Skip to main content

Aus Open 2013 - women's preview


Australian Open 2013 – Women’s Preview

Can Serena Williams be stopped?  Top seed Victoria Azarenka may have a cakewalk to the semis, but things look to get significantly more frightening there with Serena in her half.  Certainly second-seeded Sharapova will quake less to face Agnieszka Radwanska (4) as a potential semi opponent, but she may not escape unscathed from Williams wrath – Venus lurks as a possible 3rd round opponent.  But we’re getting ahead of ourselves.

Top Quarter


Azarenka (1) looms large in her half of the section.  Nearby seeds Urszula Radwanska (31), Varvara Lepchenko (21), and Roberta Vinci (16) are not particularly awe-inspiring, although Vinci has had some fine results of late from her well-crafted, if limited, game.

The other side is a little more interesting with Wozniacki seeded 10, a rededicated (?) Pavlyuchenkova (24), and Sara Errani (7).  Wozniacki is not nearly the competitor she was a few years ago, but her latent talent should not be brushed aside too easily.  Her 3R could bring up Pavlyuchenkova who seems capable of anything, but has not shown the sort of resolve that has carried a, say, Azarenka to lasting success.  Errani is the little engine that could, and made QF here last year and SF at the US Open.  I just don’t see the horsepower in her game to remove Azarenka.

Azarenka d. Errani

Second Quarter


Petra Kvitova (8) should be a scary name in this quarter.  Just a year ago she was within a weekend of the #1 ranking.  She did not win a slam in 2012 but performed well enough to stay in the top 10.  2013 has been particularly unkind, besmirching her with an oh-and-two record.  If somehow she could find a vein of consistency and start tempering her big strokes with some duller ones, she could still prove a monumental challenge for even the mighty Serena.  But I hold out no hope for that in this outing.

Kvitova’s road is made no easier by Schiavone in 1R, Robson in 2R, and Sloane Stephens (29) in R3.   Also lurking is Petrova (12), whose big game has never really seemed to find a home at the slams.  Stephens is an exciting young player who could rise very high this year.  Top 10 seems within reach, maybe even top 5.  She kept Serena’s hands full in Brisbane last week – providing by far her toughest match.  But if Williams is on-song at all, even a little out of tune perhaps, she should sweep all before her.

SWilliams d. Stephens

Third Quarter


This is the most stimulating quarter from a predictive view but is probably least likely to produce an eventual champion.  Seeded #4, ARadwanska parallels the position occupied by Ferrer on the men’s side although she is perhaps less of a lock to make the semis than he.  Mona Barthel (32), Jankovic (22), and Ivanovic (13) are the nearest seeds, and although none will be favoured to beat Radwanska, they all have the talent to do so – although perhaps not in 2013.  If this were 2008, I’d say the odds were with the Serbians, and in a few years, Barthel may have her spot in the sun.

The other half is where it gets really interesting.  Stosur (9), Goerges (18), and Li (6) have big game potential.  Stosur has definitely struggled at her home slam, but she has to turn it around sometime, right??  This may not be the year.  Her draw is murderous.  2010 semi-finalist Zheng in 2R, Goerges (18) in 3R, Li (6) in the 4th, ARad (4) in the quarters, and then likely Sharapova, followed by Serena.  Not possible for Stosur, I say.

Li (6) has been in exceptional form this year, winning her first tournament and then going down to Radwanska in Sydney.  She’s done well in Melbourne in the past, finalist in 2011, SF in 2010.  She grooves her flat strokes on the neutral court.  I say she gets revenge for this week.

Li d ARadwanska

Fourth Quarter


This quarter is bracketed by Angelique Kerber (5) and Sharapova (2), and finds Bartoli (11) and Dominika Cibulkova (15) in its middle.  Cibulkova has been on a tear in Sydney, dispensing with 3 of the top 5 seeds there, Kvitova, Kerber, and Errani, to make the final.  She will probably be too much to handle for 16-year old sensation Ashleigh Barty in the first round, although it is a match I will follow with interest.

Venus Williams makes a tantalizing addition to the quarter as the 25 seed.  She could face Sharapova in round 3.  The two have split their matches 4-3 in favour of Maria.  Based on recent form the edge has to go to Sharapova, but I think Venus probably has more talent.  Her age is probably less of a liability than her comeback from illness.  Venus will always be capable of great things and a showdown could go either way, but I think the odds are with Sharapova and the crisper tennis she has been playing recently.

Cibulkova could definitely take out Sharapova, but again the odds have to be with Sharapova.

Kerber has proven to be a consistent performer on the WTA tour and will likely earn her #5 seeding.  17-year old Madison Keys is not settled into the WTA hierarchy and could upset the apple cart in 3R.  Overall Kerber’s consistency should prevail.  Until she gets in with the really big girls.

Sharapova d Kerber

Semis


In the high unlikelihood that my predictions hold, we could have two very fascinating semis.  Azarenka vs Serena is for bragging rights for queen diva – numero uno.  Yes Serena has won everything in sight since July and her match record is 1000-2 over that period (or whatever), but what shocked me was how close Azarenka made it in the US final.  7-5 in the 3rd?? Wow!

Serena is not a total lock for this match, even if she is favoured.  The number one ranking is on the line.  Unless Azarenka wins the AO title, she will almost certainly lose the #1 ranking (Sharapova and Serena would both have to lose very early to prevent that).  So this will be a pressure-filled match.  And the pressure is greater for Serena, I think.  If Azarenka loses, she can lick her wounds and try again next time.  But if Serena loses, then suddenly Azarenka looks like ‘the real’ and legitimate #1.  The changing of the guard will clang loudly across the tennis landscape.

Serena admitted to nerves in the Wimbledon and USO finals.  Can she master them, or will she revisit her 2011-USO-final-loss-to-Stosur meltdown?

SWilliams d Azarenka

The other semi could pit the last two Roland Garros champions.  Sharapova has by far the more consistent record over the last 6 months.  Their head to head is 8-4 for Sharapova.  Maria won their first 5 meetings, Li the next 4, and Maria the last 3.  On hard courts they are 5-1 for Sharapova.  The signs all point to Sharapova, but Li is a streaky and talented player.  If she’s connecting, Li could blast Sharapova off the court.  New coach Carlos Rodriguez seems to be pushing the right buttons and another trip to a slam title-round is well within Li’s wheelhouse.  Overall, I think I’ll pick Sharapova’s consistency.

Sharapova d Li

Final


I really doubt that anyone can stand in the way of a determined Serena.  Azarenka probably has the best chance.  Sharapova’s recent outings against Serena have not looked promising for Maria.

SWilliams d Sharapova

Bookies


Average of all bookies reporting at bookies.com on 11 Jan 2013.

Rank
Player
Odds
1
Williams, S
1.87
2
Azarenka, V
4.52
3
Sharapova, M
8.93
4
Li, N
19.86
5
Radwanska, A
20.50
6
Kvitova, P
21.71
7
Kerber, A
26.57
8
Stosur, S
33.79
9
Wozniacki, C
51.36
10
Williams, V
53.14
11
Ivanovic, A
75.21
12
Pavlyuchenkova, A
79.93
13
Petkovic, A
86.00
14
Lisicki, S
88.57
15
Stephens, S
88.73
16
Bartoli, M
92.21
17
Errani, S
94.46
18
Kanepi, K
95.00
19
Robson, L
102.15
20
Cibulkova, D
103.91
21
Barthel, M
107.36
22
Petrova, N
144.85
23
Kirilenko, M
145.93
24
Kuznetsova, S
150.91

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open