Skip to main content

Wimbledon Men 2017 Preview

Wimbledon Men 2017

Federer and Nadal have been ripping up the courts this year, claiming four titles each in 2017.  Nadal took four of the big five European clay titles including a 10th French Open in the most dominant form he has ever shown at that tournament – and that’s saying something!  He lost only 35 games in sweeping to the title.  The only other years he won the French without losing a set were 2008 and 2010, the same years he claimed his two Wimbledon titles.  Nadal is in dominant, confident form, and must be considered a very serious threat for Wimbledon.  Let’s not forget that Nadal made the final five consecutive times he played Wimbledon, 2006-2011.

Meanwhile world #1 Andy Murray has looked decidedly unthreatening this year.  He did manage to win one title at the 500 level in Dubai, but lost early at the Aus Open and the four 1000 level tournaments he played.  It looked like he was turning it around at the French, where he nearly made the final, losing a tough 5-setter to Wawrinka in the semis.  But then he suffered a first round defeat on grass – which is apparently his best surface.  Things do not look good for the defending Wimbledon champion.  It’s possible he could play his way into form during the tournament and then become a threat in the final weekend.  A title is not unthinkable.  Nor is an early round loss.

Novak Djokovic has made four Wimbledon finals in the last six years, claiming three titles.  But he’s looked quite off-form in the first half of 2017.  He’s fallen to #4 in the world, after spending 325 consecutive weeks (more than 6 years) in the top 2 – a feat bettered only by Federer.

Consecutive weeks in ATP Top 2
Roger Federer
346
Novak Djokovic
325
Jimmy Connors
293
Ivan Lendl
280

But Novak has started to look a little better in the last few weeks.  He made the semis in Madrid, the final in Rome, and the quarters at the French.  Since losing his spark after winning the non-calendar slam at last year’s French, I wondered if he would ever regain it.  The move to Andre Agassi as his celebrity coach is interesting.  Djokovic seems to be looking for more than ‘just tennis’ to fill his life.  Agassi may be exactly the right fit to help him find balance while regaining his winning ways.  Andre himself seemed to find balance in the latter part of his career and had his greatest successes during that period.  Novak is still a formidable player and seems on the cusp of impressive form.  He could go deep at Wimbledon.  Will it be enough to overcome a peaking Nadal or Federer?  I’m not convinced but I wouldn’t rule it out.

What to make of Federer’s chances?  He would seem a shoo-in for favourite.  He’s lost only twice all year, and held match points in both cases.  He claimed a record 18th slam title at the Australian, and has beaten arch-rival Nadal four consecutive times, largely on the strength of his improved backhand.  Plus grass is his favourite surface, as his seven Wimbledon titles attest.

However two factors give me pause in anointing him prematurely.  First is the superlative form of Nadal.  The second is less tangible.  Federer worked his way to the Aus title with almost no expectation of success after being absent from competition for nearly seven months.  That freed him up.  Mentally he was playing with house money – nothing to lose.  Still feeling somewhat incredulous perhaps, he stormed through the sunshine double (Indian Wells and Miami), zinging his backhand all over the court effortlessly.

But now things are different.  He’s just won his ninth title in Halle on grass, and this should be an indicator of how he might fare at Wimbledon.  He’s been playing brilliantly all year, he’s beating Nadal, he’s just won on grass.  While these are excellent omens, they also bring expectation.  Federer wants to do well at Wimbledon.  He says he’s been gearing the last 12 months toward this.  He has created expectation for himself and will carry that burden with him throughout the tournament.  Anything short of the title will be a disappointment.  That’s a lot of pressure to carry.  Federer has not always handled pressure well, sometimes stumbling at the final hurdle like in the 2014 and 2015 Wimbledon finals.

So the Nadal camp, and most of the tennis world, are looking at Federer as the favourite.  That means Nadal has great confidence, great form, and no pressure.  The recipe favours Nadal.  However, tempering this is the rather mediocre play of Nadal at Wimbledon in the last five years.  Nadal may have regained peak form this year, but given the awesome form Federer has also demonstrated this year, it’s almost impossible to choose between them.

Interestingly, whomever of Nadal or Murray goes deeper in this tournament will likely emerge as #1 at the end of it.  Murray holds a 105 point advantage in the rankings, which gives him a two round cushion until the quarters.  Wawrinka or Djokovic could also claim #1 by winning, but Nadal and Murray would both have to lose before the semis.  Even if he wins, Federer can finish no higher than #3.

First Quarter

Murray (seeded #1) opens against Alexander Bublik – the sort of up and coming young player that could surprise a vet in the first round.  The second round (2R) could bring up grass-savant Dustin Brown and 3R could have Murray against Jiri Vesely.  Vesely is tall, powerful, and dangerous, and made 4R at Wimbledon last year.  Murray will need to be sharp to get through his first three matches.

