Skip to main content

Wimbledon 2023 Women’s Draw

 

The only former champions in this year’s Wimbledon draw are Elena Rybakina, Petra Kvitova, and Venus Williams.  With Rybakina recovering from a viral illness and Kvitova’s and Williams’ last victories coming 9 and 15 years ago, respectively, this draw feels wide open.

 

First Quarter

Iga Swiatek showed encouraging signs this week, making semis in Eastbourne, before pulling out with a fever.  She’s also been blessed by the draw, with most of the bookies’ favourites landing in the other half, particularly the deadly third quarter.  Only one of the bookies’ top-ten pre-draw picks is in her half, Coco Gauff. Plus Swiatek should be motivated to keep her #1 ranking: her run of 67 weeks on top might end if she doesn’t make the final and Sabalenka does.  It’s already the 13th longest #1 streak in WTA history. 

However, there’s still the question of her grass court pedigree.  It’s not long and her loss to Cornet in last year’s fourth round is worrisome.  Iga generally prefers slower surfaces, so Wimbledon grass is outside of her normal wheelhouse.  But between her wins this week and a softish draw, I’m predicting a deep run for her.

Coco Gauff (seeded #7) had a decent run this week before losing to Keys in the semis of Eastbourne.  She’s been to the second week at Wimbledon twice.

Daria Kasatkina (11) is into the final of Eastbourne this week, but could meet Victoria Azarenka (19) in Wimbledon’s third round – a matchup Azarenka leads 5-0.

Some returning veterans in this section include former semi-finalist Barbora Strycova, and a first rounder between Elina Svitolina and the ageless Venus Williams – a shame they can’t both advance.

Swiatek def Gauff

 

Second Quarter

This is the dartboard quarter.  Jessica Pegula (4) and Caroline Garcia (5) are the highest seeds and of the two only Garcia has made a fourth round here.  Liudmila Samsonova (15) won a grass tournament – but it was two years ago. Veronika Kudermetova (12) and Donna Vekic (20) were both runners-up in grass events this year. Katerina Siniakova is into a final on grass this year (yet to be played).  And Marie Bouzkova (32) made quarters at Wimbledon last year.

The resumes are all a bit thin, so an unknown emerging here would be perfectly reasonable.

Vekic def Siniakova

 

Third Quarter

This is where the fireworks begin – one of the most loaded slam quarters in memory.

Both last year’s Wimbledon finalists are here: Rybakina and Jabeur.  Elena Rybakina (3) has been my pick for this title since last year.  However, recently she’s been out with a ‘viral illness’ that caused her to withdraw from both the French Open and Eastbourne.  Her blend of smooth power tennis, dominant serve, and unshakeable demeanor would make her the clear favourite to repeat, but the illness has me second-guessing how ready she will be to go all the way.  If she can survive the first few matches, her chances of lifting the trophy will significantly improve.

Her path is full of landmines, starting with giant-killer Shelby Rogers in round one.  Next up could be Alize Cornet who took Swiatek out last year.  The third round could bring up Katie Boulter who won Nottingham two weeks ago.  After that could follow the irrepressible Jelena Ostapenko (17) a former slam winner whose swing-for-the-fences style is often at its best on grass, or Beatriz Haddad Maia (13) who just made the French semis and won two grass tournaments last year.  And that’s only half of this quarter.

Ons Jabeur (6) made two slam finals last year.  She’s had a decent year in 2023, winning Charleston and making quarters at Roland Garros.  Her all-court wizardry of slices, drop shots, net approaches, and off-speed hits is particularly effective on grass.

Petra Kvitova (9) is a two-time winner here and should not be discounted.  She’s won a grass-court tune-up, which is fairly typical of her.  In the last nine years that pre-Wimbledon win has not resulted in success on the main stage, and I suspect that will be the case again. But with Petra, anything is possible.

Runner-up here in 2021, Karolina Pliskova (18) is also in this quarter, a potential all-Czech third-rounder with Kvitova.  She is only slightly more predictable than her country-woman, but there’s little in her recent form to suggest a deep run.

Bianca Andreescu should not escape mention, the former US Open champion has struggled with injury through much of her career but is still only 23 and capable of almost anything.

Jabeur def Rybakina

 

Fourth Quarter

Aryna Sabalenka (2) is the section’s top seed and made the semis when she was last allowed to play here in 2021.  She’s an improved player since then.  Her tune-up on grass resulted in an unconvincing loss to Kudermetova, but I put little weight on it.  Her hard-hitting game should translate well to grass and her movement has only improved.  My brother says Sabalenka is his pick to go all the way and that’s perfectly reasonable, as many experts agree, however I think an in-form Swiatek or Rybakina would be favoured based on movement.

