Skip to main content

Indian Wells - Women 2022

 

Indian Wells 2022

10 March 2022

 

Women’s Draw

The first day of play is already in the books, but the seeds don’t play until tomorrow.  Without Ashleigh Barty present, this tournament feels completely unanchored – literally anything could happen.  Naomi Osaka is back, but hasn’t rounded into form yet, will she do it during the tournament?  And what about Iga Swiatek, recent winner of the 1000 in Doha? There are at least 15 former slam finalists or winners in the draw.

 

First Quarter

Barbora Krejcikova was set to be the #1 seed but withdrew shortly after the draw was released.  That leaves the highest seed here as Karolina Pliskova (#7) who hasn’t played a match this year. More likely to battle for this quarter I think, are Simona Halep (24) or Emma Raducanu (11).  Raducanu suffered an injury in Australia that forced her to slice all her forehands, yet she still won a match there.  She should be significantly more potent with a functioning forehand.  There is so little history on her, it’s tough to make predictions, but I continue to remain impressed with the powerful game she displayed in winning the US Open.

Halep was felled by injury mid-last year but is on the comeback trail and claimed a tournament in the lead-up to the Australian Open.  The former #1 is too good to ignore.

Halep d. Raducanu

 

Second Quarter

Iga Swiatek (3) has been gradually consolidating her position near the top of the rankings since her surprise run to the French title in 2020.  Her win in Doha last month was her second 1000 title.  Could she be primed for a third?  There aren’t a lot of weaknesses in her game, and when she’s hitting cleanly, like Raducanu she generates a lot of power and creates winners while placing the ball several feet inside the lines.  Handy to have that margin.  The main rub against Swiatek has been the inconsistency of her mental toughness – staying focused and not descending into impatient error-making.

The other half of this quarter has Garbine Muguruza (8), Madison Keys (25), Elina Svitolina (12), and Belinda Bencic (22).  All are potent players who might be title contenders – at least at various points in their careers.  Muguruza seems to have quickly lost the sparkling form that took her to the Tour Finals crown in November, and Keys seems to be on a resurgence, in part because of her run to the semis in Australia.  For that reason I’ll take her to make the quarters here.

Swiatek d. Keys

 

Third Quarter

Jelena Ostapenko (10), Roland Garros champ from 2017, has suddenly reappeared with a semblance of game and took the 500 in Dubai in February.  She’s a pure striker of the ball that can blow anyone off the court with her placements when she is on.  However her movement is not great.  She’s in a talent-dense section with Amanda Anisimova who took Osaka out of Australia, and last year’s US Open finalist Leylah Fernandez (18), who’s just claimed the title in Monterrey.  Fernandez is incredibly scrappy with solid strokes but lacks a point-ending weapon.  Whoever emerges from that scrum could face Paula Badosa (5) in the fourth round.  Badosa is the defending champ here – a title she’s held for only five months because Indian Wells was played in October last year.  She’s generally been playing well, and the location and court surface should trigger good memories that bring out her best game.

Also here is Anett Kontaveit (4) who took the St. Petersburg trophy last month – a tournament that would be cancelled if it were played now.  She then made the 1000 final in Doha, halting Ostapenko’s tear, but losing to Swiatek. 

Lurking nearby is the always dangerous Naomi Osaka, unseeded.  Osaka should work through a battle of former US Open champions in the first round against Sloane Stephens, and could displace Jessica Pegula (14) if they meet in the third.  It’s tough to know where Osaka’s form will be after playing so little in the last few months, but she seems, so far, to be in a better and more positive head-space this year than the depths she plumbed in 2021.  Osaka feels to me a little like Serena did five or so years ago – capable of winning any tournament she plays, possibly the best player in the draw, but with uncertainty about if she will show up with her best game.

Badosa d. Osaka

 

Fourth Quarter

The last quarter features Aryna Sabalenka (2), Maria Sakkari (6), Ons Jabeur (9), and Victoria Azarenka (13), all of whom are top-level players.  Two-time slam winner Petra Kvitova is seeded #27, but has not looked like a legitimate threat for some time.  Sakkari has put together a sparkling 12 months, with two slam semi-finals and a string of deep runs.  She’s incredibly fit and hits strongly, but she seems to have trouble closing out big matches and especially finals.  She’s only claimed one title, a small 250 three years ago.  Victoria Azarenka was runner-up last year in one of the year’s best matches, to Badosa.  She can’t be discounted but seems to rise up only occasionally these days.

Sabalenka (2) continues to occupy a spot near the top of the game because of her strong and consistent play, and finally broke through to a slam semi last year, twice, at Wimbledon and the US Open.  She won two titles last year, but has struggled with her service this season, hitting boatloads of double faults and even resorting to underarm serving at times.  The rest of her game is solid, but the serving betells mental yips.  Despite the weaknesses, she’s a good bet to go deep, although probably not all the way.

Sabalenka d. Sakkari

 

Semis:  Swiatek d. Halep, Badosa d. Sabalenka

Final:  Swiatek d. Badosa


 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open