Skip to main content

Rafael Nadal Invitational – 25 May 2019


Rafael Nadal Invitational – 25 May 2019

As we look toward another French Open at Roland Garros, is Nadal still the unstoppable force on clay he has been for the last decade and a half?  Surprisingly, he lost three European clay warm-up tournaments this spring, but he found his best form last week and claimed the title in Rome.  His supposed vulnerability, trumpeted by the commentariat for six weeks, now looks ephemeral.  He has peaked at the perfect time to extend his dominance to a record-shattering 12th title at a single slam.  Who will be his biggest challengers?

First Quarter
Alexander Zverev (seeded 5) had a reasonable start to the year making his first ever fourth round at a hard court slam, in Melbourne.  But since losing the final in Acapulco to Kyrgios, he had only 6 wins against 8 losses through Rome last week.  But this week he has claimed the small 250 title in Geneva and he did make the quarters in Madrid, so on balance, it looks like he’s found some form just in time for this slam.  Best of five seems to be a challenge for him, however I see his progression at slams as steadily improving.  Last year he made his first slam quarter-final here.  Can he do better this year?  He’ll have his hands full if he has to face Novak Djokovic.

He may also have a tussle with Dusan Lajovic (31) in the third round (3R).  Lajovic took out Thiem, Medvedev, and Goffin on a trip to the final of Monte Carlo where he was edged out by Fabio Fognini (9).  Fognini earned his third victory over Nadal on clay, in the semis of Monte Carlo.  His form has been reasonable since, but despite his many gifts, Fognini has been as far as the quarters in Paris only once.  He has a reasonable shot to get that far again, but may have to beat Zverev in the fourth round and then would likely face Djokovic.  Fognini is actually capable of getting past both those top five players and challenging for the title, but like his uber-talented brethren Kyrgios and Monfils, he has not shown perseverance on the big slam stages.

Borna Coric (13) has made great strides in the last year, rising from a ranking of 40.  Still only 22 years old, he is no slouch on clay and his best two slam results are his most recent ones.  He’s poised to do better but is slated to meet Djokovic in 4R, whom he has not beaten in 3 attempts.

Novak Djokovic (1) is the winner of the last three slam tournaments and is already the only man to win three in a row, three different times – having won three straight in 2011-12, and four in 2015-16.  Will he become the first in the open era to win four in a row twice?  His first match against Hubert Hurkacz could be tricky.  Novak may need to find top form early if he is to survive challenges from Hurkacz, Coric, and Fognini or Zverev to get out of this quarter.  Earlier in his career it seemed Djokovic could park at stratospheric levels, racking up Masters 1000 and Slam titles at a prodigious rate between 2011 and 2016.  But since re-emerging last year and winning three slams he has looked distinctly more mortal at 1000 and lesser events.  He can still find that top gear, but it is no longer effortlessly always there.  If he does find his way through the early challenges, will he be able to locate his best tennis if he has to face Thiem or Nadal in the final rounds?  And will his best remaining tennis be enough to handle those two clay court geniuses in best of five?  I suspect he will have enough juice to take down one of them but not both.  And even if Novak can avoid Thiem, a healthy Nadal in the final at Roland Garros will always be the odds on favourite.

Djokovic def. Zverev

Second Quarter
Dominic Thiem (4) has achieved his first ever top-four seeding at a slam, which takes him out of the path of Djokovic and Nadal until at least the semi-finals.  He notched his fourth consecutive year with a win on clay against Nadal by beating the Spaniard in the semis of Barcelona.  He was then edged by Djokovic in the semis of Madrid and lost disappointingly in the first round of Rome to Verdasco.  He is heralded by some as the great clay hope to finally unseat Nadal.  But despite his recent victories even their respective clay records this year show that Thiem (11 wins – 5 losses) is still behind Nadal (14 wins – 3 losses).  And the loss to Verdasco reminds us that Thiem’s presence in the final has a much lower probability than Nadal’s.  Should Thiem make it that far, remember that in last year’s final Nadal blitzed Thiem in three straight sets.

But I won’t count Thiem out.  He has the sort of explosive game that can trouble anyone, including the King of Clay.  His draw starts out reasonably but he could face Verdasco or Monfils in round four.  Fernando Verdasco (23) has experienced a resurgence this year at age 35.  He’s won six matches in his last three clay tournaments, looking stronger with each outing.  Meanwhile, Gael Monfils (14) sits at 9th in this year’s race, after claiming the 500 title in Rotterdam.  He hasn’t shown much on clay this year, but three previous quarter-finals and one trip to the semis demonstrate his potency at this venue.

Karen Khachanov (10) looked invincible in taking the indoor hardcourt 1000 in Paris at the end of last year, dismantling Zverev, Thiem, and Djokovic consecutively, all in straight sets.  But he has looked more pedestrian this year, posting only a 10-12 (win-loss) record.  He could still be dangerous if he catches fire.  Nearby in the draw is Lucas Pouille (22), who made the semis at the Australian in January.  Since then he has managed only one tour level match win. 

Also near is Felix Auger-Aliassime (25).  The Canadian is only 18 years old and seeded for the first time at a slam.  He has rocketed up the rankings this year from #108 in January to #22 in this Monday’s release, surpassing his young countryman, Shapovalov, by two spots.  He’s just made his second clay final of the year, losing to Paire.  While he could do some serious damage at this slam, Felix’s draw is not particularly easy.  Felix seems to regularly beat players ranked below him or those not too much older than him, but he has never really upset a top player. 

