Skip to main content

US Open 2011 Men - 26 Aug 2011

US Open 2011 Men

This has been Novak’s year.  But either his shoulder or his mental state in retiring last week against Murray look like a major chink in the armour.  Who can take advantage?

First Quarter
The first seed Novak Djokovic could face is #32 Ivan Dodig.  Dodig looked fantastic knocking off Nadal in Montreal, but will have his hands full trying to get out of the first round against Davydenko.  Neither should pose any real threat to Novak.  The 4th round could bring up #13 Gasquet who has had some hot moments this summer.  The other seed here Dolgopolov #22 has been cool since his hot run to start the year.  If Novak’s shoulder is healthy, and I suspect it will be, he should sail to the quarter with his head intact.  There the two highest seeds are the surge-sputter-surge artists, Monfils #7 and Berych #9.  Both have shown some fine results this summer.  Both are great athletes and either could beat Djokovic, although I’d give better odds to Berdych to see it through.  With a day of rest between each match, the head is more likely to cause problems for Djokovic than the shoulder.  Defaulting in Montreal could be a sign of caving under the pressure of expectations or it could refresh him and make him hungry again.
Djokovic d Berdych

Second Quarter
The way Federer #3 has been playing this summer, winning this quarter would be a surprise.  His draw is full of landmines, including, again, Tsonga #11.  Federer could be troubled by Sela or Bellucci in 2R.  Two years ago that would have been unthinkable, but this year, a 2R loss is comprehensible.  The third round could bring up Tomic, Harrison, or Cilic – all of whom could beat the acclaimed GOAT.  The 4R actually looks less scary with Stepanek #23 and Troicki #15 both capable of troubling the Express, but if he makes it this far he should gain the quarters where he will likely fall to Tsonga or Fish #8.  Fish is the big question mark here.  Will he retain the spectacular form he’s displayed this summer?
Fish def Federer

Third Quarter
At first glance Murray #4 appears to have the easiest quarter.  Seeds Lopez #25, Chela #24, and Wawrinka #14 look unlikely to slow his progress to the QF, until we remember that he was spectacularly upset here last year by none other than Wawrinka.  Stan has not looked his best this summer and I expect that if The Man does survive along enough to set up a rematch it will be a case of revenge for Murray.  Highest seeds on the other side include Simon (streaky this summer) and Soderling (is he beginning his descent out of the top 10?), both of whom Murray SHOULD beat.  The dark horse is, of course, Del Potro #18.  The first two rounds should serve as a nice warm-up for the Argentine.  The test could come in 3R against Simon.  If Delpo can survive that he has a very good chance of facing Murray for a spot in the semi.  It could be a blockbuster, but it seems that the Elf has not fully rediscovered his self-belief.
Murray def Del Potro

Fourth Quarter
Only the most devoted Rafalite could think that Nadal has anything but the easiest draw of the Big 4.  Ljubicic #30, Youzhny #16, Almagro #10, Roddick #21, and Ferrer #5 have pestered Nadal in the past (ok, not Almagro), but this year, at this time, none look like credible threats to the GOAT candidate.  Ljubicic, Youzhny, and Roddick are all on the decline and fellow-Spaniards Almagro and Ferrer, while solid, determined, and reliable, are no match for Nadal’s genius.
The problem with this line of thinking is that Nadal has been troughing all summer.  The loss to Fish was somewhat respectable, but Dodig?!?  Ferrer has beaten Nadal before at the US Open and this year at the Australian.  But Nadal is a big match player and he will have lots of time to work his way into form for a potential encounter with Ferrer in the QF.
Nadal def Ferrer

Semis
If Djokovic is playing mind games with himself, the semis and final are likely where they will become troublesome.  Facing Fish or Federer, or even Berdych, could cause self-doubt for Djokovic but I expect he will dig deep for the fortitude to reach his 3rd US Open final.  If Fish plays well he could make a match of it – he was close in Montreal – but ultimately Novak has too much fire power.
Djokovic def Fish
Hopefully my crystal ball is working and we are tantalized with Nadal vs Murray.  Nadal is the defending champion and I expect that at some point he should be able to tap into last year’s form.  Will his big serve show up?  With Murray the question is much more about the head.  He’s got crazy variety and talent – can he harness his petulance and think clearly enough during a difficult match to accept responsibility for his unforced errors and problem-solve his way through?  There are enough question marks around both players to make this very tough to call.
Murray def Nadal

Final
If it weren’t for the puzzling default in Montreal, Djokovic would be an easy pick.  If he faces anyone besides Murray in the final, I’ll pick Djokovic, but maybe just maybe Murray has gotten into Djokovic’s head.  On the other hand, Djokovic has shown the ability and confidence to rise to the biggest of occasions and Murray has instead crumpled.  Can Murray turn it around?
Djokovic def Murray

Average odds from bookies.com 25 Aug 2011

1
Djokovic, N
2.36
2
Nadal, R
4.90
3
Murray, A
5.78
4
Federer, R
6.26
5
Del Potro, JM
15.25
6
Tsonga, JW
30.06
7
Fish, M
30.56
8
Söderling, R
46.75
9
Berdych, T
49.13
10
Roddick, A
87.06
11
Raonic, M
117.57
12
Monfils, G
118.38
13
Isner, J
129.31
14
Ferrer, D
141.50
15
Cilic, M
157.50
16
Gasquet, R
158.69
17
Verdasco, F
169.94
18
Gulbis, E
189.63
19
Tomic, B
192.87
20
Wawrinka, S
207.29
21
Simon, G
216.21
22
Dolgopolov, A
231.20
23
Nalbandian, D
235.56
24
Davydenko, N
240.87


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl

The Case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT

The case for Bjorn Borg   The case for Bjorn Borg as GOAT will always be interesting because the last half or third of his career didn’t happen.   But what he accomplished in the short time he played was remarkable.     He became the youngest man ever to win a grand slam title (to that time) when he did it within days of his 18 th birthday at the French Open in 1974.   No man has won more pro matches, titles, or grand slams by age 24 than he did.   He also has the best match winning percentage at the slams, with Nadal and Federer a distant 2 nd and 3 rd .   In addition to 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles, he only ever lost twice at the French Open, winning there 6 times, 4 times consecutively, and 3 times consecutively he followed up his French victory with the Wimbledon title 4 weeks later – the French-Wimbledon double.   No one else has done that.     His head to head record is top notch.   In the pool of all men who have won a grand slam title in the open