Skip to main content

2013 US Open Women Predictions

2013 US Open Women’s Preview – 23 Aug 2013


Serena Williams

So Serena has lost only 4 times in the last 12 months (72-4), and only twice in the last 6 months.  Who could possibly choose against her on home turf at the US Open?  Plus she is defending champion.  She’s been chewing up opponents in dominating fashion.

But just when you think she’s done flossing opponents out of her teeth, she’ll lose to a world #24 at Wimbledon (Lisicki), or a #25 at the Australian (Stephens)... both losses, notably, at the slams.  She’s also lost twice to Victoria Azarenka (Doha, Cincy).  So the field has to have a glimmer of hope.  Serena is not exactly young anymore.  She’s the oldest woman to be ranked #1 on the computer, and the losses, especially to Lisicki, made her look uncertain, tentative, unsure of her skills, and in short, old.  All the more remarkable then that she’s still winning so much.

She lost at Cincinnati last year and went on to win the US Open.  Who realistically will stand in the way of her 5th US Open title, and becoming the first woman to win at least 5 each at the Australian, Wimbledon, and USO?


Victoria Azarenka

The prime candidate to stop Serena has to be Azarenka.  She’s recorded 2 wins over Serena this year.  Going backwards, the last woman to record 2 wins over Serena was Stosur, 2011, 2010.  Azarenka beat Serena at Cincy last week and that has to feel good for Victoria.

It was a good win, too.  Serena came out playing error-free tennis in the first set, finding the corners and playing with power, 6-2 Serena.  In the second set Victoria dug in and started hitting with some pace of her own.  At the same time, Serena’s error count was on the rise, 6-2 Azarenka.  The third set was more even and went to a tiebreak.  Throughout the set Serena appeared almost completely placid.  TV commentators said it looked like she didn’t care or was putting out no energy.  I read it differently.  I thought she was making a deliberate attempt to stay calm emotionally, because she certainly put out a lot of effort during the point and even offered the occasional shout when hitting a winner, even if her overall demeanour seemed almost soporific.  But Victoria had really raised her level and was constructing beautiful points, hitting powerfully and moving Serena around.  She took the tiebreaker playing high quality ball.

Does this mean Victoria will beat Serena at the USO if they both make the final?  It has to be a possibility... but you’ve got to think Serena will be tougher when the stakes are higher.  On the other hand, Serena has betrayed nerves in three of the last six slams.  The question is, will that matter?  Is Azarenka playing well enough to beat an in-form Serena?  In Cincy it looked like she was.

Even if Azarenka wins the tournament and Serena doesn’t play, Serena has amassed enough points to hang on to #1.  Victoria has made at least the final of the last 3 hard court slams, and is a good bet to continue that streak.


Maria Sharapova

Oh Sugar!  Sharapova has withdrawn from the Open with a shoulder injury.  That might explain why she lost 3 of her last 4 matches and hasn’t won a match since June.  If her slump can be explained by physical ailments there’s less of her head to worry about, but, increasingly, the question arises, can she hang with the big girls?

She’s lost 13 times in a row to Serena. Last year she was only 2-4 against Azarenka, but has won both their last two encounters.  But Maria hasn’t won on outdoor hardcourts against Vika since 2009, falling the last 6 times to her.  She’s struggled with big hitters that show up her relative lack of mobility, but if she can get dictating, she can be lethal.  Hopefully she comes back to us soon.


Other Belles of the Ball

Agnieszka Radwanska thought she had a golden opportunity at Wimbledon – into the semis with the big 3 out of the way, but Lisicki had other ideas.  Aggie has not made SF at a slam other than twice at Wimbledon, but she’s shown signs of improvement on North American hardcourts this year, making SF at both Canada and Miami.  Her USO record is not particularly promising, making 4R thrice but never more.  I’ll plug for her to make QF this year.

Li Na, like Serena is 31 years old.  She’s still capable of great tennis, especially on hardcourts, as her run to the final in Australia demonstrated.  She won 13 sets in a row there, but couldn’t muster the last one.  She made semis at both Canada and Cincy and seems to be rounding nicely into form for a good push at the Open.  She made QF only once (2009) so I want to expect no more from her this time.

Marion Bartoli would be high on everyone’s watch list, fresh off her Wimbledon victory, and at age 28, with several good years left.  Unfortunately, she’s just announced her retirement from the game.  After summiting the apex of the sport at Wimbledon, and with limited likelihood of repeating, she is wise, perhaps, to bask in the satisfaction and glory of that achievement.  I wish her well.

Samantha Stosur shocked the world in 2011 by beating Serena in the US Open final, just the third tournament title of her career.  Now she’s just claimed her 4th, taking out Azarenka in the final of Carlsbad.  This may indicate a return to form and anyone facing her should be as wary as a wildebeest crossing a river.  Though I doubt she will win another slam, she has made two finals so SF might not be unreasonable this year.  She’s not a consistent threat to the top 3 but, if Wimblegeddon repeats, anything is possible.

