Skip to main content

Roland Garros 2022 Women’s Preview

 


Who can stop Iga?

 

First Quarter

Women’s tennis looks radically different now than it did at the beginning of 2022.  Four months ago, Ash Barty was world #1, and a medium-strong one.  There were credible challengers to her dominance like former slam winners Naomi Osaka, Barbora Krejcikova, Iga Swiatek, Garbine Muguruza, and Bianca Andreescu.  However most of the highest ranked players were non-slam winners like Paula Badosa, Anett Kontaveit, Aryna Sabalenka, and Maria Sakkari.

But everything changed in March.  Barty retired and Swiatek became invincible, winning all four 1000 events she’s entered this year.  She’s on a 28-match win streak, (fourth longest this century). And it’s not just the length of the streak, it’s the way she beats her opponents.  It’s become unusual for Iga to lose a set.  And the frequency with which she hands out bagels and breadsticks (6-0 and 6-1 sets) is astonishing, 17 in her last 20 matches.

Swiatek has already won a slam, the French in 2020, so she doesn’t have the pressure to win her first. Her ascent two a second looks inevitable.  Who can stop her?  The opinion among commentators has seemed to become, only Iga can stop herself.  Will she feel the pressure of expectation?  She is roundly expected to sweep to the French title, and anything short of the title will seem a disappointment.  Plus there’s the pressure of the win streak.  Can Swiatek keep a level head, deflect the pressure, and concentrate her way through to the title?

She will certainly be helped by her tennis.  She has developed a fearsome game with ample power, lots of spin, and lots of margin on her shots.  She’s also quick and athletic and runs down a lot of balls.  If she can stay healthy, her game seems like a winning one.

When she came to prominence in 2020 she was notable for having a mental coach, which she claimed help her to win.   However in the intervening year and a half she has been notable for occasional mental meltdowns and collapses, punctuated with periods of great clarity, like when she blitzed Pliskova 6-0 6-0 in the Rome final last year.  But the evidence of late is that her mental state has stabilized and that the mental coaching has turned her into real force.  When she won the French in October 2020 she was just 19 years old.  Now she is 20 and will turn 21 during the tournament.  So she has had time to mature – overall her mental game looks much stronger now than two years ago.  Barring injury or succumbing to pressure, it will take a near super-human effort to defeat her. 

But there have been a few players that have troubled her, so the betting odds pre-tournament for her were at 2.1 (decimal) or +110 (American odds), which, while strong, are not a sure thing.  Which players can trouble her?

Her quarter contains Simona Halep who was the second favourite of the bookies pre-draw at 8.0 (+700).  Halep is seeded only 19, largely because of missed chunks of last year due to injury.  But Simona is a former winner here, was twice runner-up, and has been a two-time yearend #1.  Halep has had a reasonable clay court season, beating a few good players but losing to others.  It does not suggest that a title-run is imminent.  However, she is a former champion and the thing about former champions is that they raise their games in the big tournaments and big moments.  Her record against Swiatek is 2-2, including a tight match in Indian Wells, during Iga’s current win streak.  So Halep does have a chance, but, in my opinion, not a great one given Swiatek’s recent form.  They could meet in the fourth round.

Liudmila Samsonova (seeded 25), the last person to take a set from Swiatek, is a possible third round opponent for Iga.  Jelena Ostapenko (13) champion from 2017 is also here.  The other highest seeds in the quarter are Karolina Pliskova (8) and Jessica Pegula (13) who both, while posting occasional good clay results are not strongest on this surface.

Swiatek def. KaPliskova

 

Second Quarter

The highest seeds here are Paula Badosa (3), Aryna Sabalenka (7), Danielle Collins (9), and Elena Rybakina (16).  All have looked reasonably consistent and strong this year and can be good on clay.  Of these, perhaps Collins can be the most brilliant, and Badosa the most consistently strong.  Sabalenka can bull-doze opponents on her day, but looks increasingly like a one-dimensional slugger.  Also here is Daria Kasatkina (20), who’s varied game can confound anyone, but often does not.

