Skip to main content

2019 Australian Open Men’s Draw Preview


2019 Australian Open Men’s Draw Preview
10 Jan 2019 – Charles Friesen

Are Djokovic and Federer the favourites?  They’ve each won a record-tying SIX Aus Opens, leaving room for only Nadal and Wawrinka once each in the last 13 years.  But what about the young hot shots Sascha Zverev, Karen Khachanov, and Stefanos Tsitsipas who stormed into the top 15 at the end of 2018, each with a victory over Djokovic?


First Quarter
Djokovic seemed back to his winning ways last year, taking Wimbledon and the US Open and winning 31 of 32 matches at one stretch.  But somehow I’m not convinced he’s recovered his full 2015/16 level when he won 5 of 6 slams in a row.  Or maybe it’s just that the competition is catching up, especially that pesky Next Gen. 

The three most dangerous of that cohort are not in his quarter but he could run into Canadian Denis Shapovalov in the third round (3R) or Daniil Medvedev (seeded 15) in the fourth.  Or perhaps former #7 David Goffin (21 seed) will test him, or Kei Nishkori (8)?  Nishikori has two wins over Djokovic, but Novak is on a 13-match win streak in their head to head.  We could see a replay of the 2008 final if returning Jo-Wilfried Tsonga and Djokovic face off in the second round.  It looks like a great draw for Djokovic.

Djokovic d. Nishikori


Second Quarter
Milos Raonic (16) has drawn the toughest opening rounds of the seeds.  He starts against the oceanically talented Nick Kyrgios, and then could face either Stan Wawrinka or Ernests Gulbis, both of whom are former top-ten players.  Actually it’s a terrible draw for all of them. 

The game’s most astute observers speak reverently of Kyrgios’ prodigious talent and also disparagingly of his apparent inability to harness it.  Wawrinka is a three-time slam champ, including the Aus Open title of 2014, but has struggled mightily with injury in the last year and a half.  Since Raonic has also battled injury in the last year I give slight preference to the more proven gifts of Wawrinka. It may not get much easier for him in round three if he runs into last year’s semi-finalist Hyeon Chung (24), or Alexander Zverev (4) in the fourth. 

Also here are Thiem seeded 7, and Coric (11).  The 22-year old Coric made dramatic progress last year and has a level head-to-head of 2-2 with Federer, Nadal, and Murray (totaling an incredible 6 wins-6 losses against this trio).  Only Djokovic seems to have his number, leading 3-0.  Although Coric has been wholly unsuccessful at the AO, losing all four matches he has contested, I have a feeling that will change this year.  He’s got a good draw that could easily see him in the fourth round.  There he could face Dominic Thiem who has been to the second week here the last two years (but not to the quarters), for the right to face Zverev, if seeds hold, in the quarters.

Zverev is facing a career-defining year, I believe.  He’s reached #3 in the world and just won the yearend ATP Finals.  He turns 22 this year, which is the same year that such notables as Federer, Laver, and Connors won their first slams – all of whom were (relatively) late bloomers.  The only later bloomer among recent 5+ slam-winning yearend #1s was Ivan Lendl who won his first major at 24.  Lendl is now Zverev’s coach.  Ivan had tremendous success with Andy Murray, in his corner for all three of Murray’s slam triumphs.  Federer first won on the 17th slam he played, Agassi the 15th, and Laver the 14th.   Zverev has played 14 so he is ripe for a victory all of this year.  Zverev’s two yearend top-four finishes by age 21 are unprecedented for a non-slam winner. 

In short, all signs are pointing to a Zverev slam triumph, probably this year.  If he doesn’t win a major this year, his career is more likely to resemble Murray’s than McEnroe’s or Djokovic’s.  Surprisingly, Zverev has never been past the third round of a hard court slam (AO or USO).  But given his ground-shaking wins over Federer and Djokovic at the ATP Finals, and a draw that doesn’t look too tough, I expect he will go deep here this year.

Sure it’s possible Zverev could lose to wily Gilles Simon (29) in the third round. But I think it’s more probable Sascha clears that hurdle and the winner of the Raonic-Kyrgios-Wawrinka nightmare, and even Thiem or Coric to make the semis.  If he can get there he’s likely to face Djokovic.  The two have split their h2h two wins each, all in straight sets.  A pecking order is not established.  Given Djokovic’s shaky finish to 2018, I think Zverev has a decent chance to beat him and go all the way to the title.  A chance…

AZverev d. Thiem


Third Quarter
Federer should ease through the first couple rounds but could face Gael Monfils (30) in the third.  Monfils is a surprising 4 wins, 9 losses with Roger – surprising that it’s that close since Fed tends to dominate the h2h with most lesser players. 

