Skip to main content

2024 Aus Open Men’s Preview

Can anyone beat ten-time champion Novak Djokovic at his winningest tournament? I really, really want to say, YES.  We have a host of up and comers like Alcaraz, Sinner, Rune, and even Medvedev.  Despite Novak’s incredible mental strength at digging out wins down under, this could be the year he doesn’t win.  But who will it be?

 

First Quarter

There is actually some concern over Novak Djokovic’s fitness, as he complained of a wrist injury after his last match.  Last year he played through a leg injury in Melbourne but was able to manage his body and mind to win the title regardless.  But this injury is more concerning to me.  Wrists affect all strokes and they’re more fragile than legs.  Beyond that, he suffered an uncharacteristic loss to Alex De Minaur at the United Cup; plus two losses to Sinner at the end of last year.  For a healthy Djokovic I wouldn’t worry about the losses.  But combine the recent losses with questions over his wrist, and I feel Novak is vulnerable in this tournament. 

On the other hand, he’s lost only three times in the last seven months.  Near to him in the draw are former top players Andy Murray, Stan Wawrinka, and Gael Monfils.  If any of them make it far enough to meet Djokovic, they are likely to be sent packing.

More dangerous might be Ben Shelton, (seeded 16).  The young American made quarters here last year and semis at the US Open, so he’s done well at hard court slams.  His big serve and forehand, plus athleticism give him a high ceiling.  In Shelton’s relatively unpolished form, I would expect Djokovic to handle a clash with Shelton comfortably, but if Novak is slightly injured, an upset is not impossible.

Stefanos Tsitsipas (7) made the final here last year.  He too, is dealing with injury, the back in his case.  He has a potentially tough opener against former top-tenner and Wimbledon finalist, Matteo Berrettini.  Berrettini has been struggling to come back, and missed the last four months of last year, so I expect he will not be at his sharpest.  Tsitsipas should win, and should win against a likely second-rounder against Jordan Thompson.  But Thompson put on a clinic in defeating Nadal in Brisbane, and could trouble a sub-par Tsitsipas.  With a decent start, will Tsitsipas be able to play his way out of injury?

The fourth round could pit Stefanos against Taylor Fritz (12), who has made two slam quarter-finals.  Fritz has looked mediocre since the US Open, but his draw avoids landmines and could allow him to play into form.

Djokovic def Tsitsipas

 

Second Quarter

Alex De Minaur (10) has emerged from the off-season with more variety and power and has wracked up a string of impressive victories, claiming three top-ten scalps:  Fritz, Djokovic, and Alexander Zverev.  Any win against Djokovic is remarkable, but the near errorless play De Minaur displayed was breath-taking.  And his defeat of Zverev, who appeared to have been in near-invincible form, showed it was no fluke.  He’s got a possibly dangerous first rounder against Milos Raonic.  An in-form Raonic could blast De Minaur away, but Raonic is struggling to come back so likely won’t reach that level.

De Minaur’s second round could be against a near clone of himself, Matteo Arnaldi, who has been rapidly rising up the rankings after making fourth round at the US Open. And the third round could bring up the increasingly solid Nicholas Jarry (18).

Andrey Rublev (5) is at a career high ranking.  I’m tempted to ink him into a quarter-final slot.  He’s made a record nine slam quarters without ever making a semi.  He could end that here.  He’s added variety to his consistent baseline bashing.  He really has been improving and appears to be at his best ever.  But he may need to beat the 4-seed, Jannick Sinner to finally attain a semi.

Sinner has a challenging opener against the smooth-moving Botic Van de Zandschulp, but he will certainly be the favourite in that and several subsequent matches.  The fourth round could bring up past slam semi-finalists Francis Tiafoe (17) or Karen Khachanov (15).  Sinner was an absolute killer in the last months of 2023, claiming six wins over the combination of Alcaraz, Djokovic, and Medvedev.  He’s chosen not to play a warm-up tournament, so may be vulnerable to a first-round upset.  But if he plays into form, he should go very deep. Possibly even challenge for the title.  As brilliant as he’s been over best-of-three sets, he still needs to prove he can beat the best players over best-of-five at the slams.

Sinner def Rublev

 

Third Quarter

I’m not quite sure what to make of Holger Rune (8).  Any 20-year old in the top 10 is exceptional.  But although Rune has already won four titles and claimed wins over the best players, he has not shown consistency over several months.  Yet his highs have been good enough to get him to a #4 ranking and keep him in the top ten for more than 50 weeks.  However he has not been past the quarters of a slam.  He tends to make poor shot selection at times, by pulling the trigger to soon on net approaches.  Still, the talent is clearly there.  Will he go deep in this slam?

