Skip to main content

French Open Preview 2017 - Women

French Open Preview 2017 – Women

Elina Svitolina, who just took the clay title in Rome last week, assessed the field for the French Open at Roland Garros this year and said, “There is no one I can name as a favourite.”  This sentiment is also evident from the bookies odds.  Their number 1 pick for victory is Simona Halep, who has never won a slam title before.  She’s rated at 4.33 (10:3) which are not strong odds.  By comparison Nadal is rated at 1.8 (4:5) on the men’s side.

The seven largest titles of the year so far – Aus Open, five 1000/900’s and Stuttgart – have been won by six different women.  They are Serena Williams, Elina Svitolina (twice), Elena Vesnina, Johanna Konta, Laura Siegemund, and Simona Halep.  Parity is ruling the tour this year.

Is this a bad thing?  Probably not.  It makes the WTA very interesting for fans, and also hard to predict.  And to make it even less predictable, some of the biggest names are missing from the roster of the French.  Serena Williams is pregnant and expecting around Sep 1.  Victoria Azarenka is a new mother and not returning to the tour for at least a month.  Maria Sharapova is recently returned from a drug suspension and has not yet garnered enough points to qualify for the tournament.  And several potential challengers (and former slam champs) have retired like Li Na, Flavia Pennetta, Marion Bartoli, and even Kim Clijsters.  And then there’s Petra Kvitova, whose name is still on the roster but from whom little should be expected given this is her first tournament back after a horrific home invasion and knife attack before Christmas that severely damaged her playing hand.

In short, the usual round-up of slam winners is not playing this French Open, so we are in the enviable position of being able to expect something new.  The only former champs in the draw are Francesca Schiavone, Garbine Muguruza, and Svetlana Kuznetsova, and two of them play each other in the first round.  Schiavone at age 36 is likely too old to mount a deep run for the title.  But the case of her first round opponent, Muguruza, is more puzzling.

Garbine made waves taking Serena out of RG 2014 and making the Wimbledon final in 2015.  But she really splashed by taking the title here last year.  Strangely it was her only final of 2016 and she hasn’t made another since.  She clearly thrives on clay and when she’s on, one wonders how she ever loses.  But she has looked rather vincible of late.  She did make the semis in Rome last week, before retiring with an injury.  She could rise up again this year, but there appears little to indicate that is likely. 

Svetlana Kuznetsova, on the other hand, is looking more like her old clay-loving self.  After spending the better part of six years in the top ten from 2004-2010, she sublimated into the 20’s of the rankings for six years before re-emerging as the yearend #9 for 2016.  She seems strongest on clay and claimed the title here in 2009.  Most importantly, she’s playing well again, and sits at #8 in the yearly points race.

Also playing well is Roland Garros runner-up from 2014, Simona Halep.  She defended her title in Madrid, looking stronger as the tournament progressed and withstood a fine challenge from Kristina Mladenovic in the final.  Halep also made the final in Rome.  She is deservedly the bookies’ favourite.  She possesses fine clay court skills, but is not big and strong enough to be truly dominant.  Although clay neutralizes power somewhat, she can still get hit off the court at times.  Nevertheless, she is the logical choice for favourite.

Kiki Mladenovic, for her part, has been ripping it up, enjoying a career year.  In addition to finalist showings in Madrid, Stuttgart, and Acapulco, she made semis in Indian Wells and took the title in St. Petersburg.  She’s #7 in the race and a maiden slam on home soil is actually thinkable.  Aside from Canadian transplant Mary Pierce in 2000, no French woman has won at Roland Garros since Francoise Durr in 1967, but that drought could end this year.

The top 4 in this year’s points race is rounded out by Karolina Pliskova at #2, Johanna Konta at #3, and Caroline Wozniacki at #4.  They will be worth watching after the clay season ends, but generally do not thrive on dirt, and are likely not serious threats for Paris.

#1 in the race belongs to Svitolina, already winner of four tournaments this year.  Only three other women have won as many as two tournaments this year:  Karolina Pliskova, Pavlyuchenkova, and Konta.  In addition to the Rome title last week, Svitolina made the quarters at the French two years ago.  She was going to be my dark horse pick, but with her gaudy Rome laurel, she is elevated to top five favourite status.

Other names that could be mentioned include Venus Williams, finalist here in 2002 and finalist at the Aus Open this year, and world #1 Angelique Kerber who has the odd good clay result.  And then there’s a long list of potential spoilers who might make a mark but are less likely to claim the title:  Keys, Siegemund (now out with injury), Suarez Navarro, Pavlyuchenkova, Vesnina, Lucic-Baroni, Sevastova, Vandeweghe, Strycova, Cibulkova, Ostapenko, Kasatkina, Safarova, Bertens, ARadwanska, Davis, Bacsinszky, Bouchard, Stosur, Makarova, Schiavone, Errani, Puig, and even Vondrousova.  I would love to wax eloquent about all of these but will spare the reader that fate.

To sum up then, my favourites in a wide-open field are Halep, Svitolina, Mladenovic, Kuznetsova, and begrudgingly, Muguruza.

First Quarter

Kerber (#1 seed) hasn’t won a tournament this year and could hardly ask for a tougher first round opponent than Ekaterina Makarova.  Makarova has made fourth round (4R) here twice before, and at least the quarters (QF) at every other slam.  The biggest threats in this quarter are probably 2010 finalist Samantha Stosur (#23), last year’s semi-finalist Kiki Bertens (18), and 2009 champ Kuznetsova (8).  19-year old Jelena Ostapenko could also make some noise and might face Kerber in 3R. It will be interesting to see what Kvitova (15) can do in her injury comeback.  I’ll take Kuzzie over Bertens by a hair in the 4R to face Stosur in the QF.