Also here is Roberto Bautista-Agut (22) who beat Djokovic last week in Doha.  He opens against Andy Murray, who tearfully announced today that this Aus Open might be his last tournament, but saying he would try to last till Wimbledon.  It’s a shame to see this three-time slam champ and former yearend #1 felled by injury.  I’ll be pulling for one last good run from Murray but doubt that his hip will let the five-time runner-up here win more than a couple matches on this outing.  It signals the end of the Big-Four era.

Stefanos Tsitsipas (14) has an excellent shot at making the fourth round to face Federer.  I’d expect Federer to triumph although it could be close.  Next up could be another young gun, Karen Khachanov (10) or last year’s runner-up Marin Cilic (6).  These four seeds could put on an eye-catching derby.  Khachanov was nothing short of brilliant in taking the Paris 1000 last year, and Cilic has now been to the finals of three of the four slams.  Young versus old.  I think the old are slightly more reliable so I’ll take Federer to emerge.

Federer d. Khachanov


Fourth Quarter
If Nadal is healthy he should roll through this quarter.  But is he healthy?  His withdrawal last week with a strain in his thigh was probably more precautionary than serious.  That said, Nadal played only nine tournaments last year, withdrawing injured from both hard court slams. 

He could get a test from 19-year old Alex de Minaur (27) in the third round.  And the fourth could bring up the rabbit Diego Schwartzman (18) or a returning from injury Tomas Berdych.  Berdych would have to get by 13th seeded Kyle Edmund in his first match.  Edmund made the semis here last year and claimed his first tour title, a 250, in October.  But I favour Berdych who looks to be on the road back and has made slam quarter-finals 17 times, including 7 of the last 8 Australian Opens.

The other part of this quarter hosts Kevin Anderson (5), John Isner (9), and Grigor Dimitrov (20).  Anderson has had a sterling run of form, claiming three titles in the last 12 months and a Wimbledon finalist appearance on the backs of five-set victories over Federer and Isner.  But like Isner, he hasn’t been past the fourth round at the Australian.

Dimitrov has been to three AO quarters, including a scintillating five-set semi-final loss to Nadal two years ago.  Grigor struggled with form last year, but may be recovering.  It would be great to see another hard-fought battle with Nadal, but as before, Nadal would be favoured.

Nadal d. Dimitrov


Semis
Despite my bold prophecies of Zverev’s impending victory, a betting man would favour the six-time champ over the zero-time quarterfinalist, and I am a betting man.

Djokovic d. AZverev

It would be a rare treat to savour the delicacy of another Federer – Nadal battle.  They haven’t played since 2017 when Federer swept all four of their meetings that year.  Given Nadal’s impeccable play most of last year I should be favouring Nadal, but the speed of the surface and questions around Nadal’s fitness have me tipping the balance toward Federer.  If this match happens – expect fireworks.

Federer d. Nadal


Final
Unsurprisingly I’m predicting the two six-time champions will meet to determine who is the first to seven and sole possession of the men’s record for Australian Open titles.  But it might be more exciting if we have a first-time winner – Zverev, Khachanov, Cilic, Nshikori?

Djokovic d. Federer


Decimal odds from bet365.com on 10 Jan 2019
1
Djokovic
2.2
2
Federer
5.5
3
Nadal
9
4
AZverev
13
5
Cilic
26
6
Nishikori
26
7
Khachanov
26
8
KAnderson
29
9
Kyrgios
34
10
Coric
41
11
Dimitrov
41
12
Raonic
41
13
Thiem
41
14
Tsitsipas
41
15
Wawrinka
41
16
AMurray
51
17
DMedvedev
67
18
Shapovalov
67
19
Goffin
67
20
BautistaAgut
67
21
DeMinaur
101
22
Berdych
101
23
Isner
101
24
Chung
101
25
Edmund
101
26
Tsonga
126
27
Sock
151
28
Querrey
151
29
Rublev
201
30
Pouille
201
31
Monfils
201
32
Fognini
201


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open