Skip to main content

Wimbledon 2019 Men’s Draw Predictions


Wimbledon 2019 Men’s Draw Predictions
29 June 2019

It’s still the big three.  Djokovic, Nadal, and Federer have won the last ten majors.  Along with Andy Murray they have won the last 16 Wimbledons.  The latest version of the Next Gen looks like the best generation yet to come along during the big three’s reign.  Are they ready to take the next step?

First Quarter
Novak Djokovic has not looked absolutely invincible this year, so perhaps there is hope for the rest of the field.  He’s taken only two tournaments, although they were big – the Australian Open and the 1000 in Madrid.  He’s ‘only’ #2 in the yearly race (behind Nadal).  That’s the good news for the rest of the field.  On the other hand, he’s lost only six times this year, he’s the defending champion here, and he’ll be gunning for his fifth Wimbledon cup – which would make him like Borg.  He’s also won three of the last four majors.

There’s a few of the most promising Next Gen-ners in his quarter, including the young sensation of the moment, Felix Auger-Aliassime.  From outside the top 100 at the beginning of the year, FAA as he’s called, is seeded #19.  The 18-year old has never played Wimbledon before.  In fact, he has only one main draw slam match under his belt, a retirement at last year’s US Open to compatriot Denis Shapovalov. 

What everyone notices about Felix is that he has no weaknesses in his strokes.  He’s technically sound and can execute any shot, even under great pressure.  He’s lanky at 6’4” and yet very fast around the court. He stays calm and makes wise shot selections.  Some of the greatest tennis minds are proclaiming him ‘the real deal’, and a sure fire bet to become a slam champion.  Much as it swells my national pride and I hope this is correct, I have noticed that Felix has not yet pulled any real upsets.  He tends to fold mentally against higher ranked players, especially those a little older than himself.  He’s now been to three tournament finals, but has not closed the deal and claimed the hardware.  That problem could be solved if he keeps rising up the ranks – beating those same players would no longer be considered an upset.  He’s still very young, so that mental tenacity may still develop.  However he is in notable contrast to Shapovalov who seems to thrive against higher ranked opponents.

Also here is Daniil Medvedev (seeded 11).  He’s 23 but still seems to get lumped in with the Next Gen.  He’s had a fine year, as his seeding attests.  He seems comfortable on grass.  He could face David Goffin (21) in the third round.  Goffin has hardly been known for his grass game, but made the final in Halle last week against Federer, so he must be taken seriously.

And let’s not forget this year’s poster boy for the Next Gen, Stefanos Tsitsipas (7) ranked world #6.  Tsitsipas made news last year by beating Djokovic in Toronto, and he really red-lined his press junket when he took Federer out of the Australian Open.  Since then it’s been only up, including a victory over Nadal on clay.  The 20-year old’s strokes may not be as perfect as FAA’s, although his ripped backhand one-hander is a thing of beauty, but perhaps his greatest strength is his attitude.  He believes he should win.  He has that inborn sense of ego that he deserves to be on top and ‘should’ be able to beat anybody, big-three be damned.  He’s a competitor.  If Felix can find that attitude, watch out!

Tsitsipas has beaten all of the big three now and he says grass is his favourite surface.  He could have an almighty tussle against Djokovic in the quarters.  I’d expect Novak’s impenetrable defense to wear through Tsitsipas’ all-court barrage.

Djokovic def. Tsitsipas

Second Quarter
Let’s start this quarter with a look at a few members of the Stalled Gen – those poor unfortunate souls, age 26 to 33, who despite world-class talent have laboured as underlings in the shadows of the big three.  Kevin Anderson (4) was a finalist last year.  He’s missed most of the last three months, so it’s anyone’s guess what he will do.  Milos Raonic (15) was a finalist in 2016 but has also been beset by injury.  Stan Wawrinka (22) is perhaps the only member of the stalled generation to have made good on his talent – claiming three slams, but he’s never been past the quarters here.