After that, Murray could face Nick Kyrgios (seed 20) or Lucas Pouille (14), both of whom are young, powerful, have games well-suited to grass, and are former quarter-finalists at Wimbledon.  Seeing Murray lose before the quarters (QF) would not surprise me.  However, on balance, he is still the favourite of this group to come through.  Should he fail, Pouille is probably my quarter-finalist pick.

In the other half of this quarter, the seeds are Tsonga (12), Querrey (24), Verdasco (31), and Wawrinka (5).  All have been to QF or better at Wimbledon in the past.  Tsonga has been the most consistent performer at Wimbledon of this group and is perhaps the most likely quarter-finalist. 

Last year Querrey knocked off Djokovic here in a run to the quarters.  He could face Nikoloz Basilashvili in 2R, a player enjoying his best year yet.  Verdasco has a tricky opening against former top-tenner Kevin Anderson – that could go either way – and Wawrinka plays Daniil Medvedev in a very dangerous opener.  Medvedev has shown a strong proclivity for grass this year, claiming nine matches in the run-up to Wimbledon.  Wawrinka is second to Nadal in slam match wins this year with 11, but has not thriven on grass.

Also in this quarter is 18-year old Canadian wildcard Denis Shapovalov, making his main draw slam debut.  The bookies have him as 37th favourite for the title, however that is likely optimistic.  He opens against former semi-finalist Jerzy Janowicz and could face Pouille in 2R – not an easy path.

Although Murray has won all four encounters with Tsonga on grass, I do not trust Murray’s form this year.  He’s been floundering.  And his draw is not easy.

Tsonga d Murray

Second Quarter

Nadal (4) headlines this quarter and could face Karen Khachanov (30) in 3R.  Khachanov, age 21, is rapidly climbing the ranks and should strike fear into the hearts of even the best grass players.  I expect Nadal to be on high alert and to handle the challenge adroitly, although an upset is not impossible.

Nearby another fascinating third rounder could unfold if Ivo Karlovic (21) and Gilles Muller (16) meet.  Muller is enjoying a career best year at the ripe age of 34.  Karlovic is even older at 38.  The 6’11” Karlovic is renowned for his serve and has been to QF at Wimbledon before.  Either could provide a serious test for Nadal in 4R, although I would expect the superior talent of Rafa to prevail.

In the lower half of the quarter, Marin Cilic (7) is a clear favourite over the other three seeds, whom I rate about equally:  Nishikori (9), Bautista Agut (18), and Steve Johnson (26).  Cilic has been to the quarters the last three years, and has been perilously close to the semis with five-set losses to Djokovic and Federer in two of those years. 

A quarterfinal showdown between Nadal and Cilic would be a juicy treat I hope to enjoy.  It is by no means clear to me who should be favoured of the two.  Rafa gets the nod on recent form and confidence, but Cilic may be the more natural grass court player.  A win by Cilic would be viewed as an upset, but I’m not sure it should be.

Cilic d Nadal

Third Quarter

Roger Federer (3) lands in the third quarter.  He draws talented shotmaker Alexandr Dolgopolov in the first round.  It could be dangerous if Roger is a little off, but I do not expect that.  In the second, 18-year old Stefanos Tsitsipas would likely be little more than cannon fodder, provided he wins his first match.  The third round could pit Roger against net-rushing Mischa Zverev (27) who took Murray out of Melbourne this year, or against the unfulfilled talent of Bernard Tomic, a former quarter-finalist.

Also seeded here are John Isner (23) and Grigor Dimitrov (13).  Dimitrov made the semis in 2014 and has shown flashes of brilliance this year.  A 4R clash with Federer would likely be a tantalizing feast of glittering backhands, scintillating winners, and impossible gets.  Federer should be favoured but Dimitrov has the goods to make an upset.

Across the quarter Milos Raonic (6) and Alexander Zverev (10), younger brother of Mischa, look to be the two most formidable players.  Raonic beat Federer last year in a trip to the final, but has looked rather common this year, even if his win-loss record of 22-8 slightly betters #1 Murray’s 21-9.

Meanwhile the tennis world waits for AZverev to break through on the slam stage.  After making the world’s top 10 only weeks after his 20th birthday, he has yet to impress at a slam, having never been past 3R.  But given his talent, his age, and his recent gains, eventual slam titles seem highly likely.  But is he ready now?  With the still dominant form of the Big 4 plus Wawrinka, it is super tough for anyone to break through.  It’s not impossible AZverev could win this year’s Wimbledon, but I expect that a break through is more likely next year.  I would probably favour Raonic over AZverev in a potential 4R clash, but not by much.

Nearby is 19-year old American, Frances Tiafoe.  Tiafoe has a 50-50 match against Robin Haase to start, with the winner to face AZverev in the second.   It would not shock me to see Tiafoe go as far as the fourth round this year, but on balance, AZverev may be the bigger long term talent.

