Skip to main content

US Open Men’s Preview 2017

US Open Men’s Preview 2017

21 Aug 2017

The top ten is in disarray.  Djokovic, Wawrinka, and Nishikori have pulled the plug on the rest of the tennis year.  Murray and Cilic have been injured and haven’t played since Wimbledon.  Both Raonic and Federer pulled out of the Cincinnati 1000 with injuries, just two weeks before the US Open.  That means the top ten ‘healthy list’ for the USO is only Nadal, Alexander Zverev, and Dominic Thiem.  Talk about a golden opportunity.

Of course Federer, Murray, and Cilic might still play, but there will be questions about their ability to last through two weeks of best-of-5-set matches.  If any of them are healthy they will be definite threats for the title, especially Federer who hasn’t lost a slam match this year.

Nadal has looked distinctly pedestrian since his spectacular run at the French Open.  He’s lost to Nick Kyrgios, 20-something-ranked Gilles Muller, and 18-year old wildcard Denis Shapovalov.  But writing off Nadal at a slam is always inadvisable.  He still has the ability to win any tournament he enters.  He’s second favourite with the bookies, but the recent litany of losses does not augur a title run at USO 2017.

That kicks the door open for the so-called “Next Gen”.  Alexander Zverev is its brightest star having ascended to #6 in the rankings and a top 4 seeding at the US Open, and he’s only age 20.  He’s been ripping up the tour this year with 5 tournament victories, including two Masters 1000 titles.  The last non-Big-4 player to claim two 1000’s in the same year was Nalbandian in 2007 – ten years ago.  “Sascha” Zverev is for real, and a run to his first slam title would no longer be a surprise.  Will he be the first male born in the 1990’s to claim a slam? He was born in 1997, well into the nineties, and that number is evidence of the vacuum of slam winners the Big 4 have left in their wake.

Dominic Thiem, age 23, and Nick Kyrgios, age 22, have become more ‘now-gen’ than ‘next-gen’, but they are still exciting young players who have shown the goods to beat the best and make deep runs at slams.  Thiem seems a little more comfortable on clay than hard.  Kyrgios has a toolbox full of weapons and can beat anyone on any given day, but has struggled to win all the way through to a final, especially at the slams.  But this US Open may be the perfect opportunity to kick it up to the next level.

Denis Shapovalov, only 18, will have to play his way through qualifying.  Now ranked in the 60’s it’s rather disappointing he was not granted a wildcard into the main draw of 128.  If he survives three matches and makes it to the main draw, winning another few matches would be a big accomplishment.  His eye-popping wins over Nadal and Del Potro on a trip to the semis in the Canada 1000 mean he cannot be counted out of anything.  But short of the astonishing breakthroughs of Sampras, Becker, and Wilander, a title run by someone so young and inexperienced would be totally unexpected. (And Chang and Borg, to be fair).

There are a few other sharks patrolling the slam seas who could take a bite out of this US Open, like Grigor Dimitrov, Gael Monfils, or maybe even the eternal bridesmaid Tomas Berdych.  And then there are former champs Cilic and Del Potro, who might be a little banged up but are still dangerous.  At the end of the day however, a healthy Federer is my pick for the title.  And if he’s not healthy I’d deem AZverev next most likely to win.


25 Aug 2017

First Quarter
Newly re-minted #1 Rafael Nadal (seeded 1) heads the draw.  His span between first and last week at #1 (472 weeks) is the longest in ATP history, (Connors 466, Federer 457).  Reaching #1 means Nadal has been playing well this year.  He’s especially strong in the best of 5 set format used at the slams.  His draw looks manageable until the fourth round where he’s slated to meet Tomas Berdych (15).  Berdych could push Nadal but over best-of-five I expect Rafa to prevail.

The lower part of this section has David Goffin (9), Gael Monfils (18), and Grigor Dimitrov (7).  Monfils made semis here last year but has looked less impressive this year.  Dimitrov claimed the biggest title of his career last week, the 1000 in Cincinnati and put his name on the shortlist of serious contenders.  He nearly took out Nadal in five sets at the Aus Open.  I think he goes one better this time.

Dimitrov (7) d. Nadal (1)

Second Quarter
The big news of this draw is that Roger Federer (3) is in the same half as Nadal.  That means a Roger-Rafa final can’t happen.  They are the two overwhelming favourites of the bookies so it’s a shame they would meet sooner, especially since the withdrawal of Andy Murray on Saturday.  Murray had been seeded #2.  Because the draw had already been made before Murray’s withdrawal, it means the top two remaining players are stuck in the same half.  The rules are that the number 5 seed, Marin Cilic, moves into Murray’s spot.

Of the top four seeds, Federer may have the most difficult road with rising teen Tiafoe in the first round, FLopez (31) or Verdasco in the third, and then a possible blockbuster against Nick Kyrgios (14) in the fourth.  Kyrgios has hit some hot form this summer beating Nadal in straights in a run to the Cincy final.  An upset is definitely possible, but if Federer is healthy he should prevail.  After that Fed could get Juan Martin del Potro (24).

Del Potro won here in 2009 but has had numerous injuries and surgeries since.  He’s finally got a decent draw.  Although Bautista-Agut (11) and Mannarino (30) are not easy outs, the next highest seed in the section Dominic Thiem (6) is a pedestrian 3-3 on North American hard courts this summer.  It’s a window that could put Delpo in the quarters.

Federer (3) d. Del Potro (24)

Third Quarter
Sam Querrey (17) is the lucky inheritor of Cilic’s plum spot.  I think it could turn into a quarter final slot for him if he can get by Gilles Simon in round one, 21-year old Karen Khachanov (25) in the third, and Mischa Zverev (23) or John Isner (10) in the fourth.

