Skip to main content

US Open Women's Preview 2014


US Open Women’s Preview 2014

Charles Friesen

I and just about every other predictor out there have made Serena the favourite at the last 10 or so slams.  She’s bombed the last 3.  Are we all going to fall for it again?

Chaos reigns on the women’s tour.  Who is this year’s best player?  Is Serena Williams going to pull it together and assert order from the top?  Despite a tour-leading 5 titles this season, she’s been dreadful in the slams… winning only 6 matches. 

Slam match wins 2014

Bouchard
16
Halep
15
Sharapova
13
ARadwanska, Cibulkova, Kerber, Safarova
10
Li, Kvitova, Makarova
9
Others…

SWilliams
6

It used to be that despite how bad the rest of her season was, Serena was a performer.  She could always be counted on at slam time to pull off a miracle and come from some unfathomable depth to hoist the hardware.

She’s clinging to #1 by a thread and the problem is her lack of points at the slams.  Of course she could turn it all around.  Her year is still salvageable and she can still look like a legitimate #1 with a victory at this US Open.  But if she falls short, she will be vulnerable to be overtaken at the #1 spot.  She’s only 3rd in the points race this year.  Leading the pack are Sharapova and Halep.  A victory by either of them could provide bragging rights for best player of the year.  The same goes for Kvitova and Li, slam winners this year, although Li is out with injury.  If Halep wins the US title she will become #1, unless Serena makes the semis or better. 

Serena’s win-loss this year is 32-3 outside the slams and 6-3 at the slams.  Why the disparity?  At age 32 it’s not unexpected that she’s having off days.  Is it just coincidence that they’re at the majors?  Or is something wrong with her mental game?  Is the invincible one actually feeling the pressure?

First Quarter

I just can’t pick against Serena (seeded 1).  She may have been mental mush at the majors all year, but she just won Cincinnati and Washington, her form must be good.  Right…? 

She could have a test in the first round against 18 year old Taylor Townsend who, at the French, took out Alize Cornet, Serena’s conqueror at Wimbledon.  Serena’s 4th round could bring up Samantha Stosur (24), who beat her in the USO final of 2011.  Stosur is capable of anything, except consistency it seems.  Serena ‘should’ win that match but it’s also a real opportunity for Serena to suffer yet another early exit.

Stosur’s section includes Coco Vandeweghe who announced herself in Montreal by tag-teaming top-ten Serbs Ivanovic and Jankovic.  Coco may have to get through Carla Suarez Navarro (15) in her second match.  Lepchenko and Zhang (32) are also in this eighth, so Serena’s ride to the quarters is far from guaranteed.

Should she make it that far, she’s seeded to face Pennetta (11) or Ana Ivanovic (8).  Ivanovic took Serena out of the Australian this year but has lost to Serena 3 times since, including in the final of Cincinnati.  Making that final shows Ana’s form is good.  Ivanovic could have a tricky opener against Allison Riske, and Dellacqua (29) in the third is capable of rising to the big occasion.  Pennetta has done little since winning Indian Wells in March, but has made the quarters 4 times at the USO, including semis last year.  It should be a very interesting quarter.  Serena is capable of gliding through, but will she?

SWilliams d. Ivanovic

Second Quarter

The second quarter could be decided by a rematch of the Wimbledon final if Petra Kvitova (3) and Eugenie Bouchard (7) live up to their seedings.  Bouchard has been in forgettable form since a runner-up performance at Wimbledon.  The low after such an amazing high is perhaps not surprising.  She’s won only one match since.  She should be able to play back into form as the tournament progresses and has shown a real proclivity for the slams finishing SF-SF-RU at the three so far this year.   But considering her recent play, an early exit is not unthinkable.  She could get Wimbledon quarter-finalist Barbara Zahlavova Strycova (30) in R3, followed by Aus Open runner-up Dominika Cibulkova (12) or Ekatarina Makarova (17) who is having a career year and coming off semis in Montreal and Washington.

Kvitova’s first match against talented striker Kristina Mladenovic is not a gimme, and she could facing rising teen Madison Keys (27), seeded for the first time at a slam, in round 3.  The fourth could bring up Svetlana Kuznetsova (20) or Victoria Azarenka (16) who own 4 slam singles titles between them.  Both have been to the USO final twice before, with Kuznetsova winning it in 2004. 

