Skip to main content

State of Tennis - Men - 15 Jul 2011


The hegemony in men's tennis right now is fascinating.  The Fedal show ruled the roost for 6 years.  And when is the last time the same player finished #3 in the world for 4 consecutive years?  never, I would guess. 

What's fascinating about this time is that the Fedal hierarchy is being so badly shaken.  It appeared that Djokovic would do that after 2008 and then Del Potro would do it after 2009.  But various accidents and the tenacity of the top duo slowed that trajectory.  But at this point I'd say the cracks in the palace wall are fatal.

For sure Federer has lost a step.  He no longer possesses the speed or accuracy that was on display in, say, the 2005 Wimbledon final.  Nevertheless, even a diminished Federer is still a fantastic player and a threat at any slam.  But he is no longer the favourite, I would say, at any.  Given the incredible depth at the top, he will need to martial all his resources and will, and probably get a few lucky breaks, if he is to rise to the top at a GS again.

Nadal is also in an unprecedented position.  He's finally upended the reigning king, and it's taken absolutely the best of his talent, will, and body to do so.  Undoubtedly he has a rare gift of mental tenacity, and his ability to think of himself in the underdog position puts him in absolutely the perfect mind frame for long term success.  However, the Fedal wars have taken a toll on his body and his recurring injuries are worrisome.  It appears he will not long enjoy the fruits of his labour (in felling Federer).  I suspect he will be increasingly plagued by injury (unfortunately) and will have few opportunities to showcase his best work.  If he can manage to stay healthy, I see no reason why he shouldn't grab a few more GS titles, he certainly has the game and mind for the task.

In addition to the injuries, Djokovic is a major impediment to more victories by Nadal.  It seems Djokovic is a talent at least equal to Federer and Nadal although he is perhaps "one untimely born."  His game has had to mature in what may be the fiercest crucible the game has ever known.  So high has been the level required, to win a GS say, that anything short of absolute brilliance has come up short.  This has been the frustration Djokovic and Murray have faced the last 4 years.

To his immense credit, Djokovic has solved the riddle.  Slowly, patiently, his game has become refined.  He has had to learn the unparalleled consistency of Nadal and Federer.  Brilliance can come at any time, but consistent brilliance is learned.  And now that he is just that wee bit better than Fedal, finally, the trophies and plaudits come.

I see the improvement in Djokovic is evolutionary and therefore not fleeting.  He should be able to keep this up for a few years - maybe two - before he starts to come down from his prime years.  Again the question, like for Nadal, will be Djokovic's health.  If he can stay healthy he can keep winning, if injury becomes a factor, anything can happen.

I expect Nadal would be able to successfully challenge Djokovic, if Nadal stays healthy.  Since I expect Nadal to waver on the edge of injury, I suspect that Nadal will have only brief periods when he can rise above Djokovic's level.  Hopefully they both stay healthy and give us many great battles.

The loose canons in the system are Murray and Del Potro.  Both have shown the ability to play brilliant tennis, but both are a ways from learning the consistency that Djokovic has achieved.  However, either could rise up at any time and shake up the status quo.  I expect they will be more in the mold of Safin than a consistent champion like Lendl or Nadal.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Case for Rod Laver as GOAT - 25 Dec 2010

The Case for Rod Laver Two grand slams.   When one considers the near impossibility of winning a calendar year grand slam in this day and age, the thought of one player winning two boggles the mind.   It’s difficult enough to win the career slam – only 7 men have ever done it and only 4 in the Open era.   Winning a non-calendar slam is even more difficult and many great players have won three in a row and fallen just short:   like Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, and Pete Sampras. So Rod Laver should be an open and shut case for the greatest of all time.   But it’s not that simple.   His first grand slam is really negligible and doesn’t count.   It was an amateur slam won in an era when the best players were professionals.   Especially in the 1960’s the pros were gaining more and more credibility.   The sheer number of pros was increasing as more and more tournaments began to be established for pro players.   Laver was by no means considered the best player of 1962 and some experts didn’t

French Open Preview 2017 - Men

French Open Preview 2017 – Men Rafa is back! He is the clear and dominant favourite for the next slam title at Roland Garros.  Can anyone stop him? Immediately after his Aus Open final appearance I began wondering aloud if Rafael Nadal would be ranked #1 by year’s end.  It appears that eventuality could happen as early as July, but it will depend on what Andy Murray does.  Murray has had a reasonably dreadful year – especially for a #1.  He’s won only about 2.3 matches for every 1 he’s lost – which is respectable – just not for a #1.  Meanwhile Rafa just came off a 17 match win streak – all on clay – and has won three of the four big run-up tournaments to the French – Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Madrid, but fell in the Rome quarters to Thiem.  Rafa has won 3 of these tournaments and RG in the same year seven times in his career.  Will this be the eighth?  The most serious challenger to Nadal might be 23 year-old Dominic Thiem.  Thiem made the Madrid final and pushed Nad

2016 Wimbledon Women's Preview

Wimbledon 2016 –Women’s Preview What does Garbine Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros mean for tennis? Will she be able to play at a high level for Wimbledon?  Is she a legitimate contender for Serena Williams’ role as #1?  Is Serena done winning majors, or is she just ‘resting’? Muguruza’s victory at Roland Garros was surprising but not a complete shock.  Beforehand, she was deemed fourth-most likely by the bookies to take the tournament, pegged at 10:1 odds.  Anytime we welcome a new slam champion to the fold is a cause for celebration... especially a young one like Garbine, only 22.  She displaces Petra Kvitova as the last-born person to win a slam. Muguruza is one of 11 active players to have won a singles major:  Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Azarenka, Kvitova, Kuznetsova, Ivanovic, Kerber, Schiavone, and Stosur.   (There would be four more if it were not for the retirements in the last four years of Li, Bartoli, Clijsters, and Pennetta.)  These 11 players are probabl