Skip to main content

French Women 2018


French Women 2018

Even though I bitched and moaned about picking the difficult fourth quarter in the men’s draw, it was a cakewalk compared to the entire women’s bracket… which is just an enormous helping of cruel and unusual punishment.  Nevertheless I torture myself with the brackets at tennisdrawchallenge.com  Where to start?  How about the ridiculous and murderous second quarter…

That second quarter alone has four former champions in it. Four! And two of them meet in the first round, Muguruza and Kuznetsova.  Then of course there’s the very scary and very screamy Sharapova, who’s set to run into the sixth seed, last year’s semi-finalist, Karolina Pliskova in the third round.  You gotta feel sorry for Pliskova.  She could get former finalist, Safarova in round two, Sharapova in round three, and if she survives all of that, the unbelievably great and terrifying Serena Williams in round four.  And THEN, if the seeds hold, 2016 champ, Muguruza in the quarters.

And just to make this quarter really interesting let’s throw in a sprinkling of former-finalist Stosur, the young and rising Ashleigh Barty, returning Belinda Bencic, and maybe a really juicy first rounder like Vandeweghe, this year’s Stuttgart finalist against last year’s Stuttgart winner, Siegemund.  And even more former-top-tenners like Cibulkova and Goerges (meeting in the first round of course)… and mix in a little of the always dangerous Pavlyu-kerplunk-ova??

It’s a bracket disaster.  My bracket is broken.  My brain is broken!

Serena has a tough opener against Pliskova’s twin sister, Krystina.  Then she’s got Barty and could face Goerges or Cibulkova after that.  But it gets easier for the fourth when she could play Sharapova whom she hasn’t lost to for 14 years… should be an easy match against the two-time champ… easy… yeah… um….
If Serena even still remembers how to play…
god, what a mess…

So I picked Muguruza over Sharapova (cue California airhead lilt and vacant blinking)….  But really, I have no idea what will happen in this quarter.  Four of the women here have better than 20:1 odds of winning according to the bookies.  So probably none of them will make the semis and it will be a qualifier or a wildcard.  Jessika Ponchet all the way!

And now for the easy part.  After a quick look I see that the rest of the bracket is like a series of bad life choices leading to divorce and financial ruin, if I choose well… and probably prison if I don’t.

Halep is the #1 seed and in the top quarter.  In the third round she could get the winner of, oh wow (yawn), another first round match between two former top tenners, this time Mladenovic and Petkovic.  After that she could face the suddenly solid Gavrilova, or Elise Mertens, who’s come out of nowhere to win three tournaments this year.

In the other half, OF THE TOP QUARTER, we get former #1 Kerber, current #7 Garcia, and former semi-finalist Bertens, who, naturally, has a tough opener against young Sabalenka.  Naturally.  For the quarter I take Halep over Bertens.

Moving on to what surely must be an easier quarter, the third, I see it starts with last year’s champ, Ostapenko to face in the second round possibly, former #1 Azarenka… (inward groan). Also here are recent top tenner Konta and Venus Williams… who are in the other half of the top half of this quarter… did I just write that…

Meanwhile in the top half of the bottom half of this quarter (!) US Open finalist Keys and Indian Wells champ Osaka could meet in the third round. The winner could face Svitolina.  Svitolina just claimed a second consecutive Rome title and is co-ranked with Halep as 6:1 favourites for the French.  It’s a crap shoot, so I’ll go with the favourites and take Svito over Ostapenko for the semi.

In the fourth quarter lies Petra Kvitova who was a pre-tournament favourite of mine.  She’s got a tricky opener against Cepede-Royg who made fourth round last year.  After that could come Babos who won Taipei and made the final of Monterrey.  The third round could bring up red-hot Kontaveit who made the semis of both Rome and Stuttgart in preparation for Paris.

So Kvitova has no easy matches but at this stage of my bracket hell, I’m not surprised.  Par for the course then that she could get US Open champ Stephens in the fourth round.

Sakkari and Suarez Navarro have both had some real highlights this clay season and they could meet in the second round.  The winner would likely face Kasatkina, finalist at Indian Wells and Dubai. 

Aus Open champ and number two seed Wozniacki opens against Collins who’s come out of nowhere this year to register in the top 50.  If Woz gets through that she could have her hands full against two-time former semi-finalist Bacsinszky in her second match.  Overall I think Kasatkina is most likely to face Kvitova for a spot in the semis.

In the semis I’m now stuck with Halep and Muguruza. I’ll take Halep, but really, Serena, Sharapova, Bertens, or KaPliskova are perfectly reasonable choices for the top half.  In the other semi I’ve narrowed it down to Svitolina or Kvitova.  Kvitova is on an eleven-match clay win streak, but Svitolina seems the more proven player on the terre battue.  But for big match experience I’ll take Kvitova.

That sets up a fantasy final (and it would be a miracle if it actually unfolded) between Kvitova and Halep.  Much as I would love to see Halep finally hoist a slam cup, Petra looks too strong to me. Kvitova for the crown.

Decimal odds from Bet365.com on 25 May 2018
1
Halep
7
2
Svitolina
7
3
Sharapova
12
4
SWilliams
13
5
Kvitova
15
6
Muguruza
15
7
Ostapenko
15
8
KaPliskova
21
9
Kasatkina
21
10
Bertens
26
11
Wozniacki
26
12
Garcia
29
13
Kerber
29
14
Konta
41
15
Kontaveit
41
16
Osaka
41
17
Goerges
41
18
Azarenka
51
19
Mertens
51
20
VWilliams
51
21
Stephens
51
22
Keys
67
23
Vandeweghe
67
24
Barty
67
25
Cibulkova
67
26
Sevastova
81
27
Suarez Navarro
81
28
Pavlyuchenkova
81
29
Safarova
101
30
Mladenovic
101
31
Vondrousova
101
32
Kuznetsova
101
33
Siegemund
101
34
Bacsinszky
101
35
Gavrilova
101
36
Siniakova
126
37
Kanepi
151
38
Buzarnescu
151
39
KrPliskova
151
40
Sabalenka
151
41
Sakkari
151
42
Bencic
151
43
Konjuh
151
44
Collins
151


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open