Petra Kvitova seems a shade of her former self.  She gets more skittish with each passing slam.  After her breakout Wimby win in 2011, she posted SF-SF-QF-4R in the 2012 slams.  This year she’s knocked that back to 2R-3R-QF, and is at only 9 in the world.  She seems unable to harness her talent.  She’s shown no real sign of improvement and I expect another early loss.

Sloane Stephens has been patchy in the smaller tournaments but over-performs at the slams.  Hopefully this indicates a deep talent that is just latent in blossoming.  After her breakout SF finish and victory over Serena in Australia, she made 4R at the French and QF at Wimbledon.  That’s about where I’d expect her to end up again.  She did just oust Sharapova from Cincinnati, which may indicate a readiness to break through to another level – maybe top 10 - but I don’t really feel she is mentally prepared to go all the way at a slam.

Caroline Wozniacki has just risen to 8 in the rankings on the back of a QF run in Cincy – she’s seems the queen of taking advantage of weakness in the rankings – her rise was precipitated by the weaker showings of Kerber and Kvitova whom she surpassed.  What can’t be denied is that while Caroline bombed at the USO last year going out in the first round, before that she had been to at least the SF three straight times.  If she is rounding into form, it’s at one of her most successful tournaments so handle with care.

Sara Errani:  it is perhaps block-headed to slot Errani so low in my prognostications.  She currently holds down the #5 slot on the computer and made semis at USO last year.  But she has not matched the heights she attained last year.  If the draw breaks well, she can go reasonably deep, but I simply do not think she is capable of the title – I don’t see enough game there.  But she IS extremely tenacious and could pull an upset along the way.

Jelena Jankovic made #1 in the world and the final at the US Open in 2008, losing a close one to Serena.  Then she began a slow decline which she is only now, 5 years later, showing signs of halting.  She’s back to 11 in the rankings after a SF in Cincy and QF at the French.  She’s playing tough and should be good to live up to her seeding, maybe better.  Ditto Roberta Vinci.


Ladies in Waiting

There are a few other players I’ll be keeping my eyes on…  WTA rank in (parenthesis ).

Angelique Kerber has been coming down to earth after a stellar 2012.  She’s still ranked 10 in the world, but if she doesn’t defend 4R points at USO will probably drop lower.  On the other hand, the 2011 Open was the site of her initial break-out so maybe she has another deep run in store.  I don’t expect it.

Ana Ivanovic (15) continues to founder despite occasional signs of life.  Her tenure at #1 seems a fairy tale.  Despite a run to the final at Wimbledon, Sabine Lisicki (18) has given no indication that she can do it anywhere else.  Which Dominika Cibulkova (19) will we get at this year’s Open?  The one who took out Radwanska in the Stanford final or the one who lost to #102 in the first round of Cincinnati?   Sorana Cirstea (21) is reaching mid-career at age 23 and made the Toronto final, losing to Serena.  QF would be an excellent showing for her.  Svetlana Kuznetsova (29) is still only 28.  The 2004 champion has too much talent to be ignored and has shown signs of a pulse in the slams this year, but little elsewhere.  QF would be surprising.

Magdalena Rybarikova (31) may be having a career year.  QF in Toronto and a win in Washington put her in the conversation.  She may rise to the 4R, depending on her draw.  Laura Robson (32) is still a teen and showed promise last year at USO, taking out Clijsters and Li.  She has shown little to raise expectation this summer, but I keep expecting a breakout performance from one so obviously talented.  Kristina Mladenovic (37) catches me off guard with her ranking.  Still only 20, she continues to improve and should be threatening the top 20 soon.

Ditto Madison Keys (40) and Elina Svitolina (44) who are only 18 years old.  Keys has yet to show her mettle on the big stage… maybe this will be her debut.  There’s no one younger ranked above her.  Is she a legitimate ‘talent’ or just an earlier bloomer?  Annika Beck (49) and Monica Puig (50) are both 19 and worthy of tracking.  Likewise Eugenie Bouchard (57) and Garbine Muguruza (62).  Venus Williams (60) is much too talented to be ignored.  Who knows how much longer we will get to enjoy her.  If she makes 3R she will do well.

Donna Vekic (65) is the youngest player in the top 100 at 17. Lauren Davis (70), only 19, had the unique task of beating Kuznetsova twice in Toronto this year, once in qualifying and once in the main draw.  At 5’2” she may struggle to make an impact on the big stage.  Caroline Garcia (76), age 19, may have more potential.   Lastly, Ashleigh Barty is 17 and ranked 170.  She’s been to two slam doubles finals this year at Australia and Wimbledon.


The Draw (seeds in parenthesis)

First Quarter

Serena (1) could get recently hot Rybarikova (29) in 3R and ever-dangerous Sloane Stephens (15) in the fourth.  I think Serena will want revenge for Australia and will be in crushing form.  Venus (u) opens against Wimbledon semi-finalist ‘never-again’ Flipkens (12) in 1R in a wide open eighth of the draw headlined by slumping Angelique Kerber (8).  We could very well see Eugenie Bouchard or Kaia Kanepi (25) across from Serena in the QF.

SWilliams d. Bouchard


Second Quarter

An entertaining section… all 8 seeds here can do some damage.  ARadwanska (3 – thank-you Maria) would try to outfox the heavy-hitting Pavlyuchenkova (32) in 3R.  Next, Makarova (24) and Lisicki (16) can have a talent war to see who would face the winner.  Third round in the next eighth could bring up Jankovic (9) and Cirstea (19) both riding hot streaks, and at the bottom hyper-talented teen Laura Robson (30) against her victim last year, Li Na (5).  Of course Jankovic has to face Madison Keys first – both of whom I thought could go deep – I’ll pick JJ.

This little nest of fireworks should produce some excellent first and early second week viewing, but at the end of the day I expect the top 2 seeds to come through.

Li d. ARadwanska


Third Quarter

From hot to utterly tepid…  I’ll need to set my alarm to make it through this snooze fest.  None of the players here are a pre-draw pick for SF, but one of them WILL make it that far.  Errani (4) has looked lukewarm this summer but did make SF last year. Wozniacki (6 – usurping Bartoli) is predictably waking up at New Haven this week:  4-time champion there.  Kuznetsova (27) has been floundering between decent slam performances and little else.  Halep (21) was hot-ish not SO long ago… or maybe the little engine that could Vinci (10) will stage another QF with compatriot Errani like last year??

Errani d. Wozniacki


Fourth Quarter

Seeing Azarenka’s (2) name at the bottom of the draw feels like a nice solid anchor in this fortune telling game.  But wouldn’t you know it, my third favourite pick for the title, Stosur (11) is also here.  So I have to pick, and early, between them. 

Alright contestants our theme for Double Jeopardy is ‘unpredictability’…  Alex, I’ll take Kvitova for 200.  The #7 seed??  Very rich…  Instead, I’ll take Stosur over Barthel (28) in that eighth.  Svitolina vs. Cibulkova (17) could be entertaining in round one, and if she makes it to 4R, Cibu the giant-killer has a chance against Azarenka.

Azarenka d. Stosur


Semi-finals

I actually doubt that Li will get this far, but don’t like the other options better.  If she does face Serena, she could very well send the great American hope home, but all things considered, Serena is more likely to survive this far.

SWilliams d. Li


Azarenka just looked way too good in Cincinnati.

Azarenka d. Errani


Final

After 9 straight wins by Serena, Victoria has won 2 of the last 3 in their head-to-head.  After a see-sawing and very entertaining battle in Cincinnati, we know that, on hard courts, they are very close.  I think Azarenka still feel she’s got something to prove.  Serena will come out fierce, but I see fear in the American’s eyes.

Azarenka d. SWilliams


Experts

Most experts haven’t weighed in yet, but at time of writing the balance is tipped heavily  toward Serena:

SWilliams
(8 votes)
Jon Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Jane McManus (ESPN), Ray Bowers (Tennis Server), bookies.com, Ed McGrogan (Tennis), Peter Bodo (Tennis),
Andrew Lawrence (Sports Illustrated), Courtney Nguyen (Sports
Illustrated)
Azarenka
(2 votes)
Steve Tignor (Tennis), Richard Deitsch (Sports Illustrated)
Stephens
(1 vote)
Bruce Jenkins (Sports Illustrated)



Bookies

Average of decimal odds for all bookies reporting at bookies.com on 21 Aug 2013:

1
Williams, S
1.76
2
Azarenka, V
4.86
3
Sharapova, M
9.78
4
Li, N
20.38
5
Radwanska, A
21.73
6
Kvitova, P
24.20
7
Stosur, S
25.35
8
Stephens, S
38.26
9
Lisicki, S
46.80
10
Kerber, A
61.15
11
Wozniacki, C
78.45
12
Ivanovic, A
92.05
13
Robson, L
103.55
14
Jankovic, J
129.20
15
Kuznetsova, S
130.45
16
Cirstea, S
134.33
17
Petkovic, A
139.20
18
Errani, S
143.80
19
Halep, S
161.53
20
Keys, M
162.11
21
Kirilenko, M
162.95
22
Barthel, M
172.05
23
Williams, V
177.68
24
Cibulkova, D
188.61
25
Hampton, J
199.00


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open