Skip to main content

US Open Women's Preview 2016

US Open Women’s Preview – 27 August 2016
Finally, Serena has a legitimate challenger.  Angelique Kerber has been tearing up the tour this year, making two slam finals, winning the Australian and Stuttgart, and making runner-up at Wimbledon, the Olympics, and Cincinnati.  She will carry a 460 point advantage through the tournament that could have her emerging as #1 unless Serena can better her by that amount.  This means Serena has to make at least the semi-finals to hang on to #1 and break the record she shares with Steffi Graf for consecutive weeks at #1.  But can Serena do it?  She bombed out of the Olympics unexpectedly and has claimed only one slam tournament this year.  She’s still the favourite but the outcome is far from certain.

First Quarter
Serena’s opening against Ekaterina Makarova is far from an easy match.  Makarova has been to the quarter-finals (QF) or better at six slams in her career, including twice at the USOpen.  And she’s beaten Serena at a slam before.  The fourth round (4R) could see Serena facing Samantha Stosur (seeded 16) who beat her in the final here in 2011.  And the QF could bring up Simona Halep (5) whom some are picking to win the tournament.  Also in this quarter are Ivanovic (29), Suarez Navarro (11), and Kasatkina (23).  In all it’s a nettlesome section that will demand Serena be near top form to survive.  It won’t be easy, but she’s still the favourite.
SWilliams d. Halep

Second Quarter
Aggie Radwanska (4) has not done well at the Open, with her best finish here being the round of 16 (4R), something she has accomplished four times.  Can she break through to the QF?  There is little to suggest she might although her draw does not look particularly frightening.  The other seeds, Bacsinszky (15), Bertens (20), and Garcia (25) are not accomplished at the USO, and that might open the door for a deep run by unseeded Eugenie Bouchard, or perhaps the returning from injury Laura Robson.

The bottom half of this section contains the redoubtable Venus Williams (6) and Karolina Pliskova (10) who just stormed through Cincinnati to claim the biggest title of her career.  Breakthrough wins are often followed by retrenchment, so I’ll take Venus for this section, old and fragile though she may be.
VWilliams d. Bouchard

Third Quarter
This quarter is marked by potential and opportunity for players who are just starting to make their marks on tour.  Madison Keys (9) has big enough game to win the tournament, but has not harnessed the consistency to do so in the past.  Will this be the breakthrough for the 21-year old? 

Also here is the surging Johanna Konta (13) who has had a break out year that sees her rising from a triple digits ranking a year ago to the gates of the top 10.  And then there’s Belinda Bencic (24), last year’s rising star who has struggled with injury this year.  She’s still only 19 years old and regaining form.  She could be dangerous.

Facing off in the third round could be gold medalist Monica Puig (32) and this year’s French Open champion, Garbine Muguruza (3).  Muguruza’s struggles since her big win in June suggest a letdown may be likely from Puig, but sometimes the confidence a big win can inspire takes hold right away.  Muguruza could be ready to reassert herself despite never passing the second round (2R) here.  She certainly has enough game.

I think Keys can pass all these tests, although she might have her hands full with veterans Kuznetsova (9), champion here in 2004, or Wozniacki, unseeded this year but a finalist two years ago.
Keys d. Muguruza

Fourth Quarter
Angelique Kerber (2) headlines this quarter but there are some other dangerous names here, like two-time Wimbledon champ Petra Kvitova (14), last year’s USO runner-up Roberta Vinci (7), Dominika Cibulkova (12), and Serena’s conqueror at the Olympics Elina Svitolina (22).  Kvitova made the QF last year but has generally not done well at the Open. 

Vinci has had a rather modest year going 22-21 (W-L), but she has quite a fine USO record, making QF or better in three of the last four years.  Most dangerous might be Cibulkova who may be having her career best year, already claiming two tournaments.  The big-hitting Svitolina doesn’t give herself much margin on her shots, but followed up her Olympic upset with a finalist run in New Haven just before the Open.

Kvitova may well take the quarter, but I expect she’ll throw in a bad match somewhere along the line so I favour Kerber to emerge from their potential fourth-rounder.  The other 4R in this section could feature Vinci against Cibulkova.  Vinci could recapture last year’s USO magic and will likely have good crowd support, but Cibulkova is playing some awfully good ball this year.
Kerber d. Cibulkova

Semis
Serena has won 19 slam matches this year, best on tour, while Venus has won 8, which is good for seventh spot.  All my projected semi-finalists are within this range.

Slam matches won 2016
SWilliams
19
Kerber
13
ARadwanska
11
Muguruza
10
Suarez Navarro
10
Keys
9
VWilliams
8

Venus is the only woman in history to claim double digit wins over Serena.  The head-to-head is 16-11.  So anything is possible.  But Serena has to be considered the favourite.
SWilliams d. VWilliams

The head-to-head between Kerber and Keys is definitely in Kerber’s favour, 5-1, and overall I think Kerber’s more consistent game and slam final experience provide a greater probability she will make it this far.
Kerber d. Keys

Final
If Serena and Angelique face off for a third time in a slam final this year, it will start to feel like a dynasty to rival the Djokovic-Murray duopoly on the men’s side.  They’ve split their finals one each this year.  It would be a remarkable year indeed if Serena were to make all four slam finals in one year, something she has never done before, and win only one of them.  Prior to this year, Serena was 21-4 in slam finals.

If Kerber should claim two slams this year, it would be very difficult not to consider her #1 for the year.  But can a player who had previously never been in a slam final, rise to the pinnacle of the sport at age 28?  Will the pressure be too much?

SWilliams d. Kerber

Expert journalist opinion at the start of the tournament had 10 of 20 picking Serena for the title, 3 picked Kerber, 2 each picked Muguruza, ARadwanska, and Halep, and there was 1 vote for Keys.

Odds from bet365.com on 27 Aug 2016
1
SWilliams
2.25
2
Kerber
10
3
Halep
10
4
Murguruza
11
5
Keys
17
6
Kvitova
21
7
KaPliskova
34
7
ARadwanska
34
9
Puig
41
10
Konta
51
10
Bouchard
51
12
VWilliams
67
12
Bencic
67
12
Cibulkova
67
15
Wozniacki
81
15
Safarova
81
15
Svitolina
81
15
Bacsinszky
81
19
Vandeweghe
101
19
Kuznetsova
101
19
Garcia
101
19
Stosur
101
19
Lisicki
101
24
SuarezNavarro
151
24
Ivanovic
151
24
Pavlyuchenkova
151
24
Petkovic
151
24
Kasatkina
151
24
Vinci
151
24
Bertens
151
24
Mladenovic
151
24
Makarova
151
24
Vesnina
151


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open