Skip to main content

Roland Garros 2023 – Men’s Preview

After 18 consecutive years playing and 14 titles, Rafael Nadal is not playing the French Open in 2023.  This is huge news for the rest of the field.  Traditionally, Novak Djokovic would be the favourite in the absence of Nadal, but his form has been questionable this year.  With Alcaraz taking three clay court tournaments this year, Rune beating Djokovic on clay, and Medvedev winning Rome, who is the favourite?

 

First Quarter

Carlos Alcaraz has had a #1-worthy year: 30-3 on the year including 4 titles.  As tempting as it is to make him the out-right favourite and slot him into Nadal’s shoes, that feels like a bit of a cheat.  Stepping back into reality, this is a guy who’s won one slam title and hasn’t been past the quarters in Paris.  On the other hand, he’s only 20 and the trajectory he’s on has been matched only by multi-slam yearend #1’s.  This guy looks for real.

Lorenzo Musetti (seeded 17), made semis in Barcelona and quarters in Monte Carlo, both on clay, beating Sinner and Djokovic along the way. He’s a force and no one wants to face him.

Cameron Norrie (14) hasn’t had a memorable clay spring but very importantly, beat Alcaraz on clay in Rio de Janeiro in February.  Doubtful he can replicate that, but you never know.

Felix Auger Aliassime (10) has had a miserable year: 12-9 in 2023 and only 0-2 on European clay.  But he made the fourth round here last year, taking Nadal to five sets.

Finalist from two years ago, Stefanos Tsitsipas is seeded #5.  He’s had a decent year, a final, a semi, and two quarters on European clay.  He hasn’t looked quite as ruthless as previous years and landing in Alcaraz’s quarter is a tough draw for this potential contender.

Alcaraz def Tsitsipas

 

Second Quarter

The draw feels a bit unbalanced with Alcaraz, Djokovic, and Rune, arguably the top three contenders for this title, all landing in the same half.  Novak Djokovic (3) won the first slam of the year.  But by dint of Medvedev’s victory in Rome, Djokovic fell from #1 to #3, making possible a semi-final against Alcaraz – a bit of draw bad luck.  I never count out Djokovic, especially in slams in best of five.  But honestly, he has looked weak.  He’s only 5-3 on European clay this year.  He will need to play his way into form.  And best of five in a 128 draw will allow that.  But how healthy is his elbow?  I’m not confident in this Djokovic.  But watch him prove me wrong.

Alejandro Davidovich Fokina (29) has shown he cannot be counted out on clay.  He beat Rune this year and made the final of Monte Carlo last year.

Andrey Rublev (7) is always consistent and has decent results on clay, but seven losses in slam quarter-finals with zero wins seems to show a limit.

Karen Khachanov (11) seems to have his best results in the slams, making semis in his last two and fourth round in last year’s French.  But again, there seems to be a limit to his talent.

Djokovic def Khachanov

 

Third Quarter

The Scandinavians and rivals Casper Ruud (4) and Holger Rune (6) are top seeds in this section.  Twenty-year old Rune has only been improving and gained another win over Djokovic, this time in the Rome quarters.  He’s 13-3 on European clay this year.  He’s truly a title-contender. Unfortunately, it looked like he ran out of steam against Medvedev in the Rome final.  I’m a little concerned how he’ll do in best of five on clay, but he did make quarters here last year.

Taylor Fritz (9) doesn’t mind slow courts and beat two-time defending champ Tsitsipas in Monte Carlo in a trip to the semis.  But he’s faded down the stretch.

Francisco Cerundolo (23) is Argentine which is shorthand for “he’s deadly on clay.” He’s got a big forehand and is only growing in confidence.

Jan Lennard Struff (21) made a shock run to the Madrid final, beating Tsitsipas and losing a tight three-setter to Alcaraz. At 33 years old he’s hardly up and coming, but he may just be playing the best tennis of his life.

Casper Ruud has not looked particularly strong this year, but his runner-up performances here and at the US Open last year get him a lot of street cred.  Plus he finally seems to be rounding into form, making semis in Rome.

Rune def CaRuud

 

Fourth Quarter

Not sure who dubbed him Clay-vedev, but after years of trolling clay and complaining about “non-tennis” on this “not-a-surface,” Daniil Medvedev (2) won the Rome title, typically seen has the best predictor of performance in Paris.  Granted he lost first round at RG in his first four trips, but he’s made second week the last two years, so we’ve seen this new Clay-niil coming.  Not that he won’t have to fight tooth and nail to go deep, but with Alcaraz, Djokovic, and Tsitsipas safely in the other half, this is a golden opportunity for the comical Russian.

Borna Coric (15) looked convincing (finally) making semis in Madrid and quarters in Rome.  But his results are so inconsistent it’s hard to have too much confidence.

Alexander Zverev (22) looked like he might actually win the French last year, but he has not fully recovered the form that preceded his horrific ankle-snapping injury at this tournament a year ago.  He’s on the way back and will be dangerous, if not a top contender.

Jannik Sinner (8) is the guy everyone likes to love – the talent and the heart are there, and the progress has been steady.  He plays Alcaraz tough and his groundstrokes are other-worldly.  Or is his progress stalling?  He’s at a critical point in his career.  Will he become a top contender or will he become a Berdych-like perma-resident of the top ten?  He could win this tournament, but at this point I’m expecting incremental progress.  He’s 0-6 against Medvedev.

DMedvedev def Sinner

 

Semis

Alcaraz def Djokovic

DMedvedev def Rune

 

Final

Alcaraz def DMedvedev

 

Experts

Alcaraz (10) – Steve Tignor (Tennis Channel), Ed McGrogan (TC), Joel Drucker (TC), Stephanie Livaudais (TC), Peter Bodo (TC), Jon Levey (TC), Jon Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Gill Gross (Monday Match Analysis), Stephen Boughton (The Slice), Jose Onorato (CBS)

Djokovic (2) – David Kane (TC), Matt Fitzgerald (TC),

 

Bookies

Decimal odds from Bet365.com on 26 May 2023

1

Alcaraz

2.5

2

Djokovic

3.4

3

Rune

8

4

DMedvedev

10

5

Sinner

12

6

Tsitsipas

17

7

CaRuud

19

8

AZverev

26

9

Rublev

51

10

Musetti

81

11

Fritz

81

12

Thiem

101

13

Jarry

101

14

Coric

101

15

FCerundolo

101

16

Auger Aliassime

101

17

Tiafoe

126

18

Khachanov

126

19

Baez

126

20

Wawrinka

151

21

Struff

151

22

Norrie

151

23

Hurkacz

151

24

Dimitrov

151

25

Bautista Agut

151

26

Paul

151

27

SKorda

201

28

Munar

201

29

Umbert

201

30

Etcheverry

201

31

De Minaur

201

32

Davidovich Fokina

201

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open