French Open finalist Karolina Muchova (16) could be a significant obstacle for Sabalenka in the fourth round.  Twice a quarter-finalist here, Muchova’s slicey, serve-and-volley game looks perfect for grass.  But it wouldn’t surprise me if Muchova is still in a bit of a slam hangover – flushed with success from the Parisian clay.

Ekaterina Alexandrova (21) is especially potent on grass having won two of her four career titles on the surface, the most recent just two weeks ago. If she had landed in the second quarter of this draw I’d likely pick her for the semis, but as it stands she’s slated to go through Muchova and Sabalenka just to get to the quarters.

Barbora Krejcikova (10) made third round and fourth round here in her last two appearances.  A round further into the quarters would not surprise.

Madison Keys (25) has had a middling year but is into a grass final this weekend and has been in the second week at Wimbledon three times.

Paula Badosa has two fourth round appearances here but recent poor form has the former #2 unseeded in this year’s event.

Mirra Andreeva is just 16 and probably won’t make it far, but she is certainly precocious.

Sabalenka def Krejcikova

 

Semis

Swiatek def Vekic

Sabalenka def Jabeur

 

Final

Much to my own surprise, I’m picking Swiatek to hoist the Venus Rosewater dish in two weeks time.

Swiatek def Sabalenka

 

Expert Picks:

Rybakina (5): Joel Drucker (Tennis Channel), Ed McGrogan (Tennis Channel), Steve Tignor (Tennis Channel), Todd Woodbridge (AO Panel), Stephen Boughton (The Slice)

Sabalenka (5):  Stephanie Livaudais (Tennis Channel), Alycia Molik (AO Panel), Wally Masur (AO Panel), Casey Dellacqua (AO Panel), Matthew Crist (gambling.com)

Kvitova (4): Matt Fitzgerald (Tennis Channel), David Kane (Tennis Channel), Nicole Pratt (AO Panel), Simon Rea (AO Panel)

Swiatek (2):  Jon Levey (Tennis Channel), Jon Wertheim (Sports Illustrated)

 

Bookies picks:

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 30 June 2023

1

Swiatek

3.5

2

Rybakina

4.75

3

Sabalenka

6

4

Kvitova

13

5

Gauff

15

6

Jabeur

17

7

Vekic

21

8

Muchova

23

9

Kasatkina

29

10

Krejcikova

29

11

Kudermetova

29

12

Ostapenko

29

13

Keys

34

14

Alexandrova

41

15

Pegula

41

16

Sakkari

41

17

MAndreeva

51

18

Garcia

51

19

Samsonova

51

20

Haddad Maia

67

21

KaPliskova

67

22

QZheng

67

23

Bencic

101

24

Martic

126

25

Azarenka

151

26

Badosa

151

27

Bouzkova

151

28

LFerandez

151

29

Giorgi

151

30

Vondrousova

151

31

Svitolina

201

32

Tsurenko

201

33

Andreescu

251

34

LFruhvirtova

251

35

Siniakova

251

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Men’s Tennis 2024 Yearend and 2025 Predictions

2 January 2025   The Big Three is dead!  Long Live the Big Three!  For the first time in 22 years, none of Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic are in the yearend top three.  Instead we have a new set – Sinner, Alcaraz, and Zverev.  Now it would certainly be debatable if Zverev has the significance of the other two. Afterall, he still has not won a slam and he’s half a generation older than his younger counterparts.  At age 27 he should be mid-arc in career accomplishments – but in some metrics he’s just starting out.  However, his superlative play over the year landed him at #2 and who are we to argue with the algorithm? One of the biggest clouds hanging over the coming year is the fate of Jannik Sinner.  By all accounts he is the top dog, and primed to have another banner year, but whether or not he will get to play depends on what happens with WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency).  Anyone can see he’s essentially innocent – I mean, a massage...

Wimbledon Women 2024

The divas have gathered, the grass is fresh, the blades are out, the Venus Rosewater Dish beckons. Is there a favourite?  There are only three former champions in the draw, and while they may be among the top picks it’s dangerous to count on any of them: Kerber (past her prime), Rybakina (constantly sick), and Vondrousova (chronically unreliable).  So who will it be lifting the plate in two weeks’ time?   First Quarter Iga Swiatek (1) is the top seed and has pretty much nailed down this slot across the board for the last two and a half years.   But grass is her least-accomplished surface.   She pulled out of her warm-up tournament citing emotional recuperation after her fifth slam crown and third consecutive at Roland Garros.   But there is cause for hope among the Swiatek-azzi. She made the quarters last year in a game effort against a surging Svitolina.   Her strokes should hold up well on grass, although I think she loses some of the movement...

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...