Skip to main content

US Open 2019 – Men’s Predictions


US Open 2019 – Men’s Predictions
23 August 2019

Is there any reason to suspect that someone other than the Big Three can triumph here?

First Quarter
Following his Novak-slam in 2016, holding all four slam titles simultaneously, Novak Djokovic took a two-year break from winning, but re-emerged at last year’s Wimbledon.  Since then he’s been racking up slam tournaments, claiming four, and losing only one match along the way – to Thiem at this year’s French.  Djokovic is only two slams behind Nadal and four behind Federer.  I’ll be looking for that gap to have narrowed in two weeks time.

Stan Wawrinka (seeded 23) could face Novak in the fourth round.  He’s been finding his way back to near the top of the game, but I doubt he can beat Djokovic.  At age 34, Stan’s best days might be behind him.

There is an interesting first rounder scheduled between Fabio Fognini (11) and Reilly Opelka – who’s been having a break out year.  Fognini is wildly talented and on the temperamental side.  Opelka is seven feet tall and dominates with his serve.

But the real challenge for Djokovic in this quarter might come from Daniil Medvedev (5) who’s beaten Novak twice this year.  Medvedev made all three finals at North American hard-court tournaments he played this summer.  He took the 1000 in Cincinnati last week, beating Djokovic in the semis.  But when it comes to best of five sets on the slam stage, the betting money will be on Novak.

Djokovic over DMedvedev

Second Quarter
There doesn’t appear to be anything too frightening for Roger Federer (3) in this quarter.  But then again, both John Millman and Tommy Robredo have beaten Federer at this tournament in recent years.  Did Federer really win this tournament five times in a row?  It’s hard to remember because his last victory is over ten years ago.  Regardless, this quarter looks manageable.

David Goffin (15) has been re-ascending the ranks this year.  He’s a bit under-sized and lacking in weaponry, but he does well with what he’s got.  The same might be said of Kei Nishikori (7), a finalist here in 2014.  Milos Raonic (21) has lots of big guns but has never been past the Open’s fourth round – something about it must not agree with him.  Pablo Carreno Busta was in the semis here only two years ago, but is now unseeded.

Federer over Nishikori

Third Quarter
Dominic Thiem (4) leads the quarter.  He’s been to at least the fourth round here four times, making the quarter-finals here last year where he suffered a nail-biting fifth set loss to Nadal.  He won the 1000 in Indian Wells in March over Federer, so we know Thiem can win on North American hard courts.  But he went out quite tamely to Medvedev in Montreal in two quick sets.  Is Thiem really the favourite for this quarter?

The next highest seed is Stefanos Tsitsipas (8) who had a break-out run to the semis in Australia and a very strong spring on clay.  That catapulted him to a career high of #5 at just 20 years of age (he turned 21 last week).  Since then he’s looked a bit skittish, losing his first matches in both Montreal and Cincinnati.  He’s got a tricky opener against Andrey Rublev who’s just put together two solid weeks at Cincinnati and Winston Salem that include victories over Federer and Wawrinka.  Also 21 years old, Rublev was in the quarters here two years ago.

Nick Kyrgios (28) made few friends with his petulant behaviour in Cincinnati that ended with a record-setting $113,000 fine.  But there’s no denying his talent.  Which Kyrgios will show up – the talent or the brat?  Speaking of talent, Gael Monfils (13) is no less flashy than Kyrgios when it comes to shot-making.  Monfils made the semis here three years ago.  He had a reasonably strong start to this year, winning Rotterdam and making semis in Dubai and Sofia.  He also made semis in Montreal two weeks ago, but retired (again).

The young Canadians, Denis Shapovalov and Felix Auger-Aliassime (18) face off in the first round of the US Open for the second year in a row, but this time Felix is the seed.  FAA had a very strong spring, making finals on all three surfaces and he followed it up with a run to the third round at Wimbledon.  The summer has been less strong.  Will he re-find form?  Shapovalov looked to be fulfilling his promise when he made the semis at the 1000 in Miami in March, but since then has mustered only 4-11 (win-loss).  Still, he thrives on hard courts.

Roberto Bautista-Agut (10) has finally made the top-10, on the back of a semi-final showing at Wimbledon and quarters at the 1000s of both Montreal and Cincy.  He’s 31 years old and is only now discovering his best tennis. He’s also beaten Djokovic twice this year.  His game, like fellow Djokovic-killer Medvedev, is a model of Novak’s own game – built on consistency, court coverage, and opportunistic counter-punching.

Thiem over Bautista-Agut

Fourth Quarter
For Nadal, like Federer, the draw has been kind.  Nadal has been having a good year and actually leads Djokovic in the yearly Race rankings.  He took the 1000 in Montreal two weeks ago and is a three-time winner at the US Open, just like Djokovic.

Alexander Zverev (6) used to post great results everywhere but the slams.  Now he’s still struggling at the slams and not doing well elsewhere, either.  The talent is there, but he needs to sort out the head.

Karen Khachanov (9) might finally be re-finding the success he displayed in last year’s Paris 1000.  He made the semis in Montreal and survived the Kyrgios meltdown in Cincinnati.

John Isner (14) often has his best results on North American hard courts.  He’s been to the third round or better 11 times at the US Open.  He could face former winner Marin Cilic (22) in the third round this year.  Cilic has had a tough year as his seeding attests.

Nadal over Khachanov

Semis
Djokovic over Federer
Nadal over Thiem

Final
This could be very close.

Djokovic over Nadal

Expert picks
Djokovic:  6 – Steve Tignor, Ashley Ndebele, Steve Flink, Cale Hammond, Jordaan Sanford, Tom Sunderland
Nadal:  4 – Ed McGrogan, Joel Drucker, Matt Fitzgerald, Jon Wertheim
Federer:  1 – Nina Pantic

Odds
Decimal odds from bet365.com on 20 Aug 2019
1
Djokovic
2.1
2
Nadal
5
3
Federer
7
4
DMedvedev
15
5
AZverev
26
6
Thiem
26
7
Tsitsipas
26
8
Cilic
26
9
Nishikori
34
10
Wawrinka
34
11
Raonic
34
12
Kyrgios
34
13
Khachanov
41
14
Goffin
41
15
KAnderson
51
16
Shapovalov
51
17
AugerAliassime
67
18
Dimitrov
67
19
Isner
67
20
BautistaAgut
67
21
Edmund
81
22
Coric
81
23
Pouille
81
24
Tiafoe
101
25
Opelka
101
26
Monfils
101
27
Evans
101
28
Fognini
126
29
Rublev
126
30
Berdych
151
31
Tsonga
151
32
DeMinaur
151
33
Chung
151
34
Schwartzman
201
35
Fritz
201
36
Hurkacz
201


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open