Karen Khachanov (10) is in the young cohort at age 23, and he did make the second week here last year.  He could meet Alexander Zverev (6) in the fourth round.  Zverev, age 22, was the poster boy for the Next Gen for the last two years and has three Masters 1000 titles as well as the yearend championships.  It seems he is getting consistently better at the best-of-five set format used in the slams, so perhaps this will be his break-through tournament.

AZverev d. Raonic

Third Quarter
The third quarter is headlined by 12-time French Open champ Rafael Nadal (3).  Nadal has won twice at Wimbledon, making five finals in total, but has not been to the final round in eight years.  He looked very promising in an exceedingly narrow loss to Djokovic in last year’s semi-finals.  He could go all the way this year.  However his draw is unkind.  He could face Nick Kyrgios in the second round.  He shares a 3-3 head to head with Kyrgios, and has made it known that Kyrgios gets under his skin.  After that he could face Jo-Wilfried Tsonga or Denis Shapovalov (29), both of whom have been tricky for Nadal in past matches and whose explosive games are well-suited for low-bouncing grass.

And in the fourth round Nadal could face Marin Cilic (13) who was the finalist here in 2017.  Cilic has had a sub-par year, but he could still rise up and find his game at a venue where he has recorded so many match victories.

Across the way, Dominic Thiem (5) could have his hands full in the first round against Sam Querrey, who made the semis here in 2017, beating defending champion Andy Murray along the way.  He also took defending champ Djokovic out of the 2016 tournament.  The winner of that first-rounder has a reasonable-looking path to the quarters.  Thiem is not without grass victories, even if he hasn’t shone quite as brightly as on clay.

Nadal def. Querrey

Fourth Quarter
Roger Federer (2) appears to have really benefited from the bump in seeding he received for past performance on grass.  His draw is much more favourable than Nadal’s, whom he bumped.  The fourth round could bring up Matteo Berrettini (17) who has made three finals this year, including taking the title on grass in Stuttgart two weeks ago.  The 23-year old could have a decent run but I expect he will have a tough go against Federer.

Kei Nishikori (8) has not thriven on grass, but John Isner (9) has:  suffering a 24-26 fifth set defeat in last year’s semis to Anderson.  He could be extremely dangerous in this draw, with a chance to take the title, were it not for the broken foot he suffered in losing the Miami final to Federer in March.  It’s the last time Isner played, so his form is a complete unknown.  But his draw looks favourable.

Federer def. Isner

Semi-finals
Djokovic def. AZverev
Federer def. Nadal

Tennis fans everywhere will be glued to their screens if Roger and Rafa play again.  Their last match here was the 2008 final, billed by many as the greatest match of all time.

Final
Djokovic def. Federer
While I think this might be Roger’s last, best chance to up his slam tally to 21, I think Djokovic’s defense will be too strong.

Expert picks
Picks from the panels of experts at tennis.com, si.com, and espn.com
Djokovic – 17 pickers
Federer – 8 pickers
Nadal – 2 pickers

Odds
Decimal odds from bet365.com on 22 Jun 2019.

1
Djokovic
2.5
2
Federer
4.33
3
Nadal
6.5
4
Cilic
12
5
AZverev
12
6
AMurray
15
7
Raonic
17
8
Tsitsipas
17
9
KAnderson
26
10
Kyrgios
26
11
Auger-Aliassime
29
12
Thiem
41
13
Nishikori
41
14
Khachanov
41
15
Dimitrov
41
16
Shapovalov
41
17
Berrettini
41
18
DMedvedev
51
19
Edmund
51
20
Isner
51
21
Goffin
67
22
HChung
67
23
Coric
67
24
Wawrinka
67
25
Berdych
81
26
Opelka
81
27
DeMinaur
101
28
Monfils
101
29
Bautista-Agut
101
30
Tsonga
101
31
Querrey
126
32
Gasquet
126
33
FLopez
126
34
Pouille
151
35
Garin
151
36
Fognini
151
37
Evans
151
38
Schwartzman
151
39
Hurkacz
151
40
Verdasco
151


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open