In previous years I would pencil in Azarenka as the winner of this quarter based on consistency and hard court game.  But she is still coming back from injury that took her out for most of 5 months and has not displayed anything close to her top form.  Kvitova is notoriously inconsistent, especially after a big win, and has never been past the fourth round at the US Open.  Bouchard has won more matches at the slams this year than anyone else, but is struggling.  Kuznetsova is a head case.

In short, the door is wide open in this quarter.  It could be Keys breakout performance, or maybe Makarova will take another step upwards.  This quarter could easily produce an unseeded semi-finalist like young risers Zarina Diyas or Elina Svitolina.

Makarova d. Azarenka

Third Quarter

Agnieszka Radwanska (4) gets top billing and appears to have a fairly straight forward path to the quarters with the inconsistents, Vinci (28), Cornet (22), and Safarova (14), as likely seeded opponents.  Trouble is, Aggie herself has never made it out of the fourth round at the US Open.  This is a golden opportunity.  Safarova made SF at Wimbledon, which could mean she’s ripe for a letdown, although she did take Venus Williams out of Cincinnati.

The other half of this quarter features Angelique Kerber (6), Jelena Jankovic (9), Sloane Stephens (21), and Kurumi Nara (31).  Stephens has come back to earth after a stellar 2013, so a Kerber-Jankovic fourth round appears likely.  Jankovic made the final here in 2008, and Kerber’s break-through came in NY in 2011, making the semis.  I lean toward Kerber, based on her finalist performance recently in Stanford.

Kerber d. ARadwanska

Fourth Quarter

This year’s leader in the WTA points race is Maria Sharapova (5), followed closely by Simona Halep (2), and both are in the bottom quarter.  Halep could meet French Open quarter-finalist Garbine Muguruza (25) in R3.  Nearby lurks Venus Williams (19) whose return to form saw her beat Serena in Canada, two weeks ago.  A fourth round clash between Venus and Halep is difficult to predict.  Venus may have to get through Sara Errani (14) first, who has not looked sharp this summer.

Maria Sharapova opens against compatriot Maria Kirilenko  who has beaten her twice before.  The third round could bring up the ever-dangerous Sabine Lisicki (26).  Opposite them are seeds Petkovic (18) and Wozniacki (10) both of whom have been showing improving results of late.  It will likely boil down to a fourth round battle between Sharapova and Wozniacki, with the result by no means obvious.

After winning in 2006, Sharapova had struggled at the Open until last year when she made the semis, losing a close 3-setter to Azarenka.  She has not looked particularly on-form since her French victory in June.  Is she ready for another deep slam run?

There are a lot of potential winners in this quarter:  Sharapova, Halep, VWilliams, and Wozniacki look the most likely.  I like Venus’ form and attitude.

VWilliams d. Sharapova

Semis

Once again I’ve predicted Serena for the semis, but this time I honestly won’t be surprised if she doesn’t make it.  If she does, I make her the strong front runner anytime she makes the semis of a slam.  Makarova, (or Bouchard, or Azarenka, or Kvitova) would probably not beat Serena at this stage... although Kuznetsova might...

SWilliams d. Makarova

If Venus can survive the hornet’s nest of the bottom quarter, she should be able to withstand a strong assault from Kerber.  Kerber will likely play well and her hard-hitting consistency is tough to beat, but Venus has access to so many tools... if she can only find them.

VWilliams d. Kerber

Final

The last time Serena lost to Venus twice in a row was 2008-2009.  If Serena’s plays reasonably well she should take it.  But Venus is very talented and anything is possible.  The bookies are less optimistic than I about Venus’ chances.

SWilliams d. VWilliams

Bookies

Decimals Odds from Betfair.com on 18 Aug 2014
1
SWilliams
2.64
2
Sharapova
8.2
3
Halep
9.0
4
Bouchard
15.5
5
Kvitova
16
6
Azarenka
25
7
Wozniacki
26
8
ARadwanska
29
9
Ivanovic
40
10
Kerber
65
11
Stephens
80
12
Keys
85
13
Stosur
85
14
VWilliams
90
15
Muguruza
90
16
Lisicki
170
17
Vandeweghe
180
18
Pavlyuchenkova
180
19
Petkovic
180
20
Safarova
200
21
Kuznetsova
200
22
Cibulkova
200
23
Jankovic
260
24
Pennetta
270
25
Li
280



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open