Federer d. Raonic

Fourth Quarter

Here lies the deposed #1 Novak Djokovic.  A year ago, Novak was flying high and held all four slam titles, a feat not accomplished in nearly half a century.  He was being lauded as perhaps the greatest of all time.  Now he holds no slams and seems to have lost his best game.  I believe he still wants to fight, and that may yet be his salvation.  Coach Agassi is a good fit for him I think, but I’m not sure if Djokovic is ready to show us his best at this tournament.  He may have a better chance come US Open time.

After a tricky opening against Martin Klizan, Djokovic could run into Del Potro (29) in the third round.  Should he survive that, 4R could bring up the dazzling shot repertoire of Gael Monfils (15) or the formidable grass skills of Feliciano Lopez (19), thrice a quarter-finalist here.  I was actually impressed with the progress Djokovic showed in his QF run at the French, so I think he could make it through this gauntlet.

The other half of the quarter may be less intimidating.  Dominic Thiem (8) shellacked Djokovic in making semis at the French, but Thiem is much less frightening on grass, especially if the conditions get fast and he doesn’t have as much time to set up for his long strokes.  Besides, Thiem could have his hands full in 1R when he plays former quarter-finalist Vasek Pospisil.

Also here are twice semi-finalist Richard Gasquet (22) and 2010 finalist Tomas Berdych (11).  Both are showing the first signs of age and Berdych especially has dropped the amazing consistency he demonstrated over the last seven years.  It all works in the favour of Djokovic in what is probably the easiest quarter of the draw.

Djokovic d. Gasquet

Semis

Nadal has been very unlucky to get Cilic in his quarter since I think Cilic and Federer are the only players capable of beating an ‘on’-Nadal at this Wimbledon – although upsets can always happen.  Cilic and Tsonga both have a good natural set of grass court tools, but I favour Cilic’s recent form.

Cilic d. Tsonga

The pressure I foresee Federer carrying through the tournament could be his undoing at any time.  But if he can manage it well, I see no good reason he should not be able to handle Raonic or AZverev in the quarters.  The Djokovic that Federer faced in the 2014-15 finals is not the weakened version I expect Roger to face in the semis this year, should Novak even make it that far.

Federer d. Djokovic

Final

The biggest threats to a Federer title may be a revitalized Murray or a battle-hardened Nadal.  Although I’m predicting both will lose before the semis, it could easily turn out differently.  I would likely favour Federer in a Fed-Mur final, but am much less sure about a Fed-Nad final. 

Nadal possesses a peculiar magic at defusing the Federer game.  With the confidence gained from the obliteration of the field at the French, and a successful run to the Wimbledon final, he may be able to find the magic one more time for a third cup at SW19.  However the improved Federer backhand will likely have a definitive say in the outcome.  Should we be treated to another classic like the 2008 final, Federer may enjoy the benefits of lights and a closed roof if darkness should begin to fall.  So I give a slight edge to Federer over Nadal if that eventuality transpires.

But I am calling for Cilic to be the man across the net on the final Sunday and I rate his chances quite good for claiming his first Wimbledon crown.  In his previous run to a slam title at the 2014 US Open he beat Federer in the semis.  Last year he held three match points against Federer in the quarters here, but Federer miraculously dug his way out.

If Cilic can play like he did in the 2014 US Open, he has a chance.  Otherwise, the new Federer is the favourite.

Federer d. Cilic

Expert Opinion

Expert opinion I could locate at tennis.com, tennischannel.com, and Sports Illustrated tallies 7 votes for Federer, 1 vote for Murray, 1 vote for Cilic, and 1 vote for Wawrinka.

Odds

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 27 June 2017

1
Federer
3.25
2
Murray
4.33
3
Nadal
5.5
4
Djokovic
7
5
Raonic
15
6
Kyrgios
15
7
Cilic
15
8
AZverev
17
9
Dimitrov
21
10
Wawrinka
26
11
Thiem
29
12
DelPotro
29
13
Nishikori
41
14
Tsonga
51
15
FLopez
67
16
Berdych
81
17
Sock
101
18
Tomic
101
19
Muller
101
20
Pouille
101
21
Gasquet
101
22
Isner
126
23
Monfils
126
24
Kohlschreiber
151
25
MZverev
151
26
Khachanov
151
27
SJohnson
151
28
KAnderson
151
29
Edmund
201
30
Karlovic
201
31
Verdasco
201
32
Simon
201
33
Chung
201
34
Querrey
201
35
Paire
201
36
BautistaAgut
201
37
Shapovalov
201
38
Janowicz
251
39
Evans
251
40
Fritz
251
41
Coric
251
42
DMedvedev
251
43
Troicki
251
44
Tiafoe
251
45
Young
251


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem....

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and P...