Kuznetsova d. Stosur

Second Quarter

Last year’s champ, Muguruza (4), could lose in 1R to Schiavone or win the tournament.  Her road is not easy.  She could face improving Kontaveit in 2R and feisty Putintseva (27) in 3R.  The fourth could bring up Mirjana Lucic-Baroni (22) who’s having a career year, or Mladenovic (13) who has been killing it on clay lately.

The lower half of this quarter is led by Dominika Cibulkova (6) who has looked mediocre all year and Venus Williams (10) who has been making some deep runs at age 36.  Venus could face 15-year old Amanda Anisimova in 2R – who’s only 40% Venus’ age.  The third round for Venus could bring up never to be under-estimated Daria Gavrilova (24).  Timea Bacsinszky (30) has been to at least QF here the last two years and is my pick to face Venus in 4R.

It’s a murderous quarter to pick.  If Muguruza is ‘on’ it’s hers to lose, but Mladenovic, Bacs, and hard-hitting Venus are tough to overlook.

Mladenovic d. VWilliams

Third Quarter

This quarter contains my top two pre-draw favourites, Halep (3) and Svitolina (5).  Svitolina has a very tricky opening against talented Shvedova in 1R.  Also nearby are Sevastova (17), Beck, Eugenie Bouchard, Barty, and Madison Keys (12), all of whom could go deep.  If Keys gets hot she could win the tournament, so vast is her talent.  But Svitolina has been the steady horse of 2017, so I pick her to reach the QF from this lot.

In Halep’s section, Daria Kasatkina (26), Suarez Navarro (21), and 17-year old Marketa Vondrousova are names that jump out at me.  Kasatkina took Charleston this year and Vondrousova won eight straight matches out of qualifying to claim the clay title in Biel.  Halep is recovering from an ankle injury in Rome last week, otherwise she would be a shoo-in for the QF.  If she does get that far, can she reverse last week’s loss to Svitolina?  With a healthy ankle, I would say yes. With a dicey ankle, who knows?

Halep d. Svitolina

Fourth Quarter

The last quarter has, to my mind, the most opportunity.  The top seeds here do not thrive on clay:  KaPliskova (2), Konta (7), and ARadwanska (9).  Only ARad has been past 2R here, but she’s been injured and hasn’t won a match since Miami in March.  If Konta finds her footing on the dirt she could become dangerous but might have to get by Caroline Garcia (28) in 3R and Barbora Strycova (20) in 4R.

Lauren Davis (25) could benefit if KaPliskova struggles and could face in 4R Coco Vandeweghe (19) or Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (16) – both of whom have had some spectacular results this year.

Overall, the only former Garros semi-finalist in this quarter is Lucie Safarova who is unseeded after a tepid year.  While the top seeds have the potential for deep runs, I’m going with APavs.

Pavlyuchenkova d. Strycova

Semi-finals

I’ll be honest, and say this feels like a crapshoot.  It wouldn’t surprise me if none of my four predicted semi-finalists made it this far.

Mladenovic d. Kuznetsova because Kiki’s been so consistent this year, especially on clay.

Halep d. Pavlyuchenkova.  APavs could blow Halep off the court but is less consistent.

Final

Halep’s ankle injury is a worry, as is her propensity to go out in the first round of slams.  Mladenovic has made four finals this year, taking only the smallest one.  She seems to have trouble getting across the big finish line.

Halep d. Mladenovic

Expert Picks

Of the 8 expert picks I follow, 3 were for Halep, and 1 each for Kuznetsova, Mladenovic, Muguruza, Svitolina, and Venus Williams.

Bookies Odds

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 23 May 2015:
1
Halep
4.33
2
Svitolina
8
3
Muguruza
11
4
Kuznetsova
15
5
Kerber
17
6
KaPliskova
17
7
Mladenovic
17
8
Wozniacki
29
9
Siegemund
29
10
Kasatkina
29
11
Konta
29
12
VWilliams
34
13
Keys
34
14
Kvitova
41
15
ARadwanska
41
16
Bacsinszky
41
17
Bertens
41
18
Suarez Navarro
41
19
Kontaveit
41
20
Safarova
41
21
Stosur
51
22
Sevastova
51
23
Vandeweghe
51
24
Pavlyuchenkova
51
25
Bouchard
51
26
Cibulkova
51
27
Barthel
67
28
Gavrilova
67
29
Makarova
81
30
Stephens
81
31
Strycova
101
32
Ostapenko
101
33
Schiavone
101
34
Garcia
101
35
Vondrousova
101
36
Lucic-Baroni
101
37
Siniakova
101
38
Vinci
101
39
Konjuh
126
40
Begu
126
41
Vesnina
126
42
Cirstea
126
43
Puig
151
44
Errani
151
45
Jankovic
151
46
Bellis
151
47
Haddad Maia
151
48
Arruabarrena
201
49
Lisicki
201
50
Petkovic
201
51
Giorgi
201
52
Doi
201
53
Watson
201
54
Cornet
201
55
Babos
201
56
McHale
251
57
Vekic
251
58
Diyas
301
59
Beck
301
60
Flipkens
501
61
Van Uytvanck
501
62
Robson
501
63
Tsurenko
501


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open