Skip to main content

US Open Men's Preview 2016

US Open Men’s Preview – 27 August 2016
To my mind there are six men who could be favoured to win this US Open and another three who have a legitimate chance: Kei Nishikori, Stan Wawrinka, and Gael Monfils.  The traditional favourites, Djokovic, Murray, and Nadal, have shown some legendary form this year, but it is fair to question if Cilic, Del Potro, and Raonic will supersede them.

First Quarter
Two of my top six contenders are here, Novak Djokovic (seeded 1) and Marin Cilic (7).  Sporting a 51-5 (win-loss) record for the year and with two slams already in the bag, this year would seem to belong to Djokovic, but he’s been less than stellar since completing a slam at the French and becoming the first man since Rod Laver to hold all four slams simultaneously.  He crashed out early at both Wimbledon and the Olympics. 

In the meantime former USO champ, Cilic, just thumped Murray in Cincinnati and looks to be back in 2014 form when he took the title. Also here are Tsonga (9) and Gasquet (13) who are both capable of at least semi-final (SF) runs.  Up and coming US 18-year olds Taylor Fritz and Francis Tiafoe will probably not it make through their first rounds against US seeds Sock (26) and Isner (20).  And then there’s Kevin Anderson (23) who took Murray out of the Open last year.

Djokovic should beat them all, but with questions surrounding his wrist and with Cilic’s recent form, I’m picking the upset.
Cilic d. Djokovic

Second Quarter
Another two of my top six land in this quarter, Rafael Nadal (4) and Milos Raonic (5).  Nadal stormed back into contention with a fine Olympics, taken out there by the deadly resurgence of Del Potro.  Rafa could run into Lucas Pouille (24) in the fourth round (4R), the 22-year old who made the quarters at Wimbledon.

Raonic skipped the Olympics, but the Wimbledon runner-up has been peaking this year, sitting in 3rd spot in the yearly race.  He could face a very tough 4R against Monfils (10) who is having his best year, finally, at age 29.  Monfils took Raonic out of Toronto, so I take nothing for granted, but expect the Canadian to come through.
Nadal’s draw looks pretty easy, but despite better form of late, I still think he can lose it mentally and let winnable matches slip away.
Raonic d. Nadal 

Third Quarter
Of my top six, only Juan Martin Del Potro lands in this quarter and he is unseeded.  The other possible contender is Stan Wawrinka (3).  There are some tantalizing young talents in this quarter, Dominic Thiem (8), Nick Kyrgios (14), and nineteen-year old Alexander Zverev (27).  There are also some interesting middle-tennis-agers here like Bernard Tomic, Steve Johnson, and Sam Querrey – not to mention David Ferrer (11).  It could get pretty wild in this quarter.

It’s tough to say if Delpo will be able to continue the great form from his silver-medal run at the Olympics in which he took out both Djokovic and Nadal.  I think he will.
Del Potro d. Wawrinka

Fourth Quarter
My last top sixer is Andy Murray (2), and a possible contender here is 2014 runner-up Kei Nishikori (6).  David Goffin (12) has gone off the boil from his fine spring campaign, but the fortunes of Grigor Dimitrov (22) seem to be finally turning around.  He could face Murray in the fourth.
Murray d. Nishikori

Semi-finals
If I’m right, Raonic and Cilic will displace top seeds Djokovic and Nadal and gain a chance to fight for a finals spot.  Their head to head is 1:1 with the last match 3.5 years ago being a tight three-setter won by Raonic.  I really believe Cilic is in title-winning form, but I suspect the desire of the Canadian will trump that.
Raonic d. Cilic

The other semi could be an encore of the gold medal match between Murray and Delpo.  Murray won that episode, but a hungry, healthy (relatively) Del Potro is not to be counted out.  It could be painfully close.  Murray’s loss to Cilic in Cincinnati was not a good indicator of positive head space for the Murray camp.  But after winning Wimbledon and the Olympics, a little mental laxity can be forgiven.  By a hair...
Murray d. Del Potro

Final
I’m predicting the same performers from the Wimbledon final will entertain us on the final Sunday.  It would not surprise me at all if Cilic and Del Potro were here instead, or, for that matter, Djokovic or Nadal.  All have shown scintillating form this year.  If Cilic or Djokovic make the final, I think they will take it.  After that I think Raonic’s chances are almost equal to Murray’s.
Murray d. Raonic

Surveying 21 expert journalist opinions I could locate, there were 10 votes for Murray to win, 7 for Djokovic, 2 for Raonic, 1 for Cilic, and 1 for Nadal.

Odds from bet365.com on 27 August 2016
1
Djokovic
2.2
2
Murray
2.87
3
Raonic
15
4
Del Potro
19
5
Nadal
21
5
Wawrinka
21
7
Cilic
26
7
Nishikori
26
9
Kyrgios
41
10
Tsonga
67
10
Thiem
67
12
Dimitrov
81
13
Monfils
101
14
Goffin
151
14
Sock
151
14
KAnderson
151
14
Tomic
151
14
SJohnson
151
14
Gasquet
151
14
AZverev
151
14
Isner
151
22
Ferrer
201
22
Querrey
201
22
Simon
201
22
Bautista-Agut
201
26
FLopez
251
26
Karlovic
251
28
Kohlschreiber
301
28
Verdasco
301
28
Coric
301
31
Dolgopolov
401
31
Paire
401
31
Pouille
401
31
Troicki
401


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open