Skip to main content

Roland Garros 2023 – Women’s Preview

Does anyone besides the new Big Three have a chance at this title? Swiatek, Sabalenka, and Rybakina have dominated the biggest titles in the last two years and currently hold all four slams.  But there are six other former slam winners in the draw: Krejcikova, Andreescu, Stephens, Ostapenko, Kvitova, and Azarenka.  Is any of them likely to rise up again, or could a new face hold the Coupe Lenglen aloft in two weeks?

 

First Quarter

She’s still #1 but she’s had a far less remarkable half year than last year’s run-up to this tournament.  Instead of four 1000 titles, Iga Swiatek has only two 500’s year-to-date.  She’s suffered three losses to Rybakina this year alone.  But her superlative defense and heavy topspin will always giver her an edge on Parisian clay.  The last defeat to Rybakina was actually a retirement at 2-all in the third, and I suspect she was going to win that one. Iga says her thigh injury is fine. I’ll give the nod to the increasingly versatile Rybakina on faster surfaces but I think a healthy Swiatek, two-time winner here, is still the favourite.  Also at stake for Iga is the number one ranking – where she’s been for 60 weeks.  When Barty retired last year, Swiatek triumphed under pressure and cemented the #1 ranking.  Can she do it again?

There are three former slam champs in this quarter, Krejcikova (seeded 13), and a fascinating first round clash between Bianca Andreescu and Victoria Azarenka (18).  Former slam finalists Madison Keys (20) and Coco Gauff (6) also feature, as well as last week’s Rome sensation Anhelina Kalinina (25) who beat three seeds there. But the toughest competition might come from Veronika Kudermetova (11), semi-finalist in Rome and a quarter-finalist here last year.

Swiatek def Kudermetova

 

Second Quarter

Elena Rybakina (4) has been on fire, featuring in all the biggest finals of the year: the Australian Open, Indian Wells, Miami, and Rome.  The only one she’s missed was Madrid – but given Rome or Madrid as a predictor for the French, I’d take Rome.  She’s narrowly behind Sabalenka at #2 in the yearly points race. If both make it through, fans will be salivating for a clash between Rybakina and Swiatek.  Should Swiatek lose it will feel to me that she is no longer #1.  Rybakina’s calm demeanor serves her well under pressure and her clay prowess is, remarkably, still developing.  She’s probably my #2 pick for this title.

But there are some real threats in this quarter, not least of whom is Ons Jabeur (7). The Tunisian has had an up and down year, marred by injury.  She won on green clay in Charleston and if she’s healthy she could go all the way here.  Miami winner, Petra Kvitova (10) is also in the quarter, along with some dangerous floaters like Beatriz Haddad Maia (14), Donna Vekic (22), Ekaterina Alexandrova (23), and young Czech, Linda Noskova.

Rybakina def Jabeur

 

Third Quarter

Without one of the Big Three, this quarter feels more open.  Top seed is #3, Jessica Pegula.  She could certainly crown this quarter, but has never been past the quarter-finals of a slam, being halted there five times.  This is a golden opportunity to go further, even with a tricky opener against former quarter-finalist, Danielle Collins.

Maria Sakkari (8) is powerful and dangerous and made the semis here two years ago. She can wobble in big matches when the pressure mounts and is as famous for blowing seemingly insurmountable leads as for pulling off massive upsets.  She has a tricky opener against Karolina Muchova who took Barty out of the Australian two years ago.

Anastasia Potapova (24) has been having a breakout year.  Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova made the final here two years ago before missing most of last year with injury.  She’s got an intriguing first-rounder against another promising young Czech, Linda Fruhvirtova

Sakkari def Pegula

 

Fourth Quarter

It’s been hard to argue with the resume of Aryna Sabalenka (2) this year.  She leads the tour in titles and finals (3 and 5, respectively), including her first slam title at the Australian.  She beat Swiatek on clay in Madrid, and could take over the #1 ranking if she can claim the French.  Oddly she’s lost in the third round of this tournament the last three years and never been further.  I’m betting that ends this year.

She’ll have former slam champs Sloane Stephens and Jelena Ostapenko (17) to contend with. Ostapenko in particular has been having a better year, closing in on the form that took her to the title here six years ago. 

Former finalist Marketa Vondrousova is always dangerous, as is last year’s semi-finalist Daria Kasatkina (9).  Promising Qinwen Zheng (19) made the fourth round in her only previous appearance here and could run into Sabalenka in that same round.  Martina Trevisan (26) has been in the quarters or better here twice. 

And nearly forgotten is the sensation of 2022’s second half, Caroline Garcia (5).  Garcia has two runner-ups for the year, but is a patchy 12-9 outside of those two performances.  Despite and unconvincing 3-3 on clay this year, she’s got a lot of game; however her history at the French, 16-12, is hardly encouraging.

Sabalenka def Ostapenko

 

Semis

Swiatek def Rybakina

Sabalenka def Sakkari

 

Final

Swiatek def Sabalenka

 

Experts

Swiatek (6) – Steve Tignor (Tennis Channel), Ed McGrogan (TC), Joel Drucker (TC), Peter Bodo (TC), Jon Wertheim (Sports Illustrated), Jose Onorato (CBS)

Sabalenka (3) – David Kane (TC), Stephanie Livaudais (TC), Stephen Boughton (The Slice)

Rybakina (2) – Matt Fitzgerald (TC), Jon Levey (TC)

 

Bookies

Decimal odds from Bet365.com on 26 May 2023

 

1

Swiatek

1.83

2

Sabalenka

6

3

Rybakina

6

4

Ostapenko

21

5

Vondrousova

29

6

Krejcikova

29

7

Jabeur

29

8

Pegula

34

9

Gauff

34

10

Sakkari

41

11

Kudermetova

41

12

QZheng

51

13

Garcia

51

14

Kasatkina

67

15

Haddad Maia

67

16

Bencic

67

17

Potapova

81

18

Samsonova

101

19

KaPliskova

101

20

Muchova

101

21

Andreeva

101

22

Svitolina

126

23

Kvitova

126

24

Keys

126

25

Trevisan

151

26

Teichmann

151

27

Stephens

151

28

Azarenka

151

29

Alexandrova

151

30

Mertens

201

31

Linette

201

32

LFernandez

201

33

Cocciaretto

201

34

Begu

201

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem....

Victory Points - Djokovic vs Connors, Lendl vs Sampras

Novak Djokovic has just won his 63 rd main tour title with his victory in Miami last week.  It seems like a lot of tournaments and is almost as many as Nadal has won with 67... or Sampras with 64.  But it’s still a lot less than Jimmy Connors’ open era record of 109 titles.  Here’s the title list for the top 20 of the Open Era (since 1968 when professionals were allowed to play with amateurs). 109 Connors 94 Lendl 88 Federer 77 McEnroe 67 Nadal 64 Sampras 64 Borg 63 Djokovic 62 Vilas 60 Agassi 58 Nastase 49 Becker 46 Laver 44 Muster 41 Edberg 37 Smith 35 Murray 34 Chang 33 Ashe 33 Wilander That list may or may not agree with various lists published on the ATP website or Wikipedia, and that’s because there was a fair bit of confusion in the early days of the open era (1968-1973) about what tournaments counted and which were exhibitions.  Some supposed ‘tournaments’ had draws of only four players or were ‘invitational’.  But after ...

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered...