Skip to main content

The Significance of Djokovic


Is Novak Number One?

Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer, and Rafael Nadal each entered the US Open with one slam title this year.  A victory by any one of them would make a strong argument for being #1 for the year. Djokovic nailed the title and it was enough to move him from #6 to #3 in the rankings.  It also moved him to #2 in the yearly race.  But is his record enough to consider him the year’s #1?

How significant are the ITF-controlled slams in the yearly accounting?  Martina Navratilova has spoken out claiming she feels they’ve gotten too important compared to the WTA- and ATP-controlled tours that consist of the all the other tournaments at the 250 point level or higher.  In her era players often skipped the slams for more lucrative tournaments.

But that was then.  Now the slams have assigned point values for the world rankings that have been relatively stable for the last 29 years.  This year Federer has won 14 matches at the slams (missing Roland Garros) while Djokovic and Nadal have each won 21.  But while Djokovic started the year slowly, recovering from an elbow injury, he has been gaining momentum steadily.  Novak has accumulated 4540 ranking points at the slams this year, and Rafa has an impressive, but smaller, 3800 points.  So there’s no question Djokovic is the winner from the slam perspective.

Outside of the slams, Nadal has lost only once in the five tournaments he’s played.  Djokovic had a rough start and at one point leading up to Rome, he lost six of nine matches. But since then he’s 26-4.  In the yearly race he trails Nadal by 1045 ranking points, however, I have a feeling he will thrive in the home-stretch and is likely to finish #1 by year’s end.  Even if he doesn’t, most pundits will probably regard him as #1 for 2018 based on his two slam trophies.

A yearend #1 finish would be Novak’s fifth, tying him with Federer for second place in the Open era (since 1968), one behind Sampras who had six year-end #1’s. (Connors was ranked yearend #1 by the ATP computer for five years from 1974-78 before the algorithm was as refined as it is now, and most experts consider him #1 for only two of those years).

Djokovic ties Sampras with 14 slam titles, and given his current form I expect he will add significantly to his haul.  Steve Tignor at Tennis magazine has predicted that Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer will each end up with 20 slam titles.  Currently Nadal has 17 and Federer 20. 

When Djokovic (and Murray) went AWOL for a year and a half, Nadal and Federer scooped up three slams each.  It was largely Djokovic who stopped their ascendance when he began dominating in 2011.  In the five years from 2012-2016, Fedal claimed five slams, averaging only one per year between them, until Djokovic struggled in 2017.  Now that he’s back, can we expect him to suppress Federer and Nadal the way he did in the past?

Djokovic has a winning record against Federer 24-22 and against Nadal 27-25: a unique and significant achievement. He’s still a little behind in the slam count.  But give him a few years, at the rate he’s going he may one day be considered the GOAT.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem....

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and P...