Roman Safiullin is ranked #36, just missing a seeding. He showed good form in making the semis in Brisbane last week, beating Shelton and Arnaldi.  I could foresee a good run from the hard-hitting Safiullin, although he’s scheduled to meet Rune in the third round.

Hubert Hurkacz (9) is always dangerous, especially on faster courts, like at the Aus Open. Speaking of dangerous, Grigor Dimitrov (13) claimed the title in Brisbane, beating Rune in the final in straight sets.  He ended 2023 with a run to the Paris 1000 final, beating Hurkacz, Tsitsipas, and Medvedev on the way. He’s in some of the best form of his life, at age 33.

The highest seed in this quarter belongs to Daniil Medvedev (3).  Like Sinner, he did not play any warm-up tournaments.  The two-time runner-up at the Australian Open has now been in five slam finals, claiming the 2021 US Open.  His 2023 was exceptional as he achieved career-highs in titles (5) and matches (66), although the first half of the year was certainly better than the last half: his last title was in May.  He’s been very good in Melbourne, but a loss to Rune or Dimitrov, who beat him in fall, is conceivable.  But odds on, I think he’s still the favourite for this section.

Medvedev def Rune

 

Fourth Quarter

Jack Draper (unseeded) has been touted for his potential but, although only 22 years old, has been in and out of injury for the last two years.  He finally seems healthy and made waves by winning the non-tour Ultimate Tennis Showdown in London in December.  His good form continued as he made the final in Adelaide this week. Will we see him living up to his potential at this slam?

He could face last year’s semi-finalist, Tommy Paul (14), in the second round.  Either player could face a severe test if they meet Carlos Alcaraz (2) in the fourth round.  Alcaraz’s proclivity for the Aus Open is basically unknown.  His two previous appearances are from his teen years and predate his breakout slam win at the 2022 US Open.  Alcaraz has not won any tournaments since his landmark win at Wimbledon last year.  But in making the semis at the Tour Finals in November, he showed me that his form is ready to his command.  I believe he will start the year with intensity and will be a force to be reckoned with at the year’s first slam.

Also in this quarter are three-time slam finalist Casper Ruud (11), and Alexander Zverev (6).  Ruud does not appear to be a serious threat at non-clay slams.  I’m not saying he’s deteriorated, but perhaps the field has figured out how to play him.  Zverev appeared to be in deadly form at the United Cup last week, despite a 3-set loss to De Minaur.  He seems to be fully recovered from the devastating foot injury that ended his 2022 campaign.  I think Zverev’s form may actually be good enough to contend for the title.  It would not surprise me to see him in the final.  But he will have a serious obstacle to overcome in Alcaraz.

Alcaraz def Zverev

 

Semis

Like for the women, I’m predicting the top four seeds to make the semis.  I believe, however, that the top four men face a greater challenge than do the women.  I think the competition from Zverev, Dimitrov, Rune, Rublev, and perhaps even De Minaur and Shelton, will be intense.

It’s a risk, but with questions over Djokovic’s health, and renewed intensity from Sinner and Alcaraz, I’m predicting the youngsters for the final.

Sinner def Djokovic, Alcaraz def Medvedev

 

Final

In the end, I think Sinner will need to lose a slam final before he’s psychologically ready to claim a title.  His career so far has been very incremental, and I expect that to continue.

Alcaraz def Sinner

 

Expert Journalist Picks

Djokovic:  5         Gill Gross (Monday Match Analysis), Joel Drucker (Tennis.com), Matt Fitzgerald (Tennis.com), Kim Mackenzie (Tennis Weekly), Joel Girling (Tennis Weekly)

Sinner:  3             Ed McGrogan (Tennis.com), Jon Levey (Tennis.com), Chris Kneebone (Tennis Weekly)

Alcaraz:  2           Stephanie Livaudais (Tennis.com), Peter Bodo (Tennis.com)

Medvedev: 2      Steve Tignor (Tennis.com), David Kane (Tennis.com)

 

Bookies

From bet365.com on 9 Jan 2024, listed in order from the odds table.

1

Djokovic

2.10

2

Alcaraz

4.33

3

JSinner

7.5

4

DMedvedev

10

5

Rune

23

6

AZverev

26

7

Tsitsipas

34

8

Dimitrov

41

9

Shelton

51

10

De Minaur

51

11

CaRuud

51

12

Fritz

67

13

Rublev

67

14

Hurkacz

81

15

SKorda

81

16

AMurray

81

17

Tiafoe

81

18

Berrettini

101

19

Auger Aliassime

101

20

Khachanov

101

21

TPaul

101

22

Davidovich Fokina

126

23

Thompson

151

24

Shapovalov

151

25

Safiullin

151

26

Lehecka

151

27

JDraper

151

28

Humbert

151

29

Musetti

151

30

Medjedovic

151

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open