Across the section is fast-rising 20-year old sensation Alexander Zverev (4).  It’s not the easiest of roads for Zverev, with returning-to-form Kevin Anderson (28), Rafa’s conqueror at Wimbledon Gilles Muller (19), and Jack Sock (13) lying in wait.  But I’m guessing Sasha will be up for the task.

AZverev d. Querrey (17)

Fourth Quarter
With Murray out and Cilic (5) in questionable form, this section is ripe for surprises.  Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (8) is the next highest seed.  He hasn’t won a match since Wimbledon, crashing out of his first matches in Montreal and Cincy.  It was a little surprising since he won three tournaments near the beginning of the year.  He could have his hands full in the second round if he runs into giant-slaying Denis Shapovalov, the 18-year old Canadian prodigy who swept to the semis in Montreal.  Maybe it’s patriotism, but I’m willing to give the thinnest of edges in that possible match-up to Shapovalov.

Next up for Denis could be Robin Haase (32) who’s had a very fine summer, or Steve Johnson.  After that could come one of the two Spaniards Albert Ramos Vinolas (20) or Pablo Carreno Busta (12), both of whom are very serious competition.  That’s a sketch of one quarterfinal.  Shapovalov could very well lose in his first round against Daniil Medvedev, higher ranked by 16 spots, with no shame.  Maybe I am swept up in the rhetoric of the pundits, but I can actually envision a run to the quarters for Denis. 

In Cilic’s section Lucas Pouille (16), David Ferrer (21), and Diego Shwartzman (29) are the seeds.  Pouille looked strong last year making the quarters and upsetting Nadal but has been mediocre of late.  Ferrer has been playing some fine tennis this summer and could really push Cilic for the quarterfinal spot.  With Cilic in questionable form, and much as I’d like to imagine the universe for Shapovalov, even I recognize that the odds of making the quarters or semis are distinctly against him.  However I persist in my foolishness.

Cilic (5) d. Shapovalov

Semi-finals
Federer gave a pretty decisive straight sets answer at Wimbledon to questions about Dimitrov pretending to his throne.    The switch to hard courts could favour Dimitrov, so called ‘Baby Fed’, but I still favour the original.

Federer d. Dimitrov

Whomever should emerge from the bottom quarter will likely be no match for an in-form AZverev.  A possible exception would be a healthy Cilic.  Marin hasn’t played since his hobbling loss in the Wimbledon final, so I don’t expect him to be at full steam.

AZverev d. Cilic

Final
Will it be slam #20 for Federer or #1 for Sasha Zverev?  Or maybe #16 for Nadal?  The possibilities are endless.  Federer looked to be dominated in the Canadian final against Zverev, even before signs of his injury became really apparent.  A slam final will be a penetrating test of Zverev’s mettle.  Can Federer finish a year undefeated in slam matches?

Federer d. AZverev


Bookies
Decimal odds from bet365.com on 24 Aug 2017:
1
Federer
2.37
2
Nadal
3.5
3
Murray
7.5
4
AZverev
8
5
Cilic
15
6
Kyrgios
15
7
Del Potro
15
8
Dimitrov
17
9
Thiem
21
10
Isner
41
11
Tsonga
67
12
Berdych
67
13
Monfils
81
14
Querrey
101
15
Muller
101
16
Sock
101
17
Bautista-Agut
101
18
KAnderson
101
19
Ferrer
101
20
Pouille
101
21
Goffin
101
22
Gasquet
101
23
Shapovalov
101
24
SJohnson
151
25
FLopez
201
26
Edmund
201
27
Simon
201
28
Karlovic
201
29
Khachanov
251
30
Fognini
251
31
Tiafoe
251
32
Coric
251
33
Evans
251
34
Mannarino
251
35
Paire
251
36
Tomic
301
37
Dolgopolov
301
38
Cuevas
301
39
Kohlschreiber
301
40
MZverev
301
41
Carreno-Busta
301
42
Ramos-Vinolas
401
43
Rublev
501


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Men’s Tennis 2024 Yearend and 2025 Predictions

2 January 2025   The Big Three is dead!  Long Live the Big Three!  For the first time in 22 years, none of Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic are in the yearend top three.  Instead we have a new set – Sinner, Alcaraz, and Zverev.  Now it would certainly be debatable if Zverev has the significance of the other two. Afterall, he still has not won a slam and he’s half a generation older than his younger counterparts.  At age 27 he should be mid-arc in career accomplishments – but in some metrics he’s just starting out.  However, his superlative play over the year landed him at #2 and who are we to argue with the algorithm? One of the biggest clouds hanging over the coming year is the fate of Jannik Sinner.  By all accounts he is the top dog, and primed to have another banner year, but whether or not he will get to play depends on what happens with WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency).  Anyone can see he’s essentially innocent – I mean, a massage...

Wimbledon Women 2024

The divas have gathered, the grass is fresh, the blades are out, the Venus Rosewater Dish beckons. Is there a favourite?  There are only three former champions in the draw, and while they may be among the top picks it’s dangerous to count on any of them: Kerber (past her prime), Rybakina (constantly sick), and Vondrousova (chronically unreliable).  So who will it be lifting the plate in two weeks’ time?   First Quarter Iga Swiatek (1) is the top seed and has pretty much nailed down this slot across the board for the last two and a half years.   But grass is her least-accomplished surface.   She pulled out of her warm-up tournament citing emotional recuperation after her fifth slam crown and third consecutive at Roland Garros.   But there is cause for hope among the Swiatek-azzi. She made the quarters last year in a game effort against a surging Svitolina.   Her strokes should hold up well on grass, although I think she loses some of the movement...

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...