Skip to main content

2019 Australian Open Women’s Draw Preview


2019 Australian Open Women’s Draw Preview
11 Jan 2019 – Charles Friesen

There are probably 25 women who could be reasonably predicted to hoist the 2019 Australian Open trophy.  This is a staggering degree of parity – more like golf than tennis.  It has made for an interesting cast of characters for fans to follow with rivalries, playing styles, and personalities to suit every taste.  But one woman stands out.  Though past the prime age of most players, though she hasn’t won a slam or any other tournament for two years, though she is ranked only #16 by the WTA computer, Serena Williams is still the favourite.  And with 23 slam titles to her credit, it’s easy to see why the bookies have her at their shortest odds of all players.  She may have lost a step, the next generation may have learned to hit with her power, but her ferocity, drive, and sheer talent make her the opponent players most fear.

But with Serena’s increasing inconsistency, others have seized the opportunity to claim slam laurels.  The last eight slams have seen eight different winners.  One more will tie the record set in 1938.  And there are plenty of candidates for a ninth consecutive different winner:  the bookies list five women who have not won a slam in the last two years among their top eight choices for the title.  They are Sabalenka, Svitolina, KaPliskova, Barty, and Kvitova.

First Quarter
The world #1 and top seed, Simona Halep, is ranked only ninth by the bookies on their favourite list.  She was runner-up last year, and quarter-finalist twice before – so why the lack of love?  Halep finally won a slam last year, in her fourth appearance in a final.  It was the achievement of a life-long goal.  Will she still have the same desire to fight?  She arrives in Australia without a coach, on the mend from a back injury, and with questionable motivation.  To top it off, her first round opponent is Kaia Kanepi whose big-hitting game knocked Halep out of the first round of the last slam.  It’s a recipe for disaster.

Should Simona survive, she could get Sofia Kenin in the second round, a young up and comer who has been shooting up the ranks.  The third could pit her against Venus Williams, the seven-time slam winner is admittedly 38, but was finalist here only two years ago.  Venus will have to get past Mihkaela Buzarnescu (seeded 25) in the first round, who had a career year last year.

Next in the draw is Serena’s section.  Teenage Dayana Yastremska has blipped onto the radar in the last six months and could provide a stiff tussle for Serena in the third round, as could Carla Suarez Navarro (23).

The second highest seed in this quarter is Karolina Pliskova (7) who has been re-finding her best form in the last four months.  Seventeen-year old Iga Swiatek or Camila Giorgi (27) could challenge Pliskova in the third round.  The fourth round could bring up Daria Kasatkina (10), Garbine Muguruza (18), or Johanna Konta who has been to the quarters of the Aus Open twice.

Muguruza is one of the last eight slam winners, claiming Wimbledon over Venus in 2017.  She was named #1 for 2017 but has fallen precipitously since then.  Her MO in her two previous slam victories was to win out of nowhere, when she appeared least likely to do so.  She certainly fits that bill now.  Kasatkina is only 21 and had a banner year last year, rising to the top 10 and claiming a title near year’s end.

SWilliams def. KaPliskova

Second Quarter
Naomi Osaka’s (4) ability to out-hit and run down Serena’s shots in the US Open final was a revelation.  In typically transparent and charming fashion she confessed to a bad attitude in her loss last week.  Will the hitter or the pouter turn up in Melbourne?  She could face two-time former champ Victoria Azarenka in the third round, but Azarenka will have to get by dangerous Laura Siegemund first.

The fourth round could present Osaka with Anastasia Sevastova (13), Qiang Wang (21), or Canadian teenage sensation (how many of these are the Canadians hiding??) Bianca Andreescu who made the final last week in Auckland from qualifying.  The eightteen year old Andreescu plays an even younger 16-year old Whitney Osuigwe in what must surely be the youngest first round of the tournament.

Elise Mertens (12) won three tournaments last year and lands in the same group as Madison Keys (17).  Keys made two semis and a quarter in the slams last year and is ranked low because of missing time due to injury.  Keys big-hitting game looks a sure thing for future slam success, but her inability to close tournaments does give pause.  Nearby is Anastasia Potapova, 17 years old, and a potentially dangerous opponent.

The last grouping in this section contains former runner-up Cibulkova (26), young and rising Victoria Kuzmova, and Elina Svitolina (6).  Svitolina is a puzzling case.  She has been one of the most consistent performers on the tour claiming more titles, nine, than anyone else in the last two years.  She claimed her biggest title in October at the tour finals, but has consistently under-performed at the slams, not unlike Alexander Zverev on the men’s tour.  Will she finally turn it around?  She’ll have a tough time if she has to face Keys and Osaka just to get out of the quarter.

