Skip to main content

13 May 2009 - women's #1 thots

13 May 2009

Dinara certainly does seem to be trying to live up to her #1 ranking. She is now the bookies favourite at Roland Garros, and she is guaranteed to hold onto top spot at least through RG.

I think this issue of #1 without a GS tournament should really have come to the fore regarding Lindsay Davenport. The year in question was 2004. I'm still not sure who is popularly regarded as #1 for that year. The WTA computer listed Davenport in the top spot at the end of the year. The WTA player of the year award (issued in April of the next year, I believe, and well before she first reached #1 on the computer in Aug 2005) named Sharapova. The ITF selected Myskina (who never reached computer #1). The highest number of average WTA points per tournament played belonged to Henin in 2004. Davenport didn't even make a GS final in 2004. By contrast Dinara has played two GS finals in the past year and is defending 4 titles (3 of them premier events).
Nonetheless, because Davenport had won GS events in the past (last one was 2000), people weren't as up in arms about it as they are with Safina and Jankovic. Several observers have advocated for clearly regarding that the computer ranking rewards a year's worth of performance and that the correlation between ranking points and GS performance, while strong, is not absolute.

I think it is important to remember that the player with the most potential is not necessarily #1. Sure it's possible that Serena Williams, (or Hantuchova! or Wozniacki!!) might have the best game of any current player on one particular day if they were playing at their absolute best, but being #1 is about realizing your potential. As long as the ranking system is fair and reasonable (that question is, of course, up for debate), the #1 ranking recognizes the actual accomplishments of the last year, not the most talented player. That seems fair to me...

And now for the trivia buffs:
1. Although fans now seem to insist that the woman regarded as #1 for the year have won a Grand Slam title in that year, it used to be common to regard the Wimbledon winner as #1 for the year. In fact since the advent of rankings (about 1919 - these were subjective ranking of "experts") until the open era (1968) there were only five times that a woman won Wimbledon without being regarded as #1 for the year: 1926 - McKane; 1931 - Aussem; 1948, 1949 - Brough; 1962 - Hantze Susman.

2. The first year a woman was regarded as #1 for the year winning only the US (of the four GS events that year), was 1931 - Wills Moody. It also happened in 1948 - Osborne; 1977, 1978 - Evert; 1998 - Davenport; and possibly 2008 - SWilliams (if you accept the WTA player of the year award...)

3. The first year a woman was regarded as #1 for the year winning only Roland Garros (of the four GS events that year), was 1926 - Lenglen. It also happened in 1987 - Graf, and 2006 - Henin.

4. The first year a woman was regarded as #1 for the year winning only the Australian (of the four GS events that year), was 1990 - Graf. It also happened in 1999 - Hingis.
In fact, it wasn't until 1950 that for the first time the woman winning the Australian was regarded as #1 for the year - Brough.

5. Lastly the first and only year in which the popularly regarded #1 for the year didn't win any GS event was 2004 - Davenport (depending, of course, on who you believe was #1 that year...)
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Roland Garros Men – 2025 Preview

  Will anyone beside the Top Two make the final of the French Open at Roland Garros this year? Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz look a class ahead of the field.   But with Sinner’s rust and Alcaraz’s occasional inconsistency, the door may open for others – Casper Ruud, Jack Draper, Alex Zverev, maybe even Novak Djokovic…   Top Quarter Jannik Sinner has just returned to the tour after a probably-undeserved three-month suspension for doping. The locker room is visibly nervous about receiving a similar fate; they are on edge as the sword of Damocles hangs over all, seeming to strike randomly. A re-working of the doping protocols is probably in order.   Regardless, Sinner performed reasonably well in his first tournament back in Rome last week, making the final.   He will likely have some ups and downs, but playing best three of five sets in slams will likely give him time to find his game if he should start a match on the wrong foot. He was close to winning...
Post a Comment
Read more

Roland Garros Women – 2025 Preview

There’s not really a favourite for this tournament – which feels a bit weird, since Iga Swiatek has won it four of the last five years.   She’s also been #1 much of that time, but as of today is ranked only #5.   In her absence, Aryna Sabalenka has been entrenching herself at the top with multiple finals played this year, winning three of them.   The six clay tournaments since Miami have seen six different winners, so the answers are not clear cut.   Maybe Jasmine Paolini who won last week in Rome, in conditions very similar to Paris, should be regarded as the first horse.   She was indeed runner-up in the City of Lights last year.   Top Quarter Aryna Sabalenka has been burning up the tour this year. The top seed has opened her lead at #1 to nearly 4000 points.   Other than wobbly performances in Doha and Dubai, she has been a factor in every tournament she’s played.   Impressively, she’s 11-2 on clay.   It’s hard not to regard her a...
Post a Comment
Read more

Men’s Tennis 2024 Yearend and 2025 Predictions

2 January 2025   The Big Three is dead!  Long Live the Big Three!  For the first time in 22 years, none of Federer, Nadal, or Djokovic are in the yearend top three.  Instead we have a new set – Sinner, Alcaraz, and Zverev.  Now it would certainly be debatable if Zverev has the significance of the other two. Afterall, he still has not won a slam and he’s half a generation older than his younger counterparts.  At age 27 he should be mid-arc in career accomplishments – but in some metrics he’s just starting out.  However, his superlative play over the year landed him at #2 and who are we to argue with the algorithm? One of the biggest clouds hanging over the coming year is the fate of Jannik Sinner.  By all accounts he is the top dog, and primed to have another banner year, but whether or not he will get to play depends on what happens with WADA (the World Anti-Doping Agency).  Anyone can see he’s essentially innocent – I mean, a massage...
Post a Comment
Read more