I wrote all that before I knew that Felix had to withdraw with a groin pull.  Most unfortunate.  Let’s hope he’s fit for Wimbledon.

He was slated to meet Juan Martin Del Potro (8) in the third round.  Delpo needs no introduction, and his well-known sledge hammer forehand is the kind of weapon that could earn him a victory over anyone on any surface, including Nadal on clay.  But Del Potro is recently returned from injury and has not been known for his endurance at the best of times.  I can’t see him surviving slugging it out with Thiem, Djokovic, and Nadal successively.  One long match and he’ll be toast.

Thiem def. Del Potro

Third Quarter
It seems Stefanos Tsitsipas (6) is fourth on everyone’s list of favourites this year.  The 20-year old Greek made waves last year with his solid play and a victory over Djokovic in Canada.  And this year he exploded into the public’s consciousness by taking Federer out of the Australian Open in a run to the semi-finals.  His great play has only continued.  He has already claimed two titles this year and sits at 3rd in the yearly race.  To top it off, he beat Nadal on clay in Madrid.

The draw gods have done him few favours.  His first match against Maximilian Marterer could be dangerous, and he could get the explosive Tiafoe in round three.  Round four could bring up Wawrinka or Marin Cilic (11).  A three-time slam finalist, Cilic has look rather middling this year but did win three matches in Madrid.  Stan Wawrinka (24) is a three-time slam titlist, but has struggled with injuries and form since his runner-up showing at Roland Garros two years ago.  He’s shown flashes of decent play this year at Rotterdam and Madrid, but can’t seem to sustain it.  It looks like he will not threaten the top players.

Last year’s surprise semi-finalist, Marco Cecchinato (16), made the semis at the 250 in Munich but has given us little reason to suspect he can match last year’s banner performance.  Diego Schwartzman (17) has a difficult opener against Marton Fucsovics.  Diego made the semis in Rome and took Djokovic to three sets.  He is tough on any surface but especially on clay.  His draw is challenging and looks to get more so should he make the fourth round to face Roger Federer (3). 

Federer last played Roland Garros in 2015.  The five time finalist is still dangerous on clay, but one wonders how he will hold up to best of five setters on this grinding surface.  If he can keep his matches short and if he stays in the zone, the title is within reach, but he is likely behind the three favourites of Nadal, Djokovic, and Thiem, and maybe even Tsitsipas.  Should he meet the Greek, I expect he will be in revenge mode.

Roger could meet Matteo Berrettini (29) in the third round.  Berrettini has been ripping up the clay season, claiming the title in Budapest and a runner-up spot in Munich.

Federer def. Tsitsipas

Fourth Quarter
There is no one in this quarter who looks remotely threatening to Nadal.  Kei Nishikori (7) has beaten the Spaniard on clay in the distant past, but has largely floundered this year.  Daniel Medvedev (12) found his clay legs and took Djokovic out of Monte Carlo, but seemed to lose that momentum by Rome.  Nikoloz Basilashvili (15) is a decent clay player who is unlikely to cause a major upset.  Former #6 David Goffin (27) is here too, but he seems far from his best tennis.

Rafael Nadal (2) opens against a qualifier and is a guaranteed one in the second round as well.  It would be surprising if he lost a set before the semifinals.  He had a tougher start to his clay season than normal, not claiming a title until Rome, the longest he’s been delayed that pleasure in any year since he first started winning on the tour.  He’ll likely face Federer or Tsitsipas in the semis.  Although Tsitsipas beat him in Madrid, Rafa extracted a demolishing revenge in Rome.  If he should face Federer, he will probably end Roger’s five match winning streak in their rivalry.  All the most dangerous players for Nadal, like Djokovic, Thiem, and Fognini, are in the other half of the draw so Nadal can meet only one of them, in the final.  There appears little to stand in the way of a twelfth title.

Nadal def. Nishikori

Semis
Djokovic def. Thiem
Nadal def. Tsitsipas

Final
A win for Djokovic would give him a second non-calendar grand slam – only one other player in the open era has won four in a row:  Rod Laver in 1969.  Even without the outright lead in slam titles, there is a reasonable argument that two such accomplishments should make Novak the GOAT.  Neither Federer nor Nadal have accomplished one.  It would raise Nole’s slam total to 16, just one behind Nadal.

On the other hand, if Nadal wins, he raises his slam total to 18, just two behind Federer and three ahead of Djokovic.  That would put Nadal within forseeable reach of the Swiss Maestro.  If he can maintain his dominance on clay, and there is little to suggest he cannot, Federer’s record of 20 could fall within two years.  Of course there is the small matter of Serena Williams’ 23 Open Era slam titles to contend with.
Nadal def. Djokovic

Decimal odds from Bet365.com on 21 May 2019

Rank
Player
Odds
1
Nadal
2.1
2
Djokovic
3.25
3
Thiem
5.5
4
Tsitsipas
17
5
Federer
18
6
AZverev
18
7
Wawrinka
34
8
Fognini
41
9
DMedvedev
41
10
Nishikori
41
11
Del Potro
51
12
Cilic
51
13
Khachanov
51
14
Raonic
67
15
Monfils
67
16
Coric
67
17
Schwartzman
67
18
Chung
81
19
Shapovalov
81
20
Dimitrov
81
21
Goffin
81
22
Auger-Aliassime
81
23
Kyrgios
81
24
Edmund
101
25
Cecchinato
101
26
Berdych
101
27
Tsonga
101
28
BautistaAgut
101
29
Munar
101
30
Isner
101
31
Berrettini
101


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem....

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and P...