Osaka def Keys

Third Quarter
Petra Kvitova (8) seems to like winning tournaments just before slams, raising everyone’s expectations, and then bombing on the big stage.  She hasn’t been past the third round here in six years or past the quarters at any slam since her second Wimbledon victory, in 2014.  One can only wonder why.  Belinda Bencic and Yulia Putintseva are both nearby and dangerous enough to unseat Kvitova.  If Petra makes it that far, her fourth round could bring up Aryna Sabalenka (11).

Sabalenka has been on a tear, claiming three titles in the last five months.  The bookies have her as their number three pick for the title.  She is on fire.  She’s only 20 years old and we’re all watching to see what she is capable of.  She lost a fourth round nail-biter to Osaka at last year’s US Open.  Can she do better now?  This slam title seems well within her reach, but an early round loss would not surprise either.  But I’m expecting big things.

Sabalenka could face 17-year old Amanda Anisimova in the third round or Ekaterina Makarova in the second.  The 60th ranked Makarova over-performs in Melbourne, having made it to the second week seven times with wins over Serena, Venus, Halep, Kerber, and Pliskova.

Also in this quarter are seeds Barty (15), Ostapenko (22), Sharapova (30), and defending champion Wozniacki (3).  Wozniacki appeared back to her winning ways by taking the 1000 in Beijing, but didn’t face a player ranked above 20.  In the WTA Finals she lost two of three matches to her fellow top-tenners.

There seems no reason that Sharapova shouldn’t start winning again, except that she hasn’t.  Ostapenko has been mostly floundering since her French victory in 2017, although semis at Wimbledon show the 21-year old may rise again.  Ash Barty just made the final in Sydney taking out four top shelf opponents along the way: Halep, Ostapenko, Mertens, and Bertens.  Barty also won the Zhuhai tournament in October.

Sabalenka def. Wozniacki

Fourth Quarter
Sloane Stephens (5) and Angelique Kerber (2) headline the bottom quarter.  Stephens made the final of the WTA Finals but has been inconsistent out of the gates this year.  There’s no denying her talent; where will her head be?  Sasnovich, Kontaveit (20) or Bertens (9) could meet Sloane in the fourth round.

The other fourth round could pit the defensive genius of Kerber against the deadly forehand of Julia Goerges (14).  Goerges owns seven career titles but had not loved the slams, having only once made a quarter-final, last year at Wimbledon.  Is she ready for more?

Kerber def. Stephens

Semis
After Serena’s meltdown in the US Open final, if Osaka and Serena square off in this tournament, media attention will be high.  Osaka owns an unimpeachable 2-0 record over Serena.  I expect Serena to be out for revenge.  Will her indomitable will be enough to tame Osaka’s power game?  Keys and Pliskova are also reasonable candidates to make this semi.

SWilliams d Osaka

Kerber has now been in four slam finals, winning three of them.  Her defensive-offensive game and focus are admirable, but she can still get overwhelmed by big hitters.  And Sabalenka is a big hitter.  Will the height of the occasion intimidate the 20-year old?  Sabalenka has looked incredibly poised during her run of the last few months, but she is unproven at the slams.

Sabalenka def. Kerber

Final
Will Serena be satisfied in her quest for a 24th slam title, tying Margaret Court?  She’s been in the final of the last two majors and has had plenty of time to train.  She looked very solid at the Hopman Cup last week.  Sabalenka will have the hunger and fearlessness of the slam novitiate to propel her.  The big-hitting game she plays is not unlike Osaka’s.  She should have plenty of chances to claim slam titles.

SWilliams def. Sabalenka.

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 10 Jan 2019
1
SWilliams
5.5
2
Kerber
9
3
Sabalenka
12
4
Osaka
13
5
Svitolina
15
6
KaPliskova
15
7
Barty
17
8
Kvitova
17
9
Halep
21
10
Stephens
21
11
Wozniacki
26
12
Bertens
26
13
Keys
29
14
Muguruza
29
15
Azarenka
41
16
Goerges
41
17
Mertens
51
18
Kontaveit
51
19
Sharapova
51
20
Kasatkina
51
21
Sevastova
51
22
Ostapenko
67
23
QWang
67
24
VWilliams
67
25
Garcia
67
26
Konta
81
27
Bencic
81
28
Vekic
101
29
Sasnovich
101
30
Bouchard
101
31
Yastremska
126
32
Cibulkova
126


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open