Skip to main content

Roland Garros Women’s Preview – 25 Sep 2020

 

Halep is the favourite.  Serena is struggling.  Azarenka is resurgent.  Muguruza is giving off her usual set of mixed signals.  The last five slams have had five different champions.  How will it end in two weeks time?

 

First Quarter

Simona Halep is the #1 seed and would be my favourite even if all the top players were present.  Covid has depleted the ranks, along with injury, and the tightness of the end of year scheduling.  The two most notable absences are world #1 and defending champion, Ash Barty; and Naomi Osaka who just took the title in New York.  Osaka has now won three of the last seven slams, and she would be my second favourite if she were playing.  It seems when she is ‘on’ she is unbeatable.  She is the de facto alpha right now.  But I see at least two challengers for that honour, Bianca Andreescu and the redoubtable Serena Williams.  Serena has been playing like she’s past her prime the last two years, and Andreescu has been battling injury. 

So that leaves Halep.  The bookies have her next nearest competitor, Muguruza, at just over triple Halep’s odds to take the title.  Halep is undefeated since the relaunch (10-0) and has won three tournaments on the trot, since February, going 20-2 in matches for the year.  She’s been in three French finals, winning in 2018. She’s best on clay.  Victory here would mean she’d won three of the last ten slams.  Her draw has a few landmines like Anisimova (25th seed) who beat her here last year, and Vondrousova (15) last year’s finalist; but it’s manageable.

Marketa Vondrousova has played little since her banner run last year, first because of injury, and then because of covid.  But she just made the semis in Rome last week, taking out Svitolina, so she might be peaking at just the right time.

Kiki Bertens (5) looked unconvincing in both Rome and Strasbourg, losing both of her openers.  Coco Gauff and Johanna Konta (9) have a rough opener in having to face each other.  My sleeper pick for this quarter is Maria Sakkari (20) who made the semis at Rome last year and won a clay tournament in Rabat.

Halep d. Sakkari

 

Second Quarter

Serena Williams (6) has looked far from her best in the relaunch, notching 8-3 in matches.  There may be some physical issues, she looks not as swift around the court as she used to, and it seems her best tennis is getting harder to muster.  Against Azarenka in New York she came out looking like her old self with a barrage of first set winners, but in the second and third she stopped returning serve as effectively.  Is this just a factor of being 39 years old, or has her fierce concentration and will to win between compromised?  To me she looks lost at times, and uncertain.  Serena’s three Roland Garros titles are more than anyone else in the field, but she is far from the favourite in my eyes.

Elina Svitolina (3) is at her best on clay and is in a final this week.  She is slowly improving at the slams and has a decent draw to the quarters.  There she is likely to run into Serena or Victoria Azarenka (10).  Azarenka has dialed in her 2012-13 form taking the “Cincy” 900 and making the final at the US Open.  She really lifted her level in a convincing win over Serena in New York, and they are slated to meet again in the fourth round here.  There are other dangerous names here, too, like Mertens (16), Kontaveit (17), and Putintseva (23).

Svitolina d. Azarenka

 

Third Quarter

Sofia Kenin is seeded #4 on the merits of her Aus Open title, but seems to be having the typical maiden slam hang-over.  Her strengths are consistency and tenacity which are often well-served on clay.  Is she ready to re-ascend to the heights of her ability?

Aryna Sabalenka (8) loves belting the ball, but seems to have only one speed, and not a great record for tenacity.  Elena Rybakina (14) is into a tour-leading (for the year) fifth tournament final this week.  Karolina Muchova (22) made a fine run to the round of sixteen at the US Open two weeks ago, and to the Wimbledon quarters last year.  Ons Jabeur (30) has hands like Federer and Radwanska, and made quarters at the Aus Open this year.

So the quarter is loaded with talent, but the block buster match may come in the third round between Jennifer Brady (21) and Garbine Muguruza (11).  Brady ripped up her quarter at the US Open and it took a peaking Osaka to stop her in the semis, in one of the best matches of the tournament.  Her record on clay is less than scintillating, but she’s made such a massive jump in level this year, it feels like we are dealing with a new player – anything seems possible.  Muguruza is known for being unpredictable.  Just when you write her off, she shows up in a slam final, like this year’s Australian Open.  Now that everyone is expecting her to do well and she is the bookies second favourite, she will likely tank.  Still, the French is her most successful slam and she’s been in reasonable form.

Muguruza d. Rybakina

 

Fourth Quarter

Karolina Pliskova (2) retired during the Rome final, which means she’s playing well on clay, but may have injury concerns.  Since her run to the US Open final in 2016, she seems to wilt in the latter rounds of slams.  Is she the best active player never to win a slam?  Or maybe that ‘honour’ goes to Madison Keys (12) whose W-L ratio is 2.42 at the slams.  After a few years of deep slam runs, Keys seems to have lost that winning feeling.

Sloane Stephens (29) was runner-up here two years ago and has won more matches here than at any other slam.  Even one win might be a success now, given the trough in her results.  Petra Martic (13) just made round of 16 at the US Open and was in the quarters in Paris last year.  Her draw could set her up for a run to the quarters or better.  Petra Kvitova (7) has won the fewest matches at the French, of the four slams, but did make the semis here way back in 2012.  She’s also won the Madrid 1000 three times, so she can play on clay.

Martic d. Kvitova

 

Semis and Final

Halep d. Svitolina

Muguruza d. Martic

 

Halep defeats Muguruza for the title.  Halep, Muguruza, Kvitova, and Azarenka will all be gunning for their third slam title. Serena will be looking to tie Margaret Court’s record at 24.

 

Expert Picks

Halep – 20 picks – Tignor (Tennis magazine), Pantic (Tennis magazine), McGrogan (Tennis magazine), Drucker (Tennis magazine), Flink (Tennis magazine), Hammond (Tennis magazine), Sanford (Tennis magazine), Maine (ESPN), Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Rubin (Sports Illustrated), Lisanti (Sports Illustrated), Shriver (ESPN), Gilbert (ESPN), Drysdale (ESPN), Evert (ESPN), Stubbs (ESPN), Bodo (ESPN), Hamilton (ESPN), Bembry (ESPN), Stevenson (ESPN)

Muguruza – 1 pick – Fitzgerald (Tennis magazine)

SWilliams – 1 pick – Mouratoglou (ESPN)

 

Bookies

Bet 365 decimal odds on 24 Sep 2020

1

Halep

3.25

2

Muguruza

8

3

SWilliams

11

4

Azarenka

11

5

Bertens

13

6

Svitolina

15

7

KaPliskova

17

8

Mertens

19

9

Kvitova

21

10

Rybakina

21

11

Sabalenka

21

12

Kenin

23

13

Vondrousova

26

14

Keys

26

15

Swiatek

26

16

Sakkari

26

17

Kerber

26

18

Kontaveit

29

19

Yastremska

29

20

Gauff

34

21

Ferro

34

22

Konta

34

23

Brady

34

24

Martic

41

25

Stephens

41

26

Anisimova

41

27

Ostapenko

41

28

Sevastova

41

29

Muchova

41

30

Siniakova

51

31

Garcia

67

32

Kasatkina

101

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Men’s Tennis 2024 Yearend and 2025 Predictions

2 January 2025   The Big Three is dead!  Long Live the Big Three!  For the first time in 22 years, none of Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic are in the yearend top three.  Instead we have a new set – Sinner, Alcaraz, and Zverev.  Now it would certainly be debatable if Zverev has the significance of the other two. Afterall, he still has not won a slam and he’s half a generation older than his younger counterparts.  At age 27 he should be mid-arc in career accomplishments – but in some metrics he’s just starting out.  However, his superlative play over the year landed him at #2 and who are we to argue with the algorithm? One of the biggest clouds hanging over the coming year is the fate of Jannik Sinner.  By all accounts he is the top dog, and primed to have another banner year, but whether or not he will get to play depends on what happens with WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency).  Anyone can see he’s essentially innocent – I mean, a massage...

Wimbledon Women 2024

The divas have gathered, the grass is fresh, the blades are out, the Venus Rosewater Dish beckons. Is there a favourite?  There are only three former champions in the draw, and while they may be among the top picks it’s dangerous to count on any of them: Kerber (past her prime), Rybakina (constantly sick), and Vondrousova (chronically unreliable).  So who will it be lifting the plate in two weeks’ time?   First Quarter Iga Swiatek (1) is the top seed and has pretty much nailed down this slot across the board for the last two and a half years.   But grass is her least-accomplished surface.   She pulled out of her warm-up tournament citing emotional recuperation after her fifth slam crown and third consecutive at Roland Garros.   But there is cause for hope among the Swiatek-azzi. She made the quarters last year in a game effort against a surging Svitolina.   Her strokes should hold up well on grass, although I think she loses some of the movement...

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...