens
|
8
|
Mladenovic
|
17
|
9
|
Garcia
|
9
|
KaPliskova
|
17
|
10
|
Kasatkina
|
10
|
Kvitova
|
19
|
11
|
Kuznetsova
|
11
|
Kuznetsova
|
23
|
12
|
Bacsinszky
|
12
|
Kerber
|
23
|
12 Nov 2017
2018 Wimbledon
Predictions
Wimbledon has a special place in the hearts of many players
and they often have their best results there; players like: VWilliams, Kvitova, SWilliams, Muguruza,
ARadwanska, and Lisicki. Here’s a look
at the best performers who are active players.
Average # rounds gained at Wimbledon
|
8=W, 7=RU,
6=SF, 5=QF, 4=4R, 3=3R, 2=2R, 1=1R
|
SWilliams
|
6.1
|
VWilliams
|
5.4
|
Sharapova
|
4.5
|
ARadwanska
|
4.5
|
Kvitova
|
4.1
|
Muguruza
|
4.0
|
Lisicki
|
4.0
|
Azarenka
|
3.6
|
Keys
|
3.4
|
Kerber
|
3.3
|
12 Nov 2017
With their extremely hard-hitting games, Keys and KaPliskova
seem like natural grass court players, although they may struggle with movement
on the surface. Azarenka has had some
fine results at SW19, but if she can’t leave California she may not be able to
play or may not be match tough.
Wozniacki has not made it past the fourth round, although
she has been that far six times. Kerber
has been to the QF or better three times, so perhaps she will start to find her
winning ways again on grass. Lisicki has
been to the QF or better five times, although not since 2014. Aggie Radwanska has only lost before the
fourth round once in the last ten years.
Perhaps she can re-find her game at her favourite slam.
Despite making two past finals, Sharapova has only been past
the fourth round once since 2011. But
she knows how to win at Wimbledon and I expect her to be hungry in 2018. But
the real favourites in my mind are the four women who have won nine of the last
ten Wimbledons, the missing one belonging to Marion Bartoli, who is
retired. They are Venus, Serena,
Kvitova, and the defending champ, Muguruza.
Kvitova is certainly capable have zapping her lightning
bolts around a grass court. But like
lightning, she rarely strikes twice, although she does have two titles. Muguruza clearly likes the place with two
finals in the last three years and success at the formidable task of taking
down a Williams sister in the Wimbledon final.
Venus is always dangerous at the venue where she has claimed five titles
in nine finals appearances. But the
favourite, and seven-time champ, has to be Serena Williams.
|
Charles Wim Prediction
|
|
Bet365 Wim Prediction
|
Odds
(decimal)
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
4.5
|
2
|
Muguruza
|
2
|
Kvitova
|
9.0
|
3
|
Kvitova
|
3
|
KaPliskova
|
9.0
|
4
|
VWilliams
|
4
|
Muguruza
|
9.0
|
5
|
Keys
|
5
|
Sharapova
|
11
|
6
|
Sharapova
|
6
|
Azarenka
|
11
|
7
|
Azarenka
|
7
|
Konta
|
13
|
8
|
Stephens
|
8
|
Keys
|
13
|
9
|
Konta
|
9
|
Stephens
|
13
|
10
|
Garcia
|
10
|
Kerber
|
19
|
11
|
Ostapenko
|
11
|
Halep
|
19
|
12
|
Halep
|
12
|
VWilliams
|
19
|
12 Nov 2017
2018 US Open
Predictions
Is it reasonable to expect another year of American
domination at their home slam, like in 2017?
Even if Serena has not been playing much, her record at the US Open is
superlative and she will be the favourite if she plays. Venus is not far behind, and then comes the
trio of Sharapova, Azarenka, and Wozniacki who all average 4.2 rounds gained
per outing.
Average # rounds gained at US Open
|
8=W, 7=RU,
6=SF, 5=QF, 4=4R, 3=3R, 2=2R, 1=1R
|
SWilliams
|
6.2
|
VWilliams
|
5.1
|
Sharapova
|
4.2
|
Azarenka
|
4.2
|
Wozniacki
|
4.2
|
Zvonareva
|
3.8
|
Stephens
|
3.5
|
KaPliskova
|
3.4
|
Keys
|
3.3
|
Kerber
|
3.3
|
Kvitova
|
3.3
|
Kuznetsova
|
3.3
|
12 Nov 2017
Wozniacki seems to play her best tennis at the US Open, and
if she can channel the form she displayed in taking the yearend championships,
she will be a serious threat for the title.
Vandeweghe was brilliant in New York this year, and could repeat or even
exceed this year’s SF showing. I don’t
expect Venus to repeat her runner-up showing from 2017. I expect a deeper field in 2018.
Karolina Pliskova and Keys are both former finalists who
like to whack the ball hard. Both will
have to work on mental toughness before they claim this title. Last year’s winner, Sloane Stephens, clearly
likes the conditions at the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. I suspect that repeating will be more
difficult than winning the first time, Helen Jacobs notwithstanding – who was
the last woman to win her first two slam titles at consecutive US Opens
(1932-33).
Although Muguruza has only shown minimal success at the US
Open, she is too good not to be in the conversation as a potential
champion. Halep is similar, but she has
at least registered a QF and SF in Queens before.
|
Charles USO Prediction
|
|
Bet365 USO Prediction
|
Odds
(decimal)
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
1
|
SWilliams
|
4.5
|
2
|
Halep
|
2
|
Stephens
|
9.0
|
3
|
Muguruza
|
3
|
KaPliskova
|
9.0
|
4
|
Wozniacki
|
4
|
Muguruza
|
9.0
|
5
|
Stephens
|
5
|
Sharapova
|
11
|
6
|
Keys
|
6
|
Keys
|
11
|
7
|
KaPliskova
|
7
|
Halep
|
15
|
8
|
Sharapova
|
8
|
Kvitova
|
15
|
9
|
VWilliams
|
9
|
VWilliams
|
15
|
10
|
Azarenka
|
10
|
Vandeweghe
|
17
|
11
|
Kvitova
|
11
|
Konta
|
17
|
12
|
Vandeweghe
|
12
|
Azarenka
|
19
|
12 Nov 2017
Final Thoughts
At the end of the day, I do not expect Muguruza to win two
slams in 2018, despite listing her the favourite for two of them. I think Muguruza will probably win one, and
Serena will win one or two. Then I think
Halep, Sharapova, or Wozniacki have a chance at winning a slam, and it’s a slightly
lesser chance that KaPliskova, Keys, or Kvitova will win one. I also think there’s a better chance we will
have a new slam winner in 2018, as we have for 17 of the last 21 years. I also think there is a good chance Halep
will finish #1 on the computer, but Serena will be player of the year in 2018.
2017 was a very unpredictable year that saw the crowning of
two new slam winners, Stephens and Ostapenko. It also saw the rise of Muguruza,
Halep, and KaPliskova to the uppermost echelons of the game. Svitolina, Garcia, Barty, and Mladenovic made
significant moves upward. And Serena,
set the open era record for slam singles titles, male or female, with 23. Let’s hope 2018 is as exciting.
correction: Sharapova lost to Halep in Beijing, not at the US Open
ReplyDelete