Skip to main content

Best never to win a slam - men - 16 Nov 2009

On the subject of the best player never to win a slam, there is a statistical argument for Nalbandian...
Here's the best GS match (W-L) records of players in the open era never to have won a GS title:
1. David Nalbandian 78-29 (0.729)
2. Andy Murray 41-16 (0.719)
3. Tom Okker 73-29 (0.716)
4. Jo-Wilfried Tsonga 25-10 (0.714)
5. Alex Metreveli 52-23 (0.693)
6. Harold Solomon 58-27 (0.682)
7. Tommy Haas 88-41 (0.682)
8. Todd Martin 102-48 (0.680)
caveats: Tony Roche has an open era GS W-L record of 0.744 but won a GS title before the open era. Similarly, Roy Emerson's open era GS W-L record was 0.727
considering all open era GS W-L records, Nalbandian is 24th, Murray 27th, Okker 29th, Tsonga 31st, Metreveli 42nd, Solomon 46th, Haas 47th, Martin 49th.
Overall, Borg is 1st, Federer 2nd, Laver 3rd, Nadal 4th, Sampras 5th, Rosewall 6th, Connors 7th, Lendl 8th, McEnroe 9th, Newcombe 10th, Agassi 11th, Becker 12th, Wilander 13th, Edberg 14th, Ashe 15th, Djokovic 16th, Courier 17th, Roddick 18th, Vilas 19th, Hewitt 20th.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Roland Garros Men – 2025 Preview

  Will anyone beside the Top Two make the final of the French Open at Roland Garros this year? Jannik Sinner and Carlos Alcaraz look a class ahead of the field.   But with Sinner’s rust and Alcaraz’s occasional inconsistency, the door may open for others – Casper Ruud, Jack Draper, Alex Zverev, maybe even Novak Djokovic…   Top Quarter Jannik Sinner has just returned to the tour after a probably-undeserved three-month suspension for doping. The locker room is visibly nervous about receiving a similar fate; they are on edge as the sword of Damocles hangs over all, seeming to strike randomly. A re-working of the doping protocols is probably in order.   Regardless, Sinner performed reasonably well in his first tournament back in Rome last week, making the final.   He will likely have some ups and downs, but playing best three of five sets in slams will likely give him time to find his game if he should start a match on the wrong foot. He was close to winning...

Roland Garros Women – 2025 Preview

There’s not really a favourite for this tournament – which feels a bit weird, since Iga Swiatek has won it four of the last five years.   She’s also been #1 much of that time, but as of today is ranked only #5.   In her absence, Aryna Sabalenka has been entrenching herself at the top with multiple finals played this year, winning three of them.   The six clay tournaments since Miami have seen six different winners, so the answers are not clear cut.   Maybe Jasmine Paolini who won last week in Rome, in conditions very similar to Paris, should be regarded as the first horse.   She was indeed runner-up in the City of Lights last year.   Top Quarter Aryna Sabalenka has been burning up the tour this year. The top seed has opened her lead at #1 to nearly 4000 points.   Other than wobbly performances in Doha and Dubai, she has been a factor in every tournament she’s played.   Impressively, she’s 11-2 on clay.   It’s hard not to regard her a...

Victory Points - Djokovic vs Connors, Lendl vs Sampras

Novak Djokovic has just won his 63 rd main tour title with his victory in Miami last week.  It seems like a lot of tournaments and is almost as many as Nadal has won with 67... or Sampras with 64.  But it’s still a lot less than Jimmy Connors’ open era record of 109 titles.  Here’s the title list for the top 20 of the Open Era (since 1968 when professionals were allowed to play with amateurs). 109 Connors 94 Lendl 88 Federer 77 McEnroe 67 Nadal 64 Sampras 64 Borg 63 Djokovic 62 Vilas 60 Agassi 58 Nastase 49 Becker 46 Laver 44 Muster 41 Edberg 37 Smith 35 Murray 34 Chang 33 Ashe 33 Wilander That list may or may not agree with various lists published on the ATP website or Wikipedia, and that’s because there was a fair bit of confusion in the early days of the open era (1968-1973) about what tournaments counted and which were exhibitions.  Some supposed ‘tournaments’ had draws of only four players or were ‘invitational’.  But after ...