Skip to main content

Aus Open Women’s Draw Preview

 

The real injustice of this Australian Open has nothing to do with Djokovic, but is that Peng Shuai is not playing.  She has been silenced for speaking out in China and we should not abandon or forget her.

Ashleigh Barty is the clear #1.  Naomi Osaka is the defending champ and has won four slams.  But are these two the clear favourites?  Who could have imagined a slam final between Emma Raducanu and Leylah Fernandez?  Or between Barbora Krejcikova and Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova?  The only thing certain about women’s tennis these days is that it’s unpredictable. Which is kind of exciting…

 

First Quarter

This is the loaded quarter.  Both Osaka (seeded 13) and Barty (1), the two favourites, are in the top eighth of the draw. Also here are Olympic gold medalist Belinda Bencic (32), and Amanda Anisimova who showed off her devastating game by taking the 250 title in Melbourne last week.

The lower half is slightly less packed with Maria Sakkari as the fifth seed.  She made two slam semi-finals last year, but has not looked like a closer in the late rounds of tournaments.  Veronika Kudermetova (28), Ons Jabeur (9), and Jessica Pegula – quarter-finalist last year, are all present as well.

But assuming Osaka’s withdrawal last week due to a back injury was more precautionary than debilitating, this quarter likely comes down to a mouth-watering clash between Osaka and Barty.  It might show us who will dominate the next few years.  Barty has so many tools with which to inflict damage, and she has been ruling the roost two of the last three years.  Meanwhile Osaka’s fortunes have been more wildly fluctuating, but have peaked often enough to net four slam titles, double Barty’s total.  Based on recent form, Barty would seem the favourite, but such is the power and dominance of Osaka’s game that if Naomi is ‘on’ she’s nigh-well unbeatable.  So it all depends on Naomi’s headspace.  Obviously this quarter will be won by Aliaksandra Sasnovich.

Osaka d. Sakkari

 

Second Quarter

I really have not a clue who the favourite in this quarter should be.  Then 25-year old Barbora Krejcikova (4) had won precisely five slam singles matches when she swept to the French title last year.  She’s followed up that result and firmly established herself in the top ten, but looks far from a dominating force. Indian Wells champ Paula Badosa (8) looked very strong at year’s end, but is relatively unproven at the slams, especially the hard court slams where she’s never been past the second round.  Top ten stalwart Elina Svitolina (15) has been on a slide that doesn’t look about to end. Can 2020 Aus champion, Sofia Kenin (11), find her winning ways from two years ago? Madison Keys has been on a gradual descent since her US Open final appearance in 2017, but is showing signs of life this week, making the final in Adelaide.  She and Kenin face-off in the first round.

Victoria Azarenka (24) won the title here twice in 2013-14.  Her form has been up and down, but she did make the Indian Wells final in October.  She seems to thrive at the beginning of the year and is always dangerous.  Coco Gauff (18) has been knocking on the door of greatness for at least three years now, but is still somehow only 17 years old.  Her steady improvement is paying off and her raw athleticism is inspiring.

Azarenka d. Badosa

 

Third Quarter

The top seed here is Garbine Muguruza (3) who ended the year strongly with a triumph at the WTA Finals (1500) event.  Her quarter-final loss to Kasatkina this week in Sydney may give pause, but it’s just the sort of thing Garbine can shrug off and hit through in her next match.  Anett Kontaveit (6) won four tournaments last year, and was runner up at the WTA Finals.  This week she lost by the slimmest of margins, 14-12 in the final set tie-breaker, in the semis to Krejcikova. The slam pedigree isn’t there but Kontaveit’s recent ascent means anything is possible.

Elena Rybakina (12) made the final in Sydney last week and is one of the most dangerous players you’ve never heard of.  Tamara Zidansek (29) made the semis of Roland Garros last year. There’s an intriguing first-rounder between US Open champs Sloane Stephens and Emma Raducanu (17): which is more likely to find their top gear?  Simona Halep (14) got back in the winner’s circle last week by claiming the title at Melbourne 1. It wasn’t the toughest of draws, but her play was excellent.  She is definitely a contender at the tournament where she was runner-up in 2018.  But can she beat Muguruza in a potential fourth round encounter?  Their head to head is even at 3-3 with Halep tending to win on clay, and Muguruza on hard courts.  This is hard court.

Muguruza d. Kontaveit

 

Fourth Quarter

Hard-hitting Aryna Sabalenka (2) finally got past the fourth round of a slam last year, making two semi-finals, at Wimbledon and the US Open.  But she’s started her year with two losses, featuring 39 double faults. She’s #2 for a reason, but can she find her game in time? Former champ Angelique Kerber (16) showed signs of a resurrection in the latter half of 2021, and could run into Leylah Fernandez (23) in the third round. Leylah has played only two tournaments since her run to the US Open final, and the results are mixed.  Can she re-find her precision and concentration?

Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova (10), Roland Garros runner-up, has a decent draw.  Daria Kasatkina (25) is in a rich vein of form and has already made two semi-finals this year. Her varied games can cause nightmares for anyone.  The second highest seed in this quarter is Iga Swiatek (7). She beat both LFernandez and Azarenka last week before falling to Barty.  She has a very high ceiling, and seems to be getting into a good headspace. She could be very dangerous.

Swiatek d LFernandez

 

Semis and Final

Semis:  Osaka d Azarenka, Muguruza over Swiatek

Final:  Osaka d Muguruza

 

Odds and experts

The writers at tennis.com have named their projected winners, 3 for Barty, 1 each for Halep, Osaka, and Swiatek.  Jon Wertheim at Sports Illustrated has picked Muguruza.

Decimal odds from bet365.com on 13 Jan 2021 (in the order they are listed):

1

Barty

4

2

Osaka

7.5

3

Swiatek

13

4

Muguruza

15

5

Kontaveit

15

6

Halep

15

7

Rybakina

21

8

Krejcikova

21

9

Gauff

21

10

Badosa

21

11

Sabalenka

26

12

Kasatkina

34

13

Azarenka

34

14

Sakkari

41

15

Kvitova

41

16

Jabeur

41

17

LFernandez

41

18

Stephens

51

19

Raducanu

51

20

Kerber

51

21

Collins

51

22

Anisimova

51

23

Vondrousova

67

24

Svitolina

67

25

Keys

67

26

Tauson

81

27

Pegula

81

28

Bencic

81

29

Teichmann

101

30

Mertens

101

31

Kudermetova

101

32

Sasnovich

126

33

Samsonova

126

34

Ostapenko

126

35

Ann Li

126

36

Kenin

126

37

Alexandrova

126

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem.  Thiem made the Madrid final and pushed Nad

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl