Skip to main content

Roland Garros 2023 – Women’s Preview

Does anyone besides the new Big Three have a chance at this title? Swiatek, Sabalenka, and Rybakina have dominated the biggest titles in the last two years and currently hold all four slams.  But there are six other former slam winners in the draw: Krejcikova, Andreescu, Stephens, Ostapenko, Kvitova, and Azarenka.  Is any of them likely to rise up again, or could a new face hold the Coupe Lenglen aloft in two weeks?

 

First Quarter

She’s still #1 but she’s had a far less remarkable half year than last year’s run-up to this tournament.  Instead of four 1000 titles, Iga Swiatek has only two 500’s year-to-date.  She’s suffered three losses to Rybakina this year alone.  But her superlative defense and heavy topspin will always giver her an edge on Parisian clay.  The last defeat to Rybakina was actually a retirement at 2-all in the third, and I suspect she was going to win that one. Iga says her thigh injury is fine. I’ll give the nod to the increasingly versatile Rybakina on faster surfaces but I think a healthy Swiatek, two-time winner here, is still the favourite.  Also at stake for Iga is the number one ranking – where she’s been for 60 weeks.  When Barty retired last year, Swiatek triumphed under pressure and cemented the #1 ranking.  Can she do it again?

There are three former slam champs in this quarter, Krejcikova (seeded 13), and a fascinating first round clash between Bianca Andreescu and Victoria Azarenka (18).  Former slam finalists Madison Keys (20) and Coco Gauff (6) also feature, as well as last week’s Rome sensation Anhelina Kalinina (25) who beat three seeds there. But the toughest competition might come from Veronika Kudermetova (11), semi-finalist in Rome and a quarter-finalist here last year.

Swiatek def Kudermetova

 

Second Quarter

Elena Rybakina (4) has been on fire, featuring in all the biggest finals of the year: the Australian Open, Indian Wells, Miami, and Rome.  The only one she’s missed was Madrid – but given Rome or Madrid as a predictor for the French, I’d take Rome.  She’s narrowly behind Sabalenka at #2 in the yearly points race. If both make it through, fans will be salivating for a clash between Rybakina and Swiatek.  Should Swiatek lose it will feel to me that she is no longer #1.  Rybakina’s calm demeanor serves her well under pressure and her clay prowess is, remarkably, still developing.  She’s probably my #2 pick for this title.

But there are some real threats in this quarter, not least of whom is Ons Jabeur (7). The Tunisian has had an up and down year, marred by injury.  She won on green clay in Charleston and if she’s healthy she could go all the way here.  Miami winner, Petra Kvitova (10) is also in the quarter, along with some dangerous floaters like Beatriz Haddad Maia (14), Donna Vekic (22), Ekaterina Alexandrova (23), and young Czech, Linda Noskova.

Rybakina def Jabeur

 

Third Quarter

Without one of the Big Three, this quarter feels more open.  Top seed is #3, Jessica Pegula.  She could certainly crown this quarter, but has never been past the quarter-finals of a slam, being halted there five times.  This is a golden opportunity to go further, even with a tricky opener against former quarter-finalist, Danielle Collins.

Maria Sakkari (8) is powerful and dangerous and made the semis here two years ago. She can wobble in big matches when the pressure mounts and is as famous for blowing seemingly insurmountable leads as for pulling off massive upsets.  She has a tricky opener against Karolina Muchova who took Barty out of the Australian two years ago.

Anastasia Potapova (24) has been having a breakout year.  Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova made the final here two years ago before missing most of last year with injury.  She’s got an intriguing first-rounder against another promising young Czech, Linda Fruhvirtova

Sakkari def Pegula

 

Fourth Quarter

It’s been hard to argue with the resume of Aryna Sabalenka (2) this year.  She leads the tour in titles and finals (3 and 5, respectively), including her first slam title at the Australian.  She beat Swiatek on clay in Madrid, and could take over the #1 ranking if she can claim the French.  Oddly she’s lost in the third round of this tournament the last three years and never been further.  I’m betting that ends this year.

She’ll have former slam champs Sloane Stephens and Jelena Ostapenko (17) to contend with. Ostapenko in particular has been having a better year, closing in on the form that took her to the title here six years ago. 

Former finalist Marketa Vondrousova is always dangerous, as is last year’s semi-finalist Daria Kasatkina (9).  Promising Qinwen Zheng (19) made the fourth round in her only previous appearance here and could run into Sabalenka in that same round.  Martina Trevisan (26) has been in the quarters or better here twice. 

And nearly forgotten is the sensation of 2022’s second half, Caroline Garcia (5).  Garcia has two runner-ups for the year, but is a patchy 12-9 outside of those two performances.  Despite and unconvincing 3-3 on clay this year, she’s got a lot of game; however her history at the French, 16-12, is hardly encouraging.

Sabalenka def Ostapenko

 

Semis

Swiatek def Rybakina

Sabalenka def Sakkari

 

Final

Swiatek def Sabalenka

 

Experts

Swiatek (6) – Steve Tignor (Tennis Channel), Ed McGrogan (TC), Joel Drucker (TC), Peter Bodo (TC), Jon Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Jose Onorato (CBS)

Sabalenka (3) – David Kane (TC), Stephanie Livaudais (TC), Stephen Boughton (The Slice)

Rybakina (2) – Matt Fitzgerald (TC), Jon Levey (TC)

 

Bookies

Decimal odds from Bet365.com on 26 May 2023

 

1

Swiatek

1.83

2

Sabalenka

6

3

Rybakina

6

4

Ostapenko

21

5

Vondrousova

29

6

Krejcikova

29

7

Jabeur

29

8

Pegula

34

9

Gauff

34

10

Sakkari

41

11

Kudermetova

41

12

QZheng

51

13

Garcia

51

14

Kasatkina

67

15

Haddad Maia

67

16

Bencic

67

17

Potapova

81

18

Samsonova

101

19

KaPliskova

101

20

Muchova

101

21

Andreeva

101

22

Svitolina

126

23

Kvitova

126

24

Keys

126

25

Trevisan

151

26

Teichmann

151

27

Stephens

151

28

Azarenka

151

29

Alexandrova

151

30

Mertens

201

31

Linette

201

32

LFernandez

201

33

Cocciaretto

201

34

Begu

201

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open