Badosa def Sabalenka

 

Third Quarter

This is perhaps the most loaded quarter, with a passel of real contenders like Olympic champ Belinda Bencic (14) who won the clay event in Charleston.

Maria Sakkari (4) had a great run to the semis here last year, upsetting Swiatek along the way.  She may be the most dangerous player in the draw for Iga.  However, she can have trouble closing, as witnessed by her loss in Rome last week to Jabeur while up 30-0 at 6-1 5-2, but losing in three sets.  She has only one small title to her name, and she’s only 3-3 (wins-losses) on clay this year.  Nevertheless she’s a giant-killer and a deep run is possible.

The bigger threat may be Ons Jabeur (6).  She’s been in three clay finals this year, winning the 1000 in Madrid, and was on an 11-match win streak before getting buzzed by Swiatek 6-2 6-2 in the Rome final.  Jabeur’s game has a lot of variety and she makes frequent use of the dropshot. When her head is in it and she’s not making errors her game can be Barty-esque and very pleasing to the eye.

Bianca Andreescu is unseeded but pressed Swiatek very hard in a 7-6 first set during their quarter-final in Rome (although Swiatek won in straights).  Bianca’s power, variety, and determination are always dangerous, no matter the surface, and she could very well emerge from this quarter and claim the whole tournament.

There’s a block-buster first-rounder here between four-time slam-winner Naomi Osaka and the woman who beat her at the Australian Open, Amanda Anisimova (27).  Anisimova is just 20 years old but was a semi-finalist here at just 17 in 2019.  On hard court I’d pick Osaka, but here I think it will be Anisimova.

Also in this quarter are US Open finalists Emma Raducanu (12) and Leylah Fernandez (17).  Fernandez has not looked convincing during the clay season, but Raducanu has mustered a few wins and could make the fourth round before running into Jabeur.

Jabeur def Andreescu

 

Fourth Quarter

The last quarter looks very weak to me.  Defending champion Barbora Krejcikova (2) is here but hasn’t played since February.  Anett Kontaveit (5) does not thrive on clay. Victoria Azarenka (15) can never be counted out but has looked dodgy mentally, especially in giving up on a match in Miami without reasonable explanation against 16-year old Linda Fruhvirtova.  Former champ Garbine Muguruza (10) seems to have completely lost her yearend-winning form.

The two players from this quarter with the best form coming in may be Jil Teichmann (23) and Coco Gauff (18).  Teichmann made semis in Madrid and quarters in Rome, but has never been past the second round of any slam.  Gauff looked reasonable during the clay swing and has been to the second week of a slam four times.

Gauff def Teichmann

 

Semis and Final

Swiatek def Badosa, Jabeur def Gauff

Swiatek def Jabeur

 

Journalist Picks

Swiatek – 12 – Tignor, McGrogan, Drucker, Fitzgerald, Livaudais, Wertheim, Lundy, Snowman Sports, Whittaker, Law, Roberts, Boughton

Jabeur – 2 – Kane, Faizan

 

Bet365.com Odds – 16 May 2022

1

Swiatek

2.1

2

Halep

8

3

Badosa

13

4

Sakkari

15

5

Jabeur

15

6

Krejcikova

19

7

Muguruza

19

8

Sabalenka

21

9

Andreescu

21

10

Osaka

23

11

Bencic

23

12

Kontaveit

26

13

Gauff

26

14

Rybakina

26

15

Raducanu

29

16

SWilliams

29

17

Anisimova

29

18

Ostapenko

34

19

KaPliskova

34

20

Azarenka

34

21

Kudermentova

34

22

Pegula

34

23

Kvitova

41

24

Muchova

41

25

Collins

41

26

Martic

41

27

Vondrousova

51

28

LFernandez

51

29

Kalinina

51

30

Alexandrova

51

31

Tauson

67

32

Keys

67

33

Zidansek

67

34

Pavlyuchenkova

67

35

Kerber

67

36

Kasatkina

67

37

LFruhvirtova

67

38

Teichmann

67

39

Sorribes Tormo

67

40